-
Posts
6,763 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
News
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by John Bonnes
-
-
You can listen by downloading us from iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, GleemanAndTheGeek.com, click this link, or you can listen to it or watch it below. View full article
-
Gleeman & The Geek: Lowered Expectations and Familiar Rants
John Bonnes posted an article in Podcasts
-
Image courtesy of © Mitch Stringer-Imagn Images The Twins started their offseason by acquiring their likely backup catcher from the Baltimore Orioles in an arbitration-deadline-driven trade. Alex Jackson, a 29-year-old, power-first, defense-capable catcher who has spent most of his career on the fringe between Triple-A and the majors, will join Minnesota. In return, the Twins sent Payton Eeles, a 26-year-old utility infielder who has yet to make his MLB debut. Jackson is a right-handed hitter and the prototypical journeyman backstop: raw power, a strong arm, dependable defense, and plenty of strikeouts. A former first-round pick, he has consistently shown real pop at Triple-A — slugging .517 across his time at that level — but that production has never carried over against MLB pitching. Across parts of five big-league seasons, he’s hit just .153 with six home runs, limited by high strikeout rates and difficulty making consistent contact. That changed for the better in 2025. With Baltimore, he hit well at Triple-A (772 OPS) and briefly filled in behind Adley Rutschman in the majors (763 OPS over 100 PA). But he also qualified for arbitration this winter, and MLB Trade Rumors projected him to earn $1.8 million, making him available. With Rutschman and top prospect Samuel Basallo in the big leagues, and Basallo signed through 2033, Jackson would have only been an emergency catcher. For the Twins, who paid Christian Vázquez $10 million each of the past three years before he became a free agent, that's a relative bargain. Eeles, headed to Baltimore, gives the Orioles some middle-infield depth. At this time last year, he looked like one of the Twins’ most unexpected development wins, jumping from the independent Atlantic League in May of 2024 to Triple-A St. Paul by season’s end. Once in Triple-A, the then-24-year-old slashed .299/.419/.500 with eight homers, 20 steals, and a 14.6 percent strikeout rate over 260 plate appearances. Offseason knee surgery pushed back the start of his 2025 campaign back. He returned to the Saints in early June. His production was down, but he still posted a .379 OBP. But Eeles is just 5-foot-5 and unlikely to grow into much power. He profiles as a pesky, contact-oriented hitter who can get on base, pressure defenses and swipe 20-plus bags with regular playing time. The Twins have several infielders that they are more committed to developing in the organization, a fact underscored when Eeles did not receive a late-season call-up even after the team traded away ten players at the deadline. To make room for Jackson on the Twins 40-man roster, outfielder DaShawn Keirsey, Jr. was designated for assignment. View full article
-
The Twins started their offseason by acquiring their likely backup catcher from the Baltimore Orioles in an arbitration-deadline-driven trade. Alex Jackson, a 29-year-old, power-first, defense-capable catcher who has spent most of his career on the fringe between Triple-A and the majors, will join Minnesota. In return, the Twins sent Payton Eeles, a 26-year-old utility infielder who has yet to make his MLB debut. Jackson is a right-handed hitter and the prototypical journeyman backstop: raw power, a strong arm, dependable defense, and plenty of strikeouts. A former first-round pick, he has consistently shown real pop at Triple-A — slugging .517 across his time at that level — but that production has never carried over against MLB pitching. Across parts of five big-league seasons, he’s hit just .153 with six home runs, limited by high strikeout rates and difficulty making consistent contact. That changed for the better in 2025. With Baltimore, he hit well at Triple-A (772 OPS) and briefly filled in behind Adley Rutschman in the majors (763 OPS over 100 PA). But he also qualified for arbitration this winter, and MLB Trade Rumors projected him to earn $1.8 million, making him available. With Rutschman and top prospect Samuel Basallo in the big leagues, and Basallo signed through 2033, Jackson would have only been an emergency catcher. For the Twins, who paid Christian Vázquez $10 million each of the past three years before he became a free agent, that's a relative bargain. Eeles, headed to Baltimore, gives the Orioles some middle-infield depth. At this time last year, he looked like one of the Twins’ most unexpected development wins, jumping from the independent Atlantic League in May of 2024 to Triple-A St. Paul by season’s end. Once in Triple-A, the then-24-year-old slashed .299/.419/.500 with eight homers, 20 steals, and a 14.6 percent strikeout rate over 260 plate appearances. Offseason knee surgery pushed back the start of his 2025 campaign back. He returned to the Saints in early June. His production was down, but he still posted a .379 OBP. But Eeles is just 5-foot-5 and unlikely to grow into much power. He profiles as a pesky, contact-oriented hitter who can get on base, pressure defenses and swipe 20-plus bags with regular playing time. The Twins have several infielders that they are more committed to developing in the organization, a fact underscored when Eeles did not receive a late-season call-up even after the team traded away ten players at the deadline. To make room for Jackson on the Twins 40-man roster, outfielder DaShawn Keirsey, Jr. was designated for assignment.
