I think SD and Leviathan bring up some interesting points. While Doug has probably worked with 40-50 young players, here are the seven guys that will have the biggest impact on making the Twins relevant again: Buxton - played 90 games for Doug, has been very complimentary of Molitor Sano - played 56 games for Doug, has been very complimentary of Molitor JO - 96 innings under Doug Meyer- Never played for Doug May - Never played for Doug Gordon - Never played for Doug Kohl - Never played for Doug So I don't really see the connection to the future as a huge selling point for Doug. If he is more identifiable with younger players maybe, but being a first ballot HOF probably doesn't hurt Molitors credibility with young players. Here would be my two deal-breakers: If Doug really said he is not a huge SABR guy. Didn't we just get rid of a gritty, hard nosed guy that does not think math plays a big role in the game? This kind of reminds me of a guy that is sick of his wife of 20 years, divorces her and then re-marries someone that is identical to her. Can someone please send the link? I have not been able to find it. I also don't put much stock in Dougs handful of years of managerial experience. Paul Molitor is more than capable of constructing a lineup, yelling at umps, and playing the matchup game with the pen late in games. The fact that he played an extra 10 years at a much higher level should offset that IMO. I guess I don't see Doug's strengths as anythng close to weaknesses for Molitor. I think Molitors deal-breaker is how long is he willing to commit to managing this team. Obviously you can only go off of verbal commitment, but if is less than three years I don't really see the point.