Don't you think that a good hitter's approach changes with the circumstances of the game? Wanting you best hitter to swing and hit at least one of the two strikes he watches -- to hit to score one run with two outs in the ninth is not the same as wanting him to change his overall approach to hitting. Willingham's general approach is to put a power swing on any pitch over the plate... swinging for a home run/power every chance he can. I really hope his approach in his final at bat was not that, but to get on base, get that one run home. See the difference? Kind feel like I have to say that Mauer is the best Twins since Kirby Puckett now -- get the bona fides out there -- to head off silly responses that I hate, am overly critical or just can't say something nice about Joe. It's my opinion that when you have a talent like Joe Mauer, you let him decide which pitches to hit. If he had weakly grounded out to second, the board would have been up in arms, yet that's essentially what some were advocating he try to do. If he had been given "his pitch", I really doubt that bat would have stayed on his shoulder. A guy doesn't rack up a career BA of ~.320 by hoping to take a walk in every AB. His at bat was hardly memorable, not something stupid or really disappointing. It was prudent. Some of us are just a little disappointed, and I think that's okay, that his AB was a little too prudent, too safe. And who cares what the board would do with a 4-3 putout to end it. That's a red herring and many would say (irony thick) that that's who you want swinging and since it's more likely to make an out when making contact, we shouldn't be so critical of him unless we expect him to hit over .500. Thus, some on here won't stand for any criticism of Mauer, in any measure, even something as benign as this issue.