This is an old POV, but I think still lingers in the Twins way of thinking- it goes along the lines in the theory that the Twins originally embraced P2C for economic reasons as their only fiscally viable way to remain competitive during, and right after, the contraction era. K-heavy pitchers are generally more in demand, thus driving up their price of retention, and riskier, as they break down more easily. Recent history should raise alarm bells, league average K/9 rates have steadily risen since 2005, from 6.38K/9 then, to 7.56K/9 today. Meanwhile, the Twins peaked in their K/9 rate in 2006 at 7.28 and have steadily and continually dropped in the waning years of the 00s, to finally cratering to the worst in the league over the last 3 years at right around 6.0K/9. And as Puck pointed out, the K/9 gap in 2013 between 29th place and 30th place is yawning, and an even more distinct point of distinction for the Starting Pitchers. In 2006, the Twins SP had a K/9 of 6.83 vs. a League Average K/9 of 6.21. In 2013, the Twins SP K/9 is TWO FULL Ks lower/9IP, at 4.83, vs a League Average K/9 of 7.15. Hope for trends changing in the minors? Yes, Meyer, May and Darnell have nice K/9 numbers this year. But in taking a look at the top 3 Twins farm clubs and strikeouts and K/9 rates, the AAA club ranks last, and both the AA and A+ clubs are 9th (out of 12).