Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Should the Twins Consider Trading for Mason Miller?


    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of © Reggie Hildred-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Oakland Athletics are rumored to be shopping their star, young, flame-throwing reliever, Mason Miller. How interested should the Minnesota Twins be? 

     

    In the first two months of the young MLB season, A's closer Mason Miller has been one of the most exciting young players in the league. In 26 innings this season, Miller has an ERA of 2.08 with a FIP of 0.85. Yes, a FIP of 0.85. 

    Apart from just the results, Miller also has arguably the best stuff of any reliever in baseball, pairing a triple-digit fastball with a devastating slider to create a two-pitch arsenal that is striking out batters at a video game rate of 51.5%. Additionally, Miller leads all relievers in fWAR at 1.4 and is top-10 in Win Probability Added.

    With the Oakland Athletics franchise in complete turmoil until they complete their move to Las Vegas, they will be hearing out trade packages this deadline and seeing if now is the time to move their stud reliever, when his trade value will never be higher. 

    Should the Twins be interested? This potential move comes with benefits and significant drawbacks that the Twins must carefully weigh.

    Miller, with his elite stuff, could elevate the Twins' bullpen from good to great. This kind of bullpen strength is invaluable in the playoffs, where games often hinge on late-inning performances.

    Pairing him with Jhoan Duran, who has already proven to be an elite reliever, and the excellent Griffin Jax and (hopefully, soon) Brock Stewart, the Twins could create one of the most formidable late-game bullpens in baseball. Additionally, acquiring a cost-controlled, high-impact player like Miller might be one of the few moves that Twins’ ownership would be willing to sign off on.

    We saw this offseason that payroll is a huge point of contention for this ownership group. With the television deal in flux even more now than it was last season, payroll is unlikely to rise. Miller, being a rookie, would be under team control for several years, providing significant value on a minimum contract. The Twins likely won’t be able to be in the market to trade for a veteran like Vladimir Guerrero Jr. simply because they won’t be willing to pay whatever part of his contract is remaining. Miller will be one of the few players that would both provide value and that the Twins would be able to “afford."

    However, acquiring Miller will undoubtedly require a substantial package of prospects. According to Ken Rosenthal, a Miller package would need to include  “a young player of comparable ability, or a substantial package of multiple youngsters who could be part of the A's future."

    The Twins have a strong farm system, but parting with top-tier talent always carries risk. A deal for Miller would likely need to include two top-100 prospects plus another prospect or two. That's a lot to give up for a reliever.

    Historically, relievers do not provide the same level of value as starters or position players. They pitch fewer innings, and their impact, while significant, is limited to specific high-leverage situations. Overpaying for a reliever can be detrimental. The Twins must consider whether the potential upgrade in the bullpen justifies the cost in prospect capital.

    There is also the matter of Miller's health record. Prior to this year, he had been used as a starter, but the A's moved him to the bullpen in part because they wanted to see if he could stay healthy for a full year. In his four-year professional career, he's never topped the combined 52 2/3 innings he hit last year in the minors and majors. 

    The decision to trade for Miller is not straightforward. On one hand, his addition could transform the Twins' bullpen into one of the most feared units in baseball, giving them a significant edge in the postseason. On the other hand, the cost in prospect capital and the inherent risks associated with relievers make this a gamble that the Twins must consider carefully.

    Given the Twins' financial constraints and their current playoff aspirations, Miller represents a unique opportunity to add an impact piece without spending money on it. However, with the prospect capital required and the ridiculous amount of risk involved in acquiring a reliever, it’s not worth it.


    What do you think? Should the Twins make a move for Mason Miller? Leave a comment below and join the conversation!

     


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, jorgenswest said:

    If Julien returns to form and Lee is ready there is space for both.

    Concur.

    I will bite. I can’t think of a Miller who was moved last off season that the Twins missed on and could have won the bid. Maybe you are referring to Bryce. I think the Seattle Times reported that DiPoto was not looking to trade Miller or Woo. Sometimes that is smoke but neither guy moved so I am guessing it would have taken a huge overpay.

    My point was it doesn't hurt to talk and find out and you concurred.  I'm not suggesting trading Julien. Julien's a mess right now but things might get worse using someone else. We don't know the ask for the A's Miller just as we didn't know the ask for Bryce Miller last offseason. The idea of Polanco, Wallner, Raya, and a low A unranked guy may have been close. DiPoto was going to get Polanco one way or another. That's in the past though and I only made rough reference to it because we don't know what a team wants for their players and that was an example, but I'm hoping that the question is asked at the very least. The Twins have Duran, Jax, Alcala, hopefully Stewart, and potentially Varland for late in games. Still if Miller could be added it seems worth looking into at this time. 

    2 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

    according to BTV.

     

    Unbelievable that this is a pay site. After the debacles of their numbers last offseason I thought everyone had totally ignored them. BTW, who among those who pay attention to Twins prospects has Tanner Schobel as having the same value as David Festa?

    Everyone is better off just designing their own trades/values and arguing their points.

    Oakland has been notoriously cheap. Trading 1st year players does not save money unless you expect them to break. 

    The return. People here do not remember that Oakland makes head scratching deals. It would not cost someone with service time. More likely it would cost a couple arms and a couple legs. 2 pitchers and 2 hitters. Most likely a player from each level below AAA. That is why you should deal with Oakland 

    the player does not have a long history of mediocrity at the major league level as Lopez did. That is a bad comp. The question should be is he a pitcher  that other teams will figure out once there is enough data? Dunno.. will his arm blow out? Only if he is a Twin 

    Doc Gast, thanks for listing out what a possible trade could be.  I would not make the trade as displayed either.  But I wonder what Julien's "value" is right now?  After last season, I would have guessed it would be higher than his 34.0 or so.  Has it slipped since his rough start to this season?  At one time, you could almost envision a Julien for Mason Miller deal straight up.  Not so sure that would be true now with one heading to an All Star selection and the other headed to St. Paul to "find his stroke."  

    1 hour ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

    History can and does repeat.  What about the last time we traded for a converted starter with lights out stuff for 1/2 year?  How did that Jorge Lopez trade with Baltimore go?

    A BIG NO!!!

    So if Jhoan Duran was on another team and was made available in the middle of his first big league season you wouldn’t have traded for him . 

    2 hours ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

    You raise a valid point.  I prefer in developing relief pitchers not trading for them.  Seems like a better track record given what we have acquired vs given up on relief pitcher trades in the past.  No was just my opinion based on this thought.

    They got a good half season out of Romo for a 1b who couldn’t hit major league pitching

    they got an injured Dyson for 3 lottery tickets that have done almost nothing  at the major league level

    they got Fulmer for a pitcher that is undergoing TJ. He did have a good September call up pitching against 4 teams that were amongst the worst in baseball. Projected a ceiling f back of rotation starter

    They got Oekert for a utility player that can’t hit

    Pagan was good enough to get a 24 million dollar contract

    that leaves 1 bad trade 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...