Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Sabir Aden

Verified Member
  • Posts

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Blog Entries posted by Sabir Aden

  1. Sabir Aden
    “Baseball is a relative sport.”

    By nature we often remember the really good or really bad things, and not the okay or decent things that someone does. I bet you can vividly remember the last time you won an award, but perhaps not the last time you went to the grocery store, or who your 10th grade history teacher was.
     
    It’s a core principle to how memories are formed. Those that stand out are often fueled by the emotional context the situation derives from.
     
    Say me for instance, I remember when Adrian Peterson nearly clipped the 2,100 yards or when Jason Zucker beat the Blackhawks in 2013, and conversely when Blair Walsh's epic failure from 27. These were momentous occasions to me personally, and culminated milestones of jubilee and heartbreak with lots and lots of backstory.
     
    Why is that such an important thing to consider when discussing the plight to Jose Berrios? It’s these disaster moments to fans in a season, where we can get way over our heads and make truly outrageous statements, and during the offseason in retrospect be like ---”Did I actually say that?”
     
    He began the season on a pristine pinnacle. Logistically, Jose was exerting his mechanical best in how he was driving through his hips along with his delivery, and keeping his hands back in sync with driving those hips, which was a bad tendency he would commit in his youth.
     
     
     
     
     



    You can in the video how the different the glove placement is imperative to gaining that 2 to 3 ticks in velocity to the plate. In hardcore pitching circles they call this the kinetic chain, where the components of one’s mechanics are at an equilibrium, where the joints are in a symphonic harmony, making it all a simplistic, clean, and efficiently repeatable delivery.
     
    And Berrios looked really good. He proved with the results to bear, and added a new wrinkle into that much anticipated pitch mix, the changeup. In that 2019 opening unveiling we saw the changeup being fruitfully showcased 12.5% of the time, more than his total the previous season (9.1%) and the cumulative average during his very short career (10.7%).
     
    He wasn’t deliberately delaying his arm speed, and everything in that start was sublime. Pristine. You could say Berrios was perhaps an “ACE” in that start had things not turned sideways and pearshaped just a handful of months later.
     
    --------------------------------------------------------------TD--------------------------------------------------------------
     
    Now fast-forward to today. Fresh or perhaps rotten from that second consecutive all-star appearance, Jose Berrios is showcasing his most agonizing and problematic struggle points of his career. He’s been hittable, hit very hard with declining velocity, and to boot; seemingly single-handedly taking baseball’s 3rd best offense (in wOBA and wRC+; .348 and 115 respectively) out of critically important games.
     
    What’s even more frightening? That the strength of the opposition over the past 4 games has sported a 91 wRC+, with 100 being league average. He’s struggling mightily against bad opponents, compounded with the fact that they shouldn’t be hitting him this hard, period.
     
    So far, we as all seperate pitching expert entities haven’t found the culprit to what hindering subset of pitching statistics is responsible for pruning our Johan of today, devoid of the attributes that made us reminisce of Johan, the great killer of men, sheep, and those brave enough to step into the battered boxes of right and left.
     
    But jokes aside, what’s really been the inhibitor to Jose’s velocity and coincidentally his release point since his dynamic beginning?
     
    Let’s zoom into one of his particular starts, this one against the Indians on June 6th as the start to our inquiry.
     
    In that one start, Berrios didn’t feature the curveball that we have become expected of. He would throw a whopping 25.4% changeup, nearly double his career-total and triple his season percentage to that point. But something interesting of note lied in that changeup subgrouping.
     
    In that start he would throw 27 changeups of his entire 107 pitches in those 6 strong innings. Only one ball was hit harder than 85mph, and here’s a mapping of those pitch velocities with their extensions metrics.
     
     
     
     
     



    Notice anything weird? For a guy throwing from an average release point of 6.5ft away from the pitching rubber, the extensions point were remarkably scattered and the changeup release points also dropped, along with the average pitch velocity.
     
    Increasing extension would typically incite would velocity, (Josh Hader’s extension would come in mind) and it’s a very peculiar trend into Jose’s portfolio.
     
