How do you know "they certainly could have tried harder on Blackburn, and especially Liriano?" Do you sit in their offseason meetings? Hind sight is always 20-20. It was not unreasonable to think that Pavano would pitch his 200 plus innings with a 4 something ERA. It was not unreasonable to think Baker would pitch most of a season at his career numbers. It was a realistic gamble to hope Blackburn would bounce back and pitch to the level of success he had shown in the past. Same thing with Liriano. If you want to rip them for being locked into contracts with Pavano and Blackburn and Baker, then fine, but to rip them for not signing other starting pitchers when they were already locked in with three pitchers who had shown success is unrealistic. They made a great signing with Willingham in spite of his poor defense, but they were not going to be able to afford him, Doumit, Carrol, and a couple of the many SP FAs. Now, if they do not do something this offseason to address the rotation, I will be the first to rip them. Also, comparing last years record to this years at this point means absolutely nothing. They were coming off a stretch right before the deadline last year that boosted their record and then bombed the rest of the way. Lets see how the rest of the year plays out and then we can compare the two. I am willing to bet that they will finish significantly better then last year.