Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Did Colt Keith Deal, Jorge Polanco Trade Pave the Way for a Pre-Debut Brooks Lee Deal?


    Hunter McCall

    This weekend, the division rival Detroit Tigers locked up one of their top prospects for the foreseeable future. Could the Twins strike a similar deal with one of their own?

    Image courtesy of © Dave Nelson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Tigers infield prospect Colt Keith capped off a good week on Sunday by signing an extension with the team that keeps him under team control through the 2032 season. The extension is officially a six-year deal worth $28.6 million, with club options for $10 million, $13 million, and $15 million in the following seasons. Earlier in the week, Keith appeared as the No. 22 overall prospect on MLB Pipeline’s newest prospect ranking list.

    Also featured on MLB Pipeline’s list was Twins infield prospect Brooks Lee. Lee clocked in on the list at No. 18, just ahead of Keith. Lee is a similar case study, in more ways than one. Both prospects are 22 years old and likely to play second or third base in the major leagues. Both players’ bats are their best tool, and both are relatively similarly ranked on many prospect lists, as they are on MLB Pipeline’s. With similarities in the player profiles, could the Twins pursue a similar extension?

    Extending a prospect is an excellent way to get a discount on a good player by paying more for him right now. In the case of Keith, the Tigers will be paying him a higher salary over the next few years than they would have had they let him play on his rookie contract. Still, assuming he performs the way the team hopes, they will be paying him less in the later years than they would have if they had waited to extend him later in his career. It’s a relatively low-risk move that guarantees you control that player, in this case, for the next nine seasons.

    The main difference between Keith and Lee is Keith is likely to be Detroit’s Opening Day second baseman in 2024. He fills a direct need for the team and has a spot for the foreseeable future. Lee has a more complicated path to playing time. Just this weekend, GM Thad Levine said he was likely to open the season in Triple A, with the St. Paul Saints.

    There are questions about whether Lee can play shortstop, which Carlos Correa occupies anyway, so it wouldn’t matter if he were adequately equipped for the position; there isn't a path to playing time at shortstop on the MLB roster. The way Royce Lewis and Edouard Julien performed last season, one would assume second and third base are also spoken for, and just like that, the path to playing time narrows.

    On the other hand, we knew that logjam would have to start breaking up at some point, and on Monday night, it did. With Jorge Polanco traded, the extra infielder penciled into the roster for Opening Day (Kyle Farmer) is of lower quality, has less gravitas within the organization, and doesn't do some of the things Lee could do for the team as soon as this spring.

    The Twins could move Lee or Julien to first base to get both guys on the field. Still, with the defensive improvements Julien made throughout the year, the Twins may be reluctant to move him off his position, and it's hard to bank on extending a player and then trying to teach him a brand-new position. Even if they did consider such a move, a healthy Alex Kirilloff and José Miranda will also be battling for at-bats at first base. Mix in the potential arrival of prospects like Yunior Severino and Austin Martin, and you can see why the Twins might be hesitant to make a long-term commitment to Lee, especially when the team has needs and Lee is a great trade token.

    The path to a facsimile of the Keith deal opens up if the Twins decide that Lee is, in fact, the second baseman of the future. Moving Polanco is the first and simplest step along that path, but it's a step, nonetheless. To advance further, they'd need to move either Julien or Kirilloff, as well. By committing to Lee, the team guarantees him a spot on the major-league roster and an everyday role. Why would they start his controllable clock and pay extra money to him if they wanted to keep him in the minors? By extending Lee, the team would need to cut down the logjam in other ways.

    There's an incentive for Lee to work for an extension as well, as it guarantees that he won't be traded and will have a role with the team for the future. It shows the team's real and abiding faith in him, and puts a price tag on it. If the Twins think Lee is the best available option, Lee will almost certainly be willing to work with the team to get an extension done. He would be rewarded with a fast track and financial security for the following number of seasons. The catch, of course, is that Lee was the 8th overall pick in 2022, whereas Keith was taken out of high school in 2020, in the fourth round of a truncated draft. Lee got more than 10 times as much than Keith did to sign at the front door of professional baseball, so the Twins wouldn't enjoy as much leverage as the Tigers did in dealing with their young infielder.