    If we critically analyze even more into Jose’s pitching approach, we wouldn't have anything particularly striking about his movements.
     
    Berrios has a unique windup, something of another other beast where he utilizes his windup as a vehicle to increase the movement and velocity of his pitches. Whereas others use their windup as a balancing point or to find their zen, Berrios uses his windup like a stress ball where he curled himself into a ball, and breaks out of the ball in smooth rhythm to swing his front side and lurch the back end, and launch the pitch.
     
    Looking at the progress he’s made since his debut, where his arms and legs need a lot of refinements, he’s made noticeable and encouraging strides. When he was young he would treat his arms and legs as separate mechanism, and he now manages to keep his core in rhythm and not out of motion with his elbows, knees, and front stridding foot.
     
    So nothing abundantly different with the windup, and not that much difference in the general technique with his hand placement, etc.
     
    Berrios, technically speaking hasn't changed anything with the conducting of his delivery, until Glen Perkins spoke about it during Jose’s latest start. I’m paraphrasing what Roy Smalley said during the game, but here’s what he said:
     
    “This is what Glen Perkins was talking about in the pregame shows, where (Jose) coils up and then has to uncoil and gets way spun around and his arm either lags or he’s gotta really rush to catch up, and that’s what happens when you spike that curveball….. And just you’ve opened up way to quickly and your arm just whips around.”
     
    “They are trying to get (Jose) to alter his mechanics a little bit, but he’s very rotational and he gets really turned around and can’t get his arm back through, so when his hips come way around behind him he coils up, and his arm has to speed up to catch up. That’s why you see so many fastballs up and into lefthanders, and spiked breaking balls.”
     
     
     
     
     



    You can see that his windup is almost, where he isn’t riding with the energy generated by his windup as much and through that back heel, that the great Parker Hagemen discussed during the offseason as a foundation through building and sustaining velocity. We can see the locked back leg not pulling through, anchored and dragging his weight in a counterproductive direction. It’s slinging and stopping, preventing him from riding through that back leg and pulling in his follow through. It’s a sign of stress and unease to rip through, as young pitching are taught today to rip through with elastic bands at data driven developmental programs. You can see the lazy back leg grappling with the front side and the glove holstered to his side, almost as if he’s more location conscious then ripping the back leg through for the additional ticks of velocity he needs to be at his best.
     
    This looks more like a fatigue and midseason swoon related dilemma than a mechanics dead-gone disaster, but the velocity problems and mechanical technique are very much redeemable.
     
     
     
     
     
     

    -----------------------------------------------------------TD--------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally I wanted to dive into more of what’s causing the lower arm slot, and perhaps an aggravator of the lower velocity readings and the dropping of the arm slots.
     
     
     
     
     



    This graphic below shows the release points of all of Jose’s pitches horizontally since the beginning of the season. I postulated the changeup he’s been throwing has played role in why the release point has waned lately, so I consulted with two acute baseball minds to at least minimally come to a conclusion.
     
     
     
     
     
     


    Through some research and conspiracy thinking, changeups might play a part in cannibalizing fastball velocity. Now take with a grain of salt, but changeup reduces fastball velocity for youth pitchers, and Paul Nyman theorized that an intentionally manipulated change for sink and drop would lead to fastball velocity dropping.
     
    Coupled with the fact that Jose played with the changeup in the Cleveland start I spoke of, and that his deviation of his velocities are so wide, maybe the changeup is playing with his repetiore and his mehanics. It’s certainly cause for concern given that the more he’s thrown his changeup the more his velocity as dropped.
     
    So I talked with Bill Hetzel, Manager of Mechanical Analysis at Driveline and Analysis, and former pitching coach and Michael O’Neal, former pro-ball pitcher and Driveline pitching trainer, and now SIUE baseball assistant coach about the changeup possibly curtailing Jose’s potential.
     
    ME: Hey Guys. I was recently diving into a pitcher (Jose Berrios), and just wanted to ask that if….. say a righthander where to increasingly lower their arm slot, which just so happened to coincide with an increase in spin rate and decrease in velocity, would you say an increase to using a changeup could be a detriment of this?
     
