Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42,486

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    471

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    To give your question the serious consideration it deserves, I am actually in the opposite camp to what you stated. It exists if the transmission occurs, regardless of whether anyone or anything is inclined to receive it. Much like a TV broadcast of a 2013 Houston Astros game.
  2. ashbury
    .
  3. ashbury
    Why, did he hit a home run in it, or something?
  4. ashbury
    We're losing, nothin' to nothin'.
  5. ashbury
    Please re-send.
  6. ashbury
    We're certainly transmitting right now, but I'm not sure if anyone can reasonably be expected to receive and translate.
  7. ashbury
    Yeah, and if sound doesn't travel in a vacuum, why do vacuum cleaners make so much noise?
  8. ashbury
    Woah, you got back up to speed quickly!
  9. ashbury
    This is great. The Spiders are now the bar we are measuring against.
  10. ashbury
    Sanóty! / OK, the accent messes up the meter of the joke a little...
  11. ashbury
    See, Chief, while you were taking one of your extra long naps, they invented this thing called newsprint....
  12. ashbury
    You have to first GET to Texas in order to keep on going.
  13. ashbury
    Approves:
  14. ashbury
    Once again I learn something by reading Game Thread. Exactly what value I gained... ummmm... / edit - one of the things I learned is that you have to include "Duchamp" in your Google Image Search string...
  15. ashbury
    Also, at the other end of the spectrum, most plays that just fall in as Texas Leaguers, or land in the gap for extra bases, would have done so regardless of the defender. It's a rather narrow band of this spectrum for which defense matters. And it does matter, but among all the things that matter I have come to view it as part of the lower-priority group.
  16. ashbury
  17. ashbury
  18. ashbury
    Kurt Suzuki legging out a triple. The Most Exciting Two Minutes In Sports!
  19. ashbury
  20. ashbury
    Now repeat the ancient chant, "Owah... Tagu... Siam".
  21. ashbury
  22. ashbury
    Yeah, it's easy to do that. Pro-tip, get there early, because they run exactly on time.
  23. ashbury
    http://media1.giphy.com/media/6OWIl75ibpuFO/giphy.gif I am not a pile of poo, sorry.
  24. ashbury
    This view is useful, but seriously clouds the value of a stud athlete if he makes it to the major leagues. First, because these career WAR totals reflect both higher per-year WAR accumulation, and longer careers. Second, because you can't put together a winning team by promoting 50 1.0-WAR players to the majors in a season. The constraint of a 25-man roster looms huge, in making grade-60 prospects more valuable than 55-grade. I was being a little flippant in suggesting an actual exponential weighting (and I backed off of it in the next breath). But it's far, far from linear.
  25. ashbury
    Yes, and it's not just not linear, it's almost exponential, how much more valuable a player gets as he moves toward the tail of the bell curve. I'd almost try a point system like this: 45 = 1 pt per player 50 = 2 pt per player 55 = 4 60 = 8 65 = 16 70 = 32 Maybe cap it at 8, though; there is a lot of noise in these 80-point scale rankings of players, and someone's opinion that a player is a 70 and not a 65 shouldn't leapfrog a team over a lot of others.
×
×
  • Create New...