Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brad Swanson

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Blog Entries posted by Brad Swanson

  1. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Do you like meaningless stats? Do you enjoy cherry-picking? How about fallacy?
     
    Are you enamored with Kevin Correia and his shockingly awesome start to this season?
     
    Do you like being asked questions?
     
    I thought it might be fun to look at Kevin Correia's stats, with an eye toward history and multiplication. If you think that sounds fun as well, please keep reading.
     
    Pro-rated stats
     
    The Twins have played 22 games this season. Correia has started five games and stands to start about 28 more (give or take, depending on whether the Twins move to a one-man rotation or something bizarre like that).
     
    Wait, let's explore that. If the Twins decided, "hey, let's see if we can't make Kevin Correia's arm explode" and allowed him to become the full-time starting pitcher, he would get 140 more starts. Right now, he is winning three of every five starts and losing once in five. This would be his record if those numbers held (which I am pretty sure they would):
     
    87-29
     
    Hmm, that's an awful lot of losses. He would probably lead the league. Here is how many strikeouts he would have, averaging 15 for every 5 starts:
     
    435
     
    That's a lot. However, that would be over roughly 1050 innings, and thus not very impressive but really impressive. Nolan Ryan struck out a modern record 383 batters in 1973, and did so in 700 fewer innings. Not nearly the workhorse Correia could become under this scenario though.
     
    Ok, this is just not realistic. I mean, if any team is going to a one-man rotation, wouldn't the Twins be the last team you would expect? Let's try to be normal here.
     
    If Correia keeps this pace and gets 28 more starts, here will be his final numbers on the season:
     
    9.9 rWAR, 2.1 fWAR (THATS A JOKE DO YOU GET IT?) 240 IP, 20-6, 2.23 ERA, 225 hits allowed, 59 ER, 33 BB, 99 K, 0 balks, 0 wild pitches and 0 hit-by-pitch.
     
    I'm quite certain that FanGraphs.com would 404 as well.
     
    Find players with crazy rate stats like Correia's
     
    Pro-rating stats is easy. It's basically multiplication, which any eight-year-old can do. Six-year-olds? Not so much, but six-year-olds lack in a lot of areas, if we are going to honest with ourselves.
     
    Using Baseball Reference's season finder, we can pinpoint just how many pitchers have stats like Correia's and how they compare. I'll start with his rate stats, which currently sit as such:
     

    SO/9 - 3.7
    BB/9 - 1.2
    HR/9 - 0.5
    H/9 - 8.4

    14 pitchers have posted a season with those stats, since 1901. It hasn't been done since 1942 which simply means that Correia is a throwback. Tiny Bonham, Babe Adams, Slim Sallee, and Noodles Hahn have the most ridiculous names from the list. Oh, and Al Orth.
     
    So, it's rare. I am sure many pitchers have put up comparable stats over 36 innings though. Correia's walk rate alone is masterful. I wonder how many pitchers have had a walk rate that low for a full season...
     
    93 is that number, most recently Cliff Lee just last season. Brad Radke did it four times and Carlos Silva once, for a nice 4:1 Brad to Carlos ratio. The highest season ERA on this list is Radke's 4.49 back in 2003.
     
    The best ERA from someone who didn't pitch when all people who were photographed looked surprised that their photo was being taken even though you had to sit for like, a really long time, is Greg Maddux, when he posted a 1.63 ERA back in 1995.
     
    On the flip side, Correia's strikeout rate is quite low. Historically low, one might say less than confidently.
     
    It's not really that historic. Actually, it has happened 2,237 times since 1901. Rather than be thorough and comb through the data, let's cherry-pick, as you all tacitly agreed that you enjoyed it. Since 1961, this feat has been accomplished 261 times, which is much more manageable for me.
     
    The worst ERA of that group belongs to Livan Hernandez, who posted a 6.05 ERA in 2008, at the age of 67. Carlos Silva was second, at 5.94 back in 2006. The best ERA of this bunch belongs to Joe Horlen, with a 2.06 ERA back in 1967. Correia's current ERA would be the 4th best since 1961 with a strikeout rate as low as 3.7 per nine innings.
     
    Since 1961, only five names appear on both lists, and one is a 2005 Carlos Silva, which has an oak-y finish.
     
    Correia currently has a 179 ERA+. This number is astronomical. Just how astronomical? Well, only 68 pitchers have posted such an astronomical number since 1901. Just glancing at the list, Randy Johnson did it 58 times and Pedro Martinez did it 57. I could be counting poorly, as I was hit in the nose with a dodgeball while putting eye drops in. Regardless, if Correia can keep up that number, he will join some elite, blurry company.
     
    Other Fun Facts/Miscellany
     

    Correia is currently tied for 100th in the MLB in strikeouts. Anibal Sanchez struck out 17 in one game.
    Correia is tied for 7th in fewest walks, just ahead of Kevin Slowey.
    Correia is 20th in ERA, just ahead of Kevin Slowey.
    If you rearrange the letters in Kevin Correia, you get Cevin Korreia.
    Kevin Correia's fastball sits at about 90, or roughly 20 MPH faster than you can throw (probably more or even a lot more).
    Joe Mauer is his catcher (I think), so that probably explains everything.
    Correia was a Giant, then a Padre, then a Pirate, now a Twin, always a shapeshifter.
    Correia's GB% is 45.8%, which makes him a fly ball pitcher, no matter what Beck Bremleven tries to tell you.
    The proudest I have ever been of an analogy is from my Correia signing post. See if you can find it!

     
    Sumitup
     
    Kevin Correia is pitching better than anyone expected. Anyone. If someone tries to tell you that they envisioned this level of performance, you have my permission to tie their shoes together, but only as a lesson. Please draw their attention to the tied together laces and explain to them the lesson you have taught them. I mean it, no one needs to get hurt just because they are a filthy liar. His numbers are fun to look at because they are so unexpected. I look forward to seeing what craziness his numbers will bring in the future.
     
    Seriously, no one make anyone trip on their laces.
  2. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    The Twins split their four-game series with Texas this weekend. Unfortunately, I missed the Sunday game due to something called "Couples Shower." I was not aware of such thing, but have since decided that these should be outlawed completely. I won a game of Bingo where all the numbers were replaced with wedding terms. I was told I could pick any prize I wanted, so I chose "watching the Twins' game." This was met with laughter, which was followed by my sadness. Total abomination. Where were you on this one, James Madison?
     
    Anyway, I watched the other three games.
     
    Trevor Plouffe
     
    I've stressed patience with Aaron Hicks, but I'm losing patience with Trevor Plouffe. Check out his career lefty/righty splits:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid]

    [TD=align: center]I[/TD]
    [TD=align: left]Split[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]G[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]GS[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]PA[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]AB[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]R[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]H[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]2B[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]3B[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HR[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]RBI[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BB[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BA[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]OBP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SLG[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]OPS[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]TB[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]GDP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BAbip[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]tOPS+[/TD]



    [/TD]
    vs RHP as RHB[TD=align: right]215
    [TD=align: right][/TD]
    [TD=align: right]659[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]594[/TD]
    [TD=align: right][/TD]
    [TD=align: right]129[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]27[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]2[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]23[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]64[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]47[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]147[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].217[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].281[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].386[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].667[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]229[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]10[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].247[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]86[/TD]



    [/TD]
    vs LHP as RHB[TD=align: right]110
    [TD=align: right][/TD]
    [TD=align: right]242[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]217[/TD]
    [TD=align: right][/TD]
    [TD=align: right]58[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]14[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]13[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]32[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]20[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]42[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].267[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].335[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].521[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].855[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]113[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]7[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].274[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]137[/TD]



    [/TD]
    vs LH Starter[TD=align: right]69
    [TD=align: right]62[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]268[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]247[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]32[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]59[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]15[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]14[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]36[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]19[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]52[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].239[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].296[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].478[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].774[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]118[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]7[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].249[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]113[/TD]



    [/TD]
    vs RH Starter[TD=align: right]171
    [TD=align: right]148[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]633[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]564[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]86[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]128[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]26[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]2[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]22[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]60[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]48[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]137[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].227[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].296[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].397[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].693[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]224[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]10[/TD]
    [TD=align: right].257[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]94[/TD]

    [/TABLE]
    Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
    Generated 4/28/2013.
     
    Is it possible that Plouffe is just a good platoon player, and nothing more? I still want to see Plouffe get about 550 at bats this season, but I'm not sure he will earn that chance. Eduardo Escobar is hot right now, and getting him some time against right-handed pitching might not be a bad idea. Plouffe has a full season's worth of plate appearances against right-handed pitching, and the results are not pretty. If you consider that his defense has been shaky and his throws are always adventurous, there are many reasons to be concerned.
     
    Aaron Hicks
     
    I vowed to not write about Hicks until there was something new to discuss, and I finally feel that Hicks is doing things that need to be discussed. He seems to be turning the corner, but I refuse to speculate about his confidence level or concentration level, as I am not inside his head. However, his competence level is up and that is something I can clearly see.
     
    He made a variety of impressive plays this weekend. The four most memorable plays were probably his delayed steal on Friday, his awesome diving catch on Saturday and his 2 RBI double on Saturday. He also showed off his strong, accurate arm in the second inning of Saturday's game, firing a laser to second to get Nelson Cruz trying to stretch a double. However, two other plays caught my eye, each with more subtle impact.
     
    The first play occurred in the second inning of Friday night's game, when Hicks played a ball perfectly off the wall and nailed the cut-off man. Pedro Florimon threw a rocket home to get Geovany Soto at the plate. Hitting the cut-off man is obviously important, but sometimes guys with big arms will try to throw too much, so to speak. Hicks is a flamethrower, but still seems to understand the importance of good, fundamental baseball.
     
    The second play was on Saturday and directly lead to the Twins' first run. Hicks was on first after reaching on an error. Eduardo Escobar hit a rocket to left, and Hicks read the play the whole way. He used his great speed to get to third without a throw. It was an aggressive and correct play and when Brian Dozier hit a long fly to center in the next at-bat, Hicks scored easily. These are two excellent examples of how Hicks' defense, baserunning and arm make him a more valuable player than his offensive stats may ever show.
     
    Brian Dozier
     
    So far, so good. This applies both to his move to the leadoff spot and his move to second base. He looks fluid at second and provides a decent amount of range. He doesn't seem to have any issues turning double plays. At the plate, Dozier has been great since moving to his new spot in the lineup. The type of hitter we (as fans) have to hope Dozier is (good plate discipline and good contact) is suited for that part of the order. I fully expect Hicks to return to the leadoff spot at some point, but having Dozier there for now makes sense.
     
    Eduardo Escobar
     
    Is Escobar the new Alexi Casilla? He's short, small, and plays excellent defense. He can play all infield positions. He's right handed and a switch hitter. He seems gregarious and seems to enjoy playing baseball. He's probably my favorite player and I'm not sure why. It all adds up. Let's just get some space between his front teeth and call it a day. I fully expect Escobar to cool off, but having a new, cheap Alexi Casilla isn't a bad thing. While on this topic, I wrote about Casilla's HOF candidacy on Saturday.
     
    Alex Meyer
     
    I think we have reached full "get excited" mode with Meyer. Here are his stats so far this season:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid]

    [TD=align: left]Year[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]Age[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]W[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]L[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]ERA[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]G[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]GS[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]IP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]H[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]R[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]ER[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HR[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BB[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HBP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BF[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]WHIP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]H/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HR/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BB/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO/BB[/TD]



    2013[TD=align: right]23[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]2[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1.64[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]22.0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]21[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]8[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]26[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]94[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1.318[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]8.6[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0.0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3.3[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]10.6[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3.25[/TD]


    [TD=colspan: 2]2 Seasons[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]12[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]6[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]2.68[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]29[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]29[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]151.0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]118[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]48[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]45[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]6[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]53[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]165[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]6[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]615[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1.132[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]7.0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0.4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3.2[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]9.8[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3.11[/TD]

    [/TABLE]
    Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
    Generated 4/28/2013.
     
    Small samples aside, the strikeouts and walks are definitely encouraging. A slightly lower walk rate would be nice, but a K:BB ratio over three is always positive. If Meyer keeps this up, he'll probably be in Rochester at some point. I still think it's a stretch that he gets to Minnesota, but next season seems very likely. Twins' fans have longed for an "ace" since Johan Santana was traded away. Meyer has that potential.
     
    Get excited!
     
    Other MLB Thoughts
     
    Bryce Harper
     
    Good gravy. I picked Harper as my NL MVP prior to the season. I also predicted a 40-40 season, which is very unlikely because he doesn't need to steal bases anymore. The MVP part seems very reasonable. However, I called the power even earlier. Here is the first sentence that I wrote about Harper when I chose him as last seasons' NL Rookie of the Year:
     
    " I think Bryce Harper hits 40 home runs next year."
     
    You can click the quote if you want proof. I wish I hadn't written "I think" because I was sure of it. His power is insane. Just look at his swing:
     
    Can't embed, click here!
     
    The controlled violence he creates with that swing is unreal. If he doesn't hit 40 home runs this year, next year, the year after that, and every year going forward, it will be due to injury or a strike or the collapse of baseball as a sport. Otherwise, there's just no way.
     
    Matt Moore
     
    While I'm patting myself on the back, I called Matt Moore as an AL breakout player before the season. It was an easy call, as Moore has tons of talent and was considered a prospect on par with Mike Trout and Harper prior to last season. It's coming together for Moore and Tampa Bay this season. Check out these stats from April:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid]

    [TD=align: left]Year[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]Age[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]W[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]L[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]W-L%[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]ERA[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]G[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]GS[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]IP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]H[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]R[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]ER[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HR[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BB[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]ERA+[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]WHIP[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]H/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]HR/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]BB/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO/9[/TD]
    [TD=align: center]SO/BB[/TD]


    [TD=align: left]2013[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]24[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]5[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1.000[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]1.13[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]5[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]5[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]32.0[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]13[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]15[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]38[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]338[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0.875[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]3.7[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]0.8[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]4.2[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]10.7[/TD]
    [TD=align: right]2.53[/TD]

    [/TABLE]
    Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
    Generated 4/28/2013.
     
    Those stats? They're real, and they're spectacular. They also might be a bit lucky, but that doesn't change them one bit.
     
    St. Louis Cardinals
    Oh yeah, the Cardinals are pretty much always good. I thought Cincinnati would easily win that division and I figured San Francisco and Atlanta for the two Wild Cards. However, I failed to remember that St. Louis is always good. Matt Holliday, Carlos Beltran and Yadier Molina are probably all Hall of Famers. Allen Craig, Matt Carpenter and Matt Adams are nice, young players, although Adams is hurt right now.
     
    However, St. Louis' pitching is what I am drawn to. Shelby Miller is having an excellent season, and showing why he was such a coveted prospect. Jamie Garcia and Lance Lynn have been great. Jake Westbrook has been lucky good, but that works for now. Adam Wainwright has a 37:1 K:BB ratio! The bullpen is excellent, lead by Edward Mujica (terribly underrated) and Trevor Rosenthal (terrifying fastball). The Cardinals are always balanced and always good. I always forget that too.
     
    Washington Nationals:
    The Nationals went through a bit of a swoon recently, but it is way too early to give up on them. ESPN should especially know better. Check out this screen grab I got on Friday:
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9hXcK-enuP4/UX3aWuqoVEI/AAAAAAAAAm0/3xZycXMqlq8/s400/no+wash.PNG
     
    I think two Mets teams would be too much for Mets fans to handle. Have a nice week everyone!
  3. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Earlier this week, I wrote about Joe Mauer and his Hall of Fame career. I was really taken by just how well Mauer stacks up against catchers throughout history, players from this era and Hall of Famers in general. If you didn't read it, you can find it here. If you did read it, you can find it there too, but you probably shouldn't read it again. Read this instead. I thought, well, this is probably an exercise that I could complete for a lot of players, to see if anyone's greatness is being overlooked.
     
    Using Baseball Reference's amazing play reference, I shall set out on a journey to find an overlooked player and rightfully adjust everyone's attitudes on his playing career. If I can truly change the minds of the masses, then I will become the most powerful baseball blog-guy of all time. If I can do this successfully, my legacy will be cemented right next to that DIPS guy and whoever invented OPS. This is my one chance, and I cannot blow it. History awaits. Now, to pick the perfect candidate...
     
    Alexi Casilla seems like a good choice.
     
    Here are some Sexi Lexi facts:
     

    Casilla is a middle infielder
    Casilla debuted in 2006 at age 22
    Casilla is 28 and in his eighth season
    Casilla is not a power hitter
    Casilla is not a good hitter
    Casilla's has two skills - baserunning (?) and throwing the ball while completely parallel to the ground
    Casilla has played exactly 500 games in his career. Round!

    How does Casilla compare to his contemporaries in the middle infield? Casilla has had 1794 plate appearances in his career. Between 1988 and 2912, there are 121 middle infielders with roughly that many or more plate appearances. Casilla ranks 100th in OPS+, right ahead of Pat Meares. We are not off to a good start here. He's 114th in home runs, 116th in RBI, 119th in hits, 94th in OBP, 104th in slugging percentage and 98th in batting average.
     
    This isn't going well.
     
    Well, this isn't Casilla's game. He's not a hitter, he's a speed guy! I'm guessing he'll be great in the speedy categories like doubles (114th), triples (95th), stolen bases (59th), and runs (114th). Hmm. He does have the second fewest at bats on this list, so it's pretty obvious that he just needs a chance to hit more, right?
     
    Is it possible that Casilla just stacks up better against everyone? Perhaps his skills do not compare favorably to other speedy infielders, but will look shockingly tremendous against plodding corner infielders and stupid outfielders. Let's see how Casilla ranks within a different sample:
     
    Spanning Multiple Seasons or entire Careers, From 1961 to 2012, Played 85% of games at C, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, LF, CF, RF or DH, (requiring At least 1750 plate appearances), sorted by greatest Adjusted OPS+:
     
    Casilla ranks 1209 out of 1331 players. Crud.
     
    Oh oh, maybe stolen bases!
     
    Casilla ranks 498 out of 1331 players. Blast, then crud.
     
    So what? Casilla's young. I bet a lot of guys started their careers as bad hitters who offered little on the bases because you can't steal first and got hurt a lot or was just benched due to better options. The only way to know for certain is to check Casilla against other Hall of Famers, during their first eight seasons. Let's see how good they were before they hit their stride. There were 123 players in this sample:
     

    Batting Average - 3rd from last - ahead of Ozzie Smith!
    OBP - 10th from last - ahead of Ozzie Smith and Robin Yount!
    OPS+ - Last
    OPS - 3rd from last - ahead of Ozzie Smith! Was Ozzie Smith good?
    Fewest Strikeouts - 36th! - although in a LOT fewer at bats
    Walks - Last, but not that far behind Brooks Robinson and Roberto Clemente!
    Hits - Last, but strangely only 65 fewer than Harmon Killebrew
    Doubles - 2nd from last, ahead of Killebrew, although Killebrew played like no games in his first five seasons...
    Runs - Very last
    RBI - Super Last
    Home Runs - 4th from last, somehow
    Games played - 2nd last, 12 more than Killebrew
    WAR - Last, comically so

    Ok, so maybe Casilla was comparable to Smith, who still had about a 28 WAR advantage on Lexi. Killebrew was three years younger when he debuted, so he gets a pass. Although, I'm not ruling out Casilla hitting over 500 home runs now.
     
