Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

bwille

Provisional Member
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by bwille

  1. Any initial thoughts on my article? Would love to generate some discussion! Thanks for your input!
  2. You can view the article by clicking here: http://twinsdaily.com/entry.php?b=4616
  3. When the Minnesota Twins sent down Scott Diamond to Triple-A last week, it was a foregone conclusion that the team would call up left-hander Andrew Albers to take Diamond’s spot in the rotation. Albers certainly earned his promotion as he posted a 11-5 record with a 2.86 ERA, 1.179 WHIP, 2.2 BB/9, 7.9 SO/9 and a 3.63 SO/BB over 132.1 innings in 22 starts this season, but what can fans expect to see when Albers makes his debut? [ATTACH=CONFIG]5097[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Derick E. Hingle-USA TODAY Sports Some fans may be jaded about what to expect from Albers based on the disappointing performances from one of the team’s top pitching prospects, Kyle Gibson, so far this season, but Albers may be able to fair better than his former counterpart in 2013. A scouting report from 2010 stated that Albers throws a high-80s mph fastball, an above-average changeup, an average slider and a big, looping curveball. Those characteristics do not indicate that Albers is an overpowering strikeout pitcher and instead that he is a command pitcher who works around the plate. In my opinion, Albers is cut from a similar cloth that Diamond was and hopefully, the Twins can get the type of performances they got out of Diamond in 2012 from Albers in 2013. Albers' velocity is now believed to be around 85 mph, which isn’t very high, so he must rely on his command to keep hitters off balance and be effective during his stint in the majors. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ I haven’t seen Albers pitch, but from all of the reports I have seen, I can’t say that I am overly optimistic about his chances for success in the majors. There have been pitchers who have made a living only throwing in the mid-80s with their fastball, but the numbers aren’t particularly high as of late especially with the Twins. In addition, Albers is only being called up now which, to me, sends up some red flags if you look at it from an organizational perspective. The reason I believe this is because if you look at the Twins’ rotation this season, it has been abysmal almost all year. Because of this, the team has demoted some struggling pitchers in favor of pitchers at the Triple-A level. The list of pitchers the team has promoted before they chose to bring up Albers includes P.J. Walters, Samuel Deduno, Pedro Hernandez and Gibson. Deduno has stuck in the majors and Gibson has been inconsistent, but Walters and Hernandez have not found consistent success in the big-leagues and thus have been returned to the minors. Albers has been having a strong season all year; if the Twins truly believed that Albers could get it done, why did they wait until now to call him up? The way I read into this, the Twins perceived Albers as the fifth best option in the minors and now are turning to him as the next best option. Albers certainly could have flown under the radar and the team may have been waiting to see if he would ever cool off this season, but I’m not very confident in that premise. While I am not trying to knock Albers and say that he is an awful pitcher and is merely the next pitcher in a long line of losers; instead, I am saying that it is concerning that the Twins have waited so long to promote Albers after having such a strong season so far in 2013. Would the team have done the same if Gibson had been posting the same numbers or Alex Meyer or Trevor May? I believe the answer to that is no. Albers has the chance to be successful in the majors and he very well could be a major upgrade from Diamond or any of the other starters that have come through the rotation this season, but I am going to caution that fan’s temper their expectations until Albers has a few starts under his belt. At any rate, it should be fun to see what Albers has to offer when he makes his big-league debut on Tuesday and I wish him nothing but the best of luck! Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebookor add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  4. There is no doubting the obvious talents of Minnesota Twins’ mega-prospect Miguel Sano, but it appears as if Sano still has a lot to learn about baseball etiquette before he makes his debut in the majors. According to ESPN 1500’s Judd Zulgad’s Twitter account, Zulgad spoke with Paul Molitor this week and Molitor reported that the New Britain Rock Cats—the Twins Double-A affiliate—have decided to sit Sano for “a few days” due to the manner in which he conducted himself after he hit a home run this week. While this may be a small overreaction to a young player demonstrating some emotion, it sends a clear message of the Twins’ organizational expectations and hopefully protects their budding star from future harm. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4935[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports Sano is one of the most talented prospects to ever come through the Twins’ organization and there are huge expectations for him once he makes it to the majors. Many believe that he and fellow mega-prospect Byron Buxton are the saviors to the struggling Twins’ franchise and could be ready to contribute—in Sano’s case—as early as September of this season or April of next season; but the fact that Sano is being disciplined for a post-home run celebration should be nothing to worry about. Instead, fans should be thankful that the Twins are taking the time now to send a message to their bright young star in order to get him with the proper mindset for when he makes it to the majors. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ Too often in baseball and sports today, players get involved with showing too much emotion after a big play or even the most routine play. Sports are an entertainment business and the players are putting on a show for the fans who like to see the displays of emotion, but there is a fine line between displaying emotion and being disrespectful or unsportsmanlike. In Sano’s case, Sano hit a huge home run during a big moment in the game and celebrated excessively after the home run. I am not positive what he fully did during his celebration to merit the discipline—you can view the homerun by clicking here if you’d like to take a look for yourself—but he certainly took forever to get down the first baseline which likely means that Sano admired his home run or did some sort of bat flip before starting his home run trot. Sano’s celebration has no place in the game of baseball simply for the fact that it shows up the pitcher and puts himself at risk for future retaliation later in the game. Even if Sano’s celebration was not that excessive, any celebration—other than a game-winning hit—at all will put a target on his back for a pitcher to possibly throw at him later in the game in response to his home run celebration. This poses a possible injury threat to Sano and if history is any indication, a pitcher can do plenty of damage to a hitter if he throws at them and actually connects. Imagine if a pitcher threw at Sano’s head—and actually connected—in response to Sano showing up the pitcher with a celebration after a home run. Although the pitcher’s response would be highly scrutinized, Sano’s career could be in jeopardy because of the dangers connected with head injuries. In the end, all of this could be prevented by Sano not celebrating after the home run and simply acting like he has been there before (hitting a home run). By sitting Sano for a few days, the Twins are not only sending a clear message to Sano about how to conduct himself in this organization, but they are also protecting their investment and key to their future. It’s alright for Sano to get excited on occasion after a big hit, but he needs to contain himself with his excitement so he doesn’t show up the pitcher and invite in some retaliation for him or his teammates. By correcting this issue now, the Twins are protecting themselves from future harm and teaching Sano how they expect their ballplayers to behave. That mindset and discipline should be celebrated by fans, not scrutinized; sadly, not all fans see it that way. While it may seem like a minimal move now, this discipline could reap huge benefits down the road for the Twins simply because they may be preventing an injury to one of their most prized possessions in Sano. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  5. I respectfully disagree that it shouldn't have been called an infield fly. I agree that Morneau shouldn't of swung with Frieri's control issues, that I will not argue; but my argument isn't whether or not Morneau should have swung. Whether or not Morneau swung or whether or not it was a Twins' player or an Angels' player is irrelevant. The bottom line is this: the play should have never been a judgment for the umpire because by rule, it was an infield fly. The language in the official rule book reflects this. Whether it was a high pop up or a wimpy pop up doesn't matter; the important thing to look at is whether or not the play could have been made with ordinary effort, which it could have. Thus, it is an infield fly. Did the call "cost" the Twins the game? No not exactly, but it certainly jeopardized their chances of scoring a run and possibly winning the game; that fact cannot be ignored. With better plate discipline, could Morneau have changed the outcome? Certainly, but again, that is not what I'm arguing about. The infield fly rule was designed to prevent situations like this where runners are left out to dry. Is it a smart play by Frieri to let that ball drop? Absolutely, but that doesn't make it right. Had the correct call been made, Morneau still can be blamed for swinging when he shouldn't have and the both runners would have been allowed to go back to their bases and this argument never would have existed. That's what should of happened; the fact that it didn't was the premise for my article. Thank you for the comments though, I appreciate the great discussion!
  6. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=2127-Umpire’s-Error-Jeopardizes-Minnesota-Twins-Chance-at-Sweep-in-Los-Angeles
  7. After a drama-filled game on Tuesday evening in which the Minnesota Twins rallied to beat the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim in 10 innings, the teams were back at it Wednesday afternoon with the Twins having a rare opportunity to sweep a road series. The game was an old-fashioned pitcher’s duel, but it was a blown call by an umpire that ultimately stole the show in the Twins’ 1-0 defeat. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] The Twins had runners on first and second base with Justin Morneau at bat and nobody out. Angels’ closer Ernesto Frieri had been struggling mightily with his command and the Twins were poised to scratch across a few runs and steal another game on the road; all of that changed in the blink of an eye due to a crucial “judgment” error by the umpire. Morneau hit a soft, broken-bat pop-up that was heading towards Frieri, who had plenty of time to make what appeared to be a routine play, when he suddenly let the ball drop in front of him before throwing to first for the out. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ Now why would Frieri let the ball drop you may ask? Well, it’s pretty simple: if Frieri lets the ball drop, he can then pick it up and turn a double play because the runner at first—if he is a smart base runner—will freeze on such a slow and low-level pop-up and will head back to first. By letting the ball drop and throwing to first base, Frieri ensured he would get Morneau out and also catch the runner at first—Doug Bernier—in a run-down for the second out. You may be asking: where did the umpire make the error? The answer is that Frieri should never have had the opportunity to let the ball drop in front of him. The umpire should have ruled the play an infield fly, which would have held the Twins to one out, and the runners would have returned to their respective bases. Too often, fans and media members believe that an infield field fly can only be called if there is a pop-up that has occurred in the confines of the infield, to one of the four official infielders, with runners on first and second base and less than two outs; but that understanding is mistaken. According to the MLB Official Rules, by definition, “An infield fly is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, when first and second, or first, second and third bases are occupied, before two are out. The pitcher, catcher and any outfielder who stations himself in the infield on the play shall be considered infielders for the purpose of this rule.” In addition to considering the pitcher an infielder, the key phrase to pay attention to in the infield fly definition is “caught by an infielder with ordinary effort.” The fact that Frieri had time to see the ball in the air, decide to let it fall and be able to make a double-play should be evidence enough that something wasn’t right. With ordinary effort—or below ordinary effort for that matter—Frieri could have easily caught the low-hanging pop-up; thus, the umpire should have called an infield fly because it was a play that the infielder could have made with ordinary effort. This missed call may seem insignificant due to the fact that the Twins are so far out of contention, but the fact remains that this type of blunder could cost a team a decisive game down the stretch and thus, it needs to be called correctly. Of course, it needs to be correctly called in any event. Contrarians will argue that the play was a “judgment call” by the umpire. Well, it was, and his judgment that it was not an infield fly was wrong. The additional judgment by Frieri to let the ball drop should have been rendered irrelevant if the ump had made the right judgment. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  8. After a drama filled game on Tuesday evening in which the Minnesota Twins rallied to beat the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim in 10 innings, the teams were back at it Wednesday afternoon with the Twins having a rare opportunity to sweep a road series. The game was an old-fashioned pitcher’s duel throughout the game, but it was a blown call by an umpire that ultimately stole the show in the Twins’ 1-0 defeat. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4929[/ATTACH] The Twins had runners on first and second base with Justin Morneau up to bat and nobody out. Angels’ closer Ernesto Frieri had been struggling mightily with his command and the Twins were poised to scratch across a few runs and possibly steal another game on the road, but all of that changed in the blink of an eye due to a crucial “judgment” error by the umpire. Morneau hit a soft, broken bat pop-up that was heading towards Frieri, who had plenty of time to make what appeared to be a routine play, when Frieri suddenly let the ball drop in front of him before throwing to first for the out. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ Now why would Frieri let the ball drop you may ask? Well it’s pretty simple: if Frieri lets the ball drop, he can then pick it up and turn a double play because the runner at first—if he is a smart base runner—will freeze on such a slow and low-level pop-up and will head back to first. By letting the ball drop and throwing to first base, Frieri ensured he would get Morneau out and also catch the runner at first—Doug Bernier—in a run-down for the second out. You may be asking yourself: where did the umpire make the error? The answer is that Frieri should never of had the opportunity to let the ball drop in front of him. The umpire should have ruled the play an infield fly, which would have held the Twins to one out, and the runners would have returned to their respective bases and could advance at their own risk. Too often, fans and media members believe that an infield field fly can only be called if there is a pop-up that has occurred in the confines of the infield with runners on first and second base and less than two outs; but that understanding is mistaken. According to the MLB Official Rules, by definition, “An infield fly is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, when first and second, or first, second and third bases are occupied, before two are out. The pitcher, catcher and any outfielder who stations himself in the infield on the play shall be considered infielders for the purpose of this rule.” The key words to pay attention to in the infield fly definition are “caught by an infielder with ordinary effort”. The fact that Frieri had time to see the ball in the air, decide to let it fall and be able to make a double-play should be evidence enough that something wasn’t right. With ordinary effort—or below ordinary effort for that matter—Frieri could have easily caught the low-hanging pop-up; thus, the umpire should have called an infield fly because it was a play that the infielder could have made with ordinary effort. There is no way the umpire could have argued that Morneau’s pop-up was a line drive because, by definition, a line drive is a batted ball that goes sharp and direct from the bat to a fielder without touching the ground. Morneau’s hit wasn’t sharp and if it were, Frieri never would have had the chance or choice to let the ball drop in front of him like he did. This missed call may seem insignificant due to the fact that the Twins are so far out of contention; but the fact remains that this type of a missed call could cost a team a decisive game down the stretch and thus, it needs to be called correctly. Contrarians will argue that the play was a “judgment call” by the umpire; but in my mind, the only judgment conducted on the play was by Frieri himself as to whether or not he should let the ball drop. That, baseball fans, sure sounds like an infield fly to me. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter@BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebookor add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  9. As the trade deadline approaches in eight days, a lot of the attention surrounding the Minnesota Twins will likely center around Justin Morneau and closer Glen Perkins. Although the asking price is said to be steep for Perkins and the Twins appear content waiting for the right deal for Morneau, the Twins do have other players that teams have been calling about and it is possible the team may be more willing to move these players for a cheaper price. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4908[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports The latest rumor that is gaining some traction around baseball rumor mills centers on Twins’ left-handed reliever Brian Duensing, whom a number of teams have expressed interest in. The Boston Red Sox, Philadelphia Phillies and Atlanta Braves all reportedly had scouts in Minnesota to watch the Twins this weekend and David O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that the Braves would love to have Perkins, but Duensing may be more likely. The Braves are currently looking to upgrade their bullpen, specifically with a left-handed reliever, so it is not surprising that the team would approach the Twins with a possible deal due to the fact that the Twins do have a number of talented arms in their bullpen. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ Duensing has pitched well enough out of the bullpen this season to merit interest from other teams, but Duensing’s contract may be his most attractive asset. Duensing has two years remaining on his deal that will pay him $1.3 million in 2013 and will be arbitration eligible for the second time in his career this off-season. The earliest Duensing could hit free-agency is 2016 and for a team looking for an effective reliever who is affordable, reliable and controllable for a few years, Duensing could be among the hottest commodities in all of baseball. This season, Duensing is 2-1 with a 4.58 ERA in 46 appearances over 35.1 innings pitched. Duensing has also posted a 1.670 WHIP, a 7.6 SO/9 and currently owns a 1.76 strikeout to walk ratio. Teams likely will be interested in Duensing as a left-handed specialist, but Duensing has struggled this year against lefties who sport a .299 batting average against him. Duensing actually has pitched better against right-handed hitters, who are only hitting .292 against him, which still isn’t overly impressive. Although his stats may not reflect it, Duensing has had two good months this season during April and June where he posted a 2.16 and 2.25 ERA respectively while holding batters to a .250 and .226 batting average in those months; however it is the months of May and July that have hampered the lefty as he sports a combined 6.86 ERA and .350 batting average over those months. Teams seem to be willing to take a chance on Duensing and they believe they will be getting the pitcher from April and June and not the one from May and July. While the overall haul that the Twins receive in the deal may not be overly impressive, it could net them a low to mid-level prospect that could one day develop into a very serviceable player. That may not seem appealing to fans that are operating in the present, but it is the type of return that Twins’ fans should expect based on the history of deadline deals for relievers of Duensing’s caliber. For a team not set to contend in 2013, it’s time for the Twins to make moves and take chances for the future; trading Duensing would fit this strategy. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter@BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  10. On Sunday, the Boston Red Sox announced that their closer, Andrew Bailey, would have season-ending shoulder surgery. While the news is certainly disappointing for Bailey and the Red Sox fans’, it may end up becoming good news if you are a fan of the Minnesota Twins. Even before the injury to Bailey, the Red Sox bullpen was struggling with a combined 4.03 ERA. Because of this, the team was rumored to be in the market for a reliever who could bolster their bullpen at the trade deadline, even after acquiring Matt Thornton from Chicago last week. With the American League East being one of the most competitive divisions in all of baseball, the need for the Red Sox to address their bullpen, if they want to remain competitive and at the top of the division, is increasing by the day. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4889[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports One team that could assist in helping the Red Sox solve their bullpen quandary is the Twins, who have two relievers—Jared Burton and closer Glen Perkins—who could be of great value to the Red Sox if they are willing to pay the price to acquire them. Perkins, an All-Star this season, is the most valuable and intriguing option of the two pitchers due to his team friendly contract and his dominating stuff on the mound that is garnering him a reputation for being one of the brightest “young” closers in all of baseball. Perkins, age 30, has two years remaining on his contract after this season—and a team option for 2016—that would pay him a total of $12 million if the option is picked up. For a dominant, hard-throwing, left-handed closer that currently is sporting a 1-0 record with a 1.72 ERA, 23 saves and a miniscule 0.791 WHIP, that is very affordable and very intriguing to teams who may be looking to acquire a talented closer; the problem is, Perkins’ price-tag is going to be awfully steep. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ In order to acquire Perkins, the Red Sox would likely have to surrender a player such as pitcher Rubby De La Rosa or a high-end prospect like left-handed pitcher Henry Owens (currently in High Class-A with a 7-4 record and a 2.93 ERA over 18 starts), right-handed pitcher Anthony Ranaudo (currently at Double-A with a 8-3 record and 2.87 ERA over 17 starts) outfielder Bryce Brentz (currently at Triple-A with a .272 batting average, 16 HR and 53 RBI over 75 games) or a combination of the prospects of some sort. While that is a very steep price to pay, the Twins’ asking price is going to be very high and it is going to center around high-end pitching talent that the Twins are in the market to receive. A more realistic, and affordable, option for the Red Sox to consider may be Burton. Burton has had an up and down season so far, but has settled back in over the last few games and could be a nice addition to the bullpen, and a great stop-gap solution for the Red Sox, until their array of closers return from injury sometime next season. On the year, Burton is 1-6 with a 3.53 ERA, a 1.338 WHIP, an 8.1 SO/9 and a 0.5 WAR over 45 games and 43.1 innings pitched. While the stats aren’t overly impressive, Burton is a very effective pitcher, did sport a 2.18 ERA over 62 innings last season and would likely come at a much cheaper price than Perkins would. Whereas Perkins could fetch the Twins a possible combination of a big-league ready arm and a nice low-level pitching prospect, Burton may only fetch a high-end, low-level prospect in any trade. While the Red Sox claim they are not in the market to acquire a big-name closer, if they begin to falter and fall in the standings, don’t be surprised if they don’t warm up the phone lines and give the Twins a call. With the Twins not in position to compete for a few seasons, they seem to be an ideal trading partner for the Red Sox to deal with. This surely will not be the last time you hear trade rumors of Perkins and Burton to the Red Sox; but until the trade deadline passes, keep an eye on the transaction wire because you just might see a deal between the Twins and Red Sox grabbing headlines sometime soon. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter@BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  11. I'm not necessarily hating on Gardy not having Plouffe bunt in this situation, but Gardy has refused to bunt runners into scoring position numerous times this year. It was more frustration out of having Plouffe in the number two spot when he cannot bunt. I do concede that since he cannot bunt, giving him the bunt sign may have been wasted strikes; but to me you have to at least try once to bunt. I understand that Francona would likely walk Mauer but there is no guaranteeing that. Heck, we thought Francona would walk Mauer with a runner on third and first base open, but he opted not to. The article was supposed to be more focused on the fact that Gardy didn't construct the lineup correctly in my opinion and that he needs more players who have the flexibility to bunt in order to be successful. Thanks for the comments, I appreciate it!
  12. Last night I was able to take in a Minnesota Twins’ game live for the first time this season and I came away with one thought in mind: Ron Gardenhire is sure making it tough for me to defend him with the managerial moves he is continually making. Last week I came out with an article that, in essence, supported Gardenhire and stated that firing him would change nothing. To access this article, simply click here. Based on that article, I believed that Gardenhire hadn’t lost his ability to manage and that the Twins should give their manager some slack as the team endures a rebuilding process; but as the game unfolded last night, a situation in the eighth inning has made me question my initial premise. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4865[/ATTACH] With the game tied at two last night, up stepped Trevor Plouffe with nobody out and runners on first and second base. Plouffe was hitting second in the batting order last night—which in itself was a huge mistake—and was put into a great position to drive some runs in, which was the reason that Gardenhire reportedly placed him there to begin with. With the Twins only needing one run to break the tie and Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau waiting in the wings, Plouffe was in an obvious bunting situation. Brian Dozier had failed to successfully bunt over Pedro Florimon the at-bat before, but was bailed out by a Nick Swisher error which allowed Dozier to reach first safely setting up the Plouffe at-bat. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ It is no secret that Plouffe is not a good bunter; but during his at-bat, which lasted all of two pitches, Plouffe didn’t even attempt to bunt once. This obviously is Gardenhire’s call and fault for not sending in the sign to have Plouffe bunt and it should have cost the Twins the game last night if not for Mauer’s clutch RBI single. Such a managerial mishap has been a hallmark for Gardenhire this season and it is for that reason that it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to support him and defend his credibility as a manager; but as I got to thinking more about the situation, I came to an additional conclusion that goes even deeper than the Gardenhire mishap: Gardenhire doesn’t have enough players on the team who can bunt. The players on the roster who can be considered competent bunters would be Jamey Carroll, Pedro Florimon, Clete Thomas, Aaron Hicks and Dozier. Thomas and Hicks have proven that they are most effective as bottom-of-the-order hitters, Dozier currently bats leadoff and Carroll is not an everyday player. With that being said, having Plouffe bat second in the order still makes little sense because it seems as if Dozier would be a better fit as a number two hitter. It’s possible that Carroll could be an effective number two hitter, but that would likely come at the expense of Plouffe—or one of the other “competent bunters”—sitting. Ultimately, Plouffe belongs in the middle of the order and the Twins need to have more players who are more fundamentally sound and can play station-to-station baseball. Part of that is Gardenhire’s fault for not placing the players he has in the right spots in the order to be successful, but part of the blame also falls on Twins’ management for not giving Gardenhire enough flexibility to place players in different spots in the order to play effective station-to-station baseball. The Twins used to be very effective under Gardenhire at playing solid fundamental, station-to-station baseball during the years of the “Piranhas”, but the team also had significantly more talent during that time as well; nevertheless, there is plenty of blame to go around. There are no excuses for Gardenhire not at least attempting to bunt with Plouffe out of the two spot and there are no excuses for his inability to successfully manage the game to get runners in scoring position, but let’s not forget that there still is a talent deficiency on this roster which does handicap Gardenhire’s ability to manage slightly. However, at the end of the day, it starts and ends with Gardenhire and if he plans on keeping his job and getting the most out of the team he has been given, he needs to get back to the basics of managing. 