One has little to do with the other. Dozier is a trade candidate because of an excess of MLB talent at his position. Much the same as we traded AJ when Mauer was ready. It might be true that something could be obtained for ESan, and I won't protest if the return is good, but we are not dealing from an excess at his position, and we don't have any productive use I know of for the salary a trade would likely free up. I advocate trying to improve the major league roster going into each season - except for the case at the beginning of a rebuild when the prospect shelf is bare, and that is not us now. Worst to first is rare, so I want improvement this year; there is value in not subjecting our several good young players to a losing atmosphere. Falvey has been quoted that he needs to be overwhelmed in order to trade Dozier, but for me Santana is the real case where a trade offer would need to surprise me. All that said, if ESan was the additional key that unlocked Urias, I would not hesitate. I just doubt it.