    Perhaps jumping to Hall of Famers was a bit premature. This really means nothing, when you think about it the exact way I am. Perhaps Casilla is a late bloomer. I bet lots of guys were. We need a more apt comparison to his current self, with the understanding that he is going to definitely explode as a player within the next few seasons.
     
    It stands to reason that if Casilla is working on a Hall of Fame career, his first eight seasons will compare favorably to other middle infielders after eight seasons. Most of the time, Hall of Famers are judged against their positional counterparts. When Casilla has his mid-career explosion, he will surpass his peers and cement his legacy. That makes perfect sense. Lots of prominent players will be low on this list, I bet. Alexi must be better than some notable players. So, let's find out! I am very optimistic.
     
    (Redacted)
     
    Look, I don't see why I need to include these stats at all. He's pretty much last in every counting stat and nearly last in all the rate stats. So what? Stats aren't everything. There's the eye test too, you know. Plus, I thought RBI didn't matter and batting average was all luck. What really matters is that Alexi has heart and hustle. He also has a pretty nice smile and I just don't feel you are respecting that. Respect his smile!
     
    You know, I'm not sure why I am even bothering with this anymore. I've clearly failed and will have to wait for another chance to establish myself in the realm of good blog-guys. Maybe when I write about 1987 Topps baseball cards later this week, no one ever does stuff like that. However, I do present to you one final stat, and a stat that no one can argue with. If this doesn't at least get you partially on my side, I'm not sure what will. In fact, I'll feel sorry for you. I said it. I even put it in a chart for the real stat-heads.
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Rank

    Player

    Balls Thrown While Horizontal for outs



    1

    Alexi Casilla

    I think like 2



    tie-2

    Everyone Else

    Probably zero 
     


    [/TABLE]
  4. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    It seems that just about every Twins game is snowed or rained or winded out these days. When is MLB going to wake up and start banning weather from their games?!? If nothing else, the Twins should have no home games in April, just in case it snows. Then, they should have no home games in May because of melting. June would be out due to mosquitoes. September is probably pushing it when it comes to snow again. August can be quite sultry.
     
    The obvious solution: The Twins play all 81 home games in a row, immediately following the All-Star break. At roughly 3 hours per game, they could fit four games in per day. This means that in about 20 days, the Twins could get all their home games in, without the threat of snow, melt water, dangerous pests and sultry temperatures. If MLB ever got their act together and enacted a plan like this, maybe we wouldn't have to sit through these random days without baseball!
     
    Without baseball, I decided that it might be fun to cram as many gimmicky ideas as I can into one post. I love gimmicks. Slideshows, top ten lists, poems, bullet lists, other lists. Ok, maybe I just like lists. I still think I am on to something here. Just a bunch of gimmicks all put together. All it needs is a catchy title, and everyone will be hooked.
     
    I shall call it: Gimmick Post. Fasten your safety belts, it is going to be a wild ride.
     
    Random Top 5 List
     
    Here are the top 5 teams in the AL Central as of 4/22/2013:
     

    Royals
    Twins
    Tigers
    Indians
    White Sox

    That's right, your Minnesota Twins are in second place. My Minnesota Twins are also in second place.
     
    Fun Stat
     
    If Aaron Hicks walks another time in April (if the Twins ever play in April again, right? lol), he will set a Twins' rookie record for most walks in April by a first year player. He is currently tied with Jim Eisenreich, who added 23 hits that month. Hicks currently has 3.
     
    KWL Chart
     
    A KWL chart is an organizational tool that many teachers use with students to help them with a new topic. They can also be helpful with topics we want to explore further.
     
    K is what you know, W is what you want to know, and L is what you have learned.
     
    Here is a KWL chart that I made, with Brian Dozier as the subject:
     
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6FD_ZTks9sM/UXWQOBfbPPI/AAAAAAAAAmk/A1u_5KMWJcM/s400/KWLDozier.png
     
    Pro-tip - Click on the image to make it bigger.
     
    I didn't learn much, but I am happy to know that Dozier has a friend in Josh Willingham.
     
    My answer to a hypothetical question posted on the Twins' Facebook page:
     
    Question: Why don't all you whiners take your precious retactable roof AND STICK IT WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE!
     
    Answer: I feel there should be a question mark after your exclamation mark, but I'm just being a punctuation perfectionist. I'm not sure what a retactable roof is either. The irony of this question is that a retractable roof would conceivably be placed in an area where the sun does shine, thus blocking it out. In a sense, you are answering your own question. If the roof was where the sun does not shine, then we wouldn't be able to enjoy the sun anyway, thus making the retractable roof quite useful and not inhibiting to a person who wants to enjoy a nice, sunny day of baseball. That being said, your use of capital letters is very effective.
     
    Random Photoshop:
     
    Joe Mauer gets a lot of attention for his sideburns. What if he didn't have them?
     
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-kg_xN8x313U/UXWQGeB5LYI/AAAAAAAAAmc/ckMOHi5XaHE/s320/mauernoburns.jpg
     
    Yeah, so maybe the sideburns work.
     
    A Link to something stupid I wrote:
     
    I transcribed my guttural reaction to Ben Revere's catch last week. You can read it here.
     
    Random Paint Image:
     
    Here is a picture I drew of Target Field, from these past few weeks. I tweeted this out earlier, but no one follows me on Twitter, so here it is again:
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1JyDdYbik1M/UXWP75YZV1I/AAAAAAAAAmU/C0En47xQl4E/s320/target+field.png
     
    A Link to something not stupid I wrote:
     
    I wrote a screenplay a few weeks ago. It is both not stupid and stupid. I think it's satire. I'm not really sure. However, there are many puns. I punned Justin Morneau, Vance Worley, Brandon Boggs, Trevor Plouffe and Anthony Slama. No one is spared! No one! Here it is.
     
    Parting Haiku
     
    No Twins game today
    The relentless winter weather is bearing down on us like an unstoppable force, berating us with constant barbs of snow and a biting wind that will chew all the way to our very soul
    Soon it will be May
     
    Perhaps that wasn't a Haiku. If you prefer accurate poetry, you can sub this line where you see fit: Winter weather will not leave.
     
    I like my version better.
  5. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    The Twins have swept two consecutive series, but due to crazy sucky weather, it only adds up to a four-game winning streak. The weather is still cold, but the Twins are hot right now. They sit in second place after beating the White Sox in two straight, and are only a half game behind the powerhouse Royals. This week, they received good enough starting pitching, solid offense, and great performances out of the bullpen. Is it sustainable?
     
    Perhaps. Thus far, the Twins have had a roughly average overall offense from their individual players. Joe Mauer and Josh Willingham have been great, with wRC+ of 186 and 150 respectively. Chris Parmelee, Justin Morneau and Trevor Plouffe all come in around 100 wRC+. The combo of Pedro Florimon and Eduardo Escobar have averaged right around Mauer-level offense. Only Ryan Doumit, Brian Dozier and Aaron Hicks have been below average, although Hicks has been below zero, so that drags things down.
     
    I fully expect some regression from the shortstop combo and an increase in production from Doumit, Morneau and even Hicks. This could lead to an offense that produces at roughly this level all season. The bullpen has been solid, and many of the performances are sustainable. If the starting pitching can be decent, the Twins can keep this up. If the offense dips or the pitching falls apart, then... well let's just enjoy the ride we're on right now.
     
    Vance Worley
     
    Worley looked a lot better on Saturday. I mean, that is about as obvious a statement that one can make, but still true. Parts of his game have been good all season. Worley gave up his first home run of the season on Saturday, which surprised me. He has also limited walks all season long. The main difference on Saturday was that he racked up strikeouts. With fewer balls put in play, he gave up fewer hits. I had high hopes for Worley this season, and If he pitches like he did on Saturday, those hopes will be fulfilled.
     
    Oswaldo Arcia
     
    Arcia has struggled in his few MLB games, but that doesn't worry me at all. My worry is that he won't play every game while in Minnesota. He really shouldn't even spend one game on the bench, as every game is important in his development. However, the numbers game is one that Gardenhire needs to play carefully, as his veterans need at bats too. With Parmelee slightly banged up, everything is cool right now. When he feels better, the numbers game begins.
     
    Justin Morneau
     
    Morneau hasn't been very good this season. He has only five extra-base hits in 65 plate appearances and his wRC+ is at 96. Most of his numbers are in line with last season, but his power is down. There is plenty of time for Morneau to turn things around. If things don't turn around, the Twins are looking at a player with low trade value, diminishing power, advancing age and a long history with the franchise. That combination of realities does not add up well for the Twins. We'll just have to hope Morneau starts to mash again.
     
    Joe Mauer
     
    Joe Mauer is neat. This week was just a reminder of how neat he really is. Mauer reached base 14 times in 21 plate appearances this week. If that isn't neat, I don't know what is.
     
    Other MLB Notes
     
    Roy Halladay
     
    Halladay has bounced back with a couple of nice starts. I'm not sure I see anything crazy different about his peripheral stats that would explain these nice starts. I haven't seen anything that indicates his velocity is up, so that certainly doesn't help. I hope that he is improving in some way. Halladay is one of the best pitchers of this generation, and baseball is more fun when he is pitching well. He can't fight his age, but I still kind of hope he does.
     
    Joey Votto
     


    Votto: "The #Reds pay me to be good. I'm not going to worry about a homerless drought. There are different ways to be good".
    — Jeff Wallner (@JeffWallner) April 21, 2013
     
    I kind of love Joey Votto. Baseball can be such a macho game. Home runs are the best way to show off how big and strong and powerful you are. If Votto understands that there are other ways to "be good" and give the team value, then more power to him. I respect his approach. He has lead the NL in OBP the last three seasons and is well on his way to adding a fourth season to that streak. He makes outs at an extremely low rate and that makes him "good."
     
    Kevin Slowey
     
    Slowey had his best start of the season on Friday night. He went six innings, gave up one run on four hits, walked one and struck out four. Everything I wrote about Slowey when he signed with Miami was true and still is true today. Much of what I wrote was meandering and self-serving, but true. Sadly, Slowey has still not won a game in over two years. The Twins miss Slowey in their short series this week, which is a shame. Although, not having to hear Dick and Bert discuss Slowey is almost worth not getting to see if he could stick it to his former team.
     
    Ok, I'm tapped out. Have a nice week everyone!
  6. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed! with all the images in tact.
    Note: There is a 20 image limit in posts here, which is totally fair, but that is why a few of the original images were changed to links.
     
    When I close my eyes and think of baseball cards, I picture 1991 Score baseball cards. I'm not sure why, but this is the set that I picture when I dream of cards (which happens all the time). I distinctly remember that there were green, blue, white and black cards. I also remember there were some cards where dudes weren't wearing shirts, which is fine. Doesn't bother me. Come join me on a journey through these wonderful cards. I haven't looked at them in years, so I have no idea where this journey will take us, but I can tell you: IT WILL BE EXCITING!!!!!!!!!
     
    Or not, but I'll try. Let's open my utility room up and grab these cards. I have a lot of them because I think they were under a dollar per pack. That meant I could grab a whole mess of packs with my tiny hands. My mom was cool with them because she could get me a lot for a little. In a way, Score was the discount brand. I didn't care. I was nine and I just liked baseball cards. So, here are the many stacks of these treasures that I have.
    Do you see Pedro Munoz? I know I do. Here is what the individual cards look like:

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fak9fzcjIws/UXMMz7OLfvI/AAAAAAAAAhc/GJnpeL_Y1jo/s320/IMG_0626.JPG

     
    Here is the back of a card:
     


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZybzizV8TWg/UXMPteFZGzI/AAAAAAAAAic/BIoM02nd3Jg/s320/IMG_0625.JPG

     
    Ken Griffey, Jr, always smilin'!
     
    So, the blue and green cards are just players. The black cards are players but also some other types of cards that I will share later. The white cards are "rookie prospects," 1st round draft picks, and other subsets that I will also show you later. The term "rookie prospect" doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but as you can see, I have a lot of them:


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XPQACh2G3Zk/UXMN0xNqsVI/AAAAAAAAAhs/5dQPYo5IgmQ/s320/IMG_0627.JPG

     
    I think we all know that Munoz goes on top. That's just how it goes. However, I don't think Score really knew what a "rookie prospect" was. Most of these players are just rookies, which is fine. Prospect has a different connotation and I would appreciate it if my baseball cards didn't tacitly endorse inferior players as prospects. It's just bad business. I might need to burn these or something. Anyway, here are the best "rookie prospects" that I could find:
     
    Mark Whiten, David Segui, Chris Hoiles, Jose Offerman and Mike Bordick. Here are your best "rookie prospects." So...
     
    Now, there were three Twins "rookie prospects" and here they are:


    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vn_TdoEYeZc/UXMPfXrcJQI/AAAAAAAAAiU/YA5f2VF2eCc/s320/IMG_0631.JPG

     
    Paul Abbott, Scott Leius and the aforementioned Munoz. Nice. There is a legitimately great 1st round pick card though:
     


    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZBiblRY_0hs/UXMRnxRiLpI/AAAAAAAAAik/MwkKn7bP9dk/s320/IMG_0632.JPG

     
    Throughout his career, Mike Mussina improved in all areas of his game, including hat-wearing. I do believe his fingers were cold in this picture. This first round also produced an old Twins' favorite:
     


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-r4X0uCMba34/UXMSAlO9HBI/AAAAAAAAAis/ru2kWjpCoa4/s320/IMG_0633.JPG

     
    My favorite part of this card is Score's insistence that Rondell White's entire bat is shown. Rondell looked old when he was young and then looked really old when he was kind of old. I wonder what he will look like when he is actually old.
     
    Here are a few of the other white bordered subsets:
    The All-star cards depict each player as some sort of Coney Island caricature. These two made me laugh the most. Rickey Henderson just looks super weird and Sandy Alomar is smiling a lot considering the guy sliding into home is likely safe. Highlights and no-hitters are pretty self explanatory. No one will ever forget Melido Perez's no-hitter. Rifleman cards were for players with big arms, Master Blasters were big hitters and K-man were strikeout pitchers. Fun fact: Both Bonny Bonilla and Rob Dibble had notable clubhouse fights. So that's fun. Master Blaster was also a Nintendo game.
     
    Here are a few of the black bordered subsets:


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-M24T_BUHKjM/UXMWWUeXOcI/AAAAAAAAAkE/E-B-mo1tySs/s200/IMG_0644.JPGhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K1s_VsoCk9k/UXMWGpyDuHI/AAAAAAAAAkA/4fl0N9DySNs/s200/IMG_0642.JPGhttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/-J2qtoaX9XC4/UXMWGAb9iUI/AAAAAAAAAj4/v_Bz0F1OOLg/s200/IMG_0643.JPG

     
    The Reds won the 1990 World Series, so they get a special card to demonstrate proper pool/diving saftey. Lenny Dykstra looks like a future Car Wash owner in that picture. "The Franchise" was used to show franchise players, not necessarily players who would be unable to successfully run a franchise in the future. Ryne Sandberg was Man of the Year for his contributions on and off the field. I'm surprised I have this card as I thought I traded all my Sandberg cards to my friend for this Frank Thomas card that he had. Hmm.
     
    I promised you shirtless dudes:


    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_Fp8e3-xwAg/UXMXHqrx1ZI/AAAAAAAAAkM/RsA0tA1_i6U/s320/IMG_0640.JPG

     
    The Dream Team cards were pretty much all like this. Just great players showing off their pecks/lats/biceps. Speaking of old roidy, here is Jose Canseco and his brother Ozzie:


    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1hmFpmiZt6Y/UXMXl_jGq0I/AAAAAAAAAkc/Xdk-sH5M9bE/s320/IMG_0629.JPG

     
    And here are Ken Griffeys:
     


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xpkJQP2Yh9w/UXMXmjFSDvI/AAAAAAAAAkk/iKUHRzIkvlI/s320/IMG_0647.JPG

     
    Which family do you like better? Please respond in the comments below.
    Here are a few fun cards, and a nice bullet list to accompany:
     


    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NmarYLycow8/UXMYKOdpUgI/AAAAAAAAAk0/-RNTVGbYhz0/s200/IMG_0661.JPGhttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4zdqwHf9a7c/UXMYQPaSTFI/AAAAAAAAAlE/Fc-eQ8Br2ac/s200/IMG_0670.JPGhttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9qHQ-Y5OADA/UXMYGLwPdbI/AAAAAAAAAks/GEu8TPeuFGI/s200/IMG_0654.JPG 
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aPf12gH7C30/UXMYLjs4bpI/AAAAAAAAAk4/z0xf09PdrKk/s200/IMG_0663.JPGhttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4M4-werFxJo/UXMYQD1WOUI/AAAAAAAAAlI/IYK0zzdc-LY/s200/IMG_0664.JPG


     
     

    Kirby Puckett - always the best card in the set.
    Shane Mack looks really cramped in this card.
    Oddibe McDowell - always limboing
    Here's Dave Henderson punching Greg Gagne in the nards.
    Mitch Williams - always giving up a home run/making me want to turn off MLB Network

    Packs of these cards also came with these weird mini-cards that had World Series trivia.
    I think the baseball card industry learned of the technology to have two images on one card and had no idea how to use it, so they would just make stuff like this. Whew. Most of these cards are from 1950 and earlier, and if there is one thing young collectors want it has to be history.
     
    When I looked at 1989 Donruss (click here if you missed it, and you probably missed it, like 30 people viewed it), I found lots of wild hairstyles and glasses and accessories. Just two years later, I found none of that. What a difference two years make! All the Score cards are action shots, so I did find a lot of great pitch and hit faces. I made a collage of each, for your enjoyment:


    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-yxQrzPAKibI/UXMZ1XBtkPI/AAAAAAAAAlc/a2-Njkn8aME/s400/batters.gif 
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZyCEdQgxgKg/UXMZ4_YYOsI/AAAAAAAAAls/ICR8uFwlHBE/s400/Untitled.gif


     
    To fully appreciate these, click on the image and make it bigger. My personal favorite is Mark Portugal, although there is a subtle excellence in Gary Mielke's face.
     
    Look how calm Greg Maddux's pitch face is:


    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-psUSHFYHGK4/UXMdAx2wNII/AAAAAAAAAl8/idtPGlI1dZQ/s320/IMG_0676.JPG

     
    No wonder he was so good.
     
    As always, we end with a flower, from you to me, for reading through this nonsense. This one is made of "Hard-Hittin" Mark Whiten rookie cards.
    Te amo.
    Brad Swanson is an amateur photographer. The brown in the background around the cards is his couch. He also wrote about Ben Revere's catch, if you want to read about it.
  7. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
    What's more pathetic than a person writing questions to himself and then answering them, pretending all along that it is some hilarious endeavor or insightful method of talking about baseball? Not sure I can answer that question. Here's a (fake) mailbag instead.
     
    How do you feel about Joe Mauer batting zecond? Love the podcast.
     
    ~Brad S. (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    I don't have a podcast. Yet...
     
