Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Josh Bell Is Derek Falvey’s Parting Gift to the Twins

    Josh Bell’s turnaround has transformed a signing that once looked like a mistake into one of the biggest successes of Derek Falvey’s final offseason.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Jordan Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    When Derek Falvey and the Twins mutually parted ways at the end of January, it marked the end of a nine-year run for the executive who had helped reshape the organization. Before leaving, Falvey made three free-agent signings for the Twins during the offseason: Taylor Rogers, Victor Caratini, and Josh Bell.

    Rogers has struggled for much of the season, albeit usually in low-leverage spots, while Caratini has had his moments. Bell, however, has turned into something much more valuable. The designated hitter has been one of the Twins' most important offensive players, and his signing is looking more and more like Falvey's parting gift to the organization.

    Bell's overall numbers tell a big part of the story. He currently owns a 110 OPS+, putting him on pace for his best offensive season since 2022, when he split the season between the Washington Nationals and San Diego Padres. He leads the Twins with 499 plate appearances, 26 doubles and 77 RBI, providing a level of consistency in the middle of the lineup that the team has desperately needed.

    But Bell's impact goes beyond his overall numbers. He has been particularly outstanding when the Twins have needed him most, hitting .349 with a 1.039 OPS with runners in scoring position. In a season in which the Twins have struggled to consistently produce offense, Bell has repeatedly come through in the biggest moments.

    That wasn't necessarily what anyone expected when the season began.

    Bell got off to a brutal start, something that has become somewhat of a calling card throughout his career. Through May 31st, he was hitting just .219 with a .619 OPS, five home runs and 32 RBI through 57 games. At the time, it was fair to wonder whether the Twins had signed a veteran whose best days were behind him.

    Instead, Bell has completely turned his season around.

    Since June 1st, Bell has posted a .869 OPS with 12 home runs and 45 RBI over 66 games (entering play Friday). His best stretch has come at exactly the time the Twins have needed it most. In 16 games during August, Bell is hitting .361 with a 1.041 OPS. That performance has been massive for the Twins because the offense around him has struggled badly this month. Minnesota ranks in the bottom third of Major League Baseball in runs scored in August, making Bell's production even more important. Without him in the middle of the lineup, it is difficult to imagine how an already-struggling offense would have survived this stretch.

    That is particularly important considering where the Twins are in the standings. With Minnesota fighting to keep its playoff hopes alive, there isn't much room for an extended offensive slump. Games are becoming increasingly important, and when the Twins have needed a big hit with runners on base, Bell has consistently been the guy delivering it, like he did on Tuesday with a first run blast to the third deck with a runner on second base to give the Twins a big first-inning lead.

    Falvey signed Bell in December to a one-year, $7 million contract. For an executive who typically preferred to wait until late in the offseason, and sometimes even into spring training, before making significant free-agent additions, the timing of the deal was notable. It was clear that Bell was someone Falvey wanted from the beginning of the offseason, and he didn't wait around to see if the market would bring the price down. And for a while, that decision looked questionable.

    Bell's slow start made it seem as though the Twins had committed $7 million to a veteran whose best offensive years were behind him. But the Twins stuck with him, and Bell has rewarded that patience by becoming one of the most productive and important players on the roster.

    According to FanGraphs, Bell has already provided roughly $6 million in value to the Twins this season. That alone makes the contract look like a strong investment, but it doesn't fully capture what Bell has meant to this team.

    The timing of his production matters. His best baseball has come while the Twins have desperately needed offense, and his ability to drive in runs has been particularly valuable. Add in the veteran leadership he has provided in the clubhouse, and the signing has turned into a slam dunk.

    That makes Bell an interesting final chapter for Falvey, whose best previous most was arguably the signing of another veteran DH with stellar clubhouse vibes in Nelson Cruz.

    Falvey's tenure with the Twins ended before he could see the full results of the moves he made during his final offseason. Rogers hasn't provided the results the Twins hoped for, and Caratini has been a mixed bag. Bell, however, has become a legitimate success story.

    The player Falvey targeted from the very beginning of the offseason has turned into one of the reasons the Twins are still hanging around the playoff race in August. It may not have been the most exciting signing when it happened. It certainly didn't look like one when Bell struggled through the first two months of the season. But with the season entering its most important stretch, Josh Bell has made that $7 million investment look awfully smart.

    In the end, perhaps the best way to remember Falvey's final offseason with the Twins is through the player he went out and got before he left. Josh Bell was one of Derek Falvey's final moves as a member of the Twins. Now, he is one of the biggest reasons Minnesota still has a chance to make something out of this season.

    What do you think? How would you grade Josh Bell's signing now, and has he become the best free-agent addition of Derek Falvey's final offseason with the Twins? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    13 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I agree and wonder if you are right about Bell not coming back. I would not at all be surprised if that $10 million mutual option was one of the few that actually got exercised by both sides. Bell starts as DH and if the young guys actually show something, we trade him at midseason. In the more likely scenario that we call up Jenkins and Emma and only one of them can actually hit major league pitching in his first year, Bell provides a great security blanket. I think the team is poised to be a division title contender next year, with 2027 not another developing team year, and I think Bell actually has a position on the team.

