Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

bird

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by bird

  1. For the sake of this discussion, I'm making the quantum assumption that Sano works out at 3B and is ready to roll in June. I'm also assuming Polanco and Rosario progress and are at the doorstep by mid 2015, earmarked as utility guys, with Santana edging out Escobar at SS. Again big assumptions. So here's my plan: Plouffie gets shopped at the trade deadline. I 'll accept nothing less than an overpay. My preference is to package him with other surplus for a 2-3 starter, as I'll simultaneously be shopping a few of my billion-plus 4-5-6-7 starters. but I'll take an overpay in prospects too. if that fails, he becomes a super utility guy, spelling Sano, but primarily spelling Arcia and Mauer against tough lefties or when General Soreness gets a bilateral weakness of some sort. This might block Rosario during the season, but Plouffie projects as the better right-handed bat off the bench, at least in 2015. Plouffie gets shopped like the dickens over the winter of 2015-6. He ain't comin' back for 2016 to grouse on the bench, and I'll have better options by then because I' m such a brilliant GM.
  2. Yeah, I buy that for sure. Still hoping for an overpay for Pinto this winter.
  3. I don't know, Winston, but my gut tells me we've just established mediocrity or much worse at three positions, which seems like the perfect recipe for another year of [bad] baseball. Edited by glunn to replace "c" word with "bad".
  4. We may not know, but I think the Twins certainly know he can't play an adequate 1B over the course of a season. And they can fairly easily go outside the organization for a better overall solution than Mauer for a corner OF. Hell, maybe they could find a cheap Cuban.
  5. I'd find a young catcher from outside the organization who is better defensively than Suzuki and who projects to have as good or better offensive output than Suzuki's career numbers. I'd most likely take the trade route to accomplish this. Think Travis D'Arnaud of the Mets. I'd quietly put Pinto on the market this winter and look for an overpay, likely in prospects, but not accept anything less than an overpay. If I failed to trade him, I'd plan on starting the 2015 season with Suzuki and my new guy and put Suzuki out there at the trade deadline in 2015 and again look for a slight overpay. I'm assuming Suzuki has only a minor regression, and that Pinto improves just a little behind the plate, enough so that I can tolerate him as my backup at least for half a season. Longer-term, I've concluded that Pinto is not part of a future contender here. By this time, the geniuses at TD are calling for my scalp, and the consensus view is that Ryan would be the perfect replacement for me, partly because at least he would not be constantly shooing Jack Goin out of his office.
  6. There was a time there two years ago and beyond where we just kept replacing lousy players with different lousy players, and let's hope we don't go there again for a dozen years or so. I think that's how Ryan is trying to execute the strategy: building a system that can sustain a certain level of quality because it has its own well (the farm system) from which to draw.
  7. Very succinct and clear illustration, Parker. Thank you, and it's nice to have another example that helps dispel the silly narrative about Gardy and others trying to take the power out of hitters' games. Arcia seems to be responding to coachng instead of doing the coaching. Good thing Vargas isn't heeding Ozzie's advice to try to yank the ball. Kennys drove a homer and double yesterday to the opposite field. I wonder if Arcia has a chance to be a total beast once he calms himself and his swing down just a bit more and begins to hit more like he did throughout his minor league career. Without doing any research, I'm guessing he hit the ball to all fields with some authority.
  8. The way teams get in trouble is to count on one or two prospects to come through. In our case, we're not talking about a bunch of non-prospects. And you would have described Santana and Vargas as suspects this spring, maybe Arcia too. The Twins have exceptionally strong MI depth now. SD Buhr has been watching Vielma all season, and the Twins are treating him like he's an equally intriguing talent to what Polanco and Santana were the previous year. So, I think it's fair to classify all these guys as higher-ceiling, higher probability prospects, Michael excepted because of his performance and injury history. The caveat on all this is the question of who among them can play adequately at SS. I'll bet you the majority of us would have given Escobar a thumbs down to that question in April.
  9. The scouts couldn't disagree with you much more, Mr. Brooks. They assign an extremely high probability to his success, and most every one of them describes his other tools as a whole lot better than "no other tools", with speed being his worst at 40 on the 20-80 scale as I recall. His arm is way way better than average, and lots of pros think he has a good chance to stick at 3B for a few years at least.
  10. We should also cool the notion that selling high means getting an All Star corner OF for him. My biggest complaint about this FO is, forever, they have disposed of players for abysmal returns. I attribute this to the fact that they don't have a strategic plan pertaining to a "sell discipline". Selling from surplus to fill holes is a strategic process, and the Twins suck at it. Escobar conceivably represents a salable asset that meets the dual criteria of coming off a good year with some doubt about its repeatability, and being a player for whom there are very solid prospects that your replacement for him is an upgrade, perhaps immediately. Put him on the market this winter, and accept only an overpay. If you get it, live with some combination of Santana, Nunez, Rosario, Florimon, Michael. Hell, make this whole collection available, but set your price. Set it nice and high.
