Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Sam Morley

Verified Member
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Sam Morley

  1. The gold does sound a little strange, but nothing could be worse than what the T-wolves are wearing these days.
  2. I definitely did not even notice it when I read the article yesterday, but when I pulled it up and read it again today, I was like 'wait, what?' Nicely done. I wish it was real. Maybe one of you guys with privileges can convince Molitor start doing it next time you get an interview.
  3. I could watch that clip of Adam Eaton all day. Hilarious. He bounces so hard. Also, Parker, were you joking about Molitor tasting dirt for bad hop clues? I just reread that sentence; you say he tastes handfuls of dirt. Have you seen him do this? Has anyone on TD ever seen Molitor tasting handfuls of dirt? I didn't know this was a thing and now I am imagining it in many different ways. I suppose it's probably some Bear Grylls kind of thing where he takes a knee, scoops up a little pinch, brings it to his nose, sniffs it, and then just sticks his tongue out to get a little taste of dirt. But now I can't help imagining Molitor plunking down on his butt out at short and just putting a whole handful of dirt in his mouth. Visiting TV broadcasters will be like "Who's that guy and what the heck is he doing?" "Oh that's just the new manager eating some dirt. He always does that." The jokes here are limitless. According to Wikipedia, the practice of eating dirt is called geophagy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geophagy) and if you click on the link and scroll down to the sub heading "In the United States" you will learn that Molitor may have some ulterior motives for practicing... If the Twins stink again in 2015, I'm going to remember this article and say, "maybe Molitor isn't eating enough dirt." and "maybe he should try throwing his own feces at the wall and looking for signs in the splatter." Molly: Hey Bruno, come in here. Bruno: (covering his nose upon entering the manager's office) Oh my God, Paul, WTF? Molly: No no no, check out this corn. Do you see it? I think it means we should try Vargas in center. Personally, my main hope for a manager is that they are entertaining. Gardy was pretty entertaining, and I was doubtful Molitor could measure up. But I'd say eating dirt is a pretty good start.
  4. This is a pretty balanced article, but it has convinced me that Escobar should be the everyday SS at the beginning of the 2015 season. The estimation that his 2014 performance was fluke-ish (as mentioned in comments, not the article) is weakly conceived (a guess without significant statistical or historic support). At age 25, entering his third major league season, a better guess is that his best performance lies ahead (a guess based on the historic trend of players having breakout seasons around the ages of 26 and 27). Steamer projections (http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=6153&position=3B/SS) for 2015 do anticipate a drop in production, seemingly along with a return to a utility role, but the drop is not dramatic and would not be enough to classify 2014 as a fluke. Do you guys think it's even worth trying to guess that a player will perform worse and subsequently adjust his role with the team based on that guess? Obviously players are given opportunities to play based on hopes and/or projections of improvement in performance, but how often is the reverse attempted (aside from aging veterans)? In the case of Escobar, anyway, I think that he has earned the job. As for Santana, I think that he has earned the season opening CF job. It would be nice to put him at SS, but that job is Escobar's to lose, I think, and there really is not an alternative in CF until Buxton is ready. I like Hicks, and I would like to see him get another solid opportunity, but I think Santana's offensive emergence and ability to hold down CF eliminates Hicks. When you have one player successfully performing in a position, how can you justify replacing him with a player with a track record like Hicks' based on a hope that he will improve? (what a horribly constructed sentence- sorry). So does that push Hicks over to LF? Between Hicks and Santana, does it make a difference who plays LF and who plays CF? Hicks is obviously better in CF, but Santana is more used to CF than to LF, and if Hicks does get it together at the plate, wouldn't he be facing a move to LF with the arrival of Buxton? And then there is this notion of Mauer in LF, which horrified me the first time I heard it, but I seem to be warming to it now- maybe under the effect of repetition. I think my initial cringe was due to how poorly Mauer's bat profiles in LF, not that it profiles any better at 1B- and then I had to acknowledge I was just discussing Hicks in LF, so you can have a three time batting champ or a two time sub mendoza champ. And as others have said, Mauer should be able to handle LF. As we all know, anybody can play LF, just ask Travis Ishikawa. The last thing I wanted to respond to here, is the possibility that Sano makes the team out of spring training. In this case, I think that he should start at 3B and Plouffe should move to LF and Mauer can stay in his 1B/DH role with Vargas. This probably undermines what I've already said about ousting a successful player from his position based on hopes for another, but Sano is special, right? He warrants exception, and should get the chance to stick at third. One thing I hope to see, eventually, from Molitor, in contrast to Gardy, is an ability to figure out these roles and lineup places earlier in the season. I always felt that even in the Twins' successful seasons under Gardy, it often took him until near the all star break to settle on a consistent lineup. Obviously, with the team in rebuild mode, much experimenting lies yet ahead.