    Also, I assume you mean batting second. I am cool with it as long as Joe (I call him Joe, as we graduated in the same year so we're practically best friends) is cool with it. You see, Mauer getting more at bats = good. He's good at hitting and thus gets more opportunities to hit with more at bats. Joe Mauer is a better hitter than Brian Dozier. I like Dozier (mostly his eyes) but Mauer is still clearly better. In addition, Josh Willingham is a better hitter than Dozier. As is Justin Morneau, as is Ryan Doumit, as is Trevor Plouffe and so on and so forth. Once Aaron Hicks starts hitting, Mauer will get plenty of chances to drive in runs.
     
    It's all going to be just fine, at least until Morneau and Willingham are traded.
     
    Hi Brad, thanks for doing these mailbags, it's super cool of you. Recently, we found out that Johan Santana needs another shoulder surgery and might be forced to retire. This makes me sad. My questions to you: Are you sad and Is Johan Santana a Hall of Fame player? Thanks!
     
    ~Brad S. (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Thanks for reading and writing! I am pro-literacy. First, yes, I am sad. Johan Santana was my favorite Twin of recent past. I will not soon forget his 17 strikeout game or his no-hitter that may have ruined his career (I don't believe that to be true).
     
    As to whether he is a Hall of Famer: Yes!
     
    To expand: Yes, of course!
     
    For the record, I would induct him in the Baseball Hall of Fame, the Twins' Hall of Fame, I would retire his jersey, give him a job in the front office, trust him with my financial planning AND estate planning, water his plants and vote for him for President of the U.S.A.
     
    Now, I am severely biased and I will never be given any sort of Hall of Fame vote. So, this all amounts to a hill of beans. Beans aside, I feel that Johan Santana was the best pitcher of the most recent decade. While framing a career within an arbitrary set of years is lazy and borderline useless, I don't care. Santana was great and I love him. Yes, I love him! I'm sorry everyone had to learn that in a mailbag, but it's true.
     
    I can't be rational when talking of Santana and I won't be; not for you, not for society and not for some crummy institution that doesn't even include all of the best baseball players of all time. The Hall of Fame is a joke! Tim Raines? Ty Cobb, but not Roger Clemens? Kenny Lofton fell off the ballot after one year?!? Who decided on the location?!? Cooperstown, New York of all places! That's an East Coast bias! Nixon was a patsy! Now I'm fired up! I'm going to go take this anger and frustration to the streets!
     
    I'm back; my knee hurts. Next question.
     
    Hi. I'm not a fan, but you seem to write a lot of nonsense, so I thought I would try to get you to answer a serious question. Does Trevor Plouffe wear enough eye black?
     
    ~Everyone (Minnesota)
     
    I'm not sure what this nonsense is that you speak of, but yeah, I think he does.
     
    Thoughts on the bench?
     
    ~Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Sentence fragment is a sentence fragment. I like the bench. Wilkin Ramirez is not a great hitter, but he has power. I'm enjoying the older brother thing he seems to have with some of the younger players too. Eduardo Escobar is pretty much Pedro Florimon but shorter, so that works out pretty well. Jamey Carroll is a cagey veteran who can get on base when needed. Darin Mastroianni is a great pinch runner and defensive replacement. All in all, the bench is solid. I think it is much better than benches of the recent past. B+
     
    Hi Bret, I'm a big fan. Rank these extensions: Elvis Andrus, Justin Verlander, Buster Posey
     
    ~Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Ok, but I will do so in a bullet list, to save time:
     

    Posey - young, excellent, bat is good enough to play if he moves out from behind the plate
    Andrus - young, excellent, getting better, excellent fielder, improving hitter
    Verlander - young, but older, excellent, a pitcher - so there's risk, still awesome

    Do you know anything about 1989 Donruss?
     
    ~Topps Fleerscore, (Cardville, USA)
     
    You know, it's so funny that you would ask that question. I literally just wrote something about 1989 Donruss on Monday. Such great timing, thank you. Click here! Ron Washington's card alone is well worth using your mouse to click on a hyperlink and then scrolling down. The words are somewhat amusing too.
     
    Salutations. Aaron Hicks got his first MLB hit on Thursday. Who else will record their first MLB milestone of choice during this season?
     
    ~O. Arcia, (Rochester, NY)
     
    Well well well, look who reads my blog. You probably found it from Kal Daniels' Baseball Reference page like everyone else. Well, "O", I believe that Oswaldo Arcia will certainly collect his first MLB hit this season. I'll guess around August, but it could end up being sooner. I feel that Kyle Gibson will collect his first MLB win around mid-season. I believe that Chris Colabello will hit his first home run around that same time and the crowd will lose their collective s. In former Twin news, I am calling a Ben Revere over-the-fence home run as well. I mean, why not? The Phillies will celebrate by giving Ryan Howard another 40 million dollars.
     
    Thanks for the questions everyone, I have to go write a mailbag now. Have a nice weekend!
     
    Brad Swanson does not have any plans to start a podcast. He doesn't know how to play Lego. He is willing to answer actual questions, but doesn't know how to receive them. Any help would be much appreciated. Not concise, this guy.
  8. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    I just realized that my free trial of the Baseball Reference play index is going to expire on Monday. Very sad. Although, if you read this post, you already know that I am planning to purchase a subscription anyway. Happy times! Now that you can relax with this knowledge, let's find some fun stats and occurrences and seasons and whatever. Oh, and I apologize for the word "stizzles" in the title. It should read "stats" but you know how touchy autocorrect can be.
     
    Onward!
     
    Round Numbers
     
    Round numbers are excellent.
     
    Del Ennis is the only player in MLB history to have a season where with 10 triples, 20 home runs and 30 doubles. He also scored 90 runs. However, he ruined everything by driving in 107 runs. That kind of non-round numbering does not endear him to me. If he had ended with 7 fewer RBI, he'd be my favorite player of all time. Round!
     
    Roy Smalley had 80 walks and 80 strikeouts in 1979. This is fitting because he also has 80 hair. Round!
     
    In 1993, Mike Bordick had 10 stolen bases and was caught stealing 10 times, for a nice, terrible, round 50% success rate. He also scored 60 runs, walked 60 times, had 170 total bases and had 10 sacrifice bunts. His WAR that season was 2.0 and he ended his career with exactly 1500 hits, 500 walks and 800 strikeouts. He hit .260 for his career. Round!
     
    In 1973, Dick Woodson had 10 wins and posted a 100 ERA+. Round!
     
    Josh Collmenter went 10-10 with 100 strikeouts in 2011. How did I not know this? He also had zero complete games! Vida Blue posted the same numbers in 1986 and he also hit zero batters. Round!
     
    Ok, hold on, here comes the hotsteppa. In 1990 (round number), Jeffrey Leonard hit 10 home runs, 20 doubles, 0 triples, had 120 hits and as a result had 170 total bases. He also grounded into an astounding 20 double plays. But get this: he wore jersey number 00! 00!! 00!!! His WAR that season: --1.8. Perhaps round numbers aren't all that valuable.
     
    Round!
     
    The Greatest Blown Save of all-time
     
    On June 11, 1963, the Boston Red Sox played the Detroit Tigers. In the bottom of the 7th, Dick Radatz replaced Wilbur Wood with one out and a runner on first. The Red Sox were leading 3-2. Radatz struck out the first batter he faced, then issued a walk and a single, allowing his inherited runner to score. He got the next batter and the game went on. From there, Radatz pitched 8 more innings, giving up just 2 hits and striking out 11 total batters. The Red Sox hung four runs on the Tigers in the top of the 15th and Radatz was allowed to complete the game in the bottom of the inning. He ended the game with a blown save and a win. Not the way they drew it up, but not bad either.
     
    Goin' Streaking!
     
    Old School is 10 years old.
     
    Last season, Kris Medlen had a huge breakout. However, if you are a fan of odd streaks, you probably had already heard of him. Medlen had exactly 5 strikeouts in 5 straight games. This is a feat that has only been accomplished 8 times. Pete Harnisch did it twice. Kris Benson joins Kris Medlen as the two guys who accomplished this feat with a misspelled name.
     
    Back in 2000, Scott Williamson struck out exactly three batters in five straight save opportunities. He got four saves over that stretch, totally blowing the first game in this streak by issuing 5 walks in his appearance. In the other four, he only walked one. He went to Friendswood High School, which sounds friendly.
     
    Bob Gibson has the longest streak without a pickoff. He never had one in his career. So, his streak sits at 482 straight starts without a pickoff. The record stands and technically is still active, as he retired with the streak intact. If he could just come back for 18 more starts, it would be a nice, even 500 starts. Round!
     
    Ken Ray did not strike out a batter in his first 13 appearances, back in 1999. This is a record. Ray posted a robust 8.74 ERA in his rookie season and then did not play in the Majors again until 2006, when he resurfaced with the Braves as Kwang the Ninja.
     
    Carlos Quentin was hit by a pitch in a record six straight games. Quentin always seems to have a look on his face as though he'd been hit by a pitch, so this is fitting. F.P. Santangelo was hit by a pitch in four straight games and that was prior to anyone hearing him as an commentator. I kid.
     
    Julio Cruz
     
    Julio Cruz entered the lineup in the 9-hole on May 8, 1984. About a day later, he had completed 11 at bats, the most ever out of the 9 spot in the lineup. The game went 18 innings that night, then was suspended until the next day. After 7 more innings the following day, the game concluded when Harold Baines hit a walk-off home run. Cruz went 1-11 with 2 strikeouts. At least his team got the win.
     
    Other Fun Stuff
     
    I found something I am calling a xylophone game: 5IP, 4H, 3ER, 2K, 1BB, 0 HR. It's only happened four times. The last time was by Jimmy Jones on 9/24/1987. He lost that game 5-4. So...
     
    Wilkin Ramirez reached on catcher's interference during Sunday's game against Baltimore. This hadn't happened for a Twins player since 2008 when Brian Buscher reached in a September 16 game against the Angels. When these guys enter the Twins' Hall of Fame together, they should both tell their story of reaching base in the oddest way possible.
     
    No one walked more batters with the bases loaded than Nolan Ryan, who did so nine times. Mitch Williams walked a batter with the bases loaded seven times. I had the opportunity to look up how many innings each player pitched and found that Ryan threw 5386 innings and Williams threw 691.1 innings. If you extrapolate, Williams would have walked a batter with the bases loaded 54 times if he had pitched as long as Ryan. Or something like that.
     
    Cleatus Davidson stole a base in each of his first two MLB games. He never stole another base and only played in 10 more games. He ended his career with an OPS+ of -31. This seems like a good place to stop.
     
    The play index is entertaining. I hope you enjoyed the exact same things I enjoy.
     
    Brad Swanson is. Philosophy!
  9. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    The Twins won the final two games of the weekend series and now sit at 4-2. They have won both series in this young season and now will head to Kansas City for three games. The starting pitching has been surprisingly good and the bullpen has been solid. The offense has produced some big hits. If everyone starts to hit consistently, the Twins' offense could be above-average. They have been fun to watch, which is not something I could have said honestly last season.
     
    Here are some other thoughts I have from the weekend:
     
    Aaron Hicks
     
    It seems that I have started each of my game thoughts about Hicks. I'm still not worried. Check this tweet from Jeremy Nygaard:
     


    Aaron Hicks started the year 2-for-40 with 13k's. No, not in 2013, that was 2010 for Beloit. Ended the season at .279. #MNTwins #patience
    — Jeremy Nygaard (@jeremynygaard) April 7, 2013
     
    I have been saying for months that Hicks is known for getting off to slow starts and having issues adjusting to new levels. The jump from AA to MLB is the biggest jump he has faced, so some growing pains are to be expected. He looks a bit frustrated at the plate, but is also taking nice easy swings. On Sunday, in the 7th, he jumped on a first-pitch fastball and untied the game. It was a great at bat, even if it was only 1 pitch in length. It was probably my favorite moment from the game, as I want Hicks to break out so badly.
     
    Hicks after 6 games: .077/.143/.077 with 11 Ks and only 2 BBs.
     
    If this stretch had come in the middle of the season, and not the beginning, we'd probably hardly notice. The Twins should keep putting Hicks out there every day, in the leadoff spot and let him work through this rut. He has successfully adjusted to each new level, it just takes him some time.
     
    Pedro Florimon
     
    I'm quietly impressed with Pedro Florimon. He has an easy line-drive swing, good speed and great range at short. He's hitting .400 and drawing walks. While the sample is super small, his start has been encouraging. I wrote about Florimon's value a couple weeks ago. You can read it here. I maintain that if Florimon can even approach average offensive production, he will have much more value than we (as Twins fans) could have ever expected.
     
    Pedro Hernandez
     
    Hernandez made his Twins' debut on Sunday. He looked to be about what I was expecting. He doesn't throw hard, he tries to hit his spots and he pitches to contact. He did walk three batters, which is out of line with his Minor League production. If Hernandez can't post a very small walk rate, he pretty much has no chance for long-term success. He is just far too hittable and he doesn't miss many bats.
     
    Scott Diamond
     
    Scott Diamond threw his first and likely only rehab start in Fort Myers on Sunday. He went five innings, gave up six hits and four runs. He had three strikeouts and issued zero walks. He gave up a home run to Gregory Polanco, one of Pittsburgh's best prospects. All in all, I don't worry too much about results in a rehab start. Diamond needed a game to see if he was ready to join the Twins' rotation later this week and his healthy completion of the start is pretty much all I care about.
     
    Tyler Robertson
     
    On Friday, the Twins' brought Robertson in to face the white-hot Chris Davis, with the bases loaded and the game tied. Davis jumped on the first pitch and hit a grand slam that decided the game. Robertson was optioned to AAA the next day, but that move was more or less coming regardless of how Robertson pitched. Anthony Swarzak had recovered from his horseplay accident and was ready to join the bullpen. The pitch Robertson threw to Davis was located well, but had nothing on it. Robertson can work on getting his velocity back while down in AAA and likely will be back in Minnesota at some point.
     
    Oswaldo Arcia
     
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bVBRqlkpi34/UWHZW8BTI5I/AAAAAAAAAhM/VAH6bIM4muw/s320/OswaldoKing.jpg
     
    Need I say more?
     
    Other MLB thoughts
     
    Jose Fernandez
     
    Fernandez made his MLB debut on Sunday. The 20-year-old held the Mets to one run on three hits in five innings. He struck out eight while only issuing one walk. Fernandez has electric stuff and gets rave reviews for his makeup. He was extremely fun to watch on Sunday and should give Marlins fans a reason to tune in every five games. Tomorrow, Kevin Slowey starts for the Marlins. So...
     
    Clayton Kershaw
     
    I chose Stephen Strasburg as my NL Cy Young winner, just a couple weeks ago. I was wrong. For some reason, I forgot that Clayton Kershaw is the best pitcher in the NL and might actually be the best pitcher in all of baseball. Through two starts, Kershaw hasn't given up a run in 16 innings pitched. He has only given up six hits and one walk. He has 16 strikeouts as well. We can ignore the small sample warnings with someone who has a track record like Kershaw's. Kershaw will win the NL Cy Young this year and I will be wrong. At least I figured it out quickly.
     
    Dexter Fowler
     
    I chose Wilson Ramos as the breakout player in the National League in that same post. He hit two home runs on Saturday, so not a bad choice. I really wanted to pick Dexter Fowler though. I just wasn't sure if he qualified as a breakout candidate. I have always thought he was a great player. Last season, Fowler posted a 123 wRC+. He posted a .300/.389/.474 triple slash, but he still seemed to fly under the radar. Perhaps it was the low home run totals? Well, he has three already this season. I'll wager that he hits 20-25 this season, posts another elite OBP and slugs close to .500. He's going to get more attention this season, so I guess that does make it a breakout.
     
    That's all I have for the weekend. Enjoy your week!
  10. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Again, I don't plan to write about every game. However, I'm on Spring Break, my pregnant wife has been sleeping since 7pm and my dog doesn't want to talk to me. So, here you are.
     
    Aaron Hicks
     
    Hicks didn't look great today. He added two more strikeouts to his season total and only put one ball in play. However, I thought his lead-off walk was impressive. He laid off some really close pitches and seems to have good command of the strike zone. He takes pitches and that is important from the lead-off spot. If the guys behind him can get a look at the starter's repertoire, it really helps the rest of the lineup get a gauge on the pitcher. Having Hicks and Mauer 1-2 is going to be a great way to drive up pitch counts, especially as Hicks adjusts to the new level of competition.
     
    Kevin Correia
     
    Well, if you are going to rip a player when they are bad, you have to give credit when they are good. Correia looked good today. He changed speeds and moved the ball around. He only let Detroit string together hits in one inning and that really helped to limit potential damage. He only walked one batter, and while he only struck out two, we all knew he wasn't going to rack up large strikeout totals. Correia will likely have some rough outings if he gets hit like he did today, but he'll also have some good outings. I'm sure that Gardenhire appreciated the seven innings he gave the team today.
     
    Jared Burton and Glen Perkins
     
    While the bullpen is not deep, with these two pitchers, there is plenty of talent. Using Burton and Perkins kept today's game close and kept pitchers with much less talent from being used. While neither pitcher gets a hold or a save for this game, they both contributed greatly to this win. I think Perkins is excellent. This isn't a very saber thing to say, but he just looks confident and collected on the mound and I like to see that in a reliever.
     
    The 9th
     
    Was fun. Walk-off hits are just awesome. In that inning, I was particularly happy with Plouffe's at bat. He was facing a really tough righty in Joaquin Benoit and he worked the count nicely. After Chris Parmelee failed to move the runner over, Brian Dozier had a nice at bat of his own, shooting a pitch to right-center and getting Carroll over to third. Eduardo Escobar's double should have been a sacrifice fly, but I'll take the outfield miscue and the win that came with it. Everyone looked so pumped, it's always fun to watch a team walk-off.
     
    Other MLB Thoughts
     
    Baltimore
     
    Speaking of walk-offs, I watched the end of the Tampa Bay/Baltimore game. Matt Joyce hit a walk-off home run after Baltimore tied the game off Fernando Rodney in the top of the 9th. However, it was Baltimore that stood out to me. I really like their lineup. Adding full seasons of Brian Roberts, Nolan Reimold, Nick Markakis and Manny Machado will make their offense even more impressive. Nate McLouth belongs nowhere near the lead-off spot, but they should figure that out eventually. Their offense was only average last season, but could become an above-average offense with healthy seasons from their regulars.
     
    Kevin Slowey and Denard Span
     
    Slowey is back in the Bigs! I know Slowey is a polarizing figure for Twins' fans, but I always liked him. I mean, I named my blog after him, right? He's not consistent and he can nibble a bit, but he has great command of his pitches. Tonight, he was moving them in and out and changing speeds nicely. He was working quickly and getting outs. He actually walked three batters, which might end up being the most he walks all year. He couldn't get Denard Span out, walking him twice and giving up a double. It was fun to watch Span play again; he'll be a really nice addition in Washington.
     
