You're far from the only one using that adjective; just thought I'd throw out some numbers for a guy who still doesn't seem to get credit from a surprising number of people for being one of the AL's best. KC's situation is very different from the Twins of today. They have a solid young core coming off various shades of down years, sort of like the 1985 Twins had. Most of those guys either returned to form or even took big strides forward in 1986, maturing as individuals and as a team before winning it all in '87. This doesn't look like KC's year, but they're on pace to finish with 85 wins, light years ahead of the '86 Twins and exactly as many as the '87 champs. Detroit will have something to say about the division championship again next year, with almost all their major pieces signed through 2014, so 85 wins probably won't get it done next year either. But KC has a very good 1/2/3 rotation (although Santana's a free agent due a big payday), Wade Davis improving at least peripherally, and a couple of 2014-ETA pitching prospects. Almost all of their hitters are young enough to potentially make '86-Twins-like strides forward. So while the Tigers will probably own the Central again next year, the division has not historically had two Yanks/BoSox-style titans most years. A Royals wildcard bid seems possible, and will look even more likely if their kids turn it up in the two remaining months of this season. Short story long, no, wouldn't trade Sano or Buxton for two years of Shields. He's a free agent anyway FA when they might contend in 2015, so they could sign him without losing a prospect. Well, if they did that sort of thing, anyway. But no, sir, no Correia either. His upside was a couple of extra meaningless wins yet no real trade value, and his downside has been on display since his Faustian bargain's 30 day free home trial expired at the end of April.