  5. Download attachment: tony-gwynn.jpg Did anyone else read Jim Caple’s recent article on ESPN.com about Tony Gwynn and chewing tobacco? In the article he advocates for the ban of on-field use of chew in MLB, noting that it is already banned in MiLB. The topic at hand certainly evokes strong opinions; somewhere along the lines of individual freedoms vs. general health and well-being, with a whole host of other considerations on the side. I was drawn to the article because I was saddened and angered to learn that Gwynn’s passing was due to his tobacco use, but it also caused me to reflect on my own experience with chewing tobacco and baseball. Caple raises a couple of concerns in his anti-tobacco advocacy: one, ballplayers are visible to kids and are influential; and two, ballplayers influence each other and will not cease use of tobacco on their own, making a league enforced ban necessary. When I was a kid, and ballplayers were my heroes, I definitely was aware they used chewing tobacco. You could see the tin in their back pocket, and you could see wads of varying size in their mouths. I think to the extent that I really understood what it was, I thought it was pretty much gross, but definitely also thought it looked cool at the same time. To this day, (I’m 30) when I see a ball player with a huge plug, I have mixed thoughts: ‘Whoa, that’s a huge plug, sweet,’ and, ‘Man, that is gross and terrible for you, dude.’ I am a fan of the traditional elements of baseball. I like the unwritten rules, strange superstitions and classic stats. I hate replay review and manager challenges. Though chewing tobacco in baseball may fall under the banner of tradition, and though I may miss it- a very little bit- as an aesthetic component, I find myself leaning very heavily in the position Caple advocates. Tobacco was not available to me as a kid, nor did I seek it. Playing ball in high school, there was no way anyone could have chewed on the field and gotten away with it. Maybe some indiscernible amount, but that would’ve defeated the point. I remember reading about Brett Butler and his cancer diagnosis and I remember figuring that chewing tobacco use was probably on its way out in the big leagues, and in general. Then I went to college. I went to Linfield College in Oregon, home of a pretty successful D3 baseball program, which I was going out for. It seemed as if every guy on the baseball team chewed. I was totally shocked. The head coach, a life time chewer, made his no-tobacco team policy clear, assuring everyone that this season he was quitting for real. The upperclassmen giggled-- no one took it seriously. At one winter practice, we were indoors due to weather, preparing to do some conditioning sprints. Players were lined up side by side across the field house floor. A coach shouted ‘go’ and everyone took off. Two or three strides in, a tin came tumbling out the hoodie pocket of the second baseman and rolled across the floor in front of him, with him hilariously stumbling after it. I don’t remember if he got in any trouble or not. I doubt it. I’d be surprised if any of those guys’ high school experience were much different from mine. My guess is most of them started chewing when they got to the college level. I wonder, had I stuck around baseball long enough, whether I would’ve started myself. There are a lot of great baseball fans and former players who frequent this site. I’m interested to hear some other experiences/stories and opinions regarding this topic. Some commenters on the ESPN.com article page itself suggest Caple is using Gwynn’s passing to push an agenda on a touchy subject with political undertones. Others quickly pointed out that Gwynn himself was active in anti-tobacco campaigning. I think maintaining a dialogue on an issue a person cared about in his life is a fine way to honor him, posthumously. Here is the link to the ESPN.com article: http://espn.go.com/m...-tobacco-policy Click here to view the article
  6. Download attachment: 1twin041613.jpg After reading Parker Hageman’s recent analysis1 on Oswaldo Arcia’s approach and swing, I’ve been thinking about it since, particularly as Arcia’s slump is reaching toward extreme extents. I think Parker is spot on in his critique of Arcia’s over-aggressive, indiscriminate approach at the plate. Past success swinging at first pitch fastballs has led to present adjustments by pitchers to throw off speed early, but not- so far- to any counter adjustment by Arcia. I also think the swing-out-of-your-shoes approach, in combination with poor plate discipline, is problematic. I do think these have both been recent trends and not career-long issues. A quick glance at his 2014 spray chart2 supports the aggressive, hard swinging approach observations. A heavy propensity to pull, including all four home runs, is evident. Compare this to his spray charts from 20133 which demonstrate more even distribution. Just looking at line-drives, in 2013, 10 of 33 counted line-drives went left of center. Whereas in 2014, we’re looking at 2 of 17. Add home runs: 2013, 5 of 14 to left of center; 2014, 0 of 4. The higher percentage of well-hit balls in 2013 indicate a more balanced and better disciplined approach than what we have seen in 