    Alexi Ogando
     
    Ogando was electric on Wednesday, striking out 10 batters while walking only one in 6.1 innings. Granted, it was the Astros, but it was still impressive to watch. Now that Ogando is seemingly a full-time starter, it will be very interesting to see what he can do in a full season. He has great stuff. He and Yu Darvish could form a really dynamic pair for the next few seasons.
     
    Braves Outfield
     
    Justin Upton and Jason Heyward both hit home runs today. I still can't believe that Arizona traded Upton. He's only 25! Arizona's loss is certainly Atlanta's gain. Having Heyward in right softens the blow of moving Upton to left. Heyward is such a dynamic player and so graceful for his size. I love to watch him play. It's rare for a team to have two potential perennial MVP candidates, but Atlanta might have that with Upton and Heyward. In center, B.J. Upton had a golden sombrero tonight, but that happens.
     
    Thanks for reading my thoughts. What are your impressions of Wednesday's games?
  11. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Anyone who has studied the mathematical or sabermetric side of baseball has certainly heard of the concept of the Three True Outcomes. Basically, when looking at the battle between a pitcher and a batter, there are three true outcomes: a walk, a strikeout and a home run. By true outcomes, we take away things like defense, park, weather, speed, etc. It was introduced by Rany Jazayerli of Baseball Prospectus back in 2000 and you can read a lot more about the idea from him, as he is a far more talented writer than I.
     
    While we may think that Ken Griffey Jr. can notice Sammy Sosa about to drink his Pepsi and then fire a line drive into the dugout to thwart him, that actually does not seem to be
    . While some batters are better at putting balls in play than others, controlling a "hit" is nearly impossible. If it were, some crazy, but brilliant hitter would have posted a 1.000 batting average in a season.  
    The concept of the Three True Outcomes hitter is not new and not even all that rare. It is easy to find a big powerful dude with a good batting eye who also takes monstrous hacks. Rob Deer, Mark McGwire, Russell Branyan, Bo Jackson and Adam Dunn fit this baseball archetype. However, I want to know how rare a Three True Outcomes Game is. By that, I refer to a game where a batter gets only three plate appearances and uses them to walk, strikeout, and hit a home run, once each.
     
    Using Baseball Reference's incomparable game finder tool, I found that such a feat has happened 411 times since 1916. This equals roughly four occurrences per season. Pretty rare indeed. Frank Howard and
    Lance Parrish each accomplished this feat four times, which is the most of any individual player. Ok, query completed.
     
    Ok, thanks for reading! Have a nice day.
     
     
     
     
    Wait! Did you leave?
     
    I have decided that I need to narrow my search significantly. I realize that many of these players didn't play the full game. Dastardly! Just looking at Lance Parrish, I see that he was pinch hit for in one of those games and replaced by another catcher in two others. That snake! Those aren't Three True Outcome games. I'm pretty sure "getting pinch hit for" and "being a mediocre catcher" aren't true outcomes.
     
    Luckily for society, we can narrow the search to only include games both started and finished by players and get rid of these fakers. Upon doing so, we are left with only 165 instances, which is about 2 per season. Rarer than we thought! And with that, I have righted the wrong that Lance Parrish tried to perpetuate against all of us and I can move on with my life.
     
    Thanks for reading. Have a nice day.
     
     
     
     
    Wait! Sorry, one more thing.
     
    Mike Schmidt was walked intentionally in his Three True Outcomes game. That doesn't sit well with me. While it is a True Outcome to be walked intentionally, it's not a true product of the batter v. pitcher match up There were likely other factors that lead to that intentional walk. This cannot stand. Other than Mike Schmidt, there were 10 more jokers who reached their 3rd outcome in this devious fashion. Upon removing them (including personal favorite Chili Davis), we are left with just 154 true Three True Outcomes games. Handshakes and salutations all around! We have our number.
     
    Thanks again for reading. Have a nice day.
     
     
     
     
    Wait! Last time.
     
    I just noticed that George Harper's team won his Three True Outcomes game by a score of 11-1. How in the darn? Even with 11 solo home runs, Harper would have had to have hit 4 times. Wha happen? Well, I opened his box score and found that they only played 6 innings in that game! George Harper, you tramp! This cannot stand. I need to go in and remove these shortened games, for the good of a pure society.
     
    Ok, that took forever. But, for you, I now present the 144 instances of the Three True Outcomes Game:
     
    Link to Table
     
    I couldn't embed the table. But, the link is more fun anyway, because you can mess around with the table and do some fun sorting and stuff. Right? If you don't feel like doing fun sorting and stuff, here is some "analysis" from me:
     
    Fun Factz! (the z is a typo that I refuse to fix):
     

    Damion Easley, Frank Howard, Harold Baines, Jay Bruce, Rich Aurilia, and Ryan Langerhans each have two Three True Outcomes Games.
    Sean Casey, Jim Edmonds and Frank Howard are the only players with a Three True Outcomes game from the 3-hole.
    12 players hit three-run home runs in their Three True Outcomes game, and 39 hit two-run home runs.
    Bret Boone, Rich Becker, Faye Throneberry and Alfonso Soriano added stolen bases in their Three True Outcome Game
    Todd Hollandsworth, Kosuke Fukudome, Jim Anderson and Ken Harrelson were caught stealing in their Three True Outcome Game. Mercy!
    Early Wilson, Tony Kaufmann, Urban Shocker, Dave McNally and Luis Tiant were the only pitchers to accomplish this feat.
    Players were 91 and 53 in these games. Clearly, a Three True Outcomes Game means your team is likely to win. (not true)
    Sean Casey, Billy Bryan, Harold Baines and Ron Swoboda had their Three True Outcomes Game in 1-0 wins.
    On September 18, 1993, Shane Spencer had the only Three True Outcomes Game that went extra innings. He was standing on deck when the winning run was scored in the 10th, saving his place in history.

    Local Angle!
     
    Only two Twins have had Three True Outcomes Games: Rich Becker in 1997 and Danny Goodwin in 1981.
     
    Eight players have had a Three True Outcomes Game against the Twins: Toby Harrah, Ty Wigginton, Jim Anderson, Jorge Posada, Brad Ausmus, Jim Essian, Tim Hulett and Brian Downing.
     
    Conclusion
     
    None of this nonsense means a thing, but it sure is fun. These games are exceedingly rare, with about three occurring every two seasons. Useless information? Perhaps. But really, what were you doing when you opened this page?
     
    Thanks for reading, for real this time.
  12. Brad Swanson
    I'm not going to write about every game or every day of the season. However, I watched a lot of baseball yesterday and I have some thoughts to share. I thought the Twins game went about as would have been expected, and I was happy that they made it close near the end. I don't like to get too caught up in one game, but it's just too much fun to write about baseball, so here are some thoughts.
     
    Aaron Hicks
     
    Aaron Hicks had a tough debut. Justin Verlander is the best pitcher in baseball, so it wasn't going to be easy. Hicks struck out in all three of his at bats against Verlander. I went back and watched those at bats again and I didn't see anything that worries me long-term. He fouled off some decent fastballs that he probably should have put in play, but he also seemed to get good looks at Verlander's changeup. He got fooled on a curve in the first and a fastball in the third, but most of his swings were good and he didn't seem to be seeing the ball poorly.
     
    I called his first pitch swing against Smyly in the 7th. You had to figure he wanted no part of striking out four times in his debut. He was a little out in front of the pitch, but at least he put it in play. His last at bat was encouraging, as he took a couple close pitches to work a five pitch walk. He saw a first pitch changeup in all four of his left handed at bats, and didn't swing at one. If that is the scouting report on him, hopefully he jumps on an early off-speed pitch against Anibal Sanchez on Wednesday.
     
    Vance Worley
     
    I thought Vance Worley looked great yesterday. The first inning was a bit rough, but he had some bad luck as well. That Torii Hunter single could have just as easily been a double play. Prince Fielder's double wasn't hit well either. After Hunter's lead-off double in the 3rd, Worley was pretty much lights out. He did let the lead-off batter reach in the first four innings, which is something he should not get into the habit of doing, but he was basically effective through six innings. I liked what I saw.
     
    Joe Mauer
     
    I don't have much to say here except Mauer did not seem to have an issue adjusting to his new spot in the batting order. He had two hits, and probably should have had three. He nearly tied the game in the bottom of the 8th. His approach at the plate is really something to watch. I'm a fan, that's all.
     
    Casey Fien
     
    Fien looked great. He mowed down the top of the Tigers' order and made it look pretty easy. I'm not sure this means anything long-term, but if Fien can become a reliable late-inning reliever, the Twins' bullpen could be surprisingly good.
     
    Wilkin Ramirez
     
    Ramirez made the 5,000,000th appearance in MLB history, according to Baseball Reference. You can read about it here. This was exactly the time to use Ramirez. The bases were loaded, Pedro Florimon was up, and the Twins needed runs. Ramirez worked the count enough to allow a run to score on a wild pitch. While Ramirez is not a special hitter, he does have power. He is certainly a better bet to drive in runs than Florimon. Some prefer Jamey Carroll in that spot, but I am guessing Ron Gardenhire wanted a power bat, to try to tie the game up.
     
    Here's the controversy. He swung at the first pitch, which many did not like because Smyly had walked the previous two hitters. I don't have a problem with it. The bases were loaded and Smyly is command/control pitcher. Smyly could have easily grooved a get-me-over fastball to get ahead in the count. If he had, Ramirez could have done damage. Instead, Smyly threw a good slider and Ramirez swung over it. Ramirez was early on the next pitch too, but ultimately had a good at bat.
     
    Other MLB Notes
     
    Bryce Harper hit two home runs. I predicted that he would win the NL MVP. This amazing first game doesn't make him any more or less likely to win, but it was fun to watch him blast those home runs. His power is crazy. His swing is so violent. Oh, he also threw a runner out at home. My favorite baseball archetype is the power-hitting right fielder with a cannon arm. I'm going to enjoy Harper's career.
     
    Clayton Kershaw, Chris Sale and Felix Hernandez were all outstanding yesterday. No surprises here, but it's always fun to watch aces dominate. Kershaw took matters into his own hands, hitting a go-ahead home run in the bottom of the 8th. He ended with this line: 9 innings, no walks, 4 hits, 7 Ks, 94 pitches. Outstanding.
     
    Chase Utley had a great game yesterday. He was 3-5 with a triple, home run and 3 RBI. As with every example above, it is just one game. However, it would be fantastic to see Utley return to his superstar days of old. He's 34 now, and I think he has had a Hall of Fame career. If he can tack on a couple more great seasons, I am betting that others will agree with me (if they don't already).
     
    I really enjoyed Opening Day. Although, I spent the evening at the X, watching the Wild play one of their worst games of the season. Other than that, it was a really fun day and I look forward to sharing my unwanted thoughts with all of you this season.
     
    What stood out to you on Opening Day? If you aren't interested in single game notes, I did write about 1989 Donruss baseball cards, if that's up your alley. You can read it here.
  13. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at your new homepage: Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Baseball Reference made their play index free for about a month. I have intended to play around with it for a couple weeks, but I have been busy with work. However, I'm on SPRING BREAK!!!! now, so I have some free time. Let's see if we can find some cool stuff. At the end, I'll decide whether or not to pay for this feature going forward. I know you are on the edge of your seats.
     
    Of course, I then immediately got distracted within the split finder and this was the result:
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 1 - Who holds the Twins' record for most home runs in a single inning, over the course of a full season?
     
    Answer: Harmon Killebrewin 1962 and Jacque Jones 40 seasons later in 2002, with 11 each. Both achieved this feat in the 1st inning.
     
    Jones was the leadoff hitter that year, so each of those ding dongs was a leadoff shot. Killebrew hit 48 home runs that season, mostly batting clean-up. He only hit one of those home runs in the 5th inning. Odd.
     
    In case you were wondering, the highest total for each individual inning in Twins' history is listed below:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid]


    Inning

    Player

    HR

    Season



    1st

    Harmon Killebrew

    11

    1962



    1st

    Jacque Jones

    11

    2002



    2nd

    Tom Brunansky

    7

    1983



    2nd

    Michael Cuddyer

    7

    2009



    2nd

    Delmon Young

    7

    2010



    3rd

    Kent Hrbek

    7

    1987



    4th

    Harmon Killebrew

    9

    1967



    5th

    Harmon Killebrew

    8

    1963



    6th

    Harmon Killebrew

    9

    1966



    7th

    Harmon Killebrew

    7

    1963



    7th

    Harmon Killebrew

    7

    1966



    8th

    Harmon Killebrew

    7

    1962



    8th

    Justin Morneau

    7

    2006



    9th

    Harmon Killebrew

    7

    1961

    [/TABLE]
     
    One guy appears on this chart quite a few times. The conclusion: Harmon Killebrew was awesome.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 2 - Who was caught stealing the most in a season, as a substitute, in Twins' history?
     
    Answer: Denny Hocking in 1997 with 3.
     
    Hocking was caught stealing 5 times that season, and only stole 3 bases. He ended his career with 36 stolen bases and 27 caught stealing. That's an elite 57% success rate. But hey, at least he bleached his hair. He also hit a robust .184 as a sub that season. I'm guessing Hocking owns many of the Twins lol-est records.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 3 - Who had the most plate appearances as a leadoff hitter in a season, in Twins history?
     
    Answer: Kirby Puckett with 160 in 1985.
     
    Kirby Puckett lead off all but one game he played in 1985. In that season, he hit .288/.330/.385. As the leadoff hitter, he hit .243/.300/.297. Puckett was the leadoff hitter for one more season, before settling into the 3-hole. If Aaron Hicks can post OBP and SLG as high as Puckett's figures in 1985, we should all be quite pleased.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 4 - Who was hit by pitch the most at home, in a single season, in Twins' history?
     
    Answer: Chuck Knoblauch (1997) and Cesar Tovar (1968), each with 11.
     
    I'm guessing that in hindsight, many Twins fans would have been psyched to see those Knoblauch HBPs. Not me. I enjoyed Knoblauch. A.J. Pierzynski (2003), Cesar Tovar (1972) and Shane Mack (2003) were each hit 10 times on the road. That's their record to share. Pierzynski was hit a league-leading 27 times in his one season in San Francisco. Wow, hurts donut indeed. Knoblauch was hit by 139 pitches in his career. Tovar was only hit 88 times.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 5 - Who hit the most home runs on a 3-0 count, in a season, in Twins' history?
     
    Answer: Pat Meares (1997) and Bobby Kielty (2002), each with 2.
     
    Odds are, both guys were benched shortly after the second jack.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 6 - Who had the most RBI in Twins' history, with 2 outs and runners in scoring position, in a single season?
     
    Answer: Gary Gaetti with 43 in 1987
     
    In that season, Gaetti came to the plate 93 times in that situation. He hit .326/.376/.581 in those plate appearances. Most strikeouts in the same situation, in a season? Gary Gaetti, with 25 back in 1983. He hit .190/.281/.316 in those situations back in '83, in 89 plate appearances. Looks like someone learned how to be clutch!
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 7 - Who hit the most home runs at home in their final season with the Twins?
     
    Answer: Kirby Puckett with 13
     
    Puckett hit his final two home runs at the Metrodome on September 4, 1995. I know this because I was there. It was Labor Day, so it was the last day of summer. I got to go to the game, not knowing that it would be the final time I would get to see Kirby Puckett play. He was my favorite player and I just adored him. In the third inning, he hit an opposite-field solo home run. Then, in the 4th inning, he hit a another one, this time with Rich Becker on base.
     
    These were the final two home runs that Twins fans got to witness in Puckett's Hall of Fame career. No one would have ever guessed that at that time though. I feel very lucky that I was there. I think it may have been the only game I attended that season. Of course, we all know that Puckett was forced to retire due to glaucoma at the end of that season. He should have hit many more Metrodome home runs. Very sad.
     
    Wow, things just got more serious than planned. One more question.
     
    QUESTION NUMBER 8 - Who has the highest OBP against same-handed pitchers, in a season, in Twins' history (min 200 PA)?
     
    Answer: Right-handed - Kirby Puckett (1995) - .371 OBP and Left-Handed - Joe Mauer (2012) - .392 OBP
     
    Here is your daily reminder that Joe Mauer is swell. This was also in Puckett's final season as an active player. He was clearly still a great player and had at least a few more good seasons left in him. Anyone arguing that Kirby Puckett isn't a Hall of Fame player did not watch him play (or did not watch him closely enough) and probably will have to fight me at some point.
     
    Not really, I'm pretty nice.
     
    Verdict: I will be spending some money in a couple weeks. If the split finder is this addictive, the play index must be even better. Plus, this tool is only 36 bucks for the whole year, and I will probably play with it about 20 hours per week. Doing the math:
     
    20 hours x 52 weeks is 1040 hours
     
    36 bucks / 1040 hours = .03 bucks/hour
     
    Conversion to cents:
     
    3600 cents / 1040 hours = 3.46 cents/hour
     
    Yeah, it's worth it. And I didn't even use the right tool.
     
    I'll do this same exercise with some pitching records in the near future. If you enjoyed this, check out Baseball Reference's split tool. Be careful, it's very addictive.
     
    Brad Swanson has a computer and access to the internet. He started his own blog solely to show off his byline skills. You can reach him via telephone, if you know his phone number.
  14. Brad Swanson
    I remember Sunday, April 5, 1992 very well. I was more than somewhat aware that the Twins' Opener was the next day. I had been a huge Twins fan since I was like four-years-old. By 1991, I was nine and I had started collecting baseball cards, going to the occasional game and I was about to start a tradition of skipping school on Opening Day. Well, not really skipping school. You can't really skip school in 3rd grade. However, my devious plan was to fake being sick, in order to stay home and watch the game on television. It was a brilliant plan, but not exactly a unique plan for children of various ages. I mean, it's basically the plot to Ferris Bueller's Day Off. But, I hadn't seen that movie yet, so no help there.
     
    Now, I had never stayed home sick before. I missed a week with chicken pox, but never missed school for a cold, the flu or anything like that. I certainly never faked sick, as I was way too ingrained as a teacher's pet/golden child to do that. As a result, I had no idea how to even approach the idea of staying home from school sick. Luckily, my brain had developed enough where I had that deception center firing and I started to develop a plan. I knew this would take all of my cunning, and I knew that I had to lay the foundation early.
     
    That Sunday morning, I woke up and immediately started with some subtle, fake coughing. Not a lot of coughing, and nothing too horrible sounding; you can't overdo it after all. I just wanted that cough on my Mom's radar. I was a pretty boisterous kid, and usually very active. So, I just kind of laid around all day. I didn't want to do anything outwardly notable, as I wanted my malaise to be what got me noticed. Sure enough, my Mom came to see if I was feeling ok. I said, "yes, I just have a little headache and I'm tired" and we all went on with the day.
     
    The plan carried into the evening. Normally, I was all about staying up late. Not on this evening. I announced to anyone listening that I was off to bed, at a surprisingly early time. My Mom came to check on me, and I admitted that I wasn't feeling great. She felt my head, proclaimed that I "wasn't warm" and let me be. I had planted the seed, and now I needed to plan the events that would transpire the following morning. I laid in bed and calculated my every move. It had to be done just right, so that I would be able to stay home, but still watch the game. It was intense. However, part 1 of my plan was completed.
     
