I saw that earlier tonight. Having just celebrated my boys' birthday it makes me ill thinking about it. I couldn't even begin to imagine how awful it is.
Most of the "sabr folk" I converse with are just as excited to see a triple crown winner as non-sabr folk are. They (myself included) just don't want to see it be a determinant in the MVP voting.
I'm with kab, three of his first five posts were trolling for traffic, it reeks of shameless self promotion to me. Maybe the powers that be don't mind, but I know I would.
I'm not a big fan of the "because they ****ed up in the past it's ok to continue doing so in the future" rationale. I don't have a problem with him being in the discussion, and think he probably belongs somewhere in the top 10 on the ballot, but he doesn't have any business winning over a 200+ inning starter.
A Dickey for Cueto swap is the only change I would make. Those NL starters are really clumped together at the top, any of Dickey, Cueto, Gonzalez, or even Kershaw would work for me.