2014, particularly over the past couple weeks. As for his swing mechanics, I’m not too concerned about the hands drop pointed out by Roy Smalley and Parker. Because he starts with his hands so high in his stance, they’re going to have to come down. If your hands are up by your ears, you can’t go straight to the POC (point of contact) or you’ll only ever hit ground balls. From the videos I watched of Arcia hitting this year4, last year5, and in minor league seasons at New Britain6 and Ft. Myers7, I could not discern a significant change in the drop of his hands during the load stage of his swing. I suppose there is logic to the notion, which Parker points out, that with a lower load point with his hands, a hitter may be more susceptible to strikes higher in the zone. The video clip of Arcia he included demonstrates this on a one swing sample size as Arcia puts what appears to be a beautiful and well-timed swing under the pitch. However, I think the statistics cited regarding Arcia’s high swing and miss at high strikes rate, are just as likely explained by his overall lack of discipline at the plate (a lot of bad guessing and not getting a good pitch to hit), rather than an issue with his swing. And, as others have pointed out in the comment boards, Ted Williams- probably the greatest student and teacher of hitting ever- loaded his hands low8 and did not struggle with high strikes9. While I didn’t notice much difference in his swing from last season to this, there was one significant difference between his swing in the minors and what it is now: the high step. In the minors, there was a toe tap and slide-stride with the knee bending only slightly as the hips cock in. Both this season and last, his stride is preceded by a high, almost Puckett-esque step. I don’t dislike the high step. It assures a full load to the back leg and a powerful weight transfer moving forward. It effects more coil in the hips and more power in their rotational ‘snap’. Many excellent hitters have utilized it without expensing balance or batting average. I think if there has been a definite exaggeration in the drop of Arcia’s hands during his load (which I couldn't see in the video I watched) it has probably come in conjunction with the high step. While I don’t think either one is problematic, I do think, in Arcia’s case, they might be indicative of something that is: wanting to hit a jack in every PA. If this is what is at the root of his recent extended slump, then it is an uncomplicated fix and will inevitably mend itself. When you go 0 for the week, you have to come back to balance, contact and a disciplined approach. I think Arcia’s track record, particularly in the minors, indicates he is a disciplined hitter. Though his low-ish walk rates and high-ish K-rates might suggest otherwise, his ability to consistently hit over .300 indicates some level of swing selection. I think he needs to relax and trust that the quality of his swin, and his strength will produce good power, and the resultant balance will yield a higher average and on-base rate. It seems as though the Twins coaching staff has for years pushed a patient, disciplined approach to batting. I think they’ve pushed the approach to a fault. While I think the philosophy is best for most hitters, I think it has been harmful to a few exceptionally talented players to come through the Twins' system- Delmon Young and Carlos Gomez in particular. Gomez, especially, I don’t think would have become the player he is if he had stayed in Minnesota, as much as I wish he would have. Fortunately, while Oz may have earned some comparisons to the aforementioned players in terms of batting approach, I do think his true self as a hitter is more in line with what the Twins seem to preach. Maybe not totally in line, but enough that I think he will eventual excel here. I hope so. He is far and away the most exciting player on the roster, a la pimping triples off the wall in a ski mask. I hope he works through his slump with the Twins. I really do not want to see him sent to back to 'Chester. Sources 1. http://twinsdaily.co...uite-There-Yet) 2. http://www.fangraphs...type=battedball 3. http://www.fangraphs...vs1=ALL&vs2=ALL 4. A. http://m.mlb.com/vid...y=oswaldo+arcia B. http://m.mlb.com/vid...y=oswaldo+arcia 5. 6. 7. 8.http://www.chrisolea...ams_C_001_C.gif 9. http://2.bp.blogspot...strike_zone.gif Click here to view the article
  7. I was at the Kernels game for this one, the night before too. Engelb Vielma was my favorite to watch. he crushed a triple to RF corner on Saturday, and has a great arm at short. He is tiny. Unfortunately, he came out of the game on Sunday after a strange collision with JD Williams in left field. It looked like he was holding his head. If anyone has an update on his status, that would be nice to know. It seemed like the offense really lost a spark when he came out of the lineup. JD Williams sure has been at low A for a long time now, and he didn't look good at the plate at all over the two games I saw. He finally got a hit late on Sunday, and that collision in the outfield with Vielma was on him. It would be nice to see him earn a promotion sooner than later, but things didn't look good this weekend and his avg sits at the Mendoza line...