    If the current management is still in place, which I hope they aren't, he wouldn't be a security blanket.  He would be holding back either ERod or Jenkins.  If either Bell or Larnach are on the roster next year, one of those two will not be.  And we will have another lost year of development and finding out what they can do.

    The current front office loves these one year league average at best vets.  And it did hurt this year, if Bell is not here, ERod probably makes the team out of spring training and we would know now where he fits into the future.  Bell has contributed to this team but we truly don't know how many games back we would be without him.  We can't keep sacrificing the opportunity to give the younger players a chance, that is why we are developing a bottleneck now.

    3 hours ago, MeleMouth said:

    As noted by the OP, Bell is one of the main additions to the team this year, to which I would add it is a team that is outperforming expectations and has a better tone than last year's team, even before the fire sale. I'm glad you agree that Bell is a quality person or at least a good teammate (we have almost no idea what he does in his private life). When something like a team's tone is better, the team is performing better, and a new member of the team is a good and supportive teammate, it can't be proven that his conduct made the difference, but circumstantial and observational evidence suggests that he may be making a positive effect. My own career and athletic experience gave me many examples.

    I'm not aware of any math connecting culture or quality of a person or even a locker room to success. I also, however, would not mock the concept, unless "chemistry" or culture is used to explain a series of decisions that are otherwise suboptimal, nor do I feel qualified to make rules for others of what "there needs to be" regarding their opinions, with the possible exception that opinions should not be based on clear factual errors.

    Following your logic, a team would never change its manager because it wanted a new tone in the dugout, because they wouldn't be able to prove it makes any difference. Nor would it ever seek someone to provide veteran leadership, such as Andy MacPhail did when he traded for Don Baylor and Terry Ryan said he was doing when he brought back Torii Hunter. You're right that fans don't know as much as MacPhail or Ryan about the locker room or players, but fans have a right to their opinions on the issue.

    I feel like that's a pretty extreme take that no player or manager would ever have an impact on team chemistry or work ethic, etc. There are some folks who will argue the manager doesn't have any impact (usually when attempting to protect an unpopular manager under siege by fans). The manager brings more than locker room attitude, though. The manager brings philosophy on who plays, who doesn't, why they get the opportunity, coaching philosophy, bullpen decisions, etc. 

    The question at play is whether Bell could have that kind of impact on this Twins team? I think, if Bell was a Rafael Devers kind of crybaby, selfish, ****head, he could potentially cause a destabilization, but I don't believe he's likely to be a lift. I think the Twins are populated by a lot of good guys.

    In any case, I don't generally subscribe to the intangibles which aren't specifically called out by players.

    25 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    If the current management is still in place, which I hope they aren't, he wouldn't be a security blanket.  He would be holding back either ERod or Jenkins.  If either Bell or Larnach are on the roster next year, one of those two will not be.  And we will have another lost year of development and finding out what they can do.

    The current front office loves these one year league average at best vets.  And it did hurt this year, if Bell is not here, ERod probably makes the team out of spring training and we would know now where he fits into the future.  Bell has contributed to this team but we truly don't know how many games back we would be without him.  We can't keep sacrificing the opportunity to give the younger players a chance, that is why we are developing a bottleneck now.

    I don’t think he holds either one back if Laranach is gone. There are plenty of games for four outfielders to play regularly in the three spots, particularly with Buxton getting a DH or off day each week. I think this narrative that we have to get rid of Bell to play Jenkins and Emma is a false premise. We can and should have all 3 plus Buxton and Keaschall on the roster and there’s plenty of at bats for all those guys. They can all get 500 to 550 at bats a year, more if they can hit left-handed pitching and we don’t need to give Martin much time. 

    45 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I don’t think he holds either one back if Laranach is gone. There are plenty of games for four outfielders to play regularly in the three spots, particularly with Buxton getting a DH or off day each week. I think this narrative that we have to get rid of Bell to play Jenkins and Emma is a false premise. We can and should have all 3 plus Buxton and Keaschall on the roster and there’s plenty of at bats for all those guys. They can all get 500 to 550 at bats a year, more if they can hit left-handed pitching and we don’t need to give Martin much time. 

    I hope you are correct but I believe the key is who is in the front office.  This current office likes to establish players for each position based on what side of the plate they hit from.  They have typically not had 4 starting caliber outfielders and make the lineups accordingly so everyone gets at bats.  I know it can be done but I am not sure this front office will do it if Bell is here.

    26 minutes ago, weitz41 said:

    My 2 cents are Falvey and Zoll targeted switch hitters to help deal with the line up imbalance of lefties, for their heavy matchup approach. Bell being better than expected is a surprise bonus.

    Bell is basically at all his career averages in most statistical categories, I would argue he is performing as expected.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...