    I look at some of the side effects of short-arming a changeup (like slinging from the side) and couldn’t find anything, but I did however find that Jose’s changeup spin rate has increased. Do you think that a lowering of the arm slot on a changeup and an increase in spin could lead to decreased velocity? Or perhaps the lowering of arm slot could increase spin in general?
     
    Michael (Former MLB Player); It depends on the guy, but lowering the arm slot would help to create more sidespin on a changeup, which also would increase horizontal movement on the pitch. Jose’s arm slot might also be more natural for him which could be an increase in spin rate.
     
    Bill (Driveline Pitching Analysis Expert); Unfortunately you can’t (increase spin on arm slot) when it comes to increasing spin rate. Raw spin rate that is, there is not anything definitive that has been found to increase it outside of the use of foreign substance.
     
    Michael (Former MLB Player); Me personally, I have the same tendency when I try to “get on top” of my fastball. I laterally trunk-tilt more causing a higher arm slot. This also negatively impacts my spin rate. When I stay taller and don’t tilt so much (unlike what Jose has been doing), my spin rate increases and also causes my arm slot/release point to be lower on the Z axis.
     
    Bill (Driveline Pitching Analysis Expert); Now increasing true spin is different. Pitchers increase true spin all the time by improving spin efficiency. In terms of a change up you ideally and in most cases want to kill or decrease spin. Most changeups, whether it is a circle change or a split type change are trying to kill total spin, kill lift on the pitch to create separation from the heater and kill velocity. I would have to look at Berrios’ pitch metrics to really tell you anything in regards to arm slot changes or spin total changes. Traditionally a change up is predominantly side spin. The spin direction or spin axis for a righty usually needs to shift in the direction of 3:00. Sometimes pitchers won’t have a good feel for how to do that so they will manipulate theirs arm action or arm slot to try to get there instead of pronating the pitch more to create that side spin. In the case of Berrios and knowing how exceptionally good Wes Johnson is with utilizing Trackman data, I’m sure Wes has him trending in the correct direction at the very least.
     
    Michael (Former MLB Player); (It) Depends. A laggy arm could be possible, BUT better changeups have a fast arm speed. Also though, his changeup could play close to the 2 seam fastball, so hows his usage on the 2 seam changed?
     
    So that was the end to this conversation and the article. I hope you enjoyed. As far as what I would expect the Twins to do, we saw earlier in the season when Michael Pineda’s velocity was hitting a rough patch so they placed on the DL. I could conceivably see Rocco buying some time by giving the duo of Lewis Thorpe and Devin Smeltzer a start against the lowly White Sox and Tiger on this coming road trip, and perhaps recharge the rotation (Gibson and Odorizzi velocity has been down lately). Wes Johnson in the splendid piece by Dan Hayes of the Athletic during a makeup interview of his sudden unavailability, said something of significance.
     
    “We’re getting him back on his heel and trying to get him to rotate, get his chest velocity back up,” Johnson said. “It’s not just to get José to survive. We want more of the start against Chicago that he had when he was 94 mph and was dominant. Or even you go to the Miami start when his velocity was down a little bit. The pitch execution was through the roof for seven innings.
     
    “Our focus isn’t to find a way just to get this guy through. We have to try to get him better every time he goes out.”
     
    Which again corroborates with what Wes has done with biomechanics velocity induction. If you want to read more, I would encourage you to read this.
     
    Please Follow me @Sabir

  2. Sabir Aden
    R-E-L-A-X.
     
    Some words of wisdom I’m recycling, and it’d probably be best I don’t reveal the source of such resonating words of prudence, humility and humbleness.
     
    After some gut wrenching loses on the last homestand, and now a complete phase shift to an assertive series win (super hard to believe at this point), we’re back at a medium of limbo once again. Just ahead of the trade deadline, this stretch sandwiched in between the AS break and the trade deadline proves as pivotal as ever, now newly the sole universal trade deadline with the waiver deadline in August eradicated. This is only a boon for the MLB, serving as the backdrop for the most ultimate and frenetic trade deadline ever. Or at least we thought.
     