  8. I was at the Kernels game. It was unclear to me what Stewart was upset with the home plate ump about. All ball was hit down the line in left and called fair by the ump. That was when Stewart started having words. I thought it more likely had to do with not liking some balls-strikes calls earlier in the ab or previous abs. Whatever it was though, it was brief and not very animated. The ump looked like he could've been the same age as Stewart though. One other thing about Stewart: it seemed to me like he was working in his slider a fair amount. From my seat just above the first base dugout, pitch recognition isn't a sure thing, but between the velocity and the movement, I was guessing slider. The pitch was registering in the low eighties on the CR radar and often finished in the dirt. Compared to what I thought looked like his curve (a little slower on the gun) the drop was discernibly sharper. His fastball worked at around 92 and hit 96 once. I thought at first the pitch we were thinking was his slider might have just been a change that dropped but it seemed like there was another pitch that better fit the typical change up look. Whatever pitch it was, it was good. He threw it up in the count and it was getting swing and misses. It looked to me like he worked five different pitches in his short outing: FB, Curve, Slider, Two seam FB, and change. It was a bummer the defense let him down and even more of a bummer when he got tossed. The inning did get long after the errors and runs. I'm sure he was more discouraged than tired.
  9. So maybe someone has already addressed this here, but I haven't seen it, so: where will Polanco go if/when he gets sent back down? Back to Ft. Myers? That almost seems crazier than the jump from high A to the Show. There's definitely no-one in his way at New Britain.
  10. I was hoping, assuming really, that Twins Daily would be the one sports media outlet I could turn to without having to be confronted by the soccer cup tournament. Alas, not only does Joe Mauer not hit enough home runs, but has now somehow managed to invite ball-kick commentary to a baseball website.
  11. "You can scoff all you want at the Twins general philosophy of staying and promoting from within, but most of the track history the past 25 years indicates that they generally surround themselves with pretty smart talent." I agree, and additionally, I think the Twins 'family' organizational approach makes the team more fun to follow. I like that individuals define the Twins as much as the team colors. I think Jerry Seinfeld once joked that sports fans are cheering for cloth in reference to the high turnover in the pro arena. The Twins seem to defy this without sacrificing quality. I hope Gardy's replacement is in-house, or has some past connection to the organization. A handful of former catchers mentioned here, but no Terry Steinbach? I definitely would love to see Mientkiewitcz take over. Or maybe the broadcast teams should just switch with the coaching staff.
  12. Parker, I think what you're saying makes sense if Arcia's hands are still dropping when they should already have been loaded. I don't see how the distance, though I agree it is extreme, Arcia's hands move from his stance to load point would affect his pitch recognition or ability to catch up to high strikes, as long as it's not delaying his load. As long as he gets to his load point on time, what difference does it make how far his hands move to get there? I sat clicking play-pause on a few different clips of his recent swings, and it's just really hard to tell without a frame by frame high resolution gif. It seems like maybe his hands are still dropping when they should already be loaded, but it's basically impossible for me to tell from what I'm watching. What do you think Smalley means by "cheating"? Do you think he means starting the whole step/hitch mechanism a touch earlier, or do you think he means over committing to make up for lost time? I'd buy the over committing line of thinking if he's doing it to make up for his hands continuing to load when they should have already. I personally tried to duplicate the stance to load part of Arcia's swing, and it feels admittedly strange and slow-pitch softball-esque. It seems like he must be really trying to crank up the power. Didn't mean to pick on the sample size thing. It did stick out to me though. I'm definitely a mechanics and film junkie, and would've enjoyed the post even more if you had 'littered' it with a few more image samples. But thanks for clarifying some of your points.
