Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,919
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Do not sign Capps and Marquis, and you have money. And, they could have spent more money, but chose not to. It is all about choices.
  2. Wow. Overall, he has done a good job. Good luck to him in his next phase of life.
  3. Why? If they are trying to compete, no. If they are trying to get by, and deal anyone with value that is older, sure.
  4. But his budget is not twice as big, more than 40 million is in three players. That leaves only 50 million for the rest of the team. That us the great fallacy in comparing payroll with Oakland, for instance. Also, unlike Oakland, he seems unwilling to sell high on veterans right now. I do not understand the strategy. BTW, I hope you are right and I am wrong.
  5. Jason Marquis...... Which 2 above average starting pitchers will come here for as little money as Willingham made?
  6. They lost over 90 games, not sure who helped the team tremendously. Ryan is cheap, there is no evidence to the contrary. Until he actually does something different, I see no reason to expect something different.
  7. Signing mediocre guys gives you mediocre guys.......if they really want to win next year, that budget will need to be at least 115. I expect it to be under 90, and for them to stink next year. Who cares if they have big contracts that handicap them if they never go out and spend money, it is not the contracts, but the philosophy that handicaps them.
  8. I don't know, but I'd guess, well, I don't know.
  9. TR: "we were interested, but the years and money were just more than we wanted to go". He may say that directly, or he may get Christiansen to put it in his column about how smart they are for showing restraint, but you can just about guarantee we'll be hearing that sentiment about any pitcher that you are going to really want.
  10. Let's be honest, they can compete next year if they sign 2-3 starting pitchers from the top 10 free agents available, and trade an OF or OF prospect for a MIF. But, does anyone think they'll spend that money? Really, they can be competitive next year if the payroll is 115-120. But, I would be my salary against my kid's allowance that they don't spend the money. So, it is really a matter of will, nothing more or less.
  11. And the free agent pitchers will be better next off-season? Sign two legit starters, deal for a good MIF prospect, and try to win while Mauer and Morneau are healthy. You can only write off so many seasons. Otherwise, blow it all up and start over.
  12. Thanks to everyone involved. Great site and community.
  13. Why is the payroll dropping? If they cannot compete next year, they should deal willingham, span, morneau, Burton, maybe Perkins. The A's, unlike Ryan, are willing and able to deal good players. the only thing keeping them from competing is a willingness to spend on pitching next year.
  14. No doubt two of guys like this are signed. I anticipate losing interest in the twins before the season even starts. I am exactly the kind of fan this team should be worried about right now.
  15. Or, whoever wrote it thinks the only way to get pitching is to trade some existing MLB players, and roll the dice with young guys.....
  16. Given that there are 9 starting hitters, and 5 starting pitchers on a roster, would you not expect there to be more good hitters on playoff rosters? I do not think anyone is saying never pick a hitter, but some are basically never take a pitcher unless he is Strasburg.
  17. How do you ever get a good pitcher if you will not draft them, will not trade away your future for them, and will not sign them to market deals, oh, and will not trade your good current players for prospects?
  18. The twins are flush with outfielders, what do you expect to get in return for one of them that would be better than a number 2 starter? And how many number 2 starters are even on the planet? These decisions are not just about the specific people in one deal, but also what you have int the org.
  19. Billy Hamilton drops now that he is outfielder, right?
  20. You are laughing at a 21 year old catcher in his first minor league season that hit very well AA ball?
  21. Sano seems a bit high, Hicks seems a bit low. If Rosario is an outfielder, he probably drops a bit.
  22. The Marlins are not building for next year. They have already indicated they will be cutting payroll probably. I think Johnson will be traded to someone.
  23. I would roll the die on Johnson. Given his health and salary, it should take Revere or something like that to get him, something I would do with Hicks and Arcia available.
  24. Pretty darn accurate. I enjoyed last year's handbook very much.
  25. Hmm, I call BS. Nobody should complain, but they will. They will certainly complain on draft day but they won't be complaining when that OF'er has a >.900 OPS in the majors instead of getting a high 3's ERA starter. Disagree, if they still have zero pitchers, and 6 outfielders, I'll still be complaining about that OFer. And, really, what are the odds a HS player has a .900 OPS, vs Appel being successful. What are the odds? Maybe 10-20% on the OFer, but Appel is very much more likely to be a good starting pitcher, not guaranteed, but much more likely.
×
×
  • Create New...