99 percent of the fans knew the Twins’ should have bunted in the eighth inning last night; the fact that Gardenhire didn’t seem to know, worries me. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter@BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  13. Over the years, the MLB All-Star game has taken on a whole new feeling and meaning following the disaster that was the 2002 All-Star game which ended in a tie. Since then, Bud Selig has reorganized the game and has given it a new sense of meaning by giving home-field advantage to the winning league of the game. While I have no problem with Mr. Selig putting this provision in for the winner of the game, I do believe the commissioner needs to make yet another change to an outdated rule surrounding the All-Star game. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4823[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Robert Deutsch-USA TODAY Sports Traditionally, each team has been allowed to have one representative for the All-Star game no matter how bad or how good the team is. This was likely put in place for teams to be equally represented and thus, fans from all markets could be drawn to the game. For teams like the Minnesota Twins—who have benefited from this rule during their down years such as the mid-1990s—this is a great rule because it ensures that no matter how bad the team gets, there will always be one player representing the team in the mid-Summer Classic; however, this rule is outdated and needs to be changed. ~~~Originally published on RantSports.com~~~ With the provision that the winning league is granted home-field advantage in the World Series, the dynamic of the All-Star game has changed. This provision was put in place for managers and players to take the game more seriously and the message has been largely received by all; however, is it really fair for a manager/league to play in such a crucial game without the best players in the league on the roster? By requiring each team to be represented by at least one player, roster spots are being taken up by players who aren’t as valuable or worthy of a spot compared to a better player who is left off the roster simply because another team needed to have a representative. If the All-Star game is to continue to operate under the new provision of home-field advantage for the winning league, they need to allow the manager to fill the roster as they wish and not with a player from each roster to fulfill a requirement. I have no problem allowing fans to vote for the starting lineup for each team because it prevents a manager from playing favorites and it allows for a nice interaction piece with the fans of the game, but the remaining roster spots should be the manager’s choice. If the manager is going to be in charge of leading his team to a victory and securing home-field advantage, he should be allowed to build the roster as he sees fit in order to play to his managing style/strength. Whether that means some teams are represented or not, is irrelevant. Fortunately for the Twins, they have players like Joe Mauer and future prospects like Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano where they may continue to receive an All-Star representative even without the one player per team requirement because of the players’ talent on the roster. In my opinion, that is why the player should be elected or voted for in the first place: their talent. If a player is truly deserving of an All-Star spot, he should let his playing do the work and not some provision. Sure, fans tend to elect big names because they are familiar to them; but if a player has a good enough season and the manager is allowed to fill out the roster, the player will certainly be noticed and rewarded. I understand that this change may worry some Twins’ fans because they may be concerned that the team is going to fall into a talent abyss—or may trade away some of their established stars/veterans—and may not have a representative to watch over the next few years; but think about it this way: since the Twins are a few years away from contention, wouldn’t you want the rule changed so that when the Twins are contending for titles again, they have the best chance to earn home-field should they advance to the World Series? In my opinion, the answer to that question is simple; but in the end, fans may not be able to see the big-picture ramifications of the current provision because of the short-term distress the team is enduring. Change is needed in the All-Star game, but the likelihood of it occurring is similar to the Twins’ playoff chances this season: slim to none. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  14. I truly believe Gardenhire isn't the problem and i've stated why in my article, but you both bring up valid points about what has gone wrong with the Twins. I still tend to believe that it is the personnel moves, or lack there of, that have put the Twins in the funk they are currently in which is characterized by a lack of starting pitching depth. With a rebuilt farm system and a consistent flow of talent to the majors, Gardenhire will succeed once again. Certainly changing managers will have a short-term affect on a team by re-energizing them, but will it sustain over a long period of time. In my opinion, Gardenhire has a proven enough track record that indicates he can manage; firing him would solve nothing with the team.
