ewen21

Yes, that's the issue I have with May. He wants to go through Twitter and say something then he has to live with it. Not smart. Seems to me he simply heard about the accusation and decided he needed to Tweet something. I don't Tweet or do Facebook or relay anything having to do with the school district where I'm employed. I am in the public and I don't feel at liberty to discuss co-workers personal issues on the Internet. I know he just said: "Sorry Betsy" but he should not feel at liberty to go there on any level. It's just foolish. He needs to be less of a Twitter bro and more of a pro. That's about all I want I say

I don't like that his teammates spoke immediately through social media and anonymously in the press. No comments are needed. If you were there then speak as a witness. If not, you are speaking out of turn. Right or not, I did not like the anonymous comments or the Twitter stuff from the two Trevors. Both have enough to keep themselves busy with regards to their game.

Here is what I don't like. Several people affiliated with the Twins past and present weighed in on this. One of them was Trevor May. I understand he sent what can be thought of as a benign post, as he Tweeted: "Sorry Betsy" but he never should have done that. It reveals that he made the assumption his teammate was guilty. More bothersome were the anonymous quotes and Plouffe's quote. I guess he isn't a teammate so it is what it is, but as far as teammates go I've no idea why any of them would say anything beyond "I'm not aware of this issue" Those who talked about Sano being a "ticking time bomb" need to look in the mirror because they only spoke up after this woman said something. I hope the Twins front office has something to say about this to the players who felt compelled to Tweet or speak to the press about this. They had no business giving their two cents one way or the other

If you remember a guy named Tom Paciorek, he had some excellent years as a DH in Chicago during his 34, 35, and 36 year old seasons. Best seasons of his career by far.

Wouldn't be shocked to see him do as well as Darvish does.

It's pretty clear that the Twins are now operating on different terms than they were ten years ago. This isn't a small market team, we are mid-market and have enough resources to compete. If Mauer were not resigned then that money will be allocated to bring in other players. I actually am curious to see what this group can do without Mauer and a payroll equal to the one we have now. We might be able to make a MUCH BETTER team (which is what I am interested in, not whether or not Joe is allowed to play as long as he wishes).

kee How does this work? Joe turns 35 next month and with his history of injuries he is going to "keep getting better". When you extend out the timeline far enough everyone outlives their usefulness. In terms of baseball players, who gets better after 35??

The point remains. He is a player who claims to have post concussion symptoms going through three seasons. That doesn't exactly make him marketable. Please don't make the topic about me, Jim. Not sure why you initiated that

Excellent point. I love how Fangraphs determines how much money a player is worth. Are we REALLY using this as a benchmark for how the market should pay these players? I think they are using the Yen as their basis. Personally I don't sign Mauer no matter what he does this year. He had "post concussion symptoms" for three years. I am not putting out money for a 36 year old player with that history. Not sure how and why the concussion thing doesn't get discussed when talking about a possible extension. It seems to only be deployed when explaining away those three mediocre seasons he had in a row.

I surely hope the new management team isn't of the mindset where they are thinking: "How do we shoehorn Joe into our roster?" Plus with his much ballyhooed post concussion issues (that apparently lasted three years) there is plenty of risk. Seems like when we talk about the last several years the concussion thing gets discussed. When we talk about resigning him? I haven't heard anyone bring that up. ​Doesn't this factor into the equation?

That's the same rationale as, "it's this way because this is the way we have done it the last two years" Because we used him as a 4th outfielder doesn't mean it has to continue for a third year. Seriously, it seems like some people feel like Grossman needs to be here. He does not. He is a perfect example of someone who can be easily replaced by a better player at virtually the same cost.

Grossman is SCARY in the outfield. He has run into Santana, Polanco and Buxton. He made more errors than all LFers in the league in 2016 in just SEVENTY FIVE games. I don't understand why people keep referring to him as a "fourth outfielder". That means if someone goes down he is next man up out there.

