Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Your Turn: What Do You Want From A GM?


    Seth Stohs

    I feel no need to call for anyone to get fired. I won’t do it. Yes, I fully understand and don’t necessarily strongly disagree with the overwhelming philosophy that major changes may be needed to right this ship. The grass isn't always greener (though sometimes it really is), and sometimes change for the sake of change can be good. We will never 100% agree with any other person on every baseball topic.

    So instead of regurgitating the old, tired discussion about why the Twins should fire their general manager or others in the front office, let’s be a little more productive. Let’s not jump to hyperbole and automatically bash everything about the Twins brass. Like all of us, there is good and not-so-good in everybody. People have strengths and areas for improvement.

    Also, let’s not pretend that this (the Twins shockingly bad 11-33 record) is the fault of just the GM. There is plenty of blame to go around. Ownership warrants blame. The front office deserve blame. Player development can be questioned, if you like. I’m sure the scouts find some blame too. The manager and his coaching staff deserve some blame, and I do believe that the players deserve a large amount of the blame.

    Image courtesy of Don McPeak, USA Today

    Twins Video

    So, for the sake of important, meaningful discussion, let’s limit this discussion to the general manager role. Today, I’m going to post several qualifications of an MLB general manager. Feel free to discuss the qualifications in the comments, but mostly, use this article to start thinking about who you would like to see replace Terry Ryan (if that were to happen). We may not know the names of specific examples, but think about which qualities are most important to you, and how a candidate stacks up in those categories. Whether the Twins stay inside the system for a replacement or look elsewhere, the same questions need to be asked.

    Background

    Do the Twins need hire someone with experience as a big league GM? If so, does it need to be a GM who has put together World Series champions, or could you consider a candidate who wasn’t good in his first GM job but meets many other requirements? Do you prefer a candidate who has been second-in-command in a winning organization? Can the candidate be a former player, or would the negate him as a possibility for you? While we probably couldn’t officially ask, does age factor into the decision?

    SCOUTING

    The Draft

    The draft is less than three weeks away. Scouting is a big part of the draft. What would you want a GM to have as a draft philosophy? Would it be simply best player available? Would you focus on college or high school players? Would you use high picks on pitchers or hitters? How involved do you expect the GM to be in the draft process? Should the GM be very involved in the specific names, or should the GM simply have a plan with the director of scouting and develop a plan that is expected to be followed?

    International Markets

    How do you feel about signing players from around the world? Do you spend more money on scouting in the Caribbean? How do you feel about signing players from Cuba? What should the strategy be on spending slot, going over slot, or even trading draft picks for international slot money?

    Advanced Scouting

    The Twins send scouts to watch the teams that they will play next. Should that process continue, or should they just hire a stats company to provide all scouting data

    ADVANCED STATISTICS

    This is one that people think that the Twins are so far behind on. I don’t think we really know. However, if there were a change, and you were in charge, how much focus would you put on it?

    Do you need a group of 30+ statheads or could much of the same work be done with a group of six to eight?

    How much voice do you give the analytics group compared to the scouting group? Are they on equal group or should it be all about the past numbers?

    PLAYER DEVELOPMENT

    What are your philosophies on the minor leagues and player development? How do you strategize areas of focus, and development of individual development plans?

    What should the role of a minor league manager be?

    What role should player discipline be for various issues?

    What should the role be of a minor league hitting coach or pitching coach?

    What should the culture look like in your ideal world? Is it about winning? Solely about developing the top prospects?

    What is the responsibility of the GM and the big league team relative to the organization’s affiliates?

    What are the expectations for each player in the offseason? Should coaches meet individually with each player throughout the offseason?

    How much time should the GM spend with each of the affiliates during spring training, and during the season, if any?

    MEDIA/PRESS RELATIONS

    The GM is also in charge of the media relations department, including the press releases. Ideally, transactions and news would come through the PR department and to the media via press release. How do you feel about information leaks?

