Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    A Tale of Two Gibsons


    iTwins

    Twins Video

    ccs-7-140639519908_thumb.jpgKyle Gibson was lights out Wednesday night as he held the Mariners scoreless over six innings. He scattered seven hits, but only walked one while striking out three to turn in his 8th dominant performance on the year, improving his overall record to eight wins and seven losses.

    The problem is, there doesn’t seem to be any middle ground when it comes to Gibson’s starts. Either he’s lights out, like he was in Seattle (6.0IP, 7H, 0ER, 1BB, 3K) or he’s knocked out, like his outing against the Yankees on July 4th (2.0 IP, 6H, 5ER, 1BB, 0K).

    One or two starts with such a variance wouldn’t mean much. Starters have bad outings, as even staff ace Phil Hughes has thrown a clunker or two this season. Gibson, however, isn’t just having one or two all or nothing starts. Seemingly every start is defined by the all-or-nothing principal.

    Take a look at this years' splits:

    (A blank space in the charts below indicates a value of zero).

    [TABLE]

    Split

    G

    PA

    AB

    R

    H

    2B

    3B

    HR

    SB

    CS

    BB

    SO

    SO/W

    BA

    OBP

    SLG

    OPS

    TB

    GDP

    HBP

    SH

    SF

    IBB

    ROE

    BAbip

    tOPS+

    sOPS+

    in Wins

    8

    216

    198

    5

    41

    5

    [/TD]

    1

    1

    17

    28

    1.65

    .207

    .270

    .247

    .517

    49

    8

    1

    3

    .237

    58

    85

    in Losses

    7

    136

    124

    40

    47

    11

    2

    5

    1

    9

    12

    1.33

    .379

    .419

    .621

    1.040

    77

    5

    1

    2

    2

    .385

    213

    125

    in No Dec.

    3

    71

    68

    10

    3

    2

    1

    3

    13

    4.33

    .147

    .183

    .191

    .374

    13

    2

    1

    .182

    14

    9

    [/TABLE]

     

    That’s a startling difference. He’s essentially allowing opposing batters to hit 170 points higher in average in losses while also seeing opponents' OPS double (!) Obviously, in a loss, starters are going to post worse numbers than they do in wins, but the splits are not typically this wide or dramatic.

    Initially it looked like Gibson’s struggles were attributable to home/road splits. In his home starts since the beginning of the season, Gibson has had only two "clunkers"

    Home Starts:

    [TABLE]

    Date

    Innings

    Earned Runs

    4/11

    6.1

    1

    4/17

    8.0

    4/30

    6.2

    5

    5/16

    7.0

    1

    5/28

    6.0

    6/7

    7.0

    7/4

    2.0

    5

    [/TABLE]

    His road starts have been a bit rougher:

    Road Starts:

    [TABLE]

    Date

    Innings

    Earned Runs

    4/5

    5.0

    1

    4/22

    3.0

    7

    5/5

    7.0

    5/10

    2.0

    6

    5/23

    5.0

    5

    6/2

    6.0

    4

    6/13

    7.0

    6/18

    7.0

    6/24

    2.0

    7

    6/29

    8.0

    2

    7/9

    6.0

     

     

     

    [/TABLE]

    Early in the season, the solution seemed simple. For whatever reason, Kyle Gibson struggled away from Target Field. However, Gibson’s last few starts have made that assessment inaccurate. He’s turned in quality outings in Texas, Boston and Detroit while his last dud came at home.

    It’s clearly not as simple as home/road struggles. So, let’s dig a bit deeper. Maybe this is all just a matter of pitch selection?