    When I woke up, I purposely stayed in bed longer than usual. I have always been a person that wakes up immediately to my alarm. I don't mess around with snooze and I don't screw around in the morning. I'm all business, and everyone around me knows that. When I didn't head downstairs at my usual time, my Mom came to look for me. I confessed that I was ill and might need to stay home. I braced myself for a negotiation, but to my surprise, my Mom simply said "of course, go back to sleep and I'll call school."
     
    Success! Part 2 of my plan had been carried out. Not only was I one step closer to watching the Twins' Opening Day game, I was also able to get some freaking sleep. We really make kids get up early for school! I woke up a few hours later, and I started the third and final (and most challenging) portion of my plan. My Mom wasn't just going to let me watch TV all day. I needed to wait for the exact right moment to declare that I was feeling "better."
     
    About an hour before game time, I went and ate some food. I figured, if I could always pretend that the food had magical healing powers. After lunch, I went back to bed for a few minutes. I then wandered into the living room and sat next to my Mom. She was taking a break from cleaning up after me and my brother and sister, with a little television of her own. This was not in the plan. I am very non-confrontational. I didn't want to take the step of asking my Mom to stop watching her show. It was bad enough that I was being so deceptive. THIS WASN'T PART OF THE PLAN! I sat there, just hoping that things would work out. Right as the game was about to start, my Mom said "wait, isn't the Twins' game on today?"
     
    I meekly responded with a "yes" assuming my evil plan had been figured out. I readied myself to head back to bed, to get rest and "recover" from my illness. However, my Mom, being consistently awesome, put the game on, told me I should lay down, and then watched the game with me. When Kirby Puckett hit s a 3rd inning home run, we both cheered and I think I forgot all about my "illness." The Twins beat the Brewers 4-2 and I was pumped.
     
    When the game ended, I went back to bed, figuring I should at least pretend to rest up. My Mom checked on me a little later and I admitted that I was feeling much better and would probably go back to school the next day. She smiled and told me that she was glad I felt better and then went off to do any number of things that she did for us when we were little. I couldn't help but feel bad, but I enjoyed that time, watching the game with my Mom.
     
    And so a tradition was born. Each year that school interfered with the Opener, I would fake an illness and stay home. Sadly, I don't think any game was as enjoyable as that first one. My Mom went back to work shortly after the 1992 Opener, as she had been laid off a couple years prior. Luckily for my brother, sister and I, my Grandmother would come to watch us after school, until I was old enough to keep an eye on the house for everyone. Regardless of who was in charge, you can bet that I was home to watch that first Twins game of the season.
     
    Traditions change over time. Once I reached high school, I didn't put as much thought into my plan. I'd just say I had a stomachache and go back to sleep for a few hours. In college, I would just skip class. Oddly enough, I became a teacher. However, my school seems to like to accommodate my Twins schedule, as our Spring Break has coincided with each Opener since I started teaching. What a perk!
     
    For the past 21 years, I have not missed a live Twins opener. Sure, I could tape or DVR the game, but it's just not the same. I need to experience the first game live. This Monday will be my 22nd straight season. My school is on Spring Break again and I will be home in front of my TV, watching when Vance Worley throws the first pitch of the season. It's a Ripken-like streak, no doubt, but this will also be my final time sharing this tradition alone.
     
    My first child is due in June. She will be 10 months old next April. You can guarantee that she will be sitting right next to me when the 2014 season opens. Once she gets old enough to make her own decisions, I'll just have to hope that she chooses to watch those games with me. As important as I know school is, I'll gladly call her school on those future April mornings, to let her stay home and watch the game with me. Even if she isn't interested in baseball, I hope that she will sit and watch the game with me anyway, much like my Mom did when I was nine-years-old.
     
    Going back to my Mom, I used to feel bad for lying and deceiving just to watch baseball. The reality is, my Mom was smart and she likely knew what I was doing all along. It was no coincidence that she knew exactly when that 1992 Opener was starting. I mean, where do you think a nine-year-old gets the kind of smarts it takes to pull off a brilliant plan like mine? Ultimately, it is one of my fondest memories and a tradition that I look forward to each year. It was completely worth the make-up work that came with the second day of the season!
    What are your Opening Day Traditions? If you enjoyed this piece, please check me out at Kevin Slowey was Framed! Not everything I write is sentimental. In fact, I drew a ridiculous picture of Kevin Slowey and Mike Redmond that you can enjoy.
  15. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    INT. TARGET FIELD BOARDROOM - LATE AFTERNOON
    A room full of executives readies themselves for an important meeting. WILSON, JOHNSON, THOMAS, SMITH, and DAVIS each take a seat at the table. DAVIS sits at the head of the table and the others surround him. Everyone looks nervous about the events to transpire. WILSON, JOHNSON, THOMAS, and SMITH each have large, white poster boards, covered for now. There is obvious tension in the room.

    DAVIS
    Let's get this meeting started. As you know, we need to plan the promotions and giveaways for the upcoming season. We need to think outside the box, as fan interest is waning due to the on-field product. It is up to our department to make up the difference in attendance. I trust that each of you has a proposal to share. 
    Everyone looks around at each other. There seems to be confusion as each person looks down at their covered proposal.

    DAVIS
    WILSON, why don't you get us started?
    WILSON
    Ok, no time like the present, right fellas?  
    WILSON is carrying two poster boards. He uncovers the first to reveal JOE FLOWER.
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eVMbn9Ka-gU/UU39eCF8kxI/AAAAAAAAASI/iF4jzJ-MLh0/s320/joeflower.jpg

    WILSON
    My first idea is a giveaway that ties in with the Twins' best player. We create 10,000 Joe Flowers. The idea is that Joe Flower is an "atta-boy" or a pick-me-up. When you see someone having a bad day, you give them Joe Flower. Joe Flower combines the best element of a sunny, happy gift and the Twins' best and most marketable player.  
    WILSON pauses. The room seems confused an unimpressed.

    DAVIS
    This is confusing. Why would we give away something that people are supposed to then give away to someone else?
    WILSON
    The idea is a "pay-it-forward" sort of altruistic, gift-giving... 
    WILSON trails off and uncovers his second poster to reveal JOE FLOUR
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UzqILaVQF38/UU39qoUJncI/AAAAAAAAASQ/T3hQGQYpj-4/s320/joeflour.jpg
    WILSON
    Joe Flour?
    DAVIS
    You're suggesting that we give away bags of flour with Joe Mauer's face on the front? You think people are going to want to haul around five pound bags of flour at a baseball game?
    WILSON
    Let's not be over dramatic, I mean, we could give away smaller bags.
    DAVIS
    But why would people want them?
    WILSON
    Well, they would be free. That would be nice.
    DAVIS
    WILSON, why don't you take a seat. Thank you for these "ideas." 
    WILSON slowly returns to his seat. He looks noticeably embarrassed and sad. THOMAS, JOHNSON AND SMITH all develop flop sweat and look more nervous than before.

    DAVIS
    Ok, JOHNSON, you're up. Dazzle me. 
    JOHNSON stands slowly and heads to the front of the room. He drops his poster board, revealing PANTS WORLEY. He quickly picks it up, moves to the front of the room and officially unveils PANTS WORLEY.
     
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZZLA0CCvUPE/UU3-zaE_EDI/AAAAAAAAASY/SksnsMluu3I/s320/pantsworley.jpg

    JOHNSON
    Ok, so Vance Worley is one of our newest players and he has his signature glasses. So, I thought we could play off of his glasses and his name and give out pants that have different colored glasses sewn into the upper thigh area and call them PANTS WORLEY.
    DAVIS
    You want to give away pants to our fans?
     
    JOHNSON
    Yeah. I figure it would be a nice, long-lasting giveaway and most people appreciate a good pair of pants.
    THOMAS
    Wouldn't we need a lot of sizes. There is quite a range of pants-size in our crowd.
    JOHNSON
    Isn't that why we have market research?
    DAVIS
    We have market research to make more money, not to make customized pants for each person coming to a game
    WILSON
    That image is very unsettling.
    DAVIS
    JOHNSON, why don't you just take a seat?
    JOHNSON
    You could easily give out PANTS WORLEY, but cut-offs. Like, for the summer.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HbtnQvT9VHQ/UU3_F_1gTbI/AAAAAAAAASg/3lnkzz00aZo/s320/jeanshortsworley.jpg
    DAVIS
    Thank you, I actually hadn't thought of that. Please take a seat. 
    JOHNSON sheepishly returns to his seat. THOMAS and SMITH are now sweating profusely. WILSON still looks very sad. DAVIS seems to be turning redder and redder.

    DAVIS
    THOMAS, you had better be ready to wow me.  
    THOMAS approaches the front of the room. He turns as though he might go sit back down, before ultimately putting his poster up and revealing BRANDON POGGS WITH AN ANTHONY SLAMMER.
     
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-u6qVKmF3Sa0/UU3_QuLpHTI/AAAAAAAAASo/oT7ircJSm_4/s320/boggspoggs.jpg
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LPizHhq3G9s/UU3_T6_LqbI/AAAAAAAAASw/T_AkcOMaTyc/s320/anthonyslammer.jpg

    DAVIS
    (angrily) What is this?
    THOMAS
    Fans really like Anthony Slama, so I wanted to capitalize on that. I figured we could give away Anthony Slammers, you know because he comes in and slams the door shut. Then, I saw that we had a guy named Brandon Boggs, and I mean, what else can I say?
    DAVIS
    I don't follow.
    WILSON
    Pogs are toys. You set them up in a stack, then you hit them with a slammer and the pogs that stay upright are yours to keep. It's super cool. I got a bunch at home, I could bring them...
    DAVIS
    (interrupting) Are these popular? Is this a kid's toy?
    JOHNSON
    They were huge in the 90s. Huge!
    DAVIS
    Hmm, so I guess this would be an ideal giveaway. We just need to find a time machine first. So, if we decided to ignore the fact that these "pogs" are no longer relevant, you propose we give away toys with pictures of players who aren't going to be on the team? Couldn't we give away pogs with current, popular player on the front, or past favorites?
    THOMAS
    Well, I suppose, but what would we call them? Mauer Pogs? Puckett Poggs? It just doesn't have the same ring as Brandon Poggs with Anthony Slammer.
    DAVIS
    Go sit down. 
    THOMAS meekly returns to his seat. As he sits down, WILSON hands him JOE FLOWER. This seems to make THOMAS feel a little better.

    WILSON
    See, it works! 
    DAVIS does not look amused. He motions to SMITH.

    DAVIS
    You've been quiet, what do you have for us, SMITH? 
    SMITH tries to look confident as he walks to the front of the room, but he trips a bit on his chair and nearly falls down. He actually cuts his finger on a wastebasket, as he tries to keep himself from falling. He also drops his proposal, but it does not reveal itself. He stands at the front of the room, takes a deep breath, and reveals ANTHONY SPORTSHACK.
     
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RVAUyPJj_6M/UU3_3W4pQ9I/AAAAAAAAAS4/TEbjcXlqY2E/s320/anthonysportshackfinal.jpg

    DAVIS
    Just sit down.
    SMITH
    That's probably for the best.
    WILSON
    Do the workers wear umpire uniforms?
    SMITH
    (tripping on his chair) Yes, it's an homage to Foot Locker.
    DAVIS
    That is relatively clever. Guys! We need promotions that we can actually use to draw fans to the park. We're going to go around the room, rapid fire, and everyone gives the first idea that comes to mind. THOMAS (points to THOMAS)!
    THOMAS
    Cole de Fries.
    DAVIS
    Like, give away french fries?
    THOMAS
    Yeah, but like, with Cole de Vries face on the front or something.
    DAVIS
    SMITH (points at SMITH)!
    SMITH
    Ryan Donut?
    DAVIS
    JOHNSON (points to JOHNSON), no food!
    JOHNSON
    Um, what about Jared Curtains? Like, we could give, um, Jared Burton themed curtains to fans.
    DAVIS
    WILSON, anything to add?
    WILSON
    What about Aaron Tricks and Trevor Poof? We could dress them as magicians and have them do magic tricks. Or, we could make it a joke and have them be really bad at magic. I mean, it could go either way.
    DAVIS
    How is that a giveaway?
    WILSON
    It would be more of a promotion or something. Maybe a viral video?
    THOMAS
    What about Joe Pension? A play off Joe Benson?
    DAVIS
    What would that even be? Are you proposing that we give each fan a pension?
    THOMAS
    Well, no. Maybe like fake money or something.
    JOHNSON
    We could give away Kyle Lohsion. We'd have to convince the team to sign Kyle Lohse, but it might be worth it...
    SMITH
    What about Justin Porno?
    DAVIS
    What? No, stop, everyone stop! This is a disaster. These ideas are all horrible. We pay each of you to come up with ideas. We pay you to bring in fans. This is just a bunch of nonsense and wordplay. I should fire each and every one of you. 
    The room falls silent. Everyone looks very disappointed.

    WILSON
    What about bobbleheads? 
    The room erupts in murmurs and head-nods.

    DAVIS
    I love it! Excellent meeting everyone. JOHNSON, talk to marketing and order five different players. Get 10,000 of each! It's clear why you all make the big bucks! 
    The room erupts in handshakes. The handshakes become hand-pounds. The hand-pounds become bro-hugs. The bro-hugs get weird.
  16. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Yesterday, I unveiled what will almost certainly go down in history as my most popular original idea: a weekly (fake) mailbag. In that mailbag I asked myself... I mean, I was asked about the Twins player I am higher on than most. I chose Pedro Florimon because I think his defense can provide enough value to overcome his complete lack of contribution on offense. I am not sure I explained my point very well and I wasn't feeling good about my selection.
     
    Then, I listened to The Baseball Show with Rany and Joe, a weekly podcast from two baseball writing powerhouses, Joe Sheehan and Rany Jazayerli. They were talking about the Trevor Bauer trade and how much they hated it. Basically, the Diamondbacks traded Bauer for Didi Gregorius, an all-glove, no-bat, low-upside player. Sheehan remarked that they basically traded an elite pitching prospect for Neifi Perez. This lead me to Perez's FanGraphs page. Turns out, he posted a 58 wRC+ for his career. Pedro Florimon posted a 59 wRC+ last season.
     
    Perez was mostly a glove, and didn't offer much in the hitting and baserunning departments. This sounds a lot like Pedro Florimon to me. Sheehan and Jazayerli weren't really questioning Perez or Gregorius as players, but the move to give up a consensus top prospect in order to acquire a player of that caliber. Gregorius might have more upside than they are giving him, but the point makes sense. It is also worth noting that Arizona received Lars Anderson and Tony Sipp in that deal, but I'm not sure that really means a whole lot.
     
    The Diamondbacks have their Neifi Perez, but at the cost of a top pitching prospect. The Twins have their Perez, but got him for basically nothing, claiming him off waivers from Baltimore. In addition, the Twins have a second Perez, in Eduardo Escobar, and they acquired him in a trade for a player that they had pretty much grown apart from in Francisco Liriano.
     
    So, what's the point?
     
    I've been investigating middle infielders a lot lately, and I have come to the realization that a good defensive shortstop is a relatively valuable commodity. Basically, a shortstop with any good quality is pretty rare. A good offensive shortstop is very rare. I made that point in a post last weekend (near the bottom in the Addendum). In addition, good, valuable shortstops are extremely rare, as I posited here.
     
    Florimon is valuable because he was acquired so cheaply and he makes almost no money. In addition, he isn't the type of player who will ever earn a lot of money through the arbitration process, as he isn't likely to put up statistics that bring back big paychecks.
     
    Fine, but how hard is it to get a Florimon or Perez or Gregorius. The Twins got Florimon cheaply, while Arizona gave up a fair amount. The only way to really find out is to find more players who fit this profile. I checked each MLB team's depth chart and found players who roughly fit this profile. I only used players who project to get significant time at shortstop this coming season. I found 14 players.
     
    These players range in their offensive abilities. Some are as poor as Perez, but others have performed at a higher level. Each has been considered below average in their offensive contributions though, using wRC+, or has a poor offensive reputation, based on minor league performance. Now that I have a sample, I investigated how each of these players was acquired by their current team. Here is the chart:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 607]


    Player
    Team
    Salary (in $)
    How Acquired?


    Brendan Ryan
    Seattle
    3.25 Mil
    Traded for Maikel Cleto


    Adeiny Hechavarria
    Miami
    1.75 Mil
    Acquired in Jose Reyes/Josh Johnson/Mark Buehrle Blockbuster


    Ruben Tejada
    New York M
    491 K
    Amateur Free Agent


    Zack Cozart
    Cincinnati
    480 K
    2nd Round - 2007 Draft


    Clint Barmes
    Pittsburgh
    5.5 Mil
    Free Agency - 2 yrs/10.5 Mil


    Pete Kozma
    St. Louis
    League Min
    1st Round - 2007 Draft


    Cliff Pennington
    Arizona
    1.75 Mil
    Acquired in Chris Young/Heath Bell Trade


    Didi Gregorius
    Arizona
    League Min
    Acquired in Trevor Bauer Trade


    Jose Iglesias
    Boston
    2.06 Mil
    Amateur Free Agent


    Everth Cabrera
    San Diego
    1.275 Mil
    Rule 5 Draft


    Brandon Crawford
    San Francisco
    481 K
    4th Round - 2008 Draft


    Freddy Galvis
    Philadelphia
    480 K
    Amateur Free Agent


    Pedro Florimon
    Minnesota
    League Min
    Waivers


    Eduardo Escobar
    Minnesota
    480 K
    Francisco Liriano Trade
    [/TABLE]
     
    Upon first glance, it is easy to see that the Neifi Perez type is more of a National League phenomenon. Most American League teams can boast players with average offense, but not all of those shortstops provide good defense. If a better offensive option isn't present, a good defensive shortstop seems to be a worthy trade-off. It shouldn't really matter where a player provides their value.
     
    Looking at the cost of each player, we can see that the Twins might pay the least this year and will have given up the least to acquire their Neifi Perez. This chart includes some early draft picks and some players who were centerpieces in trades for quality MLB players. Others are rule 5 picks, amateur free agents and waiver claims. The range of cost for these players is greater than I would have expected.
     
    While we can debate the true merits of a player like Florimon, if a team chooses to go that route, they could do a lot worse than a waiver claim making the league minimum. One other thing that I like about a defensive shortstop is that they can have a lucky offensive season, and provide bonus value. A random, lucky, good defensive season is pretty unlikely.
     
    Many will argue that glove-first shortstops grow on trees. While this may be true, they aren't showing up in droves on MLB teams, at least not as cheaply as Florimon has. While the Twins did not raise payroll this season, if they choose to in the future, they can save a lot of money for pitching and other positions if they have a player like Florimon at short.
     
    All of this hinges on Florimon's defense. If he is as good defensively as we saw last year, the Twins may have found a valuable commodity, at a bargain basement price. The fatal flaw would be that Florimon's biggest asset is also very hard to properly quantify. Personally, I trust defensive metrics, but many do not. If his defense is not being properly evaluated, his value cannot be accurately calculated. Offense is easy to see on the field and in a spreadsheet, but defense is much tougher.
     
