I understand the desire to trade EVERYONE.....I just don't think it happens. I am also not 100% sure it should happen. I am highly conflicted on a few cases for older players: Dozier.....he won't be good in 3-6 years, when this team should be peaking, but he's also likely to be good for a couple years. I am not sure on Polanco, nor do I see another option he's really blocking. If you are sold on Polanco, you deal him. If not, I think you keep him unless you get a good lottery ticket back. Santana.....you need 5 starters. I don't think he brings much back. I also think having one veteran the other starters can talk to and learn from does matter. I don't think Hughes can do that from the DL or bullpen, and given how Nolasco talks, I'm not sure I want that to be him. I'd probably keep him around, despite my feeling he's not part of the next great Twins' team. Suzuki.....every team needs a veteran catcher. I don't mind Suzuki as a backup, I mind him as the primary option that is never PH for, and who wears out from too much playing time. If used properly, I think he adds value in the same way Santana does. That said....you could deal him and sign him or another veteran in the off season. I'd probably deal him, but if they kept him and used him correctly. I'd not be upset. Other than that, I'd probably deal everyone over 27 or whatever age you want to pick.