Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Louie Varland Has a Home Run Problem


    Cody Schoenmann

    Varland's Achilles' heel is hindering him from becoming a reliable Major League starting pitcher.

    Image courtesy of © Jeffrey Becker-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    When Twins starting pitcher Tyler Mahle was placed on the 15-day IL with a posterior impingement and flexor pronator strain in his pitching elbow on May 3, the Twins elected to recall right-handed pitching prospect Louie Varland from the Triple-A St. Paul Saints. 

    Varland, who made a spot start for the Twins earlier in the season against the New York Yankees on April 14, where he threw six innings, giving up three earned runs on six hits and one walk while striking out eight hitters, was finally getting his first extended look as a member of the Twins rotation.

    Varland's extended look started on a not-so-hot note when he gave up four earned runs on seven hits while giving up two walks and striking out six through 4 2/3 innings pitched against the White Sox on May 3. Varland struggled initially, but things turned around quickly. 

    Over Varland's next five starts, spanning from May 9 through May 31, Varland pitched a combined 30 1/3 innings while giving up only nine earned runs, striking out 25 hitters, and walking only five. 

    Varland's five-game stretchVarland also pitched to a combined BABIP of just .246, which is lower than the league average currently sitting at .296, a Left On Base % (LOB%) of 92.5%, which is 20.74% higher than the league average, and an ERA of just 2.77, which is 1.52 points lower than league average. 

    During that five-game stretch, Varland was incredible. Unfortunately, Varland has struggled over his last three starts against the Toronto Blue Jays on June 6, the Tampa Bay Rays on June 11, and the Detroit Tigers on June 18 (Happy Father's Day!). 

    Through this three-game stretch, Varland has given up 21 hits, eight walks, five home runs, and 17 earned runs over 15 innings pitched. Varland also mustered a LOB% of 51.2%, which is 41.3% less than what he earned over his previous five games, an ERA of 8.64, which is 5.87 points higher than the previous five games, and a Home Run to Fly Ball Ratio (HR/FB) of 19.45%, which is 7.25% higher than league average and 6.95% higher than what he generated over his previous five games.

    Varland's promising start to his first opportunity as a full-time starting rotation member has since been dampened by three rough outings.

    It is important not to overreact and make critical judgments over relatively small sample sizes. Still, some serious red flags have been present all season for Varland, and the most significant red flag in Varland's game is the inability to limit home runs. 

    Varland has a home run problem. 

    There is no way around it.

    Through 51 2/3 innings pitched, Varland has given up an HR/9 of 2.09, which is 0.92 points higher than the league average of 1.17, and an HR/FB of 21.1%, which is 8.9% higher than the league average. To add context, Fangraphs classifies an HR/FB for pitchers of 13.0% as awful, so, in a sense, Varland's HR/FB ratio of 21.1% is "Below Awful." 

    I don't mean to slander Varland, and I am optimistic that he can still be a key member of future Twins rotations alongside Joe Ryan, Pablo López, and Bailey Ober. Still, his inability to limit home runs is very real and very concerning. 

    Why is Varland struggling with giving up home runs?

    Let's take a deeper look. 

    First, it is essential to understand what it looks like when things are going well for Varland on the mound. Here is an example. 

    In this sequence, which shows only two pitches, Varland strikes out Astros first baseman/designated hitter José Abreu on a slider low and outside. Varland's slider begins looking like it is going toward the inside half of the plate but then quickly jumps out to the outer half, confusing right-handed hitters like Abreu. 

    The reason Varland's slider tends to be so effective, like in the video example above, is because his off-speed pitches come from the same arm slot as his fastball. Varland's average arm slot when he throws fastballs comes in at 5.5 feet, while his average arm slot for when he throws sliders comes in at 5.4 feet, virtually the exact same, especially to the human eye. 

    On average, Varland's slider moves 11 inches horizontally from right-handed hitters and drops 40 inches, which is impressive considering the league average for right-handed pitchers who throw sliders horizontal movement is six inches along with 36 inches in drop. 

    In the next at-bat shown in the video example, Varland strikes out Astros outfielder Jake Meyers looking on a fastball high and outside. Varland's fastball, like most pitchers, works best when he is working it on the outside edges of the zone both vertically and horizontally. In this specific example, Varland strikes out Meyers by being able to pinpoint his fastball on the upper left-hand edge of the strike zone. 

    Varland's unique wind-up, which looks like his arm is slinging the ball toward the plate, reminiscent of a trebuchet or a catapult, helps him confuse hitters as, when he is effective, his off-speed pitches and fastball come from the same unique arm slot, making hitters question every pitch coming from his hand. 