    It's more than just defense though, it's more defense by cost. If Florimon was making $3 million next season, I wouldn't be writing this. Fortunately for the Twins, he will be one of their cheapest players. He may not be a sexy player, but I do know that short of better options, a Florimon type makes sense and clearly other teams agree with the Twins.
  17. Brad Swanson
    The Twins made a few more cuts today, which is common during these final days of Spring Training. Joe Benson was cut and that is very disappointing to me. Benson is a player that I have been excited about for many years and a player who was given the opportunity to win the open center field job, after the trades of Ben Revere and Denard Span. Benson was not impressive this Spring. I don't put a lot of stock into Spring Training stats, but a .151/.286/.283 line with 15 strikeouts in 63 plate appearances is not something that wins an open job. He flashed power, but it was rare, and he was never in a position to use his speed on the bases.
     
    Beyond the unimpressive stats were a few miscues in the outfield and a general lack of "seizing the opportunity" that he was given. Benson's demotion to AAA means that he will be out of options after this season. If he remains on the 40-man roster through the year, he'll need to make the team next Spring, or risk being released from the organization that drafted him back in 2006. I know that I did not expect Benson to be in this situation, especially after his call-up back in September of 2011.
     
    That September seems like a billion years ago. Benson's 2012 was injury-plagued, or really injury-nuked. He missed a lot of time, and when he played, he wasn't very special. However, his return to AAA could be exactly what he needs. Benson should not have been considered for the 4th outfielder position. While he isn't young, he is inexperienced, and he needs to play every day. In AAA, he will play every day, likely in center, and rack up at bats. He needs to work on the same thing he has always needed to work on: contact. He strikes out far too often, which really masks the fact that he has great power and speed.
     
    I still hold out hope for Benson, but my hope is waning. I see Benson as a player that either isn't concentrating hard enough, or is concentrating too hard. I'm not close enough to know which side he's on. He makes mistakes in the field, although he is a good fielder. He strikes out a lot, and seems to swing a bit too hard at times. If concentration is an issue, it can be worked on. He might still be rusty, after a 2012 season when he spent much of his time trying to get healthy. If he can get into a rhythm at AAA, he might get called upon later in 2013.
     
    I think this move pretty much cinches the Opening Day center field spot for Aaron Hicks. Unless the Twins really like Brandon Boggs, it would seem that Hicks will start in center and Mastroianni will be the 4th outfielder. Hicks will not be kept as a reserve, so he is the starter or he's joining Benson in AAA. I don't see that happening. I like Mastroianni in that 4th outfielder role and I am very excited to watch Hicks all year.
     
    Getting back to Benson, all is not lost. He certainly has a long way to go, if he wants to get back into the Twins' long-term plans. He'll need to show that he can hit over .200 at AAA before he gets anywhere near Minnesota. He also will need to show that he can handle an outfield position, a task he certainly has the natural talent to accomplish. If Benson can basically do what everyone wanted him to do in 2012, things will be fine. If his 2013 season looks like his 2012 season, he may be with another team, come Spring 2014.
     
    I wrote about Benson in more detail a few months ago. If you want to know why I am infatuated with what Benson could become, please take a look.
  18. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    I get asked a lot of questions in my daily travels. Most of them are related to social studies and asked by 14-year-olds. However, I was once asked a question about the Twins and that inspired me to start a weekly (probably not) Friday mailbag!
     
    A recent report stated that the Texas Rangers are likely to trade Elvis Andrus if they cannot extend him. With Jurickson Profar on his way to stardom, should the Twins try to low-ball the Rangers to help with their impending problem? What would be a realistic trade proposal the Twins could make and would you make that trade. Thanks, huge fan!
     
    - Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Aw, that's sweet. Elvis Andrus is an excellent player. He plays great defense, is improving on offense and runs the bases well. He is only 24 years old and could be a star shortstop for the next 10 years. Of course, the Rangers know that as well. I don't think a low-ball offer is a good idea, because the Rangers have other options. They may try to trade him, find that no offer is up to their standards, and then simply move him to second base, to make room for Profar. It's not their ideal scenario, but it's better than taking back a poor return.
     
    A fair offer would probably start with Miguel Sano or Byron Buxton. Both are excellent prospects, but Andrus is a proven shortstop with upside of his own. I wouldn't see any scenario where the Twins acquire Andrus without giving up one of those players. Then, they would likely need to add 2 more good prospects (think some combination of two of the following: Eddie Rosario, Alex Meyer, Jose Berrios, Max Kepler), to make it work. That sounds like a lot to give up, as we tend to grow to love our teams' prospects. However, a player like Andrus is rare and has a ton of value. You can't low-ball and expect to land him.
     
    If the Twins offered Sano, Oswaldo Arcia and Berrios, I bet it would be a done deal. Would you make that deal?
     
    Hi Brad, huge fan. I have three questions. Who wins a "Battle of the Network Stars" style competition between current Red Sox players and current Celtics players? Can you please compare the cast of Cheers (Shelly Long version, of course) to the 2004 Red Sox? Which 90210 character would make the best shortstop? Thanks!
     
    - Bill S. (Los Angeles, CA)
     
    Wow. I had no idea you were a reader. I'm a huge fan as well. However, these questions are well outside of my area of expertise. I just assumed you were working on 5000-word-columns about each of these questions. I'll answer rapid fire: Red Sox because they'd have PEDs, No, I cannot, and Robbie? Oh, and thanks for letting me use your mailbag idea. That was very kind.
     
    Hi Brad, big fan. I would say that you and Teddy Roosevelt are my two heroes. I print all your posts and use them to line my walls as wallpaper. Anyway, which Twin are you higher on than most and which Twin are you lower on than most?
     
    - Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Thank you for the kind words. Although, Roosevelt was a known conservationist, and he would probably be appalled to hear that you are wasting paper in such a manner. In fact, he'd probably hunt you for sport. However, he is dead, and ghosts can't hunt. Going forward, just make PDF copies of my posts and set them as your computer desktop background instead.
     
    As for your question, it depends on what you mean by higher and lower. I certainly think that Pedro Florimon can provide better value than many are expecting, if his glove is as advertised. A 2-win player is a 2-win player is a 2-win player. If a player provides value in one area and not the other, it shouldn't matter which area the player provides value. Ryan Doumit was pretty much all offense and no defense. Pedro Florimon could prove to be the opposite. If both provide equal value, who cares where it comes from?
     
    I am lower on Justin Morneau, but just because I think his World Baseball Classic showing might be inflating his expectations. I think he will be good, but I don't see him returning to his MVP form or anything like that. If he can provide a .280/.350/.475 line, I'd be pretty happy with that. I'd probably trade him before he can put up a full season at that rate though.
     
    Stop making fun of my cheeks, stomach and tiny running steps.
    - Delmon Y (Philadelphia, PA)
     
    You're right, I need to stop resorting to making fun of your body. It's just not nice, and it's lazy. Instead, I shall refer to you now as Elmn Yung, since you have no O and no D.
     
    Hi Brad, I am a relatively huge fan. I consider you the Sacagawea of Kevin Slowey was Framed! The Twins recently reassigned Kyle Gibson to AAA. He wasn't having a great Spring, but it seems he is a better option than a few slated for the rotation. Where do you stand on Gibson and his contributions in 2013?
     
    - Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    Wow, two U.S. History references! Who are these people, am I right? To be fair, I am the only member of Kevin Slowey was Framed! so I am all things and nothing at once.
     
    I think Gibson is going to be a really good pitcher. I like that his stuff is mostly back after his surgery. He seems to be working on getting his feel and consistency back, but those were his hallmarks prior to his arm issues. If those two things come back, he could be a quality starting pitcher for the Twins, in the near future.
     
    That being said, I am fine with Gibson being cut and I would be fine with Gibson spending all of 2013 in AAA, if it comes to that. The Twins have other starting options. We may not like them, but they exist. Gibson is still recovering from major elbow surgery and he hasn't been consistently effective yet. I'm not saying they should hold him down in AAA no matter what. If he pitches well for a sustained period of time, he should be called up. However, if he remains inconsistent and is still getting his feel back, he should do that in AAA. I would like to see him get at least a handful of starts with the Twins, at some point this season.
     
    Joe Mauer is the Worst.
     
    - Brad S (Twin Cities, MN)
     
    That's not a question. It's not true either. This stuff has to stop. You are either expecting too much from Mauer or you hate everyone. Either way isn't good for your blood pressure. In 2012, no one made outs at a lower rate than Mauer. That seems to be better than "the worst." Just enjoy him. He'll be gone before you know it.
     
    Thanks for all the great questions everyone. If you want to contribute to a future mailbag, you should probably contact me. I think I have a hotmail account that I use, but I can't remember the password.
     
    How about this, post your question as a review of this Little Caesar's Pizza on Yelp. I'll just know to check that review periodically. Have a nice weekend!
     
    Brad Swanson is not qualified to answer your questions. He really needs to start cleaning the garage. His musings can be heard if you are in his car between the hours of roughly 7:30 - 8:30am and 4:00 - 5:00pm, depending on traffic.
  19. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Last weekend, I introduced the Gagne Threshold. I used a variety of criteria to find good middle infielders over the past 30 seasons. I'm not going to go through everything again, but if you missed it and want to take a look, you can find it here. To summarize, I found 63 good players, 33 at second and 30 at short. I also found that there wasn't a specific team that was more or less adept at finding these players, as the sample is so small that no team really stands out. In the end, 30 shortstops in 30 years seemed like an impossibly low number. However, the number on its own isn't all that useful, unless it can be compared to other positions.
     
    Therefore, I decided to investigate if the middle infield positions have been harder to fill with good players over the past 30 years. Career numbers aren't as important to me, so I focused on seasonal data. If a team has five or six good, young middle infielders that they rotate through, they may not produce good career players, but would still get good value at those positions on a relatively regular basis.
     
    I looked at each offensive position, year-by-year, over the past 30 seasons. I wanted to know how many players would be considered "good" in each year and how "good" the best players were during those 30 seasons. I decided to use WAR again. Terrible toothbrush analogies aside, I do think WAR is the best available measure that we can use to compare players from 2012 to 1983. It isn't perfect, but it gives us some information, which is better than just throwing our hands up in the air and crying under the bed.
     
    FanGraphs.com has an excellent explanation of how they calculate WAR. You can start here, and choose to read as much as you'd like. I read through the all the pages, and I feel that I understand their methods very well. FanGraphs outlines a player with a 2+ WAR as being a solid starter or better, which is a number I will be using as the basis of this analysis.
     
    Here are the two factors I investigated:
     

    How many players provided a 2+ WAR at each position, in each season? This was an easy way to look at how many good players each position supplied.
    What was the cumulative WAR for the top ten players at each position? This allowed me to compare the actual value given at each position.

    Here is my resulting chart:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Year
    # of 2+ WAR
    2+ WAR/ Season
    Top 10 Total WAR
    Top 10 Avg WAR
    Top 10 Player Avg WAR


    C
    417
    13.90
    1131.8
    37.73
    3.77


    1B
    564
    18.80
    1512.1
    50.40
    5.04


    2B
    487
    16.23
    1307.6
    43.59
    4.36


    3B
    569
    18.97
    1472.8
    49.09
    4.91


    SS
    442
    14.73
    1308.6
    43.62
    4.36


    LF
    592
    19.73
    1475.2
    49.17
    4.92


    CF
    617
    20.57
    1541.9
    51.40
    5.14


    RF
    624
    20.80
    1427
    47.57
    4.76


    OF
    1625
    18.06
    4389.8
    48.78
    4.88
    [/TABLE]
     
    I am terrible at labeling fields, so let me just clarify:
     

    # of 2+ WAR = Number of players with 2+ WAR in the last 30 seasons
    # of 2+ WAR/Season = Average number of players with 2+ WAR, over 30 seasons
    Top 10 Total WAR = Total WAR from all top ten players, added together from the last 30 seasons
    Top 10 Avg WAR = Seasonal average for the top ten players (as a whole), by WAR
    Top 10 Player Avg WAR = Average WAR for a top ten player, over the past 30 seasons

    I broke down outfielders by individual position, but also by all outfielders. I did this because many outfielders played multiple outfield positions. The OF value is most accurate, but the LF, CF and RF values are still interesting to look at.
     
    The results show that the two middle infield positions are pretty hard to find, compared with all other positions other than catcher. Catcher is the hardest position to fill, according to these findings. The number of 2+ WAR second basemen was higher, but the overall WAR value was almost identical. So, it seems to be easier to find second basemen, but good shortstops provide more value. In short, the average top ten middle infielder between 1983 and 2012 provided 4.36 WAR.
     
    Teams get roughly 10-15% less value from the middle infield, compared with corner infield and outfield. Of course, teams get even less value from catcher. Having Joe Mauer on the team over the last 9 seasons has been a really big boost for the Twins. Just finding a good catcher is hard to do, but having a consistently good catcher is extremely hard to pull off. Of course, that is a separate topic.
     
    The average top ten middle infielder provides about .5 WAR less than the average top ten player at nearly every other position. This shows that teams are often playing middle infielders that are both below average and below the quality of players at other positions. Something to keep in mind about WAR is that the stat already gives players credit for playing these difficult positions, so some of their value actually comes from simply playing the position, saying nothing about how well they play it.
     
    Basically, if two players are completely equal in all ways - batting, slugging, baserunning, defense, etc, the shortstop will have a higher WAR than the first baseman, simply for playing the more difficult position; shortstop more than second base, but still. So, the actual production of these players might even be worse than would be indicated in my chart. By giving these middle infielders an automatic bump, their WARs are artificially inflated (on purpose). In addition, the first basemen and corner outfielders are actually penalized in WAR, ever widening the gap.
     
    There is logic in the positional adjustments made in calculating WAR. However, these adjustments show that if the sample of shortstops and first basemen are about .5 WAR apart, their production might actually be much farther off than one might think, just looking at WAR. Finding a good shortstop or second baseman is clearly hard to find, and that is why these players get a boost in their value.
     
    The actual production is important though. We can see that over the past 30 seasons, the middle infield has provided less value than most of the other positions and that good middle infielders are clearly rarer than good players at most of the other positions. While this may seem like an obvious conclusion, having the research and data to support the conclusion is very important.
     
    The next step is to investigate the samples of good second basemen and shortstops. Where does their value come from? Why are they more rare than players at other positions? I'm working on analyzing some data and I hope to share it with you very soon. Stay tuned!
     
    Here is a link to the spreadsheet I created while doing this research. It breaks down most of this data by year, and it is pretty interesting to look at: Raw data
    For Jim:
     
    wRC+ is my metric of choice. wRC+ is slick because all the factors that create runs are put together and then the values are normalized and adjusted for park factors and era. Thus, you can compare Greg Gagne to Brendan Ryan, to see who was the better hitter. The metric is based off of the number 100, where 100 is average and each corresponding number is a percentage above or below. So, Gagne's career wRC+ is 82, meaning he was 18% below league average for his career.
     
    I decided to look by position, to see if good, offensive shortstops are particularly rare. I decided I had no use for players with fewer than 500 games played. Roughly three seasons worth of games seems like a decent sample size. Here is my resulting chart:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    [/TD]
    # of Players
    Good Offense
    Good %


    C
    238
    46
    19.33%


    1B
    230
    137
    59.57%


    2B
    284
    52
    18.31%


    3B
    249
    84
    33.73%


    SS
    239
    24
    10.04%


    LF
    341
    150
    43.99%


    CF
    269
    76
    28.25%


    RF
    296
    143
    48.31%



    500 games min
    [TD]

    [/TABLE]
     
    n is the number of players, "good" refers to players with above average offensive production (wRC+ > 100) and "good %" shows what percentage of each sample met that criteria. As you can see, the further down the defensive spectrum you go, the harder it is to find a good offensive player at that position. This is hardly breaking news. The part that surprised me was just how small the sample was at short. There were only 24 players from the past 30 seasons who posted a career wRC+ over 100.
  20. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
    If you prefer real baseball news to tomfoolery, I analyzed the Kyle Lohse signing that hasn't happened yet. You can read it here: Kyle Lohse signs with [MLB Team]. If you like tomfoolery...
     
    I buy MLB the Show every single year. I always think that I won't and then I do. I buy it, play it a lot, then completely forget about it. In fact, here is an easy to use monthly breakdown of my MLB the Show usage:
     

    March - Buy the game, play it often
    April - Continue to play the game, less often, tell myself "I'll just play this one for the next two years and buy the newer version every other year"
    May-February - Completely forget about MLB the Show, place disk under a couch, in a cereal bowl or on a shelf
    Late February - See a commercial or read a review for the next MLB the Show, tell myself "eh, I don't really need to buy this"
    Early March - See some extremely minor change in the new game that makes me want to buy it
    March - Buy the game, play it often

    Using this information, you can logically conclude that I am in the "play it often" stage of my MLB the Show development cycle. In fact, I did buy the game. I stopped on my way home from work Wednesday and I bought it. I played it for a little bit that night, then really got into it on Friday, when I didn't have to work.
     
    It's fun. It always is. The minor change that convinced me to buy the game this year is about as minor as it gets. They finally decided to give players numerical ratings instead of vague bar graph ratings! Yeah! This is nice because it is now much easier to see which players are better than others. This is important to me for some reason. I'm 30.
     
    Anyway, I thought it would be fun to see what Sony thinks of the Twins. In looking at the player ratings, there are some questionable ratings, along with some downright comical ratings. All of the ratings are out of 99.
     
    Joe Mauer leads the way with an overall 93. He also has a clutch rating of 99, so take that, haterz1! Mauer also leads the way with a 90 contact rating, an 82 arm strength rating, a 90 fielding rating, and a 99 handsome rating. In short:
     
    Sony ♥ Joe Mauer
     
    The Twins best pitcher, according to Sony, is Glen Perkins, with an overall rating of 90. He has the best control on the team, at 90, and the highest K/9 rating with an 81. He also has a fielding rating of 6. Interestingly, whenever a ball is hit to Perkins in the game, he falls down and splits his pants. Nobody's perfect.
     
    The Twins best starter is Vance Worley, with his 84 rating. Their top Canadian player is Justin Morneau at an 86. The best bad player on the team is Esmerling Vasquez at a baffling 74 overall rating, the same overall rating as Trevor Plouffe, Brian Duensing and Kevin Correia.
     
    Are you still with me? Let's look some of the Twins' best ratings:
     

    Stamina - Scott Diamond - 90
    Velocity - Mike Pelfrey - 82
    Break - Casey Fien - 90
    BB/9 - Scott Diamond - 87
    Power - Josh Willingham - 78 ?
    Durability - 88-year-old Jamey Carroll - 84
    Speed - Darin Mastroianni - 77
    Horseplay - Anthony Swarzak - 99 (see below)

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-as8M6JW5Aok/UTvFX193jNI/AAAAAAAAARg/hw-dl-a66tk/s320/Swarzak_finished.png
     
    This opens itself to a debate. Is Anthony Swarzak good or bad at horseplay? He did crack ribs as a result of horseplay, but what is the true goal of horseplay? Perhaps we can come back to this, at another time.
     