    And, as a GM, how much should you be telling the media or a listening audience? Do you want them to be an open book, or do you want the information on what is going on to be kept close to the vest?

    Do you, like Terry Ryan, spend time before each game meeting with the media and answering what he can?

    FRONT OFFICE

    What is important for you in a GM as it relates to hiring the following:

    What are the expectations for the hiring of an assistant GM?

    What are the expectations for the director of player personnel?

    What philosophies are important for a minor league director?

    How do you feel about keeping Twins “royalty and historical figures” around? Should Tony Oliva, Rod Carew, Torii Hunter, LaTroy Hawkins, Tom Kelly, Ron Gardenhire, Kent Hrbek and the like be involved in the organization, and how so?

    Of the current group, who stays and who goes?

    THE ON-FIELD STAFF

    What is important for you in hiring a GM in terms of his or her philosophy on the role and/or selection of a manager?

    How much say do you let a manager have in player decisions, if any?

    How much say should a GM have in managerial duties such as lineup construction and in-game decisions, if any?

    What are the keys when selecting the coaching staff?

    THE CURRENT SITUATION

    That’s all the behind-the-scenes stuff (probably not ALL, but a good portion of it) that a GM has to be responsible for, but now this candidate must step into the current roster and make some decisions.

    Do you want a manager who makes a bunch of moves on day 1? Do you want a manager who steps in the door and says that he needs to evaluate a few things before making decisions.

    How do you figure out the outfield situation? Should Miguel Sano be in the outfield, moved back to third base, or DHd. Should Brian Dozier be sent to AAA, keep playing or be traded? Should you trade the likes of Trevor Plouffe, Brian Dozier, Kurt Suzuki, Phil Hughes, Rick Nolasco and Kevin Jepsen for pennies on the dollar? Or, if you can’t trade some of them, are you willing to just explain to ownership why releasing them is the right thing?

    TRADES

    What should a GM's philosophy be on trading veterans? Whose opinion counts most when it comes to prospects you are getting in return: scouts, minor league coaching staffs, or number crunchers? How does that same GM feel about acquiring an elite talent and being willing to deal prospects?

    FREE AGENCY

    Four years ago, the Twins needed to go from a terrible pitching staff to just a mediocre pitching staff, so Ryan went out and spent money to acquire some solid, mediocre veteran starters. Results have been mixed.

    Understanding the Twins current starting and relieve staffs, should the Twins have gone after the $150-200 million starters? Should they have stayed away from the $10-13 million starters and focused more on the $5-8 million variety. What is the value of a strong bullpen and quality, reliable relievers. How long is too long for a contract, or how much is too much?

    What is your philosophy on signing minor league veterans to contract? Good idea, you never know who will develop later, or never sign them and push players excessively rapidly?

    MISCELLANEOUS

    Have them define “Success” in their job? What do you want their answer to be?

    What should the clubhouse atmosphere be like?

    What should the atmosphere of the front office personnel be?

    How does the GM candidate feel about building from within.?

    How does that GM candidate create a culture of accountability?

    Which current major league and minor league coaches would be let go, and who would you bring back? (I do find it interesting that a lot of people who want to clear house would like to see Doug Mientkiewicz as the next Twins manager, but anywho…)

    WHAT DO YOU THINK?

    All right, now it’s your turn? What are the most important qualities that a GM can bring to an organization? I brought up a lot of topics, and how do you go about acquiring those kinds of players?

    Again, I will not call for Terry Ryan to be fired. I wouldn’t be surprised if he steps down again, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he sticks around and says, “I helped make this mess, how are we going to make it better?”

    You are in the shoes of the Twins owner. You need to decide if you want Terry Ryan to make the July and August trades and then let him go after the season. Or, you need to decide that it needs to happen right now so that a replacement can be established before the draft and before any trades are made so that the new GM’s footprint can be made on those decisions.