    [TABLE]

    Date

    Opp

    FB%

    FBv

    SL%

    SLv

    CB%

    CBv

    CH%

    CHv

    7/9/2014

    @SEA

    7/4/2014

    NYY

    57.70%

    90.9

    23.10%

    83.7

    3.90%

    79

    15.40%

    83.3

    6/29/2014

    @TEX

    67.40%

    92.2

    24.20%

    85.5

    2.10%

    80.5

    6.30%

    84.5

    6/24/2014

    @LAA

    62.00%

    92.6

    20.00%

    85

    2.00%

    82

    16.00%

    84.1

    6/18/2014

    @BOS

    56.90%

    92.1

    20.60%

    84.9

    3.90%

    81

    18.60%

    84.1

    6/13/2014

    @DET

    60.00%

    91.5

    24.60%

    83.9

    2.70%

    78.3

    12.70%

    82.5

    6/7/2014

    HOU

    65.10%

    89.9

    18.90%

    83.8

    2.80%

    77.3

    13.20%

    82.1

    6/2/2014

    @MIL

    62.30%

    92.1

    31.20%

    84.3

    2.60%

    79

    3.90%

    83.3

    5/28/2014

    TEX

    67.30%

    91.5

    20.60%

    84.7

    5.60%

    79.7

    6.50%

    82.7

    5/23/2014

    @SFG

    51.40%

    92

    26.40%

    85.5

    9.70%

    81

    12.50%

    83.8

    5/16/2014

    SEA

    68.80%

    90.9

    12.50%

    84.1

    1.00%

    78

    17.70%

    83.2

    5/10/2014

    @DET

    56.30%

    91.7

    33.30%

    84.6

    10.40%

    83.2

    5/5/2014

    @CLE

    69.00%

    90.5

    7.00%

    85.6

    7.00%

    79.4

    17.00%

    82.7

    4/30/2014

    LAD

    64.40%

    91

    19.80%

    82.4

    3.00%

    79

    12.90%

    83.2

    4/22/2014

    @TBR

    68.60%

    90.8

    24.40%

    82.9

    7.00%

    82.7

    4/17/2014

    TOR

    80.00%

    90.9

    11.40%

    83.7

    8.60%

    82.9

    4/11/2014

    KCR

    67.00%

    91.3

    19.00%

    83.2

    3.00%

    78.7

    11.00%

    83

    4/5/2014

    @CLE

    69.10%

    90.4

    13.40%

    82

    [TD]

    17.50%

    81.8

    [/TABLE]

    That big block of data does have some interesting points. Mainly, in wins, Gibson is using his fastball between 60%-70% of the time while in losses the fastball usage resides at 51%-57%. Why is Gibson shying away from his fastball in losses? It looks like he’s struggling to locate the pitch.

    Here’s Gibson’s Pitch F/X data from his 7/4 start against the Yankees:

    attachment.php?attachmentid=8196&stc=1

     

    Look at the gray squares, which indicate Gibson’s sinker. As you can see, Gibson struggled to locate his sinker, leaving many balls out of the zone. That caused him to fall behind and then have to come into the zone with a different pitch (since his sinker control was off) – thus resulting in a fireworks performance courtesy of the Yankee bats.

    The trend repeats in his 6/24 start against the Angels.

    attachment.php?attachmentid=8197&stc=1

     

    Again, there’s little consistency in the location of his sinker and not surprisingly the results are very similar to the start against the Yankees.

    Finally, look at the Pitch F/X data from his 6/29 start against Texas and the start yesterday against Seattle.

     

    attachment.php?attachmentid=8198&stc=1

    attachment.php?attachmentid=8199&stc=1

    A majority of his sinkers are low in the zone and are grouped nicely. Greater control yielded a better result.

    Admittedly, that’s a lot of data to comb over to simply reach the conclusion that Gibson is better when he can control his pitches. That policy applies to every starter in the league, outside of maybe Sam Deduno who in fact may be better when he has no idea where the ball is going. What’s startling is just how different the results are when Gibson is struggling with control and when he’s on.

    Every starter will battle control issues from time to time and even the best starters get knocked around a bit, but I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a player as all or nothing as Kyle Gibson. Hopefully, Gibson can improve on these results as he continues to learn and grow. He’ll need to learn how to pitch when his best stuff just isn’t with him – even Kevin Correia and Ricky Nolasco can turn in quality outings when their command is evading them.

    It seems like Gibson’s struggles may simply be because he hasn’t figured out how to work with what he has on any given night. We hope that as he pitches further into the season, he’ll figure things out and we’ll stop seeing so many "boom or busts" starts from the Twins’ righty.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Thursday night, his third straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Three games later, he is hitting .296/.359/.437 (.796).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...