He's MUCH better? Make me understand how you get that.

Help me understand how that Arietta deal is so bad when some folks here were upset we didn't outbid Chicago to get Darvish.

Dozier has been an everyday player for the last four seasons, playing over 150 games each year. How many guys do that for 7 or 8 years straight? Are we supposed to bank on him being one of those guys?

I sure hope management doesn't think that Dozier is going to be the player he was the last two years for the next three or four. This is the trouble with baseball contracts. Too often you overpay for what the guy did instead of for what he is capable of doing. If you give Dozier too many years it's a mistake. I even think three years is too much, Take a look at a player like Chase Utley. He was better than Dozier was for a longer period of time and by the time he hit his early 30s his production declined pretty sharply: https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/u/utleych01.shtml I guess it is natural to get attached to players, but do what is right for the betterment of this team going forward.

These are things I just cannot get around when hear how deeply Joe was affected by his concussion. For him to slip through all the protocols implies rampant negligence. I also do not understand how he can experience issues to the extent where production drops so sharply and no one puts two and two together for three seasons.

I think Polanco and Kepler are two guys to watch this year, If they make even just a small gain offensively this lineup with be very tough

Houston and NY are pretty stacked. If we do make the playoffs I would hope that we can make some noise, though. I keep going back to the 2003 Marlins. There was a team that had a staff that was no better than this one at the outset of the season, but Dontrelle Willis had a great year and they had Beckett, Pavano and Penny all taking a step forward. We need one more pitcher, imo. I don't believe an ace is necessary. What is needed is for players to peak at the right time. That is what the Marlins did AND it is what the Royals did as well

The only other explanation is that he really didn't have the ongoing symptoms from the concussion and used it as an excuse for subpar play.

The thing I have trouble with is how could it be that all these people around him on a daily basis can't detect something was amiss (for over two years). He described some pretty clear symptoms and yet this was apparent to no one in his life? Honestly, that is just strange to me

You are correct. No two concussions are the same. The problem I have is he withheld information from the team for over two years. I question that. If he had ongoing symptoms with a level of severity that affected his performance for three years THAT drastically why did he just keep on playing with no input from anyone? How is it the people close to him don't notice it? This would include his teammates, team officials, his family, etc.... I question that. The truth is no one really knows the level to which Joe suffered post concussion symptoms. What I am saying is that if he was having those problems then he should have kept the team in the loop. If I can't question it these things please let me know. I will never say another word about it.

A lot has been made about Mauer's concussion problem. It lasted for three years.... and now?? Suddenly it's all better?? Healed and good to go, just like that. It's as mysterious as "bi-lateral leg weakness". I saw the interview where Rosen spoke to Mauer that November after the concussion in 2013 and Joe said he was cleared to workout. Then over two years later, after some bad seasons, he says he had symptoms. Why did he not say something over all that time? How did no one notice? I am no fan of Terry Ryan, but he was dead right when he said all this: The bigger issue is that Mauer withheld health information from the club during some of his struggles last year. “The eyesight and the sunglasses and so forth, that caught quite a few people off guard including myself,” Twins General Manager Terry Ryan said. “I wish Joe would’ve been up front and brought it to our attention. Now I understand that with concussions you’re not going to be 100 percent every day coming off concussions.” Things always seem to be wishy-washy with the communication between him and the team, in my opinion. I think it is time to move on from Joe. It would also probably be best for him to move on as well. Why is he risking potential disaster if he had those symptoms for that long? He has more money than God and he has a family to raise. It makes no sense for him to keep playing provided the information he gave us last spring about the concussion symptoms. Not with what we know about them now. Why in the world does he need to keep playing? Because he loves it so much? I question it. I really do.

I'm not sure wants to make the transition. He was a shortstop and has carved his niche at 2B

At one point last year I could hardly bring myself to watch a Kyle Gibson start. He is like Nick Blackburn 2.0