    With the pros and cons of a potential extension laid out, the question remains: should the Twins pursue an extension? The answer is unsatisfying: Maybe. If the Twins have a plan that guarantees Lee an everyday role, and the team doesn't believe they can package him for a starter they deem worthy of losing him for, then they should absolutely extend Lee. He’s likely to be a solid everyday player, and if the team can lock that up for the long haul for a relatively cheap price (as the Tigers did with Keith), then they should. However, if they have questions about where the puzzle pieces will fall in, they must seriously consider finding a trade partner.

    What are your thoughts on offering Brooks Lee an extension similar to Colt Keith's? Should the team pursue a trade instead? Let me know in the comments! Go, Twins!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    You're ignoring years. Keith's guaranteed years don't buy out any of his free agent years while Chourio's buys out 2, that's the difference in guaranteed money. That's why Keith's option years add up to the same total, but over 1 extra year so AAV is slightly less. That's why I separated my numbers by years.

    If you're only guaranteeing the contract for Lee's pre-arb and arb years the number is 27-30 mil. If you're adding 2 or 3 years onto that you need to get to the 80-90 mil mark. Call it 9/100 if that makes you feel better. But you need to take into consideration what the length of the deal is buying out.

    Keith makes 2.5m salary this year while Churio will make 10m. I was told there would be no math but I would think that's where most of the guaranteed money comes from, year by year. 

    There is no comparison of these two contracts, Churio is in another orbit.  Lee is somewhere in between the two, about halfway by my estimation. 

    7 minutes ago, Jocko87 said:

    Keith makes 2.5m salary this year while Churio will make 10m. I was told there would be no math but I would think that's where most of the guaranteed money comes from, year by year. 

    There is no comparison of these two contracts, Churio is in another orbit.  Lee is somewhere in between the two, about halfway by my estimation. 

    No, Jackson Chourio is making 2 million this year. He doesn't make 10 mil in a year until year 6 of his 8 year deal. You need to take into account the pre-arb and arb year portions of the deal, not just the overall deal. Chourio is getting 45 mil for his first 6 years so if you want to say it'd take at least 45 mil in the first 6 years to sign Lee that'd be a better argument. But there is a very real difference between buying out pre-arb and arb years and buying out free agency years. So comparing just their guaranteed money is not an effective way of comparing these deals because Chourio's deal includes guaranteed money in his first 2 free agent years while Keith's doesn't. That is a very important part of these deals.

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    No, Jackson Chourio is making 2 million this year. He doesn't make 10 mil in a year until year 6 of his 8 year deal. You need to take into account the pre-arb and arb year portions of the deal, not just the overall deal. Chourio is getting 45 mil for his first 6 years so if you want to say it'd take at least 45 mil in the first 6 years to sign Lee that'd be a better argument. But there is a very real difference between buying out pre-arb and arb years and buying out free agency years. So comparing just their guaranteed money is not an effective way of comparing these deals because Chourio's deal includes guaranteed money in his first 2 free agent years while Keith's doesn't. That is a very important part of these deals.

    I see what I was reading wrong on the 10m but I don't think it changes my point.  Other than the first year Churio is banking much more cash throughout the deal.  The money is still guaranteed and that is what represents the investment.  I would think with the higher guarantee more years would be a part of it.  To me the money is the driver and the years just fall into place.  I don't see a meaningful difference between arb and prep arb years other than the player aiming for an age to hit free agency again.  

    6 minutes ago, Jocko87 said:

    I see what I was reading wrong on the 10m but I don't think it changes my point.  Other than the first year Churio is banking much more cash throughout the deal.  The money is still guaranteed and that is what represents the investment.  I would think with the higher guarantee more years would be a part of it.  To me the money is the driver and the years just fall into place.  I don't see a meaningful difference between arb and prep arb years other than the player aiming for an age to hit free agency again.  

    Their pre-arb and arb years are capped financially so to speak. You get the outlier Soto and Judge guys who "break" the arb system, but generally speaking there's a limit, and a known one at that, to what the player is going to make in their first 6 years of service time. There is a massive difference between singing a guaranteed deal that only covers your first 6 years and one that goes into your free agent years. It can't be understated. Keith only getting guaranteed money through his arb years is a massive difference between his deal and the Chourio deal. The second you get to the 7th year in a deal like that the value skyrockets. The years are a huge part of this conversation. And yes, it's about hitting free agency. You simply can't compare their guaranteed money without addressing the fact that one only covers arb years and the other goes into free agency. The years are very important.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...