I am definitely in the camp that says the Twins have room for more starting pitchers. However, I'd probably resist adding Santana for a Nolasco-type contract now. He would improve us right away, but I can't shake the feeling that some of our best prospects are going to turn out to be average-ish starters (like Gibson arguably already has), and I'd rather gamble some money or a roster spot on some more upside (Anderson, Masterson, etc.). To quote Seth, though, it wouldn't be the end of the world. Actually my biggest issue with a Santana signing now, around the rumored 4/50 price, would be, why didn't we do it last winter? Getting some guys was necessary for our league-worst staff, so I sorta understand the quick action on Nolasco and Hughes (less so for Pelfrey). But I suspect we over-rated what we had in Nolasco and didn't make our best offers for Garza and Santana later.