    A few other things I learned from the game:
     

    Pedro Florimon and Brian Dozier are equally good fielders - 59
    Kevin Correia is a better strikeout pitcher than Mike Pelfrey - 46 to 43
    Jamey Carroll has "A" potential, and stands to get better as he gets older

    Now, not all Twins players are in the game. If a player wasn't in the MLB last season, they do not appear. So, Aaron Hicks, Joe Benson, Rich Harden, Kyle Gibson, and so forth, are all MIA. But, you can make players, which is a tedious chore. I made Aaron Hicks, based on his current Spring Training performance. Here is the result:
     
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YMNhE8FoW0c/UTvFw1F_BDI/AAAAAAAAARo/7pzuAWSuTYw/s320/photo+(19).JPG
     
    Not sure I captured his eyes perfectly, but everything else seems about right.
     
    If Sony has anything to say about it, here is the Opening Day lineup:
     
    [TABLE=width: 134]


    Mastroianni
    CF


    Carroll
    2B


    Mauer
    C


    Willingham
    LF


    Morneau
    1B


    Doumit
    DH


    Parmelee
    RF


    Plouffe
    3B


    Florimon
    SS


    [/TD][TD]

    [/TABLE]
    Apparently, Ron Gardenhire works for Sony. Here is the rotation:
     
    Worley
    Diamond
    Correia
    Hendriks
    Pelfrey
     
    Looks to be fairly accurate actually. I might flip a few around, but those five seem pretty likely. Of course, if you take the five best starters by rating, it would look like this:
     
    Worley - 84
    Pelfrey - 78
    Diamond - 77
    De Vries - 76
    Correia - 74
     
    Prior to a roster update, De Vries was an embarrassing 81 overall, and was the Twins' best starter. They addressed that issue within the first 24 hours of the game launch. His rating is still much too high. Apparently Sony loves players from Minnesota as much as we all do.
     
    You like former Twins? Here are some of the more notable ratings I found when looking around:
     

    Danny Valencia - Clutch - 71 - lol
    Tsuyoshi Nishioka - Fielding - 81 !!!! Yep, Nishi's in the game; get excited!
    Delmon Young - Speed - 36 - HA!
    Delmon Young - Clutch - 92 - Come on
    Delmon Young - Fielding - 58 - *spit-take, fall-over-in-chair, choke-on-gum, pants-fall-down, head explodes*
    Denard Span - Fielding - 53, worse than Delmon, but wait
    Carlos Gomez - Fielding - 46, so yeah
    Luke Hughes - Spring Training - 99 (see below)

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-peU0kD_jYFU/UTvGRpvy-iI/AAAAAAAAARw/iEsPUScnqzQ/s320/Hughes_finished.png
     
    I want that hat. The worst former Twin I could find is Eric Komatsu, at an emasculating 55 overall. Most of the computer generated minor leaguers are better than Eric Komatsu. Jeff Gray is nowhere to be found, but I am sure we can all agree that he would be a -84.
     
    But, my favorite part of this whole exercise was finding Nick Blackburn, pitching as the Ace of the New Britain Rock Cats. In fact, Sony didn't even put his picture in the game, opting to computer generate him.
     
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hiugLXh00TE/UTvGb2v5qqI/AAAAAAAAAR4/zKfwGk6n4Fo/s320/photo+(17).JPG
     
    Not terrible, but Blackburn's real face isn't that fat. His K/9 is worst on the team, but you already knew that.
  21. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    The most recent episode of Gleeman and the Geek touched on a familiar topic for Twins fans. The middle infield has been a consistent area of need for the Minnesota Twins, since the days of Greg Gagne and Chuck Knoblauch. It was discussion of Gagne that specifically interested me. I remember Gagne as a kid. He was a player that I never really thought a whole lot about. Now that I am older, I understand his value. The Twins haven't had a consistent shortstop since the days of Gagne. In the coming weeks, I want to investigate just how rare good middle infielders are. Are the Twins in a unique situation, or are most teams in consistent need for quality middle infielders?
     
    I want to focus on this quandary from a few different angles. This week, Greg Gagne is my muse. How rare is a player like Greg Gagne? I intend to find out.
     
    We need to start with some GAGNE FACTS!
     

    Greg Gagne debuted in 1983.
    Gagne played 1765 games at shortstop.
    In his 15 season career, Gagne accumulated an fWAR of 26.1
    At his peak, defined as his best 5-year stretch, Gagne had an fWAR of 15.0.
    Gagne posted three seasons with an fWAR greater than 3.0.

    Let's talk WAR for a bit. WAR is not a perfect stat. WAR has major limitations. The fact that three different sites have their own version of WAR and they do not match up is troubling. All that being said, I like WAR. In my opinion, WAR is the best way to look at the overall value of a player and compare that value to other players. In addition, the comparisons translate to past eras, which is very useful when looking at players from the 80s and today, like I did here. WAR includes offense, defense and baserunning. Many do not trust the defensive metrics, but I don't trust your eyes.
     
    I couldn't tell you how WAR is calculated. Think about all the things you use on a daily basis that you would have no idea how to construct, create or compute. I use an electric toothbrush a few times a day and I have no clue how to put one of those together. Does that mean I shouldn't use it? I don't think so. I trust people who put more time into innovation to create things that I do not need to understand or create on my own, but still plan to use. WAR is one of those things for me.
     
    I chose to use FanGraphs' version of WAR for this study.
     
    Back to the research. I used GAGNE FACTS! to define some research terms. I wanted to find how many middle infielders were Gagne or better. FanGraphs.com helped me create a custom spreadsheet for middle infielders who debuted in 1983 or later. I defined a middle infielder as a player who played more games in the middle infield than any other position. I made one exception (Alfonso Soriano) because he provided so much value at second base early in his career. From there, I included only players who could match or exceed Gagne's career fWAR, his 5-year-peak fWAR, or are active players with three seasons greater than 3.0 fWAR (pro-rated based on how many seasons the player has actually played). I call this the Gagne Threshold.
     
    The result is this spreadsheet. I included wOBA, Fld, and BsR. wOBA is a great measure of offensive production. It is much better than OPS because the importance of each type of hitting result is weighted properly in line with their actual run value. Fld is the fielding component that FanGraphs uses for WAR and BsR is their baserunning component. You can see just how good each player is in each area, with these segmented numbers.
     
    I found 63 players who met the Gagne Threshold. 33 primarily played second and 30 primarily played short. Basically, there have been 62 players as good or better than Greg Gagne (Gagne makes 63) who have debuted since 1983. Perhaps Greg Gagne is even more special than I thought. I wanted to look at some data related to these players, so I looked up whether they had been drafted or signed internationally. Here are a couple of facts:
     

    42 of these players were drafted and 21 were signed internationally
    Of the 42 drafted, 29 were drafted out of college and 13 were drafted out of high school
    18 of those players drafted were selected in the first round
    12 players were selected in rounds 2-5

    Out of curiosity, I looked to where these players were from. Here are the most common results:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    California
    DominicanRepublic

    Florida
    Venezuela
    New York
    Puerto Rico
    North Carolina


    13
    11
    5
    5
    4
    4
    3
    [/TABLE]
     
    Back to the original premise. 63 players in 30 seasons is roughly 2 new players per season. If only two middle infielders are added to the quality player pool each year, it would stand to reason that many teams are looking for middle infielders. 35 players are active, which might indicate an uptick in the talent pool, but many of these players have not reached any sort of career Gagne Threshold, but simply have a few good seasons early in their careers. They may never have another good season, then drop out of this pool. Regardless, there aren't many quality middle infielders to choose from. Here are debuts by year:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]

    [TD=colspan: 6]Number of Debuts by Year (* not possible based on Threshold)[/TD]



    1983
    3
    1993
    0
    2003
    3


    1984
    0
    1994
    1
    2004
    1


    1985
    0
    1995
    4
    2005
    5


    1986
    4
    1996
    3
    2006
    6


    1987
    0
    1997
    3
    2007
    2


    1988
    2
    1998
    2
    2008
    2


    1989
    1
    1999
    1
    2009
    2


    1990
    2
    2000
    3
    2010
    2


    1991
    1
    2001
    2
    2011
    *


    1992
    5
    2002
    3
    2012
    *
    [/TABLE]
     
    There isn't a pattern, but the 80s certainly look leaner than the 90s and 00s. It does appear that there are more quality middle infielders entering the pool in recent years. Add in young, promising players who have not qualified or have large chunks of their careers remaining, and you could see this pool expanding in the coming years. The question remains, is this a Twins issue, or a league issue?
     
    Here is a team chart:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Team
    Signed/Drafted
    Peaked With


    Arizona
    1
    0


    Atlanta
    5
    4


    Baltimore
    1
    2


    Boston
    4
    3


    Chicago C
    1
    1


    Chicago W
    2
    2


    Cincinnati
    1
    2


    Cleveland
    1
    4


    Colorado
    1
    1


    Detroit
    0
    2


    Houston
    3
    1


    Kansas City
    1
    0


    Los Angeles A
    3
    2


    Los Angeles D
    0
    1


    Miami
    2
    3


    Milwaukee
    2
    2


    Minnesota
    2
    3


    New York M
    1
    1


    New York Y
    4
    3


    Oakland
    1
    1


    Philadelphia
    2
    3


    Pittsburgh
    2
    2


    San Diego
    4
    1


    San Francisco
    1
    4


    Seattle
    5
    2


    St. Louis
    1
    1


    Tampa Bay
    0
    1


    Texas
    2
    4


    Toronto
    4
    3


    Washington/Montreal
    6
    4
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Nationals franchise leads the way with 6 players, while Detroit, the L.A. Dodgers and Tampa Bay have zero. From there, I looked at when these players reached their peak. I didn't necessarily mean their best season, but more or less when they became a notable player. Atlanta, Cleveland, San Francisco, Texas and Washington/Montreal had 4 each, while Arizona and Kansas City had zero. Basically, the Twins do struggle to find quality middle infielders, but this seems to be more of a talent pool issue, rather than a Twins ineptitude issue. At least, that is how I see it, as no team is miles ahead of the Twins.
     
    Interestingly enough, many of these players who were traded while very young, netted big name players in return. Here are just a few players that these middle infielders helped bring back in trades: Bert Blyleven, Randy Johnson, Fred McGriff, Josh Beckett, Mark Teixeira, and Scott Rolen. Not bad.
     
    There is much more to this story. The Twins are in a 20 year Gagne Threshold drought, but does that mean the middle infield has been a constant gaping hole?
     
    In the near future, I want to look at each individual season from 1983 to 2012. How many good middle infielders were there in each season? Who were these players and why didn't they all reach the Gagne Threshold? I'm already working on another spreadsheet, and I am excited to share it with all of you.
  22. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Sometimes inspiration strikes in odd ways. Today, Rhett Bollinger, the Twins' MLB.com beat writer, sent out this tweet:

    Joe Mauer just popped out. Something he did only once last year in 641 plate appearances. #MNTwins
    — Rhett Bollinger (@RhettBollinger) February 26, 2013
     
    Wait, what? I saw that come through my feed and I was immediately interested. Was it true?

    @bridman77 Yep. It's actually only once in the last two years. Fangraphs has the stats.
    — Rhett Bollinger (@RhettBollinger) February 26, 2013
     
     
    That seems so unlikely. Even by raw luck, one would think that Mauer would pop out a few times each year. Mauer was the best in the AL last year at not making outs. He only made an out 58.4% of the time. He had 641 plate appearances and only one resulted in an infield fly ball, which is what I will now be using to describe a pop up (at times). He struck out 88 times, so he still made over 300 outs with his bat. And yet, only once did he make an out by flying out in the infield.
     
    How rare is this? I was inspired to investigate. I started doing some research. Mauer has only 20 infield fly outs in his nine-year-career. Crazy. I decided to look at how many players had 20 or more infield fly outs last season. Forty. Forty players! Forty players popped out as much or more than Mauer has in his entire career, and all just last season. Now I am really intrigued. Here's a spreadsheet that resulted from my intrigue:
     
    Infield Fly Ball Nerd Spreadsheet
     
    Looking at the spreadsheet demonstrates just how rare this feat or accomplishment or freak occurrence really is. In fact, take a look at this chart:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    [/TD][TD]Mauer Infield Fly Balls

    # of Players > 20 IFFB that season
    Mauer Infield Hits


    2004
    1
    87
    4


    2005
    3
    62
    6


    2006
    2
    73
    8


    2007
    1
    62
    5


    2008
    6
    57
    10


    2009
    2
    50
    8


    2010
    4
    46
    12


    2011
    0
    56
    6


    2012
    1
    40
    8


    Total
    20
    533
    67
    [/TABLE]
     
    Mauer has had 20 infield fly balls in 9 years, and 533 players have had 20 or more infield fly balls in a season during that same span. I threw in a BONUS! column that shows Mauer has over 3 times as many infield hits than infield fly balls. How crazy.
     
    Before I go further, this data does not necessarily mean these were all pop outs. They are simply infield fly balls. Some may have dropped, although it stands to reason that the vast majority were converted into outs. So, when I use these terms interchangeably, I apologize. This isn't an academic journal.
     
    Since we are all in love with this stat at this point, I looked at who created the most infield fly balls per plate appearance. Basically, these are the Pop-Up Kings (2002-2012 data):
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Name
    IFFB
    PA
    IFFB/PA


    Eric Byrnes
    273
    3478
    7.85%


    Tony Batista
    180
    2315
    7.78%


    Mike Rivera
    45
    593
    7.59%


    Todd Greene
    58
    841
    6.90%


    Mike Moustakas
    64
    979
    6.54%


    Rod Barajas
    234
    3642
    6.43%


    Joe Crede
    212
    3307
    6.41%


    Drew Butera
    33
    531
    6.21%


    John Flaherty
    43
    692
    6.21%


    Lenny Harris
    34
    555
    6.13%
    [/TABLE]
     
    Do you prefer volume pop-up hitters? Here is the chart for you (2004-2012 data used to mirror Mauer's career)!
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Name
    Career IFFB


    Vernon Wells
    277


    Carlos Lee
    255


    Eric Byrnes
    245


    Albert Pujols
    239


    Johnny Damon
    221


    Alex Gonzalez
    212


    Jimmy Rollins
    210


    Yuniesky Betancourt
    207


    Aramis Ramirez
    206


    Rod Barajas
    205
    [/TABLE]
     
    A few familiar names indeed! Personally, I'd rather remember Eric Byrnes for his extreme pop-up-edness, rather than for his current gig at MLB Network. Tony Batista would have absolutely been my first guess as a Pop-Up King. The way he stands would seem to lend itself to popping up a lot. The leaders pop-up about every 13 plate appearances. What about the players with the lowest rate of infield fly balls? WordHippo tells me that the opposite of a King is a Subject. So, here are the Pop-Up Subjects (that sounds terrible):
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Name
    IFFB
    PA
    IFFB/PA


    Larry Bigbie
    1
    1218
    0.08%


    Julio Franco
    4
    1517
    0.26%


    Ben Revere
    3
    1064
    0.28%


    Joey Votto
    11
    3064
    0.36%


    Howie Kendrick
    13
    3232
    0.40%


    Ryan Howard
    19
    4701
    0.40%


    Joe Mauer
    20
    4552
    0.44%


    Derek Jeter
    34
    7644
    0.44%


    Jose Tabata
    6
    1197
    0.50%


    Buster Posey
    7
    1255
    0.56%
    [/TABLE]
     
    Mauer, even with all his anti-pop-up glory, is only 7th. Larry Bigbie had one pop-up in his career. Here is the box score from that game, in case you want to frame it. Many of the names on this list are players who just don't hit a lot of fly balls at all. Just looking at last year, Ben Revere had the lowest fly ball rate, Jeter was second lowest, Kendrick fourth and Mauer sixth.
     
    Votto, Howard and Posey seem like the anomalies, as they are all powerful hitters. Votto and Posey post lower than average fly ball rates, and Howard is right at average. The fact that each hits a lot of homeruns is quite impressive, as they just hit fewer balls in the air than most power hitters.
     
    I refuse to try to make sense of anything related to Julio Franco.
     
    Back to Mauer. Mauer hits an infield fly ball once in every 227 plate appearances. So, today's event was pretty rare. In fact, we might not see another one until around June. The real question is why is he such a Subject of Pop-Ups? I really hate that name. Let's call them No Pop-Up Dudes going forward.
     
    A bigger picture can be seen with all of his batted ball data. Here are his batted ball rates compared with league average:
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Rates
    Mauer
    League Avg


    LD
    23.10%
    20%


    GB
    50.30%
    44%


    FB
    26.60%
    36%


    IFFB
    2.20%
    10%
    [/TABLE]
     
    This helps to explain his lack of home run power, but overall great hitting.
     
    BUT WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?!?!?
     
    I don't know, nothing?
     
    Well, the best contact hitters seem to be good at avoiding the worst type of contact. It stands to reason that the infield fly ball is the worst type of batted ball. It doesn't get converted to hits or runs unless there is some sort of hilarious infield mishap and they almost never lead to sacrificed runners.
     
    Mauer likely avoids this type of contact because he has such a great approach and he doesn't deviate from it. He swings easily and tends to swing at only pitches he can handle. The fact that he doesn't hit a lot of fly balls to begin with helps as well. Overall, Mauer seems to be a hitter who knows exactly what he wants to do, and stays within that approach in nearly all cases.
     
    Or, he's a wizard.
     
    Upon further review, Grant Brisbee, Jeff Sullivan, and Jeff Passan all wrote about Joey Votto's extreme aversion to pop ups. You could argue that he was the original No Pop-Up Dude. In addition, Sullivan wrote about how remarkable Joe Mauer is. You can say I stole from everyone and no one.
  23. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    I went to Target this afternoon. That alone is exciting enough for a new post, but there's more! I was going to get bread and milk for my family. I also needed to buy some pens, which happen to be on the opposite end of the store. There's still more. After procuring my pens, I went down an unmanned checkout aisle to get a soda pop. I wanted a Diet Dr. Pepper. Farther down that aisle were the baseball cards. I thought to myself "oh man, I used to love baseball cards." It's true. In fact, this card is burned into my brain and remains my favorite card ever.
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-v8rm8jo9rSY/USmnwx5r4DI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/m88zpwdxePU/s320/1993-Topps-KirbyPuckett.jpg
     
    I stood there looking at the cards. At first, I was surprised. Then, I was confused. There were packs and then there were jumbo packs, then there were these value boxes and then there were some other value boxes that were bigger. It was overwhelming. I had invested a good five minutes into this venture, so I decided I would buy a pack of baseball cards. I scoured the area for something familiar. There were old looking cards that were new and there were some packs that had only 3 or 4 cards for like 5 dollars. Now, I'm no cheapskate, but man, that seems high.
     
    I found the 2013 Topps. I used to collect Topps! In fact, that Kirby Puckett card is a Topps! I wondered if any of the cards would have giant bats involved, but figured the only legal way to find out was to buy a pack. So, I got the pack of 2013 Topps. There were 12 cards for $1.99, which actually doesn't seem that unreasonable. I'd like to turn this into a cute story where I forget to buy the milk and bread because I was so excited, but that just isn't the case.
     
    I arrived home and shared with my wife that I bought a pack of cards. She didn't seem that impressed, but wasn't mad or witty or anything stereotypical like that. This isn't a sitcom. However, she was not nearly as excited as I was when I opened the pack.
     