  11. Also concur. Especially in light of the fact that Florimon is doing in AAA what they hoped he'd do up here, Polanco appears to be at the doorstep as a very adequate utility guy, Nunez is an OK fallback as a bench guy, and even Michael may be turning the corner at AA. Maybe we could buy low on Liriano.
  12. Good point about being contextual. I'd advise putting the whole subject of their "past approach" in context as well, which I think you generally do. They have never, ever simply told pull hitters to slap the ball the other way, I'm absolutely certain of that. I'm also certain that, when a pull hitter is struggling to make adjustments to well-located change-ups and breaking balls and find themselves contending with huge holes in their swings at the next level of competition, the very most common and sound piece of advice a hitting coach is going to supply is to adjust to get better plate coverage and to hit the ball where it's pitched. Plouffe is a recent example of how this advice works. I'm just not so sure that Ortiz didn't get similar advice and was simply a bit misguided in his criticism. I'm not blindly defending any coaches, but don't we often blindly accept a player's criticism as gospel? If we knew the entire context of most of these situations, we'd probably be less critical of both player and coach and recognize how nuanced some of these changes are.
  13. On Arcia, like I said, right now he's a very ordinary player, a league average corner OF with a .300 OPB, a tendency to get over-amped in the clutch and have gawd-awful AB's, so I agree 100%, he should open his ears and shut his yap, because he has all the makings of being a beast. And while stealing bases is a god-given gift, using all fields is much much less so. Lots of players make that adjustment. You know, this other subject, about what coaches do or don't do with certain players? I think we grasp for the same narrative a lot, and IMO it's an oversimplification at best and a convenient criticism at worst. The Ortiz story has become this truer-than-life thing, and frankly, I think it's a half-myth. Wish we could compare spray charts of his time here versus in Boston. He DOES hit to the opposite field. I don't think he overcame a coaching issue when he left here. He simply grew up as a hitter. And this notion that we run a risk that coaches are going to sap Meyer and May of velocity by forcing them to "pitch to contact", in my mind, is completely senseless. Give me the names of past Twins pitching prospects that threw it up there at 97MPH. Until recently, we haven't drafted a single pitcher with that sort of velo, mainly because when you draft at #22, you get stuck with the likes of Kyle Gibson. Even Justin Verlander and Yordani Ventura have to throw it in the zone.
  14. I'm sorry, but Arcia is a very very ordinary player right now. He'd be well-served to close his mouth and open his ears.
  15. Yeah, me too, and I keep getting warnings about it.
  16. Jason Adam slid from being the 9th best prospect to the 16th best in KC. I'm wondering if he's even the 16th best PITCHER in our system. Where does he slot in? 1. Meyer 2. Stewart 3. Berrios 4. Thorpe 5. May 6. Burdi 7. Tonkin 8. Jorge 9. Romero 10. Goncalves And then, lots of guys more comparable to him? Which of these guys would you have given up for him? Gilmartin, Hu, Darnell, Johnson, Olivares, Rosario, Jiminez, Landa, Cedaroth, Rogers, Duffy, Lee, Jones, Melotakis, Eades, Slegers, Wheeler, Reed... Who's his best comp among our prospects?
  17. Anderson should have no trouble fixing Jason Adam. Ducking now...
  18. No reason to be discouraged. This is Dick Bremer we're talking about.
  19. There's more to pitching well than a handful of stats. In the minds of the staff who watches him every day, Meyer most likely hasn't pitched as well as his statistics. But if you have to hang your hat on numbers and are honestly trying to figure out why he hasn't been promoted, perhaps his pitch counts are telling.
  20. Oh, and Liriano's stinking up the joint again. Must be because he reverted to all the old habits that rubbed off when he was mishandled by Anderson, right? Geez.
  21. First of all, I'm not defending Anderson. He's probably no better and no worse than the others. I'm blasting your argument because it has more holes in it than a hair net. For every pitcher, starter AND reliever, that you can put up some ridiculously specious claim that Andy is responsible for their performance, I can stack up two that improved once they got here or declined when they left. And think about how silly your argument is about Liriano. When he was exceptional with the Twins, was that in SPITE of Andy? And why would you argue that relievers don't count? Seriously, you want to NOT rip on Andy when a reliever fails? Like, lately, Burton? You can do better than that.
  22. So predictable! But hey, really, it's that incompetent fool Marty Mason in Rochester that has got to go!! Diamond gets turned over to Powers in Louisville, and boom, you see what a GOOD pitching coach can do. Diamond's unhittable now, thanks to Powers. That Mason, what a clown! Well, except if he was still working for the Cards. Because in THAT case, just like every other coach and manager and FO guy with the Cards, Marty Mason is a genius. Especially when compared to that incompetent fool Rick Anderson. I mean, look at the shambles Anderson's made of....hmmm....Worley?.....um....Fien?....er, Thielbar maybe? Never mind.
  23. This is an uplifting list for sure. A year ago, and especially two years ago, there were quite a few proclamations that the system was bereft of legitimate pitching prospects, and we can now see that the problem was well on the way to being corrected even then. Now, if only we could get some bats in the lower minors.
  24. It's because they already know what they have and aren't going to care that we don't know what they have at this stage. Nothing's terribly broken in the MLB bullpen, although Burton's been more bad than good, but big deal. Perhaps they have concluded that Tonkin, Achter, Oliveres, Ibarra, and Thompson aren't better alternatives. They did bring up Pressly. Not sure what the complaint really is here, mike.
×
×
  • Create New...