Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    36,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. SOMEbody needs a bannin'. And I'm just the ************ to do it. ... Right after my nap.
  2. Thanks Brock...one of the neatest things I've read in a while!
  3. Well it's not a secret any more. Thanks. Thanks a lot.
  4. Levi stepped way out on a limb with that'n, too.
  5. Not "perfect." Just good, and aggressive. The Twins have been awful for over half a decade. Historically bad, drafting near the top all that time. What do they have to show for it? Hope that Buxton continues to improve? That Berrios--the only highly rated pitcher in the Twins system--can be an above average pitcher in a couple years? THAT'S the reward? Judging by comments here, we shouldn't even expect contention for another couple years. Meanwhile...what about the minor league system, that Twins management so jealously guarded? Could the Twins have even put together a package good enough to land Chris Sale? I don't think they could have. Yet Boston can, and still have plenty of talent in their minor league system, AFTER being in contention and active in the FA and trade market for, like, forever. Could the Twins even trade for Brian Dozier? How can the Dodgers? How can Detroit trade for David Price in 2015? It isn't a given that "not trading the farm" gets you anywhere, nor it is a given that "trading the farm" leaves you with nothing for the future. The evidence suggests it's often the opposite. Holding on to minor leaguers, playing for the future, hurts today and often doesn't do anything for tomorrow, either.
  6. So why not just take the guy with the first pick?
  7. Shouldn't a smart GM have been able to restock the farm system by the time core gets old? You don't stop adding players to your farm system because you traded some off.
  8. I thought there was also a PTBNL coming the Twins way in this transaction, from the Padres. No?
  9. Yes. ... There...now it's a game thread.
  10. That's it, GC...gonna have to show you the door.
  11. Stuck?? You told us you found a way to put your phone on vibrate and then set it up to continuously dial itself.
  12. Don't forget the fees to change flights.
  13. Perhaps I over-generalized. Let me restate...of the friends and family I have in MN who are to some extent Twins fans, none would view a Dozier trade positively, or be more likely to buy tickets to a game (which is the context of this discussion.) They would view it as "why are they trading their best player? Same old cheap Twins. They just don't want to pay him."
  14. I'd take the "win now at the expense of some prospects" route 100 times out of 100. There are always more minor leaguers.
  15. Most Twins fans are casual fans, and I guarantee those fans would view a Dozier trade negatively. I agree they need to win to turn around the attendance decline, but I also believe a Dozier trade would negatively impact interest in the Twins, at least for 2017.
  16. Since you brought it up...the Johan Santana trade is the perfect example of why it is self defeating to ever put yourself in a position of "needing" to trade a good player. The Twins got bent over a barrel, and ended up with virtually nothing. The move then was to keep Santana, put another 230 innings on his arm and get the value of one more season, and take the picks. Instead, they forced an "obvious" trade and hurt themselves.
  17. There is only one option available to the Twins? Trade Brian Dozier? They can't get some natural internal improvement from last year? They can't make other trades, targeting lesser known prospects from other orgs that they feel are undervalued? Or trades for other major leaguers? They can't target FAs they feel will emerge next year as terrific bargains? Trading Dozier hopefully wouldn't be the only move, because in and of itself it's not enough...and not trading Dozier doesn't doom the future. I'm very hopeful our new management is smart enough, and courageous enough, to look at trading Dozier as only one possible avenue to improvement. One they WON'T pursue unless they feel it makes the Twins immediately better. And all the while they are pursuing other ideas...in addition to as well as instead of trading one player. A good player, by the way, probably the team's best, and one who is absolutely capable of being a big contributor to a winning team.
×
×
  • Create New...