Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,925

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    why? Why give up on a negotiation if you want the player over that? We see leaks every day, it's part of the game.
  2. Mike Sixel
    if so, they should shut down right now. I hope not.
  3. Mike Sixel
    Are we sure ATL didn't leak first? I would.....
  4. Mike Sixel
    I agree. I'd put it in the 10-20% range, but then, that's a WAG based only on the fact they are close and lots can happen in the next 2+ months.
  5. Mike Sixel
    Agreed, but I thought we were discussing something totally different. I guess not. What would you say the odds are?
  6. Mike Sixel
    Agreed.
  7. Mike Sixel
    btw, Ken Rosenthal is writing on FB now. A very good follow.
  8. Mike Sixel
    I'm guessing Wade or Granite, personally. It fits their needs, I think. Garver is also likely. I think they want someone close to the majors, given where they are in the process, and I don't think they want more pitchers.
  9. Mike Sixel
    Will this reach Dozier traded thread length, all for the same outcome? I'm going: no maybe
  10. Mike Sixel
    Huh? We weren't even discussing base runs.
  11. Mike Sixel
    that sure would make it cheap on teh Twins' side! I like it.
  12. Mike Sixel
    I asked in the comments. Sometimes they look at the comments....
  13. Mike Sixel
    Same with Berrios / Santana vs all other starters. If Berrios gives them a 55% chance to win, and Santana a 52% chance, and Mejia 48% and all others 40........averages look bad. But games are discrete entities, not a single 162x9 event. I'm sure there is research on this out there, but I've never looked for it.
  14. Mike Sixel
    I believe they update the odds daily.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Predicting a likely outcome is very different than saying there are chances that a different outcome will happen. and no, FG had MN at 5.1% to make the playoffs before the year started, so it's double. http://www.fangraphs.com/coolgraphs.aspx?lg=AL&div=C&stat=poff&year=2017
  16. Mike Sixel
    Like trading for a 3 month rental? I mean, that's not exactly about long term sustainability. I'm not saying its the wrong thing to do, but how does that help the long term?
  17. Mike Sixel
    I'm not sure how baseruns works.....but I think it ignores that Molitor uses his good RPs in tight games, and that it isn't all "sequencing". Not that all of the run differential should be ignored, that would be silly.
  18. Mike Sixel
    what doesn't make sense?
  19. Mike Sixel
    Agreed. And I'm sure some of the board will cringe at the name, since that's the range of highly variable outcomes and fan favorites.
  20. Mike Sixel
    Let's just say that Cameron doesn't agree with this article, he was clear on that on Twitter last night. He feels the Twins should be sellers.
  21. Mike Sixel
    I'd add Thorpe and Stewart to that list. Though I don't know how Stewart does it, but his last 6 starts have worked, strikeouts be danged.
  22. Mike Sixel
    His lawyers are digging for "dirt" on Mueller and his staff......
  23. Mike Sixel
    where is "meh" at in the list? I've never quite figured that out.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Yes they are. But its a a lot harder to acquire good, long term, assets.
  25. Mike Sixel
    Indeed I did. Tiresome wasn't it?
×
×
  • Create New...