The very next thing in the U.S. Constitution, after describing the roles of the three branches of government (that you learn about in civic class), is the “full faith and credit clause” of the Constitution. This actually obliges Congress to act when states disagree on what contracts to honor. Doesn’t get talked about much, but DOMA makes sense. I do think, however, that all its language about protecting marriage undermines this issue. I also think some allowances could have been made in Federal tax law, etc., for these differences, out of charity and kindness, if nothing else. As for “equal rights” and all that language, any definition of marriage is discriminatory. All the advocates for same-sex marriage are discriminating mightily against those committed relationships that are not sexual partnerships: elderly siblings, for example, who live together. They may have inheritance rights, but little else. And all this comes from the same people who wanted to take “government out of the bedroom.” Nothing is as open and shut as you people make it. That you can’t see that and resort to name-calling is ugly, in my book. Now let’s get back to talking about the Minnesota Twins.