Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

John Bonnes

Site Manager
  • Posts

    6,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John Bonnes

  1. You’ll be hard-pressed to find anyone that doesn’t think the Detroit Tigers are the favorites to with the AL Central, including those who generate MLB futures odds. But Vegas has also tagged them with the highest over-under number in the American League: 93 games. Vegas picked a similar number last year and the Tigers disappointed.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] They won the division, but they only won 88 games, and only their dominance of head-to-head matchups with the White Sox saved them from an ignomnius fate. After adding Cecil Fielder in the offseason, their offense was only slightly above average, though playing in Comerica Park might skew that a little. They bolstered their starting pitching staff by acquiring Anibal Sanchez but their bullpen remained full of question marks. To their credit, they further improved this offseason. They retained Sanchez and replaced Delmon Young with Torii Hunter. But maybe best of all, they’ll add Victor Martinez to their lineup as he is fully recovered from the ACL surgery that cost him all of 2012. So start with 88 wins, add a full year of Martinez, a full year of Sanchez, swapping Hunter for Young….and they pretty clearly approach that number. I’ll add in a more ethereal reason too: sometime it seems like it takes a team of superstars a year or so to remember that games won’t be just handed to them. However, 93 is a huge number, so it’s hard to take the over – but that’s the point. If it was lower, everyone would bet it. Which way would you go?
  2. International draft. Find a guy in a later round that is still going to be a great pitcher. Trade for a premier player. I'm a little surprised how many posts I'm seeing here that suggest people will be really dissappointed if the Twins don't come out of this draft with a college arm. Based on nothing more than Jeremy's writeups, it looks like there are four pretty good options in this draft: 3 college pitchers (Appel, Manea, Gray) and one high school outfielder (Frazier). If Frazier is the one of those guys that is left by pick #4, and my only other choice is a second tier college pitcher, I'd rather they take Frazier, in theory.
  3. Not to beat the Butera thing into the ground, but it seems that last year the approach was reasonable: 1) Start the year without him 2) Call him up when Mauer is banged up (fulfilling the "just a phone call away" strategy) and 3) Keep him because, really, why the hell not? It's not like he was keeping a great pinch-hiter off the roster. But this could be different. I'd love to see a real pinch-hitter added IF they can identify one or bring one in. I don't know if Colabello qualifies or not. Thome certainly would. Then, when Mauer gets banged up and needs to sit for a while, bring up Butera and send down Escobar.
  4. Minnesota Twins: Anthony Swarzak ready, finally, to return to mound - TwinCities.com But before you get too excited about his imminent return.... Anyone have a feel for how long it takes to get ramped up if he's still not even throwing from full distance? That doesn't sound too promising to me.
  5. Kevin Correia had spring training's longest outing. Chris Parmelee saved a home run by leaping over the outfield wall. And Dozier ranged, dove three times and converted all of them to outs. JP Kinsela couldn't have scripted this game. But the Twins lost because (stop me if you've heard this before this spring) a couple of relievers imploded. We're not 19 days away from Opening Day. Is it still too early to start worrying about the bullpen? Are some of these guys snapping out of it yet? Twins waste great defense and a late rally | StarTribune.com
  6. There has been some talk about this, but I don't think it's been this frontal before. I don't know if Gardy is still lobbying for Thome with this kind of talk, or if he's impressed with someone like Colabello, but it seems like this is a serious option: I have no problem with this plan. I certainly like it better than having Escobar AND Butera on the roster. If he wants a bat, Gardenhire is going to need to make a decision on those guys. Escobar works at catcher, impresses in infield | StarTribune.com
  7. Jonathan Mayo of MLB.com raves about Byron Buxton, emphasizing that he has a work ethic equal to his talent. The Twins certainly seem to have him on the fast track. It doesn't sound like E-Town will get him this year. He's going to be in Cedar Rapids for you road-trippers out there.... Twins outfield prospect Byron Buxton is working hard in his first spring camp | twinsbaseball.com: News
  8. Patrick Reusse, in his blog at ESPN 1500, evaluates the Twins and concludes their rebound is on it's way, as opposed to the dry spell of the 90s. He has several optimistic tidbits, including: He also says Sano will find some time in The Show in 2014. They all seem a little optimistic to me. Reusse's Reality from Florida: Not a rerun of 1993-2000 - Minnesota Twins news | 1500 ESPN Twin Cities ? Minnesota Sports News & Opinion (Twins, Vikings, Wolves, Wild, Gophers) | Sportswire: Minnesota Twins
  9. So how were you able to do this comment? What did you do differently? Thanks, John
  10. Actually, we knew this right? I'd forgotten, but two weeks ago he missed the first few days of spring training because of a calf strain. We talked about it quite a bit: http://twinsdaily.com/twins-talk/5219-bollinger-plouffe-batting-sore-calf.html I'm not ready to start piling onto the med/training staff just yet, but it sounds like he came back from this too soon. And that they at least were a little worried that they had under-diagnosed it originally and did this MRI.
  11. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=1447-Gleeman-and-the-Geek-Ep-84-Aaron-Hicks-Bar-Dreams-and-Over-Under
  12. [ATTACH=CONFIG]3464[/ATTACH]Aaron and John talk about Aaron Hicks' odds of being the Twins' Opening Day center fielder, the pros and cons of service time shenanigans, dreaming of buying a bar together, betting on the over/under win totals for every American League team, why the AL Central is once again underwhelming, the dangers of parallel parking, Ryan Doumit and evaluating catcher defense, unprofessional bathroom breaks, and the stability of one-run games. Here are: the podcasts the rss feed if you want to subscribe and the podcast on iTunes. Or, just click below:
  13. Aaron and John talk about Aaron Hicks' odds of being the Twins' Opening Day center fielder, the pros and cons of service time shenanigans, dreaming of buying a bar together, betting on the over/under win totals for every American League team, why the AL Central is once again underwhelming, the dangers of parallel parking, Ryan Doumit and evaluating catcher defense, unprofessional bathroom breaks, and the stability of one-run games. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]Here are: the podcasts the rss feed if you want to subscribe and the podcast on iTunes. Or, just click below:
  14. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=1446-Twins-Daily-Welcomes-Summit-Brewing
  15. There are great rewards and great risks in doing something new. We know a thing or two about that at Twins Daily. We also know a thing or two about passion and experimentation and rejecting the limitations older corporate entities might embrace. (Or try to enforce.) I think these are core values with which our members empathize. If they didn't, I think they'd get their Twins fix someplace else. It has been harder to find local sponsors that embrace that same attitude. But today we welcome our first, and given their history, I wonder what took us so long to find each other. In 1986, Summit tackled a stodgy industry by trusting consumers to get past old habits by brewing new experimental products of exceptional quality. They took great risks and we've all received the great rewards. In the brewer’s interview for their new Unchained series beer, brewer Gabe Smoley talked about the impressive measures he took to make sure that his beer would really be 100% organic: I think that’s the DNA of Twins Daily too, and I think it’s the DNA or our community. So, please raise a glass and welcome Summit to Twins Daily. I'm glad we found each other.
  16. Herrmann surprised me some, but Tonkin surprises me more. It seemed like he had some buzz going on about him this spring. I didn't think he would make the leap out of spring training, but I'm surprised they didn't want to see more of him.
  17. +1. Just like I get suspicious as soon as I hear any pitcher being compared to Tom Glavine.
  18. I really enjoy reading your research on this Brad. I appreciate you writing it up for us all.
  19. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=1439-Over-and-Under-The-Royals
  20. Can any season for the Kansas City Royals, who have only finished above .500 once since strike-shortened 1994, really be considered a disappointment? Maybe not, but last year was close. Last year was supposed to be the year the the Royals perennial rebuilding efforts finally paid off. Vegas gave them an over/under of 80.5, giving them even odds at that elusive .500 year. It wasn't to be. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]Their offense was below average (20th in runs scored) and their pitching was worse (23rd in combined ERA). They won only 72 games. Their starting rotation was especially bad, posting an ERA of 5.01. That's the area they attacked this offseason. Last year's Opening Day starter, Bruce Chen, goes into the season and their fifth starter. A trade with the Rays netted them James Shields and Wade Davis. Another trade with the Angles brought them Ervin Santana. And they re-signed Jeremy Guthrie, who was outstanding for them after a midseason trade with the Rockies. Despite all those improvements, Vegas is cautious, giving them an over/under of 78.5, two games worse than they expected last year. It looks like those that bet the over last year may need a little reassuring to make the same bet this year. I don't blame them. The Royals were 11 games under .500 by April 24th last year. Five months is a long time to wonder why the hell you thought this year would be any different for the Royals. For the record, I think this year might just be different. If I had to choose one way or the other, I'd take the over on that 78.5, but .... there is just no way I'm laying money on that number. Let me rephrase that: there is no way I'm laying money on that franchise. I expect the good people of Missouri understand. After all, they are the "Show Me" state. Make sure you're heard, too. We'll review these at the end of the year.
  21. [ATTACH=CONFIG]3443[/ATTACH]Can any season for the Royals, who have only finished above .500 once since strike-shortened 1994, really be considered a disappointment? Maybe not, but last year was close. Last year was supposed to be the year the the Royals perennial rebuilding efforts finally paid off. Vegas gave them an over/under of 80.5, giving them even odds at that elusive .500 year. It wasn't to be. Their offense was below average (20th in runs scored) and their pitching was worse (23rd in combined ERA). They won only 72 games. Their starting rotation was especially bad, posting an ERA of 5.01. That's the area they attacked this offseason. Last year's Opening Day starter, Bruce Chen, goes into the season and their fifth starter. A trade with the Rays netted them James Shields and Wade Davis. Another trade with the Angles brought them Ervin Santana. And they re-signed Jeremy Guthrie, who was outstanding for them after a midseason trade with the Rockies. Despite all those improvements, Vegas is cautious, giving them an over/under of 78.5, two games worse than they expected last year. It looks like those that bet the over last year may need a little reassuring to make the same bet this year. I don't blame them. The Royals were 11 games under .500 by April 24th last year. Five months is a long time to wonder why the hell you thought this year would be any different for the Royals. For the record, I think this year might just be different. If I had to choose one way or the other, I'd take the over on that 78.5, but .... there is just no way I'm laying money on that number. Let me rephrase that: there is no way I'm laying money on that franchise. I expect the good people of Missouri understand. After all, they are the "Show Me" state.
  22. We'll get that back Thrylos. We had a few issues.
×
×
  • Create New...