    But ... the trade deadline offers the most boom or the most bust, just ahead of the most visionary moment of the year. Make the right move and press the right buttons, and catapult yourself into the hoisting a world championship. Make the wrong move, short-circuit your postseason hopes, and even worse navigate a direct path into a course of demolition taking years to recover from. Yes, headsy moves like the esteemed Justin Verlander trade can pay vast dividends in the short term and long terms, but they don’t just appear out of thin air. The ramifications can unquestionably postpone a team’s contention window for years to come, which is one reason why it’s so important to straddle the lines of immediate and future consequences of parting away with prospects in the future, for major league help in the present, especially if the chances of even making the cut aren’t guaranteed.
     
    So to fulfill the appetites of those of you who can’t wait for the Twins to stop flirting with on the block chips (or Sergio Romo), to actually pulling the trigger on blockbuster trade deals, we’ll please your craving with fruitful speculation to rest your itches just until the action begins unfolding.
     
    A BRIEF OVERVIEW
    With the bullpen by far being the most indisputable area of improvement, it wouldn't be sensible to include both hitters and pitchers together on the same list, especially for an area of need so dire and existential. Just because Edwin Encarnacion is so much better on every level than Jake Diekman, the desperation meter for the Twins greatly supersedes any above and beyond difference maker that could conceivably add any added production offensively. That’s why the list is exclusive to difference making relievers, when the position group is so bamboozled in their own mannerisms. I’ll even add my patented likelihood meter and my hypothetical trade proposal infusions with twins prospects to add a little authenticity. It wouldn’t hurt to foster a little jockeying for trade value validity would it?
     
    So without any more small talk, let me present to you the first annual edition of The Ultimate Trade Deadline Special. Let the games begin!
     
     
    Capital C Closers
     
    1. Ken Giles
    W/L Record; 1-2
    1.64 ERA, 14/15 Saves
    33.0 innings & 57 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2020 Season (1 ½ Years of Control)
     
    The Toronto Blue Jays certainly have an encouraging young core with cornerstone young stars, namely Vladimir Guerro, and other projectable, consistent, sneaky good prospects in Bichette, Biggio, and Danny Jansen that give the front office of Ross Atkins a very good preliminary sketch to the core of this team in the not so distant competitive future. With that said though, the Blue Jays possess many young, controllable, team friendly affordable, problematic stars that assuredly would be jettisoned in the short term.
     
    Ken Giles, formerly of the Houston Astros comes into the fray as the most dominant reliever of the trade block crop. After a brutal season where Giles was relinquished the Astros closer role and soon traded for a reliever in the plight of a domestic assault scandal, you’d assume rock bottom was hit.
     
    GB 36.9% FB 21.5% LD 30.8%
    Hard Hit 33.8% Barrel 7.7%
     
    Giles, has improved on a fastball that was absolutely torched in his 2018 campaign, and paired it with an omnipotent breaking ball, that at it’s best can be one of the most effective pitches in baseball. His slider isn’t an artificially overthrown and loopy-like, frisbee slider but more of a fall of the table type that has held left handed to a redundantly anemic triple slash of .034/.034/.034.
     
    Giles should demand a buyer's haul, given that he’s assumed his former dominance as a top-flight, and at times unhittable closer. Of his 135 pitcher versus batter appearances that end up with a result, he’s induced balls in play fewer times than outs at the plate (strikeouts & walks). Therein lies the sheer dominance of Giles, as he’s afforded a 42% strikeout rate, the highest in the major leagues. But Giles isn’t doing it with an approach of nickel and diming the zone, a core principle of this bullpen staff that has come under scrutiny, and even more exacerbated by this mid-season funk.
     
    Given that Giles is under control for another season, he should require some blue chip prospects to convince the Blue Jays front office to ship Giles in a deal. Giles is at peak value, but given that the trade block market is so broad and robust with relievers that are equally as good or better than Giles, that should be enough to humble Tornoto’s brass from a lucrative offer.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; Ken Giles for Jake Cave + Willians Astudillo + Prospect Lewis Thorpe (#11)
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 85%
     
    2. Kirby Yates
    W/L Record; 0-2
    1.02 ERA, 31/33 Saves
    44.0 innings & 72 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2020 Season (1 ½ Years of Control)
     
    An unheralded and most unexpected star to blossom as maybe the most desirable relief arm to take center stage in this trade deadline, Kirby Yates is a true impact arm to feel for the market. Probably one of the brightest spots of the 2019 MLB season, has been the profound and overwhelming emergence of Kirby Yates. Besides being named one of my most favorite and iconic childhood fictional characters, he has sliced and diced in a Padres uniform that’s quickly on an upswing with an even more loaded prospect class, ranked arguably top of the game. En Route to leading the league in saves with 31/33 saves (arbitrary statistic, but notable stat for a once journeyman pitcher). Number 2 on that list? Brad Hand, predecessor of Yates having his own season, and the primary contender to a Twins division crown.
     
    GB 48.8% FB 30.2% LD 16.3%
    Hard Hit 34.9% Barrel 4.7%
     
    So what’s made Yates put the league on notice? Your guess is as good as mine.
     
    So, is it a dead red fastball that’s made hitters plainly look foolish? Wrong. Is it a senile breaking crafted from hell? Wrong again. Could it be a fluke season, were he’s benefited from stats that just don’t line up with the subliminal metrics?
     
    Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
     
    Kirby Yates is carving up the big leagues with an arsenal that isn’t going to strike fear into the hearts of hitters. It isn’t a breaking pitch or fastball that’s a conventional bread and butter, either. Nor is it a pitch that is sexy or @pitchingninja gif worthy as pitchers like Chapman and Jansen.
     
    It’s the splitter that’s been both tremendously effective and swing and miss worthy, along with a fastball that has held hitters to a sub .200 BA. Both pitches have been especially susceptible to strikeouts, and the surface level statistics match the peripherals as Yates owns the best wOBA and the best xwOBA in the league.
     
    So because Kirby Yates is simply legit, what’s the price is the real question. San Diego should request a haul for Yates, but this does come with it’s pros and cons.
     
    It was only a season ago when the LA Dodgers traded a large package for the rental of Manny Macado, for 5 other prospects. Only one of which was in MLB top 100, and the 4 others were tried and true depth pieces for a barren Orioles minor league pipeline. When the Padres traded AS Closer Brad Hand and promising sidearmer Adam Cimber, they received one prospect in the now destined preeminent catcher of the future Fransico Mejia.
     
    You’ve got to believe the Padres would ask for prospects on the fastrack to the bigs, but the Twins don’t have any high profile prospects knocking on the door. This would lead you to believe that the only feasible option would be overpaying for 1.5 years of Yates, and that wouldn’t be the most sensible transaction.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; Kirby Yates for Prospects Brusdar Graterol (#2) + Brent Rooker (#8) + Jhoan Duran (#9)
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 65%
     
    3. Will Smith
    W/L Record; 3-0
    2.37 ERA, 26/28 Saves
    46.1 innings & 66 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2019 Season ( ½ Years of Control)
     
    Of the relievers that have been on the spotlight to be sold at the trade deadline, the one reliever I’ve heard the most chatter about is Will Smith. This is ironic, because it might be that the Giants (currently 2.0 GB of the 2nd WC) at no indication would abandon ship. It seems even storybook, in the final season of the Bouchy tenure to make some waves in the postseason picture.
     
    The problem with Smith is that he is the only legitimate left-handed closer on the market, that for his benefit is equally as dominant against lefties or righties. I might be the biggest believer of this, but I’ve adamantly believed relievers always have their faults and warts, but accentuating those positive attributes to there fullest is what makes a reliever great. And Will Smith has done just that.
     
    GB 46.8% FB 23.4% LD 22.3%
    Hard Hit 42.6% Barrel 3.2%
     
    Will Smith has the stuff to be a truly impact arm in postseason. But what should be noted is that Will Smith’s ceiling isn’t anywhere near the capabilities of Yates or Giles.
     
    In a season full of positives, it’s easy to pasteurize the negatives. A career high strikeout rate masks the scent of a career high hard hit rate. A career low walk rate and top 2% expected wOBA, hids the fact that he’s afforded a mildly pedestrian average exit velocity.
     
    Will Smith is striking batters at wildly remarkable rates, but when he’s been hit it’s been hard. And lately he’s been hit hard just as well as he has been striking out batters.
     
    Will Smith throws his fastball at 93mph on average, and relies heavily on the breaking stuff to offset the straight fastball. Because Will Smith got off to such a great start to begin the season and since has faded a bit, I’ve decided to split his seasons into two parts.
     
    From the beginning of the season to the end of May Smith threw 43% fastball paling in comparison to 56.9% of the breaking pitch offerings (changeup-light, slider-heavy, curveball-heavy). That fastball mitigated a .235 BA, and the breaking stuff an even better .100 BA. That was the gameplan, plant the fastball to set up the killshot breaking ball and it showed as the breaking ball consummated 60% of the two strike pitches he’s thrown, and 65% of the 3-2 offerings he’s thrown. That’s a red flag that the breaking stuff owns priority over the fastball.
     
    So since we covered the fact that the bread and butter relationship between the breaking stuff and the fastball is symbiotic, and breaking stuff is option #1, why is it that Smith is #3 on this list? One thing that shouldn’t be discounted is the fact that the fastball velocity is fluky. Velocity of pitches is always the measuring stick for the performance bar to how a pitcher can succeed. Average velocity can usually be bridged by the complementary attributes, but when the offspeed is so overwhelming the star to the platter it can become such a predictable serving.
     
    I say this because both Yates and Giles profess fastballs that at times can be dominant, and the matter of those pitches and not the deception can bear the results. Not to mention, Smith owns one of baseball's best BABIP, an indicator of what of the defense (or dimensions of the ballpark) might be inhibiting, or perhaps producing in distorting ERA. Smith granted is a beyond stellar reliever, but in my wishlist he just doesn’t cut top priority.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; Will Smith for Trevor Larnach (#5) + Blane Enlow (#12)
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 49%
     
    4. Ian Kennedy
    W/L Record; 0-2
    3.40 ERA, 19/22 Saves
    42.1 innings & 52 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2020 Season (1 ½ Years of Control)
     
    If you haven’t been tabs on Ian Kennedy lately, you’d probably be quite shocked to know Ian Kennedy hasn’t been pitching as a starter. That’s the main backstory with Kennedy, a solid, reliable mid-rotation starter with flashes of #1 starter and somes flashes of #5 starter. It’s the inverse of the classic Michael Pineda scenario, where the stuff and the peripherals were vastly outperformed by the actual on the field performance, reinforced by a 2 seam/4 seam with a higher than average spin rate.
     
    So what’s made a pitcher, once below average and egregiously overpaid a suddenly hot trade deadline candidate? Well for starters, an unleashed fastball brought upon by a conversion from the starters slab into the pen, has enkindled a higher average velocity and better conviction.
     
    GB 47.0% FB 25.9% LD 20.%
    Hard Hit 33.3% Barrel 6.1%
     
    The most intriguing and savorful thing about Kennedy is the fact that he’s owed 33 million over the next two years, and for many of us inclined to be a wee bit clingy to the prospects that are the fuel to these midseason trades, could assume rights to control without eviction. It’s pretty simple. Swallow the contract, pay a marked down price and keep the prospect that so dearly are vital to sustained success, every GM’s favorite buzzword.
     
    I really do think Kennedy’s promise is substantial and his newfound approach is real. The fastball has always played, and he’s showing the signs necessary of taking the groundbreaking measures of change, given that he’s tinkered with a new cutter, a pitch he’s introduced into his repertoire only a year ago and is throwing at a 15.1% clip.
     
    From a pitching analysis point of view, what concerns me is that the knuckle-curve isn’t being optimized. If there was one point of improvement, it’s that in 2 strike counts Kennedy is using his curveball only 23% of the time. It’s a curveball that ranks 15th in baseball with 58 inches of vertical drop, 11% above average. This metric is calibrated to determine pitches thrown at the same speed and release point, and of pitches thrown at that velocity Kennedy’s has the 15th best rate of drop to velocity.
     
    Kennedy began the season during the month of April throwing his curveball 24% of the time, but has since dwindled it to around 8% as of recently. Why you might ask? Well hitters are hitting .378 on the pitch, when by Expected Batting Average (xBA) a metric that assigns an expected hitting percentage to when all variable such as positioning, defensive efficiency and luck has hitters hitting just .201 (which is weird given that I thought the royals were going all speed this season). As far as the 2 strike curveballs, and Kennedy isn’t getting any luckier with a .320 BA, when by expected BA assigns it a .130 BA, a .190 point discrepancy.
     
    It’s pretty understandable why Kennedy has feared from using the pitch, because the curveball has played some function or role in all 3 of his blown saves and 2 of his worst outings of the season.
     
    I’d be very happy, in fact even jubilant with Kennedy being the headline crown jewel for the Twins trade deadline bonanza. I’ve seen plenty on Kennedy not having the chops to be a legitimate closer, but the stuff and the peripherals tell me that the actual performance should at minimum match the underlying metrics.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; (Swallowing the remainder of the contract) for Kohl Stewart + late-round draft pick
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 95%
     
    5. Felipe Vazquez
    W/L Record; 2-1
    1.87 ERA, 21/22 Saves
    43.1 innings & 68 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2023 Season (4 ½ Years of Control)
     
    It’s hard to not imagine in this day of the 3 true outcomes, when I allude to shutdown closer, you not think of someone blowing triple digit gas. I’m not gonna recollect like everybody else does when they mention 100mph stuff being an endangered thing, but Felipe Vazquez certainly fits the bill as being the shutdown, at times truly invincible closer.
     
    GB 47.0% FB 25.9% LD 20.%
    Hard Hit 33.3% Barrel 6.1%
     
    I’m not questioning the stuff. It’s certainly there. But this may be more of a problem with the situation than the actual substance of the transaction. With the NL being the most enticing narration of keeping up with the K’s, it’s hard to speculate what the Pirates could given that the NL is so evenly matched.
     
    The con to this is that Vazquez is running on a very affordable deal, that runs through 2023. That makes his baggage season also a part of the price, and given that he’s under control for more season that just perfectly coincides with his peak, makes his deal and the workings to pry him out a challenging, and perhaps future-jeopardizing endeavor with the haul he’ll receive in return.
     
    Vazquez is a top-notch closer make no mistake about it. But I’ll pass if the Pirates are asking for the sun, moon and galaxy for only a handful of years of an injury hampered closer with an ascending career hard hit rate.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; Felipe Vazquez and Michael Feliz for Tyler Duffey + Trevor Larnach (#4) + Jhoan Duran (#8) + Nick Gordon (#11)
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 60%
     
    6. Shane Greene
    W/L Record; 0-2
    1.22 ERA, 22/25 Saves
    37.0 innings & 41 strikeouts
    Controlled Through; End of 2020 Season (1 ½ Years of Control)
     
    You can count me with the group of people who didn’t not in the least suspect Shane Greene to be trade bait during the deadline. But here we are, you reading a persuasive article on Shane Greene and I wracking my brain on how to write something juicy enough, for you to somehow want a Shane Greene. Weird world, isn’t it?
     
    Shane Greene might be the most shopped reliever, and he certainly should be. Which such an antithesis to the overwhelmingly successful season Shane Greene is having.
     
    Shane Greene has improved in every possible way a reliever can transition from good to great. Strikeout a lot of batters (highest rate of his career 28%), don’t give up hard hits, and when you do keep it on the ground (career-high groundball rate). The total package for most relievers………...on first glance.
     
    Yes, Shane Greene might be having a career year of substance, but the underlying metrics say this shouldn’t and won’t continue to be as cherry as it is.
     
    Shane Greene is pitching by far his best season in the majors. A sub 2 ERA, and a major league 6th best .223 wOBA, the most all-encompassing offensive statistic in baseball. But the peripherals suggest regression, not only to the mean but perhaps even worse.
     
    GB 55.3% FB 23.4% LD 13.8%
    Hard Hit 37.6% Barrel 9.6%
     
    Just because Greene is having an absolute wonderstruck ERA, that is undoubtedly influenced by luck, has no indications of carrying over to Target Field. Speaking of fields, Greene is the unknown, or probably well known to Greene himself, beneficiary of pitching at the most pitch friendly by dimensions in baseball.
     
    Shane Greene has given up a hard hit rate of 37.6% the highest of career, yet owns the lowest BABIP of his career. Pitch repertoire has no notable change, meaning the results are the only things that must be changing.
     
    At some point you’ve got to parse the good with the bad, and the only plus pitch of Greene’s might be the slider. It may be very straight vertically (combatted that with using cutters to lefts, sliders to rights) but the horizontal movements is truly remarkable. That horizontal moving slider is 12th in the league in right to left movement which might be a really good paring to the cutter once refined.
     
    One thing that I would love to see Greene tinker with is a cutter that could slice his his sinker usage in half. He’s certainly got a knack for the cutter and slider horizontal movement, (cutter 4th, slider 12th) and his sinker is an outdated pitch that when hit should be hit hard (xSLG .444). So cutter’s better than sinker, so flipping the ratios into 50-50 would be ideal.
     
    Even though Shane is benefiting from amazing expected statistics, a metric enumerated by exit velocity and launch angle doesn’t mean those numbers hold any water. Shane Greene plays in a very pitcher friendly ballpark by the dimensions (not lately though) but still very pitcher friendly field. Expected statistics play in a virtual reality, meaning the area/field the expected statistics take place are virtual and the averaged dimensions of every MLB park. So the expected statistics underplay the actual expected statistics, because Comerica’s space between fielders is larger than anyone else's, Greene is worse than even the discrepancy of his wOBA to expected wOBA difference.
     
    Shane Greene might be having a good season, but at face value (ignoring the fact he’s a rental) he shouldn’t cost much more than a top 7-10 prospect and nothing more.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; Shane Greene for Travis Blankenhorn (#24) + Gabriel Maciel (#28)
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; 80%
     
    7. Sean Doolittle
     
    Yeah, he’s not getting traded.
     
    TRADE PROPOSAL; NOPE
     
    TRADE LIKELIHOOD; -100%
     
    Please follow and direct all inquires at @Sabir_Aden on Twitter. Till my next pen.
  3. Sabir Aden
    The Twins have played 3% of the scripted schedule, and are on pace to eclipse 130 wins, and a meager 32 losses. Not to mention the Twins are well on their way to capture the division title, but would only be slated to the second seed in the conference seeding chart, playing the mediocre, (but good?) Seattle Mariners in the divisional round.


    HOLD YOUR HORSES, PEOPLE
     
    Consider this. If the entire season was tabulated in the form of a baseball game, meaning that each of the 54 outs recorded in a game would be translated to represent each of the 162 scheduled games, the Twins haven’t even recorded the second out of that very game. That’s a super complicated way of synthesizing that the season is grueling monster, and that 4 games can't really convey any semblance of what the Twins midseason form might be, much less their state come season’s end. Sample size is a word occasionally tossed around as a gauge to what’s legit or not, and no matter how much of a buzzkill word sample size is, it's a small sample size. You can’t go wrong with 4-1, but playing a awfully decimated Indians club and the tantalizingly pesky and obnoxious, but inferior Royals rosters does nothing in solidifying or cementing our far-fetched hopes to a stellar season.
     
    So people don't get all worked up or hyped that Byron Buxton’s hitting .500, or that Marwin Gonzalez cannot hold the trigger on a curveball for his life, or that Willians Astudillo is current sizing up as the best hitter in the history of baseball, because the reality of it is that these players either scorching hot or ice cold will eventually fall in line with their typical production outputs, UNLESS there's some superior extraneous force that might mitigate someone’s (wink*wink*Logan Morrison wink*wink*) