Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    A Radically Different Deadline Approach Has Led to the Same August Results for the Minnesota Twins

    After making a series of buy moves and announcing their intent to push in the AL playoff race, this year's Twins have actually been slightly worse in August than the team that sold nearly half its roster and gave up in 2025.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett, David Frerker-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Last year, the Twins stumbled into the month of August, dropping four of their last five in July to fall six games below .500 and spur an unprecedented deadline sell-off. In what would prove to be Derek Falvey's final big swing at the helm, Minnesota's front office traded away 10 major-league players. The outgoing wave included their three best relievers in Jhoan Duran, Griffin Jax and Louis Varland, and one of their top-three position players in Carlos Correa. What remained was an ill-suited starting shortstop in Brooks Lee and a bullpen full of marginal (at best) MLB talent.

    The ensuing result was predictably very bad. Through August 27th, they were 9-16, a .360 winning percentage. Their decimated bullpen ranked 19th among MLB teams in fWAR, while their rotation ranked 18th and their offense ranked 21st. 

    This year, August started on a very different note for the Twins. They won seven of their last nine games in July, bouncing back from a post-break slump, and by the time the trade deadline arrived, they had emphatically emerged as buyers. They traded one of their top pitching prospects for Jeff Hoffman, after also shipping out noteworthy prospects for reliever A.J. Minter and starter Dean Kremer.

    Following Tom Pohlad's edict, first-year baseball ops leader Jeremy Zoll invested in his roster, in an effort to bolster the club's chances in August and September as they competed for a playoff spot. And in response to that investment, through August 27th, this year's Twins have gone ... 8-15, good for a .348 winning percentage that is slightly worse than 2025 through this date. The revamped bullpen has been modestly better (15th), albeit with a far worse Win Probability Added, while the rotation and offense have both been middle-of-the-pack.

    Just as expectations played to Shelton's favor in the first half of the season, they now work against him relative to where Rocco Baldelli stood one year ago. Last August, people were commending the Twins for playing free and easy, absent the weight of contention status and urgency. Now the current team is collapsing under pressure, struggling across all phases, with poor play accompanied by questionable decision-making from both Shelton and Zoll's front office.

    The difference is that the ending of this year's story remains unwritten. We know where it went from here last season: from August 28th onward the Twins went 10-19 to end up in fourth place with 92 losses. There's still time for the Twins to turn the ship around and at least make things interesting. Their remaining schedule is favorable. Walker Jenkins is on his way and Joe Ryan is hopefully not far behind.

    But in order to avoid irrelevance by mid-September, an outcome that would cast huge scrutiny on their decision to parse out future assets for short-term help three weeks ago, these beefed-up Twins need to show they are better than the dismantled, resigned team that marched to the finish line a year ago. So far, they haven't proven it in the least.


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    9 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    Duran and Jax both had 2 1/2 years left not 1 1/2.  Trading away every decent RP on your team sure as hell is not an indication you are trying to contend.  What were they trying to do with these moves trading for Abel , Rojas, and Bradley who had 4+ years of control if not rebuild?   Falvey was removed because he and Tom Pohlad did not agree on direction.  Pohlad wanted to go for it.  Can we read between the lines and conclude Falvey wanted to continue the rebuild.  Is there another direction other than try to contend or rebuild?  

    Tendering Larnach tells us nothing.   Maybe he thought he could get a prearb RP for him which would have saved money and filled a need.  More likely, he believed Jenkins and Rodriguez were near ready, and he could eventually move Larnach to a 4th OF spot or out of the organization.  That would not only be consistent with a rebuild strategy it would allow the team to time promotions with readiness as opposed to forcing the issue.

     

    Let me restate, in my opinion they were not in a rebuild, we do not know the conversations between Falvey and Tom P.

    What we do know is when Falvey left it was clearly reported that he was not happy with having the business operations duties that he had been given a year earlier taken away.  He felt one person could oversee both business and baseball operations even though the Twins have never operated that way.  The only reason he was given the business operations was St. Peter stepped down and the team was for sale.  They were not going to bring someone new into that business with ownership still in question.

    What I do know is Falvey never appeared to have a clear plan and he did not value younger players.  So to me a rebuild was more of a retool.

     

    18 hours ago, HarmonK03 said:

    Other than a couple of teams every team is trying to maximize profit, they don't have an open checkbook.

    Yes, most teams work within their budget. Aside from the occasional new owner who subsidizes the payroll with his own cash (Mets) expenses have to match up with revenue. 

    What's done with the revenue is the difference. Are you trying to build a winner or are you maximizing cash flow? Long term vision or short term profit? I don't think many experienced baseball executives are interested in the latter. Twins ownership has already signaled they're looking at the short term. I don't see a proven executive signing on just to boost the teams sale price. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...