He doesn't need to say "a dodgers source said" and doing so could unintentionally revel his source to that sources employers, the source could have asked him specifically not to mention him in any form after providing the information. Also, lets not conflate saying that Dozier hasn't played in a large market is anything close to the whole "pizza gate" nonsense. Or that saying Dozier hasn't played in a large market is the same as promoting a conspiracy about organized child abuse. I don't see why your taking this so personally. Also, it could well be a concern of the dodgers, though their concerns could be tiered, such as; 1)He strikes out a lot 2)He can be incredibly streaky 3)His power is incredibly pull heavy 4)They don't know how he'll adjust to such a large market. But not all of those concerns would necessarily be ranked the same. Lastly, he one of the most respected guys in his industry, he's never been a shill for any team, why would he start now, considering that neither he nor the dodgers had anything to gain by putting that blurb into his article. I get you don't like it, but there really is no need to be jumping to conclusions, or making personal attacks. Not really, it's not as though his contract is going to get longer or more team friendly from this point, he isn't suddenly going to become more valuable going forward. And it's not as though only one team that is trying to compete was interested in him, the problem is the other teams were like the Giants and Angels. Lets say at the deadline you have 4 teams in need of a 2nd basemen, the giants, angels, orioles and marlins, so you have a bidding war, big deal. None of the teams have anything remotely as good as Deleon to offer.