  13. Even if it is out of necessity and not permanent, this is so awesome I could cry.
  14. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/3157-The-Ozzman-Cometh-Around-the-Bases-Not-So-Much-Lately
  15. Now that's how you break a slump!
  16. Paul Goldschmidt might be the best hitter in the National League. Gennett hit a monster grandy today.
  17. Arcia's K rate throughout his minor league career, including his time this year at AAA, is right around 20%- not great, but not "far too high" either. Last year, his OBP at AAA was .426, this year, it's .365. With his BA basically identical, the difference is in the BB rate. He has demonstrated plate discipline in the minors. He needs to put it together at the show. His minor league K rate of around 20% is fine. If he can bring his big league K rate of around 30% down to that, he'll be doing great. Another, albeit better fielding, right fielder, Yasiel Puig strikes out at around 20% and walks at around 10%. I think Arcia's hit and power tools profile similarly. If he can bring to the show the plate discipline he has demonstrated in the minors, I think we could see comparable production. He has nothing left to prove at AAA.
  18. After reading Parker Hageman’s recent analysis1 on Oswaldo Arcia’s approach and swing, I’ve been thinking about it since, particularly as Arcia’s slump is reaching toward extreme extents. I think Parker is spot on in his critique of Arcia’s over-aggressive, indiscriminate approach at the plate. Past success swinging at first pitch fastballs has led to present adjustments by pitchers to throw off speed early, but not- so far- to any counter adjustment by Arcia. I also think the swing-out-of-your-shoes approach, in combination with poor plate discipline, is problematic. I do think these have both been recent trends and not career-long issues. A quick glance at his 2014 spray chart2 supports the aggressive, hard swinging approach observations. A heavy propensity to pull, including all four home runs, is evident. Compare this to his spray charts from 20133 which demonstrate more even distribution. Just looking at line-drives, in 2013, 10 of 33 counted line-drives went left of center. Whereas in 2014, we’re looking at 2 of 17. Add home runs: 2013, 5 of 14 to left of center; 2014, 0 of 4. The higher percentage of well-hit balls in 2013 indicate a more balanced and better disciplined approach than what we have seen in 2014, particularly over the past couple weeks. As for his swing mechanics, I’m not too concerned about the hands drop pointed out by Roy Smalley and Parker. Because he starts with his hands so high in his stance, they’re going to have to come down. If your hands are up by your ears, you can’t go straight to the POC (point of contact) or you’ll only ever hit ground balls. From the videos I watched of Arcia hitting this year4, last year5, and in minor league seasons at New Britain6 and Ft. Myers7, I could not discern a significant change in the drop of his hands during the load stage of his swing. I suppose there is logic to the notion, which Parker points out, that with a lower load point with his hands, a hitter may be more susceptible to strikes higher in the zone. The video clip of Arcia he included demonstrates this on a one swing sample size as Arcia puts what appears to be a beautiful and well-timed swing under the pitch. However, I think the statistics cited regarding Arcia’s high swing and miss at high strikes rate, are just as likely explained by his overall lack of discipline at the plate (a lot of bad guessing and not getting a good pitch to hit), rather than an issue with his swing. And, as others have pointed out in the comment boards, Ted Williams- probably the greatest student and teacher of hitting ever- loaded his hands low8 and did not struggle with high strikes9. While I didn’t notice much difference in his swing from last season to this, there was one significant difference between his swing in the minors and what it is now: the high step. In the minors, there was a toe tap and slide-stride with the knee bending only slightly as the hips cock in. Both this season and last, his stride is preceded by a high, almost Puckett-esque step. I don’t dislike the high step. It assures a full load to the back leg and a powerful weight transfer moving forward. It effects more coil in the hips and more power in their rotational ‘snap’. Many excellent hitters have utilized it without expensing balance or batting average. I think if there has been a definite exaggeration in the drop of Arcia’s hands during his load (which I couldn't see in the video I watched) it has probably come in conjunction with the high step. While I don’t think either one is problematic, I do think, in Arcia’s case, they might be indicative of something that is: wanting to hit a jack in every PA. If this is what is at the root of his recent extended slump, then it is an uncomplicated fix and will inevitably mend itself. When you go 0 for the week, you have to come back to balance, contact and a disciplined approach. I think Arcia’s track record, particularly in the minors, indicates he is a disciplined hitter. Though his low-ish walk rates and high-ish K-rates might suggest otherwise, his ability to consistently hit over .300 indicates