    Again, I appreciate this thread not turning into yet another negative, bashing thread, but instead, let’s be productive and each of us jot down our thoughts on what makes a good GM, and what type of candidate we would support the Twins signing.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I want a GM who can do similar things to turning RA Dickey into D'Anaud and Symdergaard.  I want a GM who knows when to move a player on while there is still value. I want a GM who is lucky. 

     

    People from successful organizations moving on

    Friedman ran the Rays and did a good job. The Dodgers not so much.

    Luhnow's team had a good year last year, this year so far, not so much.

    Dombrowski has reinvented multiple team.

    LaRussa was considered a great baseball mind

    Dombrowski has been good wherever

    Hiring away from another organization is not foolproof.

     

    How about trading journeyman catchers with a career WAR of -1.6 and and a so-so back-end SP for a good RP and a future ace? (Because that's what Theo pulled off).  It isn't just deep resources.

     

    Yes, we got nothing of value recently for Butera, Doumitt, and Herrman.  Oh, and TINSTAAPP certainly applies to any minor leaguer with the title "future ace."

     

    I've already been on record stating I'd do some things differently, but I'm really not sure what your point is given that the context I was specifically addressing is why I disagreed with the idea of not drafting any pitching in the early rounds of the draft. 

     

     

    Yes, we got nothing of value recently for Butera, Doumitt, and Herrman.  Oh, and TINSTAAPP certainly applies to any minor leaguer with the title "future ace."

     

    I've already been on record stating I'd do some things differently, but I'm really not sure what your point is given that the context I was specifically addressing is why I disagreed with the idea of not drafting any pitching in the early rounds of the draft. 

     

    My point is we can't keep crying poor about the lack of depth of resources. Right now the main poverty surrounding this club is the paucity of cleverness and intrepidity.

    Over the last few weeks I've seen a lot of references to trading Perkins at peak value.

     

    I assume he took the hometown discount to stay home.

     

    If a GM trades away someone who took the hometown discount, that GM (or team) will probably never get the hometown discount again.

     

    I don't hold Ryan accountable for not trading Perkins - I think it's clearly the right thing to hang onto him unless Perkins was ok with it.

     

    Over the last few weeks I've seen a lot of references to trading Perkins at peak value.

     

    I assume he took the hometown discount to stay home.

     

    If a GM trades away someone who took the hometown discount, that GM (or team) will probably never get the hometown discount again.

     

    I don't hold Ryan accountable for not trading Perkins - I think it's clearly the right thing to hang onto him unless Perkins was ok with it.

     

    They signed Perkins to a 3 year $10.3 million deal after his 1st good season in the majors. The fact that he continued to be a good pitcher made this contract look like a bargain, but I would hardly classify that as a hometown discount... and I don't think the Twins owed him anything

     

    Given that this is not a team with as deep of resources as the Cubs, I think not getting pitching in the early picks is just as risky as we won't be going out and handing out those 150MM ace contracts. I do think pitching and hitting should be mixed up, but refusing to draft a pitcher at #1 simply b/c of the risk smacks in the face of all that BPA talk I hear every day. 

     

    You can make the counter argument that we can't afford take a pitcher high in the draft and not have him work out vs taking a hitter. I'm all for BPA at the top of the draft, but lean toward hitting once the those "elite" amateur players are taken. High end pitching can be found all over the draft. It's more a matter of scouting and player development, IMO.

     

    Most of the posts m to be saying:  "I want the new GM to do...(follow my orders)". I just want him to build a consistent winning team geared to win the Word Series.  I expect him to do things "his way".

     

    I don't think anyone here believes the new GM will be calling them for advice on potential moves.  I think we all understand that new GM will run things their own way.  That doesn't mean we can't discuss what types of traits we'd like to see in the new GM. 

     

    You can make the counter argument that we can't afford take a pitcher high in the draft and not have him work out vs taking a hitter. I'm all for BPA at the top of the draft, but lean toward hitting once the those "elite" amateur players are taken. High end pitching can be found all over the draft. It's more a matter of scouting and player development, IMO.