-
Image courtesy of © Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images This afternoon, Major League Baseball announced the anticipated new media-rights agreement granting ESPN rights to distribute local games for six teams beginning in the 2026 season—including the Minnesota Twins. While this represents a significant change in the league’s broader TV and streaming strategy, Twins fans can relax; nothing changes about how you watch games. In-market streaming: Twins.TV will continue to carry all in-market games for fans in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and parts of Wisconsin and Iowa. Out-of-market streaming: MLB.TV remains the option for out-of-market viewers (with the usual blackout rules). The MLB.TV and Twins.TV bundle will remain available. Traditional TV: The deal does not affect 2026 local television distribution. You should continue watching on the same carrier, same channel, and same subscription tier you used last year. In addition, MLB will gain an additional distribution lane and may choose to stream select games on the ESPN app or related platforms. Those specifics haven’t been announced, but whatever ESPN adds will be in addition to, not instead of, Twins.TV or your current TV provider. In addition, this deal should not affect the broadcasts themselves, as it is a distribution rights deal, and doesn’t affect the production of the broadcasts. After last season’s rocky rollout of Twins.TV (including late carrier announcements and MLB server issues on Opening Day), this stability is a welcome development. Fans will be able to watch exactly as Twins Daily's TV/Streaming Guide directed you to in 2025: Twins.TV for streaming, and the same TV provider and channel for cable/satellite. From that standpoint, the announcement is straightforward, but it represents a much bigger deal to MLB. This is an early step toward consolidating national television and streaming rights, which is an especially important development for smaller markets. Unlike the NFL or NBA, where the bulk of television money is shared, local television revenues represent a major difference between large- and small-market teams in MLB. The hope is that grouping most MLB teams into a single deal will help address that inherent disparity. View full article
-
Don’t Panic: Twins TV/Streaming Won’t Change Despite MLB’s ESPN Deal
John Bonnes posted an article in Twins
This afternoon, Major League Baseball announced the anticipated new media-rights agreement granting ESPN rights to distribute local games for six teams beginning in the 2026 season—including the Minnesota Twins. While this represents a significant change in the league’s broader TV and streaming strategy, Twins fans can relax; nothing changes about how you watch games. In-market streaming: Twins.TV will continue to carry all in-market games for fans in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and parts of Wisconsin and Iowa. Out-of-market streaming: MLB.TV remains the option for out-of-market viewers (with the usual blackout rules). The MLB.TV and Twins.TV bundle will remain available. Traditional TV: The deal does not affect 2026 local television distribution. You should continue watching on the same carrier, same channel, and same subscription tier you used last year. In addition, MLB will gain an additional distribution lane and may choose to stream select games on the ESPN app or related platforms. Those specifics haven’t been announced, but whatever ESPN adds will be in addition to, not instead of, Twins.TV or your current TV provider. In addition, this deal should not affect the broadcasts themselves, as it is a distribution rights deal, and doesn’t affect the production of the broadcasts. After last season’s rocky rollout of Twins.TV (including late carrier announcements and MLB server issues on Opening Day), this stability is a welcome development. Fans will be able to watch exactly as Twins Daily's TV/Streaming Guide directed you to in 2025: Twins.TV for streaming, and the same TV provider and channel for cable/satellite. From that standpoint, the announcement is straightforward, but it represents a much bigger deal to MLB. This is an early step toward consolidating national television and streaming rights, which is an especially important development for smaller markets. Unlike the NFL or NBA, where the bulk of television money is shared, local television revenues represent a major difference between large- and small-market teams in MLB. The hope is that grouping most MLB teams into a single deal will help address that inherent disparity. -
-
-
-
