I think most people aspire to rise through the ranks wherever they are. I work for a company with 300,000 employees and a CEO that makes $20M a year. In fact, if you took the 25 highest paid executives in MN their salaries would dwarf the Twins payroll. So the lotto ticket theory does not really apply, as the odds are much worse in the real world. If you get that first job in the mail room, our society says you deserve at least minimum wage while you start your ascent, which is not the case for a minor league player. The fact that he has a potential payoff down the road should not justify a salary of $6k a year. You're making my point here, lottery-wise. I'm saying the "lottery" odds are much better as a minor league ballplayer than as a burger flipper (or lotto player). You agreed with me on this. So, let's consider the price of a ticket. If a dollar buys you a ticket for a million dollar payout at odds of 10 million to one, what is a ticket with odds of 100 to one worth? What would you pay for a 1 in 100 chance at a million dollars? The minor leaguers are playing in the 1 chance in a 100 lottery, and the price they pay for that ticket is low wages and long hours. (playing a game, I might add). I'm not at all arguing that they couldn't be paid more, the skin-flints who own the team wouldn't miss the money. And I'm fully on board with the idea that a labor agreement negotiated by a group with opposing interests is inherently wrong. But the fact the league has no shortage of players willing to play for the going rate tells me the wage is not too low.