The highlighted part... We are in complete agreement. I also want to know this. I just don't believe that the current defensive metrics can tell me that for a wide variety of reasons. The important thing to me is the damage that can be done by one ball in a zone that a large percentage get to but he doesn't get to because a coach waved him over to Dominic Brown's back pocket or he had a cramped foot or slowed up thinking it was Marlon Byrd's ball. And once you have that screwy piece of data in the mix. It can take a real long time to stabilize it because of the weighing involved and the small number of opportunities in that particular zone. In the end... It's Ok... If you believe in what UZR or other metrics are telling you... I just don't belong to that church. I love stats... I think Bill James is the man... I think he revolutionized baseball for the good and smart people are continuing to advance things but my personal belief is this: Some stats can tell you pretty solidly what they have done in the past but the eye can tell you what they can do in the future. Once a player fixes something... the data changes. It doesn't matter if a hitter is hitting .184 when he steps to that plate. If he gets a hit he's batting 1,000 into the future. It's why I don't want to throw Hicks away. He can fix things and he just might. I'd love to have Ben Revere on my team but I'm guessing that Hicks, Arcia and Buxton will all be better choices someday. That's just my personal opinion. And I fully admit that I overvalue Speed... Probably to a fault but I can't see myself changing. Too much baseball under this bridge.