     

    Yep, precisely. In the draft, the international market, and on other team's rosters, as well. Money/small market excuses are the easy way out.

    Yeah the Perkins thing is a bit too 20/20 in my eyes. You typically don't trade a guy one year or so into an extension/contract that he signed with you. Especially one that is playing effectively (at the time).

     

    The last thing you also want to happen anyways is be stuck with a team with no real closer, that is how Ramos for Matt Capps deals happen, and those are bad.

     

    I suppose one could argue that first one was fair, but what about the $22MM extension?  Doing a little research:

     

     

     

    They lost 96 games in the 2 years (2012, 2013) following his 1st extension, before his 2nd.  They signed him to a second extension in March of 2014 with 3 years remaining on the original extension.  

     

    96 loss teams don't need good closers,.  They could have traded him many times without worrying about offending him and his "hometown discount" (or they could have just never signed him to that 2nd one.. the original would be in its final year now)

    Edited by alarp33

     

    Yeah the Perkins thing is a bit too 20/20 in my eyes. You typically don't trade a guy one year or so into an extension/contract that he signed with you. Especially one that is playing effectively (at the time).

     

    The last thing you also want to happen anyways is be stuck with a team with no real closer, that is how Ramos for Matt Capps deals happen, and those are bad.

     

    At the 2013 trade deadline they were 1.5 years into that "extension", would that have been an ok time to trade?  They were on the way to 96 losses, and would follow that up by losing 92 the following year.  

     

    I really don't think this was a case of hindsight at all, plenty of people were calling for him to be traded.  

    I also don't think bringing up Capps justifies it at all... "Don't do this smart thing, because you might follow it up with something really dumb"

     

    They signed Perkins to a 3 year $10.3 million deal after his 1st good season in the majors. The fact that he continued to be a good pitcher made this contract look like a bargain, but I would hardly classify that as a hometown discount... and I don't think the Twins owed him anything

     

    Yeah the Perkins thing is a bit too 20/20 in my eyes. You typically don't trade a guy one year or so into an extension/contract that he signed with you. Especially one that is playing effectively (at the time).

     

    The last thing you also want to happen anyways is be stuck with a team with no real closer, that is how Ramos for Matt Capps deals happen, and those are bad.

     

    All good points, except for the fact that the team was clearly years away from contending... a top-flite closer as a rule is an unneeded luxury on a rebuilding team, and Perk was most probably their best source of talent via trade for improving the team for the long-term.

     

    And RPs by their nature are a bit unpredictable year to year, Perkins was not immune to that fact of life- many of us supported the move at the time.

    Edited by jokin

     

    That's a little unfair IMO.

     

    Buxton hasn't floundered at all yet, he still is wayyyy too young to say this and he is currently doing very well in AAA. Several top prospects struggle their first time in the majors, Trout comes immediately to mind. Also, Buxton likely wasn't ready to be brought up anyways. If he is still struggling in 3 years then maybe we can talk about him being a bust.

     

    Ditto with Stewart, he was a high school arm, those guys take longer to develop then the Jr/Sr college pitchers we have drafted quite a bit in the past. He was a top 30 prospect coming into this season and is pitching well as a 21 year old in A+.

     

    Berrios is another first rounder who has worked out "well" so far and has a bright future.

     

    Span was a very good CF for us, I don't see how you can include him in this list as well. He is a good player who will have a good career, most teams will take that 7 days a week out of their mid first round pick.

     

    Gomez was never picked by the Twins, he was part of the Mets system.

     

    Gibson and Plouffe haven't been all stars, but at least they have contributed and are solid players as well. You can't really call them busts.

     

    If you want to talk busts, then at least mention the busts like Hunt, Gutierrez.

    Overall I think the Twins have done a pretty solid job drafting in the first round IMO.