  15. Over the past few weeks, the Minnesota Twins have resorted back to their old ways of the past two seasons which has been hallmarked by long losing streaks and feelings of inadequacy. While the team searches for answers to solve their many ailing problems, the media around the Twin Cities and around the nation have started to clamor for a change at the top with the firing of manager Ron Garenhire. While this may be the popular move at a time like this, it certainly isn’t the correct one. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4799[/ATTACH] Photo Courtesy of: Kim Klement- USA TODAY Sports Typically when a team struggles, the first person who takes the brunt of the criticism and responsibility for the team’s mishaps is the manager; whether or not that criticism is justifiable or not is another matter. While the manager is the face of the team, he by no means is the sole reason why the team struggles. He does not make the plays on the field, he does not hit with runners in scoring position and he doesn’t get hitters out on the mound. Instead, he manages the game and attempts to put players in the best position to succeed. The managers who do these things the best, the most often and with the greatest efficiency are the ones who stick around the longest and are remembered as “great managers”. ~~~Article originally published on RantSports.com~~~ Up until 2011, Gardenhire was characterized among the best managers in baseball. His teams were wining division titles under the financial constraints of playing in the Metrodome and he had to often put together a team with an organization unwilling to go out and spend money on players who could take the team to the next level in the playoffs. Instead, Gardenhire and his staff relied on a strong farm system and a strong core of young players. Because the Twins continued to compete, win division titles and make the playoffs—despite not performing well in the playoffs—Gardenhire’s ability to manage was rarely questioned; yet, over the last three seasons, the name that often gets thrown into the blame game first is Gardenhire’s. That, Twins’ fans, is utterly ridiculous in my opinion. Gardenhire has won six division titles, Manager of the Year in 2010 and a total of 969 wins compared to 903 losses during his 12 year tenure. In addition, 247 of those 903 career losses have come over the past three seasons. While Gardenhire’s poor record over the last three years should not be excused, it by no means indicates that he has lost his ability to manage. Sometimes in sports, a team fails to respond to a manager’s message and style after a certain period of time. This results in a lack of effort and poor performances. Because of this, teams normally fire the manager in hopes of reigniting the team and bringing in a new person with a fresh message that the players may be willing to embrace. In the Twins’ case, this would not be the correct move. If you look at the Twins this year, they certainly have played poorly, but they have continued to play hard and haven’t complained about playing for Gardenhire. The losing streaks and poor play haven’t been Gardenhire’s fault. The reason the Twins have struggled is simply been due to a lack of talent at the majors. There certainly is talent on the way headlined by Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano and I’m confident that once Gardenhire has the full array of talented players on his roster—most importantly a competent starting rotation—he will again return to his consistent winning ways. Changing managers now would not alter the team’s success this year or next year because this team is built to contend two years from now, not this season. Unless the organization decides to spend big in free-agency this winter, that plan will not be altered; thus, it won’t matter who is managing the Twins because they will continue to lose. Unfortunately for Gardenhire, he may not have that long. Instead, he may need to rely on the 2013 version of the Twins to turn it around in order to save his job. If the Twins decide to part ways with Gardenhire, it will be a horrible mistake for the organization and will simply be a public relations move. Gardenhire knows how to manage and do so effectively and if longevity—in addition to six division titles in 12 overall seasons—is any indicator, Gardenhire deserves to stay; firing him would solve nothing. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
  16. With the addition of Eddie Guardado to the Minnesota Twins’ Hall of Fame two weeks ago, I got to thinking about the opposite end of the spectrum from great players. When I began watching the Twins in the early nineties, Kent Hrbek was retiring, Kirby Puckett was at the tail-end of his career and the Twins were about to be enveloped by a period of mediocrity that would damage the franchise for a few seasons. During that time, I grew up expecting mediocrity, but I also got to see the complete spectrum of players the Twins had to offer.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] In addition, the Twins have been criticized over the years for signing or bringing in players who were cheap, over-the-hill, underwhelming and unproductive; players the team hoped could be revitalized or that they would find some value in. Often, the Twins wasted money on players who had nothing left to offer and had no business being in the majors; yet, the FO gave them their one last chance. Photo Courtesy of Ben Tesch ~~~Article originally published on RantSports.com~~~ With that in mind, I started to have an idea that could recognize some of these moves and players scattered throughout Twins’ history. My idea led me to the Twins’ Hall of Shame. While this idea may not be fully unique, I think it’s a great forum that could generate great conversation. In order to be nominated for the Twins’ Hall of Shame, my only requirement is that the player had to play/be on the team a minimum of 40 games with the Twins, which is the equivalent of one-fourth of a season, or be acquired via trade/signed at some point during the season. This would allow for a good enough sample size to be considered worthy of the Hall of Shame, but also