    Vice versa, it is essential to understand what it looks like when Varland is struggling. Let's look at an example. 

    In this sequence, Varland leaves an 84 MPH changeup center cut to Toronto Blue Jays third baseman Matt Chapman

    Now, any 84 MPH center cut changeup will more likely than not get hit very hard and very far by any worthwhile Major League hitter, especially those the likes of Chapman. But it is still essential to analyze what might have gone wrong, despite the obvious. 

    Varland has struggled with his changeup this season, likely because it is a very average pitch, if not slightly below average. Varland's changeup moves 14 inches and drops 31 inches. In comparison, the league average for changeups thrown by right-handed pitchers is 15 inches in horizontal movement with 31 inches in drop. 

    Varland's changeup movement is almost perfectly average, which isn't inherently discouraging. What is discouraging is that Varland threw an average pitch toward the middle of the zone to an above-average Major League hitter, a story that has been told far too often this year.

    Varland has allowed 10% of balls put in play hit off of him to be barreled, which is 3% higher than the league average. This measurement is further evidenced by Varland's Barrel% being in only the 20th percentile. When Varland gives up contact, it tends to be hit hard and in the air, which can be a recipe for unfortunate outcomes for Varland, the Twins, and Twins fans alike. 

    Now, this formula can work well in pitcher-friendly ballparks like Target Field. Still, when facing teams away from Target Field in hitter-friendly ballparks, as illustrated in the Blue Jays video, things can quickly go wrong for Varland if teams begin to make hard contact off him. 

    Can Varland's Home Run Problem Be Fixed?

    Yes, but Varland will need to work on changing things.

    First, Varland needs to develop better off-speed pitches and locate them better. Can that happen at the Major League level? Yes, but it's not a foregone conclusion that the Twins would be comfortable with that, especially with potentially better options in the recently emerging left-handed pitching prospect Brent Headrick doing well in Triple-A and his most recent long relief appearance versus the Tigers on June 17, and the return of veteran right-handed 35-year-old Kenta Maeda imminent. 

     

    Varland also needs to stop leaving as many fastballs hanging in the zone as he does. Varland throws 67% of his fastball in the strike zone, which is why he is so good at limiting walks, but when a pitcher throws 67% of his fastballs in the zone, that leaves the possibility of more hard-hit balls being put in play. 

    If Varland can find ways to make his off-speed pitches more effective and play a complementary role to his fastball that needs to not be left in the middle of the zone as often, then he could become a solidified member of the Twins starting rotation alongside Ryan, López, and Ober. 

    We will have to see if the Twins will allow Varland to make those adjustments at the Major League level or if he needs to undergo more fine-tuning in Triple-A with the St. Paul Saints and their coaching staff, but with Varland giving up two more home runs through 4 1/3 innings pitched while also propelling his ERA on the season to 5.30 in his most recent start against the Detroit Tigers on June 18, it feels like Varland has pitched himself out of a spot in the Twins rotation.

    What do you think about Varland's home run issue? Do you think he should get optioned to Triple-A or can he work out his command and location issues at the Major League level?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Riley Quick

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, RHP
    Start #3 for the 21-year-old went well again. He tossed three scoreless innings with no walks. He gave up one hit and had three strikeouts. In 8 IP through 3 starts, he's given up 0 runs, 1 hit, 3 walks, and 13 strikeouts.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    59 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Do they have 5 guys in high leverage roles now? Why would having more long relievers mean there's more high leverage roles? Who outside of Duran, Jax, and Stewart are really getting high leverage innings now? I wouldn't be replacing anyone above Moran and Pagan in the pecking order so I'm not sure why they'd be moving up. I'd be replacing the guys at the bottom of the pecking order.

    The current pen is Duran, Stewart, Jax, De Leon, Moran, Pagan, Headrick, Balazovic. I'd replace Pagan with Maeda. That doesn't move anyone up the ladder into higher leverage roles. Just adds a guy who can go more, hopefully better, innings.

    Well Moran has gotten put in high-leverage spots multiple times this season and Pagán was most recently put in a high-leverage spot against the Blue Jays where he imploded and gave up a three run home run to Cavan Biggio. What I am trying to say is that if you only have five short relievers they are all going to be forced in high-leverage spots. For example, say Joe Ryan starts a game and pitches six innings and then Stewart pitches the seventh, Jax pitches the eighth, and then Duran closes the game out in the ninth. If this occurred, then it would be safe to assume that Stewart, Jax, and Duran would be unavailable for the next game. Now, in the next game say, hypothetically, Bailey Ober pitches seven innings and he gets pulled after the seventh with a one-run lead. If this situation arose, then one of Moran or Pagán would be forced to pitch in the eighth inning of a one-run game, which is obviously a high-leverage situation. The Twins don't have many other options, but it would be nice to have a short reliever like Kody Funderburk or Oliver Ortega available as short relievers rather than having a bunch of stretch relievers who won't be able to help you in high-leverage situations unless you want to risk using them as short relievers. It is a messy situation, but I think the Twins need to roster at least six short relievers as they can't afford to depend solely on Moran or Pagán being second tier high-leverage relievers. 

    Edited by Cody Schoenmann
    1 hour ago, jkcarew said:

    If only the goalie didn’t give up so many goals, he’d be good.

    If only the pitcher didn’t give up so many really hard hits…

    It’s the same argument. Just needs to be better overall.

    AAA. Three years ago, I wouldn’t have bet 2 cents that Varland would ever see AAA, let alone the majors. He may surprise yet again, or maybe this is the ceiling. The International League ballparks, including CHS, are HR factories…an excellent situation for working on keeping it in the park.

    The fact that Varland was able to skyrocket through the Twins minor league system so fast is incredible and I admire him for it, but it feels like he has reached a roadblock, and this roadblock is probably the hardest one he has faced yet. Will he be able to overcome it? I'm not sure, but I think he needs to work on crafting the skills needed to overcome it in Triple-A rather than with the Twins for the time being. If Maeda struggles or gets injured again, then Varland should be the pitcher the Twins choose to call-up, although if the Twins decided it was going to be Headrick I wouldn't necessarily disagree with them.

    4 minutes ago, Cody Schoenmann said:

    Well Moran has gotten put in high-leverage spots multiple times this season and Pagán was most recently put in a high-leverage spot against the Blue Jays where he imploded and gave up a three run home run to Cavan Biggio. What I am trying to say is that if you only have five short relievers they are all going to be forced in high-leverage spots. For example, say Joe Ryan starts a game and pitches six innings and then Stewart pitches the seventh, Jax pitches the eighth, and then Duran closes the game out in the ninth. If this occurred, then it would be safe to assume that Stewart, Jax, and Duran would be unavailable for the next game. Now, in the next game say, hypothetically, Bailey Ober pitches seven innings and he gets pulled after the seventh with a one-run lead. If this situation arose, then one of Moran or Pagán would be forced to pitch in the eighth inning of a one-run game, which is obviously a high-leverage situation. The Twins don't have many other options, but it would be nice to have a short reliever like Kody Funderburk or Oliver Ortega available as short relievers rather than having a bunch of stretch relievers who won't be able to help you in high-leverage situations unless you want to risk using them as short relievers. It is a messy situation, but I think the Twins need to roster at least six short relievers as they can't afford to depend solely on Moran or Pagán being second tier high-leverage relievers. 

    I disagree with the premise that they would, or should, be unavailable the next day. If you can't use your best relievers in back to back games they're not good enough to be the best relievers on a team. Do you want to use them back to back days super frequently? No. But it can, and should, be done from time to time. If you want to win in the playoffs you better have some guys who can throw back to back days. Especially your closer, and fireman.

    I also don't know why you can't use a multi-inning capable pitcher for 1 inning if needed, or, heaven forbid, to pitch both the 8th and the 9th inning after Ober leaves your hypothetical game. Why not use Headrick to finish off that Ober game and not have to throw either Moran or Pagan? If Headrick is better why can't you use him for 2 innings? 

    Would the Twins actually do it? I don't think so at all. But there's no rule that says you have to throw worse pitchers for 1 inning each instead of using a bulk guy for multiple innings, and still have bulk guys left for the next day. 

    12 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I disagree with the premise that they would, or should, be unavailable the next day. If you can't use your best relievers in back to back games they're not good enough to be the best relievers on a team. Do you want to use them back to back days super frequently? No. But it can, and should, be done from time to time. If you want to win in the playoffs you better have some guys who can throw back to back days. Especially your closer, and fireman.

    I also don't know why you can't use a multi-inning capable pitcher for 1 inning if needed, or, heaven forbid, to pitch both the 8th and the 9th inning after Ober leaves your hypothetical game. Why not use Headrick to finish off that Ober game and not have to throw either Moran or Pagan? If Headrick is better why can't you use him for 2 innings? 

    Would the Twins actually do it? I don't think so at all. But there's no rule that says you have to throw worse pitchers for 1 inning each instead of using a bulk guy for multiple innings, and still have bulk guys left for the next day. 

    I think I am more so trying to approach this through how I think the Twins operate more than anything. To me, it feels likes whenever one of their better relievers is used in a high-leverage spot that reliever is then unavailable for the next game. For example, when Stewart, Jax, and Duran were used in high-leverage spots during the first two games of the most recent three game series against the Blue Jays in Toronto, they were then unavailable for the third game of the series, which is why Moran, De León, Winder, Pagán, and Lopez were the only available relief options for that game. Evidently, the Twins blew a two run lead in the eighth inning when Pagán let up a three run home run to Cavan Biggio. What I am trying to say is that I don't think the Twins are going to over-tax their starters and short relievers in the name of having an abundance of stretch relievers. Plus, the pitchers who are short relief options like De León, Winder, Balazovic, Headrick, Woods Richardson, and so on don't have the Twins trust yet, so I think the Twins would go to almost every length imaginable to not use them in high-leverage spots. I don't think the fact that high-leverage relievers can't be used in back-to-back games means that they aren't good enough to be the best relievers on the team, I just think it means that you can't tax out your best relievers in a 162 game season.

    3 minutes ago, Cody Schoenmann said:

    I think I am more so trying to approach this through how I think the Twins operate more than anything. To me, it feels likes whenever one of their better relievers is used in a high-leverage spot that reliever is then unavailable for the next game. For example, when Stewart, Jax, and Duran were used in high-leverage spots during the first two games of the most recent three game series against the Blue Jays in Toronto, they were then unavailable for the third game of the series, which is why Moran, De León, Winder, Pagán, and Lopez were the only available relief options for that game. Evidently, the Twins blew a two run lead in the eighth inning when Pagán let up a three run home run to Cavan Biggio. What I am trying to say is that I don't think the Twins are going to over-tax their starters and short relievers in the name of having an abundance of stretch relievers. Plus, the pitchers who are short relief options like De León, Winder, Balazovic, Headrick, Woods Richardson, and so on don't have the Twins trust yet, so I think the Twins would go to almost every length imaginable to not use them in high-leverage spots. I don't think the fact that high-leverage relievers can't be used in back-to-back games means that they aren't good enough to be the best relievers on the team, I just think it means that you can't tax out your best relievers in a 162 game season.

    Yeah, I don't expect the Twins to do anything I'm suggesting. But when your team has played like this one has for 2.5 years now I think it's time to quit doing things the way you're doing them. 

    As for that Toronto series, you kind of proved my point about them being able to pitch back to back days. They pitched back to back days that series, and weren't available for the 3rd game. That's different than not being allowed to pitch back to back days. Pitching back to back days doesn't mean they're throwing 2 games in a row all the time, just that they're allowed to do it when the moment calls for it. And, unless you have 6 high leverage arms, you better get them used to throwing back to back games during the regular season, because they're going to need to do it in the playoffs. It's why I never thought Rogers was an elite arm. He was terrible in back to back situations. In the playoffs you have to be able to use your closer in both game 1 and game 2. If you can't he's not good enough. Being willing to use your best relievers in back to back games during the regular season doesn't have to equal taxing them.

    I don't understand how having an "abundance of stretch relievers" over-taxes both your starters and your short relievers. If you have 4 guys who can all go multiple innings, and a rotation with at least 3 guys who can go 6 or 7 innings pretty regularly, you shouldn't be over-taxing anyone. If you're getting 6 innings out of Lopez, Ryan, and Ober most of the time you should be able to get 5 out of Gray, and 4 out of Maeda without over-taxing anyone, as long as you have multiple guys who can go multiple innings. It takes a change in mindset, though. You don't need 1 inning guys to throw the 7th, 8th, and 9th. You can use a multi-inning arm to pitch any combination of those innings.

    The Twins not trusting anyone outside of Duran, Jax, and Stewart is a self-made problem that should've been addressed in the offseason, but wasn't. Only trusting 3 guys to get high leverage outs puts you in a tough spot no matter how the rest of your staff looks. Switching out Moran and Pagan types who aren't trusted for high leverage spots for Headrick and Balazovic types who aren't trusted in high leverage spots just reduces the number of relievers you have to use in a game which allows you to save your Duran, Jax, and Stewart types from having to pitch in the 9th inning of a 9-3 game. Having just a 3 man bullpen is a disaster no matter what.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...