    Twins early round drafting, first 150 picks:

    2005: MATT GARZA, Henry Sanchez, Paul Kelly, KEVIN SLOWEY, Drew Thompson. BRIAN DUENSING, Ryan Mullins, Caleb Moore

    2006: CHRIS PARMELEE, JOE BENSON, TYLER ROBERTSON, Whit Robbins, Garrett Jones

    2007: BEN REVERE, Angel Morales, Danny Rams, Reggie Williams

    2008: AARON HICKS, Carlos Gutierrez, Shooter Hunt, Bobby Lanigan, TYLER LADENDORF, Danny Ortiz, Nick Romero

    2009: KYLE GIBSON, Ben Tootle, Billy Bullock, Derek McCallum

    2010 Alex Wimmers, Niko Goodrum, PAT DEAN, EDDIE ROSARIO

    2011: Levi Michael, Travis Harrison, Corey Williams, Hudson Boyd, Madison Boer, Matt Summers

    2012: BYRON BUXTON, JOSE BERRIOS, Luke Bard, Mason Melotakis, JT Chargolis, Adam Walker, Zach Jones, TYLER DUFFEY

    2013: Kohl Stewart, Ryan Eades, Stu Turner, Stephen Gonsalves, Aaron Slegers

    2014: Nick Gordon, Nick Burdi, Michael Cederoth, Sam Clay, Jake Reed

    2015: Tyler Jay, Travis Blakenhorn, Trey Cabbage, Alex Robinson, Kyle Cody (didn't sign)

     

    The last four drafts do look pretty promising, but you never know, especially when you see the dozen guys who made it to the majors out of the next 7 drafts. There was a minor benefit in finishing in the bottom of the league compared to being competitive when you look at the big picture.

     

    I'm sure there are other teams that have developed many more top round picks than the Twins overall, and some teams that have developed even less.

    At the 2013 trade deadline they were 1.5 years into that "extension", would that have been an ok time to trade? They were on the way to 96 losses, and would follow that up by losing 92 the following year.

     

    I really don't think this was a case of hindsight at all, plenty of people were calling for him to be traded.

    I also don't think bringing up Capps justifies it at all... "Don't do this smart thing, because you might follow it up with something really dumb"

    Actually I would have been fine trading him at that point. My bad, I didn't realize it was that far into the deal.

    All good points, except for the fact that the team was clearly years away from contending... a top-flite closer as a rule is an unneeded luxury on a rebuilding team, and Perk was most probably their best source of talent via trade for improving the team for the long-term.

     

    And RPs by their nature are a bit unpredictable year to year, Perkins was not immune to that fact of life- many of us supported the move at the time.

    Yeah, great points, I probably let my Perkins homer glasses blind me to these things haha. I hope he comes back strong for us at some point either way though.

    Twins early round drafting, first 150 picks:

    2005: MATT GARZA, Henry Sanchez, Paul Kelly, KEVIN SLOWEY, Drew Thompson. BRIAN DUENSING, Ryan Mullins, Caleb Moore

    2006: CHRIS PARMELEE, JOE BENSON, TYLER ROBERTSON, Whit Robbins, Garrett Jones

    2007: BEN REVERE, Angel Morales, Danny Rams, Reggie Williams

    2008: AARON HICKS, Carlos Gutierrez, Shooter Hunt, Bobby Lanigan, TYLER LADENDORF, Danny Ortiz, Nick Romero

    2009: KYLE GIBSON, Ben Tootle, Billy Bullock, Derek McCallum

    2010 Alex Wimmers, Niko Goodrum, PAT DEAN, EDDIE ROSARIO

    2011: Levi Michael, Travis Harrison, Corey Williams, Hudson Boyd, Madison Boer, Matt Summers

    2012: BYRON BUXTON, JOSE BERRIOS, Luke Bard, Mason Melotakis, JT Chargolis, Adam Walker, Zach Jones, TYLER DUFFEY

    2013: Kohl Stewart, Ryan Eades, Stu Turner, Stephen Gonsalves, Aaron Slegers

    2014: Nick Gordon, Nick Burdi, Michael Cederoth, Sam Clay, Jake Reed

    2015: Tyler Jay, Travis Blakenhorn, Trey Cabbage, Alex Robinson, Kyle Cody (didn't sign)

     

    The last four drafts do look pretty promising, but you never know, especially when you see the dozen guys who made it to the majors out of the next 7 drafts. There was a minor benefit in finishing in the bottom of the league compared to being competitive when you look at the big picture.