Five Pohlad Family Minnesota Twins Payroll Levels, and What They'll Mean
John Bonnes posted an article in Twins
During Twins President Derek Falvey’s wide-ranging, season-ending sit-down with the media on Tuesday, he was asked what the Twins' payroll would be in 2026. He didn’t answer, but we’ll find out. And when that number is released, I want you to understand what it means. So I’m going to give you five payroll levels and what they mean for the future of your Minnesota Twins. That’s because there was also one inadvertent admission during that session: payroll matters. Falvey was also asked how he viewed the Twins roster for the 2026 season. He replied that it depended on ownership. “Specifically working with ownership around exactly what the vision is for this team going forward and opportunities and the markets and things like that.” That’s an interesting and backwards response, because usually ownership would lean on, say, their President of Baseball Operations to evaluate the current level of the team and the free agent market. But you know what ownership can dictate? They can dictate a payroll budget, which was the very next question. “I think that’s a conversation that we’ll continue to have, certainly with the Pohlads and whatever conversation they’d like me to have with the limited partners”, replied Falvey. So Falvey doesn’t know what we can expect from the Twins next year until he talks to ownership. And he doesn’t know what he has to spend until he talks to ownership. Well, of course. It is well-documented that the decline of the Twins' payroll has influenced the decline of the Twins over the last two years. However, it has also been the primary limitation of the team since its inception. For that matter, it has been a critical factor of every baseball team throughout their history, and while we’re at it, for the vast majority of other businesses as well. Listen, I love underdog Disney movies, too. But our love of underdog Disney movies doesn’t change the way the world works. In fact, our sad understanding of the way the world works is what makes us love underdog Disney movies. Payroll matters. So let’s look at the five levels at which the Pohlads and their new limited partners could reasonably be expected to fund payroll for 2026. They correspond with five grades fans should give them. But before we get to that, you have to know one number: 95. $95 million is roughly what it will cost the Twins to retain the team they have. Below is the 2026 roster and rough estimates for players' salaries. I’d encourage the baseball geeks to check my work, and more casual fans to peruse what the lineup and bullpen look like. If $95M is the baseline, here are the five levels (and grades) that Twins fans should reasonably expect. $80M - Grade: F At this level, ownership is telling you that the historic trade deadline fire sale still wasn’t enough to satisfy their money-lust. To get to this level, the team will either need to trade away some combination of Pablo Lopez, or Joe Ryan AND Ryan Jeffers, or Byron Buxton (who has a no-trade clause). If the knife cuts this deep, there’s a decent chance that $80M would be the lowest payroll in MLB, behind the Athletics, Marlins, and Rays. The Twins’ win expectations (and likely, attendance) would reflect this. $100M - Grade D At this level, ownership is fielding the same team that went 19-36 after the trade deadline, or they’re trading away one of the names above to free up some cash to add some minor free agents, like a couple of low-leverage relievers or a Ty France-level bat. This is a below .500 team. (Maybe well below .500.) $120M - Grade C This was roughly what the team’s payroll was this year. They would have about $25M to spend, which is either enough room to add one big bat, or to add a couple of semi-decent bats at first base and designated hitter, and maybe a bargain reliever. The Twins would be projected to be a .500 team and a wild-card also-ran. $140M - Grade B This was roughly what the team’s payroll was going into 2025, before they traded away $25M in payroll at the trade deadline. They would have about $45M to spend, which is definitely enough to add two middle-of-the-order bats and a decent reliever or two. They would be projected to be a wild-card contender. $160M - Grade A This is about the Twins' payroll in 2023, when they beat Toronto in the Wild Card round. It is also $20-30M below the average MLB payroll in 2026. However, it provides $65M to spend, which can be allocated to a combination of two or three big bats, two lockdown relievers, and possibly some complementary pieces. They would be an AL Central contender or Wild Card team. So, there you have it: five payroll levels, five grades, and five expectations. The fact that Falvey is entering an offseason claiming not to know which level we should expect is alarming, because surely that would be revealed if he knew it was good news. Whatever the news, he’s going to have to find a way to make the best of it, because payroll matters. And we Twins fans will have to do the same. What will the payroll level be? What should it be? Let us know below. -
Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images During Twins President Derek Falvey’s wide-ranging, season-ending sit-down with the media on Tuesday, he was asked what the Twins' payroll would be in 2026. He didn’t answer, but we’ll find out. And when that number is released, I want you to understand what it means. So I’m going to give you five payroll levels and what they mean for the future of your Minnesota Twins. That’s because there was also one inadvertent admission during that session: payroll matters. Falvey was also asked how he viewed the Twins roster for the 2026 season. He replied that it depended on ownership. “Specifically working with ownership around exactly what the vision is for this team going forward and opportunities and the markets and things like that.” That’s an interesting and backwards response, because usually ownership would lean on, say, their President of Baseball Operations to evaluate the current level of the team and the free agent market. But you know what ownership can dictate? They can dictate a payroll budget, which was the very next question. “I think that’s a conversation that we’ll continue to have, certainly with the Pohlads and whatever conversation they’d like me to have with the limited partners”, replied Falvey. So Falvey doesn’t know what we can expect from the Twins next year until he talks to ownership. And he doesn’t know what he has to spend until he talks to ownership. Well, of course. It is well-documented that the decline of the Twins' payroll has influenced the decline of the Twins over the last two years. However, it has also been the primary limitation of the team since its inception. For that matter, it has been a critical factor of every baseball team throughout their history, and while we’re at it, for the vast majority of other businesses as well. Listen, I love underdog Disney movies, too. But our love of underdog Disney movies doesn’t change the way the world works. In fact, our sad understanding of the way the world works is what makes us love underdog Disney movies. Payroll matters. So let’s look at the five levels at which the Pohlads and their new limited partners could reasonably be expected to fund payroll for 2026. They correspond with five grades fans should give them. But before we get to that, you have to know one number: 95. $95 million is roughly what it will cost the Twins to retain the team they have. Below is the 2026 roster and rough estimates for players' salaries. I’d encourage the baseball geeks to check my work, and more casual fans to peruse what the lineup and bullpen look like. If $95M is the baseline, here are the five levels (and grades) that Twins fans should reasonably expect. $80M - Grade: F At this level, ownership is telling you that the historic trade deadline fire sale still wasn’t enough to satisfy their money-lust. To get to this level, the team will either need to trade away some combination of Pablo Lopez, or Joe Ryan AND Ryan Jeffers, or Byron Buxton (who has a no-trade clause). If the knife cuts this deep, there’s a decent chance that $80M would be the lowest payroll in MLB, behind the Athletics, Marlins, and Rays. The Twins’ win expectations (and likely, attendance) would reflect this. $100M - Grade D At this level, ownership is fielding the same team that went 19-36 after the trade deadline, or they’re trading away one of the names above to free up some cash to add some minor free agents, like a couple of low-leverage relievers or a Ty France-level bat. This is a below .500 team. (Maybe well below .500.) $120M - Grade C This was roughly what the team’s payroll was this year. They would have about $25M to spend, which is either enough room to add one big bat, or to add a couple of semi-decent bats at first base and designated hitter, and maybe a bargain reliever. The Twins would be projected to be a .500 team and a wild-card also-ran. $140M - Grade B This was roughly what the team’s payroll was going into 2025, before they traded away $25M in payroll at the trade deadline. They would have about $45M to spend, which is