    The cards are pretty nice. The photos are good. There was this weird green card that I assumed was super valuable, but the pack says there are 1 in every 6 packs. Considering there were roughly 5,000 packs at that one Target, I'm guessing these aren't very rare. They ugly too. I didn't get any Twins in Twin uniforms, but I did get this little gem:
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TxhUeXi0btU/USmoW9dXyJI/AAAAAAAAAPY/wHqPfZLqW8c/s320/photo102.JPG
     
    I also got rookie phenom Jurickson Profar's rookie card! I know this because there is a logo with an RC on it:
     
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YUczBvbG22s/USmon3x8afI/AAAAAAAAAPg/HbpamZsvxiU/s320/photo+(98).JPG
     
    I zoomed in on his face. It looks painted. I can't confirm if Profar's real face just looks like a painting, or if this is a photoshopped image. If anyone knows the answer, please let me know. Take a look at this bad picture and see for yourself:
     
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vvdEJff5FzM/USmoz1QV44I/AAAAAAAAAPo/Wc1gcjdUURo/s320/photo+(100).JPG
     
    As you can see, I don't take great care of my card collection:
     
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HLxMvXB6XuU/USmo7JZuEhI/AAAAAAAAAPw/rP8xUy9P8i0/s320/photo101.JPG
     
    They fell off the couch and landed there. I had forgotten they were on the couch. At first, the dog was very interested, but ultimately seemed bored with the whole deal:
     
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BnBa3uhOtpY/USmpKpDzsUI/AAAAAAAAAP4/5sG5i5DAhiE/s320/photo+(99).JPG
     
    One of the blinds is crooked. I should fix that. Ok, what's the point of all this? I got a card that had a checklist on the back. I didn't take a picture for some reason, and I'm not really able to get off the couch right now:
     
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NCbSCOpE454/USmpWmIqDfI/AAAAAAAAAQA/r-fi-_5O4t4/s320/photo103.JPG
     
    He does that. Have you typed with a 90 lb dog on your arm? You should, it adds a degree of difficulty. The checklist is the cheese here though. I remember when I was a kid, the checklist card was just a list of players. It sucked. I usually threw them out. They didn't have a players on them or anything. This 2013 version had Johan Santana on the front. Very nice! I'm a gypsy. My wife. Sorry, Borat loop.
     
    The checklist got me thinking: do they make a card for each player? I did some research and found that in 2012, they made 3 series of Topps standard cards. There was series 1, series 2, and update series. I guess series 3 would have been too predictable. I did investigate further and found that "update series" is for players who have changed teams and other events like the all-star game and whatnot. This confirms my suspicions that each player does not have a card.
     
    Side note: Topps makes like a million different sets each year. Some have really funny names like Gypsy Queen. There is also a baseball card Wikipedia of sorts. Here's the link, have fun!
     
    Back to the task at hand. It's simple math. There are 330 cards in each of these Topps sets. 330 x 3 = 990. In any given season, there are at least 750 players, but usually many more. That should add up, but remember what I said about the "update series." Perhaps the worst players just don't get a card. That makes sense, right?
     
    Oh wait:
     
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TxhUeXi0btU/USmoW9dXyJI/AAAAAAAAAPY/wHqPfZLqW8c/s320/photo102.JPG
     
    So, that's not it.
     
    The reality is that some players must be snubbed! You can't have a player on a Topps card until they actually play an MLB game. It's a rule. It must be a contract thing. So, some rookies might not get cards until the next season. That's fine. There likely was not a 2012 Profar card. I checked eBay quick but that was exhausting. There are just too many colors and variations. What happened to the days of guys holding giant bats?
     
    I decided to find the player checklists from the three series in 2012 to see which Twins were snubbed by the good people at Topps. In the end, I found 32 players who had cards in the 2012 sets. I also counted 8 fairly notable Twins without cards. Here is the spreadsheet I made. Don't make fun of me.
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    Card #
    Player
    Notes


    Series 1
    [/TD]



    62
    Ben Revere



    81
    Liam Hendriks
    Rookie Card


    95
    Chris Parmelee
    Rookie Card


    97
    Jim Thome
    Record Breakers, not sure which one


    111
    Kevin Slowey
    In a Twins Uniform, I looked it up


    164
    Carl Pavano



    179
    Denard Span



    230
    Justin Morneau



    235
    Joe Benson
    Rookie Card


    249
    Trevor Plouffe



    276
    Scott Baker



    292
    Ben Revere
    again?


    303
    Danny Valencia
    lol


    316
    Nick Blackburn
    lol


    Series 2




    337
    Glen Perkins



    389
    Alexi Casilla
    Note to self: buy this


    411
    Tsuyoshi Nishioka
    hmm


    501
    Matt Capps



    512
    Josh Willingham



    517
    Francisco Liriano



    529
    Luke Hughes
    huh?


    535
    Joe Mauer
    I was starting to wonder


    655
    Ryan Doumit


    [TD=colspan: 2]Update Series

    [/TD]


    US7
    Joe Mauer
    All-Star


    US67
    Jamey Carroll



    US112
    Eduardo Escobar
    Rookie Card


    US140
    Brian Duensing



    US158
    Jared Burton



    US161
    Brian Dozier
    Rookie Card


    US163
    Scott Diamond



    US274
    Jeff Gray
    BWAHAHAHAHAHA


    US330
    Alex Burnett
    That's right, the last card for the year is Alex Burnett


    No Card





    Darin Mastroianni
    0.8 WAR



    Pedro Florimon
    0.8 WAR



    Matt Carson
    0.1 WAR



    Anthony Swarzak
    -0.6 WAR



    Cole De Vries
    0.2 WAR



    P.J. Walters
    -0.6 WAR



    Sam Deduno
    0.5 WAR


    [TD]Casey Fien

    1.0 WAR
    [/TABLE]
     
    I listed those without cards by WAR. The winner: Casey Fien. Casey Fien was pretty good last year. He was certainly better than Alex Burnett and Jeff Gray. Plus, Casey Fien doesn't even have a rookie card, even though he has played in parts of three seasons. At least not one I can find. I have decided to reward him with his own card. I'd say the results are a bit mixed. I'm still learning the intricacies of gimp. A billion points if you can guess the body of the player I used. No google, yo.
     
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XLu2t5dsiro/USmqj1O_wkI/AAAAAAAAAQM/Pzzowh9VtxM/s320/casey
     
    Whoa, that is terrifying.
     
    With that, I have righted an injustice and taken you on a journey of what happens on an average Saturday in my house. If you have feedback, I'd love to read it. Clearly, I need more things to help me pass the time.
     
    If you like this sort of nonsense, you can read about my trip to Glenallen Hill and see what a bowl of Bobby Bonilla ice cream might be like. Click here, you'll be "glad" you did.
     
    Brad Swanson is a professional photohop guy. He had the title line in Star Wars.
  24. Brad Swanson
    Originally posted at Kevin Slowey was Framed!
     
    Not all bad teams are created equal. Some teams are bad for just one injury-plagued season. Some teams are bad for a few seasons and then good for a few seasons. Some teams are just chronically bad. Bad teams need to be changed. Bad teams have the benefit of receiving good draft picks, but other than that, they don't really gain any sort of advantage from being bad. Teams do not want to be bad. Bad teams can struggle to attract fans and free agents, while also struggling to keep their own home-grown players.
     
    Good franchises can field bad teams. Most teams go through rough patches. The Boston Red Sox might have been the most successful franchise of the 2000s, but finished in last place in 2012. Going with the local angle, the Twins were successful during that same decade, but has suffered through 2 consecutive last place seasons. As hard as it may be to swallow, the Twins need to rebuild. Some fans cringe at that word, some scoff, but the reality is that any given last place team needs to rebuild in some manner. That being said, not all rebuilds are the same. Let's look at the 5 worst teams from 2012 and try to better understand their method for rebuilding.
     
    Note: I created some charts for my own purposes. I took the 5 best players on each of these five teams, over the past three seasons. I used fWAR to determine the best 5 players. I just wanted to see if this data indicated anything. I think it does, you might disagree, but I'll include the charts as I think they are pretty interesting. The chart shows the player name, their fWAR that season, and what team this player is with right now. I used NOWHERE for players without a team, because I am a drama queen.
     
    Houston Astros - Blow Up the Outside World
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    2010 - 76-86
    [/TD]



    Michael Bourn
    5.8
    Indians


    Brett Myers
    4.7
    Indians


    Hunter Pence
    2.8
    Giants


    Roy Oswalt
    2.5
    NOWHERE


    Wandy Rodriguez
    2.3
    Pirates


    2011 - 56-106




    Carlos Lee
    3.7
    NOWHERE


    Hunter Pence
    3.2
    Giants


    Clint Barmes
    2.9
    Pirates


    Wandy Rodriguez
    2.3
    Pirates


    Michael Bourn
    2.1
    Indians


    2012 - 55-107




    Lucas Harrell
    2.8
    Astros


    Justin Maxwell
    2.3
    Astros


    Wilton Lopez
    2.2
    Rockies


    Jed Lowrie
    2.1
    A's


    Jose Altuve
    1.3
    Astros
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Astros seems to be employing the fantasy baseball "full rebuild." They have basically taken each and every valuable player and traded them for younger pieces. They will hang on to young, cheap players, but anyone else is being used to rebuild their farm system. They will likely have a payroll around 25 million this season, which is comically low. When you look at their chart, you can see that nearly every valuable player has been moved. The three remaining players are all pre-arbitration. Only Bud Norris and Carlos Pena will make more than 2 million dollars in 2013, and both seem very unlikely to finish their seasons in Houston.
     
    The present in Houston is terribly bleak. The future is getting brighter. Their farm system is much improved. Going into 2012, the Astros had a terrible team and a terrible farm system. Only one of those statements is true today, due to their trades. It also doesn't hurt to get the first pick in the draft, which they used to draft a very promising shortstop named Carlos Correa. The farm system is nice, but everyone knows that prospects aren't sure bets.
     
    My biggest issue with this form of rebuild is that teams eventually run out of good players to trade. Right now, Houston might be able to get something for Norris, Lucas Harrell and Jose Altuve. Do they really want to trade those guys? Each is relatively young, each is relatively productive and each is under team control for the foreseeable future. At some point, these atom bomb rebuilds have to start showing MLB results. Correa won't be ready for years. They have the first pick this June as well, but who knows when that player will be ready? This rebuild could take 5 more years, for all we know. It's a risky endeavor, that is for sure.
     
    Chicago Cubs - Mrs Dash
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    2010 - 75-87




    Marlon Byrd
    3.5
    Mets


    Geovany Soto
    3.1
    Rangers


    Carlos Marmol
    2.6
    Cubs


    Randy Wells
    2.6
    Rangers


    Carlos Zambrano
    2.5
    NOWHERE


    2011 - 71-91




    Starlin Castro
    3
    Cubs


    Aramis Ramirez
    2.5
    Brewers


    Matt Garza
    2.5
    Cubs


    Sean Marshall
    2.4
    Reds


    Carlos Pena
    2.3
    Astros


    2012 - 61-101




    Darwin Barney
    4.6
    Cubs


    Starlin Castro
    3.5
    Cubs


    Ryan Dempster
    3.3
    Red Sox


    Anthony Rizzo
    2.2
    Cubs


    Alfonso Soriano
    1.8
    Cubs
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Cubs are one of those franchises that seems to sprinkle good seasons around their general misery. It makes me sad. I like the Cubs and I hope they turn things around. It looks like my hopes might be coming to fruition. The Cubs do not seem to want to sit around, blow things up and wait to see if their talented prospects pan out. Instead, they are seasoning in some good players here and there, making smart decisions and trying to build the ship as they sail, so to speak.
     
    They certainly do not have the payroll of a rebuilding team. They'll likely settle in right around $100 million, but that isn't a crazy figure when you consider their market and fan-base. Their roster is better going into 2013 and they have some pieces that they could move if the team struggles, but who can also contribute if the team experiences some success. They have a nice young core of players, including Starlin Castro, Anthony Rizzo, Jeff Samardija and yes, Darwin Barney. They have some elite prospects in their system and they will pick 2nd in the June draft. It seems that the Cubs are willing to move anyone outside of their young core and farm system.
     
    They added depth to their starting staff, and signed guys who can be moved if the 2013 season isn't going well. They went upside with Scott Baker, Scott Feldman and Carlos Villanueva. If one guy hits, they could have a long-term contributor in their rotation. If all three hit, well, that would be nice for the Cub fans. There is obvious risk in this strategy as well. The market for injured pitchers isn't great, and the Cubs exploited that, but they will have to rely on that same market if they decide to try to move those pitchers.
     
    Colorado Rockies - Hide under coats; hope it all works out
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    2010 - 83-79




    Ubaldo Jimenez
    7.3
    Indians


    Troy Tulowitzki
    6.5
    Rockies


    Carlos Gonzalez
    5.8
    Rockies


    Jhoulys Chacin
    2.4
    Rockies


    Miguel Olivo
    2.3
    Reds


    2011 - 73-89




    Troy Tulowitzki
    5.9
    Rockies


    Carlos Gonzalez
    4.2
    Rockies


    Jhoulys Chacin
    3.6
    Rockies


    Chris Iannetta
    3.1
    Angels


    Dexter Fowler
    2.5
    Rockies


    2012 - 64-98




    Rafael Betancourt
    2.6
    Rockies


    Dexter Fowler
    2.5
    Rockies


    Matt Belisle
    2.3
    Rockies


    Jhoulys Chacin
    2
    Rockies


    Josh Roenicke
    2
    Twins
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Rockies confuse me. They have had two consecutive bad seasons. They have a couple of superstar players, but both miss a decent chunk of seemingly each season (Troy Tulowitzki and Carlos Gonzalez). They did next to nothing this off-season, other than signing Jeff Francis, and trading for Reid Brignac and Wilton Lopez. These aren't moves that help rebuild a team. They also did not trade anyone for any sort of young player or prospect.
     
    Their strategy seems to hinge on healthy seasons from their stars and development from their young pitchers. Their farm system is pretty poor, so there isn't a lot of help coming from that part of the organization. They have good players (I love Dexter Fowler), but they also have old players. Gonzalez is 27 and Tulowitzki is 28. Both are signed forever, so that is good, but there isn't much around them. Michael Cuddyer is overrated, Todd Helton is a billion and I can't think of a third thing. I think that is a bad sign. I can't assess any risk because I have no idea what they are even doing.
     
    Minnesota Twins - Some sort of Cobra-Squirrel hybrid
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    2010 - 94-68




    Joe Mauer
    5.5
    Twins


    Justin Morneau
    4.6
    Twins


    Jim Thome
    3.4
    NOWHERE


    Orlando Hudson
    2.6
    NOWHERE


    Brian Duensing
    2.4
    Twins


    2011 - 63-99




    Scott Baker
    4.2
    Cubs


    Denard Span
    2.3
    Nationals


    Glen Perkins
    2
    Twins


    Carl Pavano
    1.8
    NOWHERE


    Michael Cuddyer
    1.7
    Rockies


    2012 - 66-96




    Denard Span
    4.8
    Nationals


    Joe Mauer
    4.1
    Twins


    Jamey Carroll
    3.2
    Twins


    Josh Willingham
    2.9
    Twins


    Ben Revere
    2.4
    Phillies
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Twins have certainly struck like a cobra in a few instances this off-season. They added three young pitchers (Vance Worley, Alex Meyer, and Trevor May) in two excellent trades. At the same time, they have been hesitant to trade off other valuable players like Josh Willingham and Justin Morneau. They may simply be lying in wait, looking for the best deal. It is also possible that the market for these two players isn't very good right now. Each has question marks, and each could address them in 2013, raising their trade value. The Twins never really seem committed to a full rebuild, but they have done a nice job of picking their spots and addressing their needs.
     
    It is still a work-in-progress though. Much like the Astros, the Twins could run out of good players to trade. Really, other than Willingham and Morneau, the only realistic trade pieces are Ryan Doumit, Glen Perkins and Jared Burton. Each of those guys might also be worth keeping around. Unlike the Astros, the Twins have more near-ready prospect talent. Aaron Hicks, Oswaldo Arcia, Alex Meyer, Kyle Gibson and Trevor May are all top ten prospects who likely will be playing in Minnesota before the end of the 2014 season. The Twins also have some payroll flexibility, and could use the 2013 off-season to truly improve their MLB team, around these young, promising players.
     
    Some are starting to say that 2013 is not a rebuilding year. I don't agree with that sentiment, but I do think the Twins are going to relevant as soon as 2014. I see strong parallels between 2014 and that 2001 season that started their AL Central mini-dynasty. There was uproar about the free agent starting pitchers that were signed this off-season, but the reality is that the Twins likely did not want to sign anyone who would block the young arms who are getting closer to Minnesota each day. There is risk here, and the middle infield is still an issue, but the Twins are amassing resources and making shrewd moves when given the opportunity.
     
    Cleveland Indians - Protein Powder
     
    [TABLE=class: grid, width: 500]


    2010 - 69-93




    Shin-Soo Choo
    5.6
    Reds


    Roberto Hernandez
    2.5
    Rays


    Chris Perez
    2.5
    Indians


    Travis Hafner
    2.1
    Yankees


    Carlos Santana
    1.8
    Indians


    2011 - 80-82




    Asdrubal Cabrera
    4.6
    Indians


    Justin Masterson
    3.6
    Indians


    Carlos Santana
    3.4
    Indians


    Jack Hannahan
    2.2
    Reds


    Joe Smith
    2.2
    Indians


    2012 - 68-94
    [TD]



    Jason Kipnis
    3.7
    Indians


    Carlos Santana
    3.7
    Indians


    Shin-Soo Choo
    3.1
    Reds


    Asdrubal Cabrera
    3
    Indians


    Michael Brantley
    2.9
    Indians
    [/TABLE]
     
    The Indians seem to be employing a strategy similar to the Cubs. They likely had a better MLB team to begin with, but definitely do not have a comparable farm system. The Indians seem to be targeting their weaknesses and dealing from their strengths. This isn't a unique strategy, but that doesn't make it any easier to implement. The Indians needed to bolster their young pitching, and used Shin-Soo Choo, a great player, to get Trevor Bauer. Bauer has his flaws, but he also has crazy upside. The Indians also signed some good players in free agency, including Nick Swisher, Michael Bourn and yes, Mark Reynolds.
     
    They have their core of good players: Jason Kipnis, Carlos Santana, Asdrubal Cabrera, Michael Brantley, Bourn and Swisher. They have interesting arms in Bauer, Justin Masterson, Carlos Carrasco, and Ubaldo Jimenez. They also have two great bullpen arms in Vinnie Pestano and Chris Perez. You could make the argument that the Indians have been rebuilt. They might not be a World Series team, but who knows? A lot of people want to find the next 2012 Orioles or 2012 A's. Likely, there won't be one, but the Indians might be as good a bet as any other team.
     
    So, not all rebuilds are the same. Each of these teams had major flaws, and that is why they were the five worst teams in 2012. However, each is employing a different method in their quest to return to relevance. Which strategies will work? Only time will tell.
×
×
  • Create New...