My point isn't that hitting and fielding are the same thing. That's why hitting .300 is considered elite. My point is that it seems to be a similar task for the human brain to recognize a pitch coming out of the pitcher's hand as it is to recognize a ball coming off of a bat. Not the same physical task, but a similar process that your brain goes through in order to react. The human brain can be trained to distinguish balls from strikes. It can also be trained to read, to guide an artist's hand, and to drive a car. It's generally agreed upon that people can improve at all of these things through repetition, even if the person is not Stephen Hawking, Kandinski, or Jeff Gordon. So yes, you can train your brain to better recognize the trajectory of a ball that was hit by a baseball bat. Not everybody is innately gifted to routinely get a perfect jump. But Arcia is a major league outfielder, meaning that he is athletic enough to learn to take that correct first step, to take better routes, and to position himself better so that he doesn't need to get as good of a jump in the first place. Also, pitches have spin and they break, so I'm not sure what you're getting at there. Whether or not the ball is moving toward "the same general zone as the plate" is extremely difficult to pick up on in practice, especially when moving 90+ mph. So shouldn't improving at the plate be astronomically harder than improving in the outfield? I would think so. I can't argue with you about Arcia's k rate. What I'm saying is that I think it's wrong to assume that Arcia (or below average outfielders in general) can't get better and become a serviceable glove out in right. I would rather the Twins look into a Vargas-Miller swap than Arcia-Miller.