     

    I'm sure there are other teams that have developed many more top round picks than the Twins overall, and some teams that have developed even less.

    It's important to keep in mind that a lot of the "worse" draft classes in that example were years the Twins were drafting mid to late in the first round. So basically, the last 4 year draft classes should definitely be looking more promising! That 2011 one looks rough currently, but looks to be the exception and not the rule.

     

    Overall if I had to guess the twins would

    Be slightly below average during this time, they certainly could have "hit" on more picks, but it could have been worse. Again that is purely a guess with no research.

    Edited by DaveW

     

    My point is we can't keep crying poor about the lack of depth of resources. Right now the main poverty surrounding this club is the paucity of cleverness and intrepidity.

     

    And it's not like we're a small market team anymore, either. And when Mauer's contract comes off the books we'll have plenty of budget room to go after a top free-agent pitcher.

     

    Twins early round drafting, first 150 picks:

    2005: MATT GARZA, Henry Sanchez, Paul Kelly, KEVIN SLOWEY, Drew Thompson. BRIAN DUENSING, Ryan Mullins, Caleb Moore

    2006: CHRIS PARMELEE, JOE BENSON, TYLER ROBERTSON, Whit Robbins, Garrett Jones

    2007: BEN REVERE, Angel Morales, Danny Rams, Reggie Williams

    2008: AARON HICKS, Carlos Gutierrez, Shooter Hunt, Bobby Lanigan, TYLER LADENDORF, Danny Ortiz, Nick Romero

    2009: KYLE GIBSON, Ben Tootle, Billy Bullock, Derek McCallum

    2010 Alex Wimmers, Niko Goodrum, PAT DEAN, EDDIE ROSARIO

    2011: Levi Michael, Travis Harrison, Corey Williams, Hudson Boyd, Madison Boer, Matt Summers

    2012: BYRON BUXTON, JOSE BERRIOS, Luke Bard, Mason Melotakis, JT Chargolis, Adam Walker, Zach Jones, TYLER DUFFEY

    2013: Kohl Stewart, Ryan Eades, Stu Turner, Stephen Gonsalves, Aaron Slegers

    2014: Nick Gordon, Nick Burdi, Michael Cederoth, Sam Clay, Jake Reed

    2015: Tyler Jay, Travis Blakenhorn, Trey Cabbage, Alex Robinson, Kyle Cody (didn't sign)

     

    The last four drafts do look pretty promising, but you never know, especially when you see the dozen guys who made it to the majors out of the next 7 drafts. There was a minor benefit in finishing in the bottom of the league compared to being competitive when you look at the big picture.

     

    I'm sure there are other teams that have developed many more top round picks than the Twins overall, and some teams that have developed even less.

     

    God, that 2011 draft was awful. 

     

    It's important to keep in mind that a lot of the "worse" draft classes in that example were years the Twins were drafting mid to late in the first round. So basically, the last 4 year draft classes should definitely be looking more promising! That 2011 one looks rough currently, but looks to be the exception and not the rule.

    Overall if I had to guess the twins would
    Be slightly below average during this time, they certainly could have "hit" on more picks, but it could have been worse. Again that is purely a guess with no research.

     

    Actually, they drafted quite poorly. Out of the 7 drafts 2005-2011, they had 3 regular starting players (Garza, Revere, Gibson), 4 role players (Duenseng, Slowey, Hicks, Rosario?), and few more "cups of coffee." On average a team will get at least one major league regular per draft, plus role players and various replacement level players. 