would allow for a player who was acquired via trade or signed during the season and quickly released again a chance to make the list. Without further ado, I will release the five nominees for the inaugural Hall of Shame class of 2013. I will release an article next week revealing the players who will be selected to enter the Hall of Shame based on your votes. Players must receive a minimum of 75 percent of the votes in order to be selected. You can vote on my group page on Facebook or via Twitter at @BeeWill15. Bret Boone Boone was a career .266 hitter with 252 HR and 1021 RBI, with 22.6 WAR over his 14-year big-league career, but his brief time with the Twins was shameful. Boone was acquired from Seattle after the team designated him for assignment and the Twins put in a claim to trade for him. The Twins agreed to pay the balance of his $9.25 million salary and also agreed to send Seattle a player to be named. General Manager Terry Ryan had this to say about Boone when he was acquired, "I'm not saying that Bret Boone is going to be a savior, but he might be a guy that can help. There's a lot at stake for him, obviously." If those aren’t inspiring words, I don’t know what are (sarcasm). Ryan went on to say that, "This is a high-reward, low-risk situation. I don't think there's any downside." Besides paying a player a portion of 9.25 million dollars to appear in 14 games (58 AB's) with a .170 batting average, zero HR and three RBI in 58 at-bats, the Twins also missed the playoffs after hoping Boone was the player who would revitalize the team. All in all, Boone made himself a strong candidate to enter the Hall of Shame as a first-ballot member. Jason Marquis The typical off-season pitcher signing of the Twins was well beyond his productive years; the Twins thought they’d take a chance on signing the starter in hopes of catching lightening in a bottle like they did when they acquired Carl Pavano. In reality, the Pavano acquisition working out probably was the worst possible thing to happen to the Twins because it was validation for their ridiculous strategy of acquiring players to fill out a roster. At any rate, in 2012, Marquis was horribly ineffective with a 2-4 record, 8.47 ERA, 1.941 WHIP and a not-good 13.8 H/9 in seven starts with the Twins. Marquis was a 10 game winner for a six straight seasons in the mid-2000s, but he hadn’t won more than eight games since then and had an ERA near 4.00 over that time. The Twins figured he was better than what they had and so they made a move to sign him and ended up getting what they paid for. Marquis did have a nice run in San Diego after he left town, but his performance with the Twins was bad enough that he wound up on the ballot for Hall of Shame in 2013. Pat Mahomes Mahomes wasn’t your one-year wonder with the Twins and in fact, he spent a total of five years with the team. Well, while that may be more an indication of how bad the team was in the mid-1990s, he still lasted longer than other players on this list. During his five-year run with the Twins, Mahomes went 18-28 with a 5.82 ERA, 1.617 WHIP, 4.6 BB/9, 9.9 H/9 and a total of 237 earned runs allowed over 366.2 career innings. Mahomes was seemingly always trying to work himself out of trouble and never really seemed to have a plan when he was on the mound. The image of Mahomes consistently taking off his hat to wipe the beading sweat off his forehead because he was in a difficult situation is engrained in my memory; he, in my opinion, best represents the ineptitude of the Twins’ starting pitching during the mid to late 1990s; thus, he is a candidate for the Hall of Shame. Tsuyoshi Nishioka Nishioka was supposed to be the solution to the Twins’ problems at shortstop when the team signed him from Japan and traded away J.J. Hardy. He ended up being a huge bust and cost them a valuable shortstop in the process. Hardy wound up having a couple great seasons in Baltimore and Nishioka ended up being vastly overmatched by American baseball and seemed lost and overwhelmed on the most routine plays and situations. Even time in the minors couldn’t save Nishioka’s career in Minnseota. The Twins signed Nishioka to a three-year, 9.25 million dollar contract before the 2011 season after the team gave more than $5.3 million to his Japanese team to gain negotiating rights; talk about money wasted. In his two years with the Twins, Nishioka wound up hitting .215 with zero HR and 20 RBI over 71 games with a WAR of -2.4. If you watched the Twins during Nishioka’s two-year run, you’ll understand why he is Hall of Shame-worthy. Butch Huskey No list of Hall of Shame candidates would be complete without Butch Huskey. Before the start of the 2000 season, the Twins were looking to add a player with DH experience. They threw half a million dollars at Huskey and gave him the role over a young David Ortiz who was also fighting for at-bats at DH; ultimately, the experience factor mattered more for the Twins. In the end, playing Huskey over Ortiz may be Hall of Shame-worthy in itself. Huskey was a career .267 hitter and put up seasons of at least 15 HR and 49 RBI in four of five seasons from 1996 to 1999. Those weren’t great stats, and expectations of him as a power hitter and run producer on a team that didn’t possess those qualities in abundance were never fulfilled. At any rate, in 2000 Huskey hit .223 with just five home runs and 27 RBI in 215 at-bats with the Twins. Huskey wound up being dealt to Colorado; the shameful part of his time with the Twins can, unfortunately, be seen by the team not playing a man who became David Ortiz and instead choosing to play an over-hyped, not very good player on a team that was young and emerging as a playoff contender. These are the candidates for the inaugural Hall of Shame class of 2013. Remember to vote via Twitter or Facebook on who should be placed into the Hall of Shame and also let me know if I missed anyone who could be included on next year’s ballot. Brian Wille is a Minnesota Twins writer for RantSports.com. Follow him on Twitter @BeeWill15 or “Like” him on Facebook or add him to your network on Google To view more articles by Brian Wille, click here
×
×
  • Create New...