some level of swing selection. I think he needs to relax and trust that the quality of his swin, and his strength will produce good power, and the resultant balance will yield a higher average and on-base rate. It seems as though the Twins coaching staff has for years pushed a patient, disciplined approach to batting. I think they’ve pushed the approach to a fault. While I think the philosophy is best for most hitters, I think it has been harmful to a few exceptionally talented players to come through the Twins' system- Delmon Young and Carlos Gomez in particular. Gomez, especially, I don’t think would have become the player he is if he had stayed in Minnesota, as much as I wish he would have. Fortunately, while Oz may have earned some comparisons to the aforementioned players in terms of batting approach, I do think his true self as a hitter is more in line with what the Twins seem to preach. Maybe not totally in line, but enough that I think he will eventual excel here. I hope so. He is far and away the most exciting player on the roster, a la pimping triples off the wall in a ski mask. I hope he works through his slump with the Twins. I really do not want to see him sent to back to 'Chester. Sources 1. http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/3084-Oswaldo-Arcia-Is-Very-Good-(But-He-s-Not-Quite-There-Yet) 2. http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=10306&position=OF&type=battedball 3. http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=10306&position=OF&type=battedball&pid2=10306&ss1=2013&se1=2013&ss2=2013&se2=2013&cht1=hangtime&cht2=battedball&vs1=ALL&vs2=ALL 4. A. http://m.mlb.com/video/v33776145/minbos-miller-strikes-out-arcia-swinging/?query=oswaldo%2Barcia B. http://m.mlb.com/video/v33469001/milmin-arcia-slugs-a-grand-slam-to-deep-right-field/?query=oswaldo%2Barcia 5. 6. 7. 8.http://www.chrisoleary.com/projects/baseball/hitting/Videos/_Baseball/Clips_SD/TedWilliams_C_001_C.gif 9. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-84RsOfF6J28/TovgP_y5CYI/AAAAAAAAAKE/RD_13wXkFlQ/s1600/Ted_williams_strike_zone.gif
  19. Everybody knows! LSMFT.
  20. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/3128-Tobacco-and-Baseball
  21. ashburyjohn, I think a ban is a good idea. I liked the article, and I think it's a pretty easy case in favor of a ban. By "dialogue", I definitely didn't mean to say that people shouldn't have a particular opinion here. Rather, I am interested in hearing people's particular opinion.
  22. Did anyone else read Jim Caple’s recent article on ESPN.com about Tony Gwynn and chewing tobacco? In the article he advocates for the ban of on-field use of chew in MLB, noting that it is already banned in MiLB. The topic at hand certainly evokes strong opinions; somewhere along the lines of individual freedoms vs. general health and well-being, with a whole host of other considerations on the side. I was drawn to the article because I was saddened and angered to learn that Gwynn’s passing was due to his tobacco use, but it also caused me to reflect on my own experience with chewing tobacco and baseball. Caple raises a couple of concerns in his anti-tobacco advocacy: one, ballplayers are visible to kids and are influential; and two, ballplayers influence each other and will not cease use of tobacco on their own, making a league enforced ban necessary. When I was a kid, and ballplayers were my heroes, I definitely was aware they used chewing tobacco. You could see the tin in their back pocket, and you could see wads of varying size in their mouths. I think to the extent that I really understood what it was, I thought it was pretty much gross, but definitely also thought it looked cool at the same time. To this day, (I’m 30) when I see a ball player with a huge plug, I have mixed thoughts: ‘Whoa, that’s a huge plug, sweet,’ and, ‘Man, that is gross and terrible for you, dude.’ I am a fan of the traditional elements of baseball. I like the unwritten rules, strange superstitions and classic stats. I hate replay review and manager challenges. Though chewing tobacco in baseball may fall under the banner of tradition, and though I may miss it- a very little bit- as an aesthetic component, I find myself leaning very heavily in the position Caple advocates. Tobacco was not available to me as a kid, nor did I seek it. Playing ball in high school, there was no way anyone could have chewed on the field and gotten away with it. Maybe some indiscernible amount, but that would’ve defeated the point. I remember reading about Brett Butler and his cancer diagnosis and I remember figuring that chewing tobacco use was probably on its way out in the big leagues, and in general. Then I went to college. I went to Linfield College in Oregon, home of a pretty successful D3 baseball program, which I was going out for. It seemed as if every guy on the baseball team chewed. I was totally shocked. The head coach, a life time chewer, made his no-tobacco team policy clear, assuring everyone that this season he was quitting for real. The upperclassmen giggled-- no one took it seriously. At one winter practice, we were indoors due to weather, preparing to do some conditioning sprints. Players were lined up side by side across the field house floor. A coach shouted ‘go’ and everyone took off. Two or three strides in, a tin came tumbling out the hoodie pocket of the second baseman and rolled across the floor in front of him, with him hilariously stumbling after it. I don’t remember if he got in any trouble or not. I doubt it. I’d be surprised if any of those guys’ high school experience were much different from mine. My guess is most of them started chewing when they got to the college level. I wonder, had I stuck around baseball long enough, whether I would’ve started myself. There are a lot of great baseball fans and former players who frequent this site. I’m interested to hear some other experiences/stories and opinions regarding this topic. Some commenters on the ESPN.com article page itself suggest Caple is using Gwynn’s passing to push an agenda on a touchy subject with political undertones. Others quickly pointed out that Gwynn himself was active in anti-tobacco campaigning. I think maintaining a dialogue on an issue a person cared about in his life is a fine way to honor him, posthumously. Here is the link to the ESPN.com article: http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/11099021/mlb-tony-gwynn-death-force-mlb-re-visit-tobacco-policy
  23. Did anyone else read Jim Caple’s recent article on ESPN.com about Tony Gwynn and chewing tobacco? In the article he advocates for the ban of on-field use of chew in MLB, noting that it is already banned in MiLB. The topic at hand certainly evokes strong opinions; somewhere along the lines of individual freedoms vs. general health and well-being, with a whole host of other considerations on the side. I was drawn to the article because I was saddened and angered to learn that Gwynn’s passing was due to his tobacco use, but it also caused me to reflect on my own experience with chewing tobacco and baseball. Caple raises a couple of concerns in his anti-tobacco advocacy: one, ballplayers are visible to kids and are influential; and two, ballplayers influence each other and will not cease use of tobacco on their own- making a league enforced ban necessary. When I was a kid, and ballplayers were my heroes, I definitely was aware that they used chewing tobacco. You can see the tin in their back pocket, and you can see wads of varying size in their mouths. I think that to the extent that I really understood what it was, I thought it was pretty much gross, but definitely also thought it looked cool at the same time. To this day, (I’m 30) when I see a ball player with a huge plug, I have mixed thoughts: ‘whoa, that’s a huge plug, sweet,’ and, ‘man, that is gross and terrible for you, dude.’ I am a fan of the traditional elements of baseball. I like the unwritten rules, strange superstitions, and classic stats. I hate replay review and manager challenges. Though chewing tobacco in baseball may fall under the banner of tradition, and though I may miss it- a very little bit- as an aesthetic component, I find myself leaning very heavily in the direction Caple advocates. Tobacco was not available to me as a kid, nor did I seek it out. Playing ball in high school, there was no way anyone could have chewed on the field and gotten away with it- maybe some indiscernible amount, but that would’ve defeated the point. I remember reading about Brett Butler and his cancer diagnosis, and I remember figuring that chewing tobacco use was probably on its way out in the big leagues, and in general. Then I went to college. I went to Linfield College in Oregon, home of a pretty successful D3 baseball program, which I was going out for. It seemed like every guy on the baseball team chewed. I was totally shocked. The head coach, a life time chewer, made his no-tobacco team policy clear, assuring everyone, that this season he was quitting for real. The upperclassmen giggled- no one took it seriously. At one winter practice, we were indoors due to weather, preparing to do some conditioning sprints. Players were lined up side by side across the field house floor. A coach shouted ‘go’ and everyone took off. Two or three strides in, a tin came tumbling out the hoodie pocket of the second baseman and rolled across the floor in front of him, with him hilariously stumbling after it. I don’t remember if he got into any trouble or not. I doubt it. I’d be surprised if any of those guys’ high school experience were much different from mine. My guess is most of them started chewing when they got to the college level. I wonder, had I stuck around baseball long enough, whether I would’ve started myself. There are a lot of great baseball fans and former players who frequent this site. I’m interested to hear some other experiences/stories and opinions regarding this topic. Some commenters on the ESPN.com article page itself suggest Caple is using Gwynn’s passing to push an agenda on a touchy subject with political undertones. Others quickly pointed out that Gwynn himself was active in anti-tobacco campaigning. I think maintaining a dialogue on an issue a person cared about in their life is a fine way to honor them in passing. Here is the link to the ESPN.com article: http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/11099021/mlb-tony-gwynn-death-force-mlb-re-visit-tobacco-policy
  24. jeez, that mustache is premium.
×
×
  • Create New...