     

    It's important to keep in mind that a lot of the "worse" draft classes in that example were years the Twins were drafting mid to late in the first round. So basically, the last 4 year draft classes should definitely be looking more promising! That 2011 one looks rough currently, but looks to be the exception and not the rule.

    Overall if I had to guess the twins would
    Be slightly below average during this time, they certainly could have "hit" on more picks, but it could have been worse. Again that is purely a guess with no research.

    I wouldn't have guessed that you had taken a Big Gulp of the Twins Kool-Aid about "no good players available when it's our turn to draft".  Other teams found players--or shall I say were able to develop major league players, while the Twins are stuck with marginally skilled talent if not outright bums.

    Actually, they drafted quite poorly. Out of the 7 drafts 2005-2011, they had 3 regular starting players (Garza, Revere, Gibson), 4 role players (Duenseng, Slowey, Hicks, Rosario?), and few more "cups of coffee." On average a team will get at least one major league regular per draft, plus role players and various replacement level players.

    Actually yeah, you are right. I was trying to give the Twins the benefit of the doubt in this case, I thought at least they had "done" the draft ok overall. But this looks to be another area that has to be fixed/personal changed over.

     

    I guess the international scouting has at least done a good job? Sano, Kepler, Park all are nice players.

    I wouldn't have guessed that you had taken a Big Gulp of the Twins Kool-Aid about "no good players available when it's our turn to draft". Other teams found players--or shall I say were able to develop major league players, while the Twins are stuck with marginally skilled talent if not outright bums.

    After taking another look, it looks like every draft the twins had between 2007-2011 were not very "special". Especially with huge question marks around Gibson and Rosario now.

     

    Yeesh.

    A couple of things to consider.  First, let's not assume that an experience GM wants the job.  We may only have first time candidates to chose from.

     

    Second, when it comes to signing free agent pitchers, the numbers don't lie and the numbers for 30+ pitchers aren't pretty in terms of them staying healthy or improving.  So, I would avoid signing pitchers to long term deals when those deals are taking them beyond the wall known as 30 years old.  That wall has been defied by only a few and a couple of those few were known PED users.  I think one area where TR has failed is hiring pitchers and hoping they defy the odds.

    The right time to change? No ones likes change, until it starts paying dividends. Pride and fear conspire to tell us not to change.

    When it comes to the GM, it's a matter of trust.

    I like what the Cubs did. They went and got the best GM. Who then in turn went and got the best field manager.

    On the other end of Chicago, their GM was faced with a need to rebuild. But he saw that he had 2 front line arms under control. So he move aggressively forward.

    Houston and Oakland do well with the math majors advising. As all teams do now.

    Keeping x twins around is fine. As you trust who you know.

    But in moving players and in making plans (to rebuild)... My only knock on TR is that he never -ever- sells high. And alway gets caught in log jamming positions. Of course he has sold high when got log jammed in center field and catcher. And then was forced to look for help there too. Bad luck? Bad planning? How does one so conservative get caught like that? And why buy up all mediocre pitchers available, and lock them in long term.

     

    Actually yeah, you are right. I was trying to give the Twins the benefit of the doubt in this case, I thought at least they had "done" the draft ok overall. But this looks to be another area that has to be fixed/personal changed over.

    I guess the international scouting has at least done a good job? Sano, Kepler, Park all are nice players.

     

    It's not like the Twins were always bad in this area. The 2002-2010 teams were mostly based off success from the draft and player development in the mid 90s to about 2003,2004. The issue of not being able to develop players is one of the top three reasons for the Twin's struggles in this decade. Whether that's a failure of scouting, player development, or a combination of both, from an outside position it is impossible to separate one from the other. 

    It's not like the Twins were always bad in this area. The 2002-2010 teams were mostly based off success from the draft and player development in the mid 90s to about 2003,2004. The issue of not being able to develop players is one of the top three reasons for the Twin's struggles in this decade. Whether that's a failure of scouting, player development, or a combination of both, from an outside position it is impossible to separate one from the other.

    Agreed.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...