I don't know if, as a general rule, people like Michael Tonkin. I guess he hasn't really pitched enough this year to draw much attention, but I was doing some math (yeah, right, me doing math for the fun of it...lol) concerning all the Twins pitchers; that drew my attention to Tonkin more than anyone else. I was just a little surprised since yes, while he's only pitched 7 innings, he's picked up 7 strikeouts and his strikeout to walk ratio is 7.00, leading all Twins pitchers with the exception of Glen Perkins. Yes, even Phil Hughes (well, I did say he's only thrown 7 innings, but...). His WHIP looks good, too, at 1.43. Considering all that, he should be pretty good...but unfortunately, the good news ends there. His ERA stands at 5.14, and that isn't pretty at all. But considering that, I still didn't think much at first since Brian Duensing and Tim Stauffer (surprise!!) both have worse ERAs, and Ricky Nolasco, who currently leads the team in wins, has an ERA of 5.12. Trevor May (and yes, I could even include Phil Hughes) isn't much better. So what's the deal? Well, like I said, I was doing math. (Reading stats is not math, by the way. ) I wanted to know every pitcher's runs per walks/hits ratio. I'm not the most stats geeky person in the world, so this may be a stat I can see by looking at player's Baseball Reference pages, but as it is, I multiplied WHIP by 9 and then divided ERA by that (I suppose I could abbreviate it to WH9 - is that on their stats pages, btw?). I have a feeling that there's a faster way to do this, but whatever. I got the necessary data. So this is what I came up with. I'll just say that this so-called runs per walks/hits ratio stat thingy can be abbreviated to RWH to make it easier. It might be a kind of stupid stat to look at, but I found it to be sort of interesting, nonetheless. It's probably not important. I guess you could say it's a sort of trust stat. Anyway, Perkins had the best RWH, at 0.14, which isn't surprising, or we wouldn't all laugh about how he likes to tease us. The team's RWH is currently 0.32, and the worst players were 0.40. Those were Tim Stauffer and Michael Tonkin. I wasn't surprised about Tim Stauffer at all, and I suppose I shouldn't have been surprised about Michael Tonkin, all things considered. But it was interesting. Now, I'm not saying that Tonkin is as bad as Stauffer. I'm sure that his RWH would go down if he could get more innings under his belt, and while he sure hasn't been too good at keeping runners from scoring, of course that could have something to do with his fielders. Looking at stats doesn't tell you much about that scenario. Also, most importantly, his WHIP is considerably lower than Stauffer's, at 1.43 while Stauffer's is 2.28. But we'll see what happens. Oh, and another thing I noticed is that Aaron Thompson is our only pitcher with more losses than wins (1). Could we have said that about any given pitcher last year?