definitely enough to add two middle-of-the-order bats and a decent reliever or two. They would be projected to be a wild-card contender. $160M - Grade A This is about the Twins' payroll in 2023, when they beat Toronto in the Wild Card round. It is also $20-30M below the average MLB payroll in 2026. However, it provides $65M to spend, which can be allocated to a combination of two or three big bats, two lockdown relievers, and possibly some complementary pieces. They would be an AL Central contender or Wild Card team. So, there you have it: five payroll levels, five grades, and five expectations. The fact that Falvey is entering an offseason claiming not to know which level we should expect is alarming, because surely that would be revealed if he knew it was good news. Whatever the news, he’s going to have to find a way to make the best of it, because payroll matters. And we Twins fans will have to do the same. What will the payroll level be? What should it be? Let us know below. View full article
-
You can listen by downloading us from iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, GleemanAndTheGeek.com, click this link or you can listen to it or watch it below. You can listen by downloading us from iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, GleemanAndTheGeek.com, click this link or you can listen to it or watch it below.
-
You can listen by downloading us from iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, GleemanAndTheGeek.com, click this link or you can listen to it or watch it below. You can listen by downloading us from iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, GleemanAndTheGeek.com, click this link or you can listen to it or watch it below. View full article
-
Gleeman & The Geek: Open Bars, Damn Yankees, and Running Games
John Bonnes posted an article in Podcasts
-
-
Payroll 101: Where the Twins’ 2026 Budget Starts (and Could Go)
John Bonnes posted an article in Twins
Payroll isn’t just a Twins problem—it’s the primary factor shaping every MLB team’s roster, even without a salary cap. You might feel that’s unwarranted, and if so, feel free to vent in the comments of the dozens of stories we’ve had on ownership. But our focus is going to be more practical. Given that payroll is an important factor for the Twins, what are the hard numbers for 2026 and what do they mean? To do that, we’re going to do some back-of-the-napkin figuring, approximating the numbers the front office will also be using as this offseason begins. But first, here is some context about the Twins' payroll. Payroll for this year's 26-man roster is approximately $115 million. It started at around $140 million, but about $25 million of that was traded away during the fire sale. Last year’s payroll was closer to $130M. So the Twins went into this year raising payroll about $10-15M, but when they failed to compete, they lowered it by another $10-15M. The year before that, the Twins had a payroll of over $150 million. It was “right-sized” by ownership following that 2023 season. That remains the high-water mark of payroll in the Twins' history. The median payroll for an MLB team in 2026 will likely be around $170M. So where do things sit? To figure that out, we’ll look at the Twins’ team as they enter the offseason. Essentially, we’re assuming they won’t bring back any free agents, make rational decisions on players under arbitration, and must pay MLB’s minimum salary (~$800K) to someone for each roster spot. We call it our “back-of-the-napkin” figuring because some of these estimates are imprecise: we generally know how much players are likely to earn in arbitration, but the exact numbers may not be known until the offseason is over. Doing all that, the answer is ... (drumroll, please): The baseline Twins payroll is about $95M. Here are the back-of-the-napkin figures: It’s essential to note that this is a starting point, not an endpoint. If the Twins add some free agents, they will add to that number, as they did last year when adding Harrison Bader, Danny Coulombe, and Ty France for $10.25M. Of course, they could also trade away some of these guys, too, as they did the year before when they traded away Jorge Polanco to free up additional money. A glance at the numbers above shows why there is so much speculation about whether the Twins might trade away pitchers like Pablo Lopez or Joe Ryan: doing so could lower their payroll to $65M. All of which leaves us short one very important number: what is the Twins’ payroll budget for 2026? That is something the team has been increasingly less willing to share, which makes it harder for fans and media to see the context around the offseason moves they make. The difference between an $85M payroll, a $115M payroll, and a $145M payroll becomes obvious when looking at the details. At $85M, the Twins likely need to cut further. At $115M, they can tread water, making modest additions. At $145M, they’d have up to $50M to shop, enough to chase one premium free agent or even multiple difference makers. Without that piece of information, it is very difficult for us to evaluate what the Twins will be up to this offseason. However, that information tends to leak out during the offseason as they engage in meetings with free agents and other teams. When it does, we’ll see whether the Twins plan to scrape by, tread water, or reload in earnest. Let us know in the comments what you think will happen and what you think should happen.- 87 comments
-
- pablo lopez
- joe ryan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Image courtesy of © Harrison Barden-Imagn Images Payroll isn’t just a Twins problem—it’s the primary factor shaping every MLB team’s roster, even without a salary cap. You might feel that’s unwarranted, and if so, feel free to vent in the comments of the dozens of stories we’ve had on ownership. But our focus is going to be more practical. Given that payroll is an important factor for the Twins, what are the hard numbers for 2026 and what do they mean? To do that, we’re going to do some back-of-the-napkin figuring, approximating the numbers the front office will also be using as this offseason begins. But first, here is some context about the Twins' payroll. Payroll for this year's 26-man roster is approximately $115 million. It started at around $140 million, but about $25 million of that was traded away during the fire sale. Last year’s payroll was closer to $130M. So the Twins went into this year raising payroll about $10-15M, but when they failed to compete, they lowered it by another $10-15M. The year before that, the Twins had a payroll of over $150 million. It was “right-sized” by ownership following that 2023 season. That remains the high-water mark of payroll in the Twins' history. The median payroll for an MLB team in 2026 will likely be around $170M. So where do things sit? To figure that out, we’ll look at the Twins’ team as they enter the offseason. Essentially, we’re assuming they won’t bring back any free agents, make rational decisions on players under arbitration, and must pay MLB’s minimum salary (~$800K) to someone for each roster spot. We call it our “back-of-the-napkin” figuring because some of these estimates are imprecise: we generally know how much players are likely to earn in arbitration, but the exact numbers may not be known until the offseason is over. Doing all that, the answer is ... (drumroll, please): The baseline Twins payroll is about $95M. Here are the back-of-the-napkin figures: It’s essential to note that this is a starting point, not an endpoint. If the Twins add some free agents, they will add to that number, as they did last year when adding Harrison Bader, Danny Coulombe, and Ty France for $10.25M. Of course, they could also trade away some of these guys, too, as they did the year before when they traded away Jorge Polanco to free up additional money. A glance at the numbers above shows why there is so much speculation about whether the Twins might trade away pitchers like Pablo Lopez or Joe Ryan: doing so could lower their payroll to $65M. All of which leaves us short one very important number: what is the Twins’ payroll budget for 2026? That is something the team has been increasingly less willing to share, which makes it harder for fans and media to see the context around the offseason moves they make. The difference between an $85M payroll, a $115M payroll, and a $145M payroll becomes obvious when looking at the details. At $85M, the Twins likely need to cut further. At $115M, they can tread water, making modest additions. At $145M, they’d have up to $50M to shop, enough to chase one premium free agent or even multiple difference makers. Without that piece of information, it is very difficult for us to evaluate what the Twins will be up to this offseason. However, that information tends to leak out during the offseason as they engage in meetings with free agents and other teams. When it does, we’ll see whether the Twins plan to scrape by, tread water, or reload in earnest. Let us know in the comments what you think will happen and what you think should happen. View full article
- 87 replies
-
- pablo lopez
- joe ryan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:

