you're the voice of reason, dave. never thought i'd say that. but yeah, i think the crazies are unaware of the value of a mid-rotation starter, of which we currently have none. for all those upset with the eades pick, it's probably a good idea to point out that gibson is projected by most to be exactly that and scott baker fit that mold to a tee. if we had a rotation of true mid-rotation guys, we'd be competitive this year. what is a formula for disappearing in the first round of the playoffs, however, is to have no frontline starters. the org seems to be actively seeking out power arms for the first time i can recall and complementing the rare rare talent with a solid arm like eades makes sense. not to mention one glaring thing: stewart's price. law and crawford both assumed he'd go above slot. if that's the case and we shell out $5million at no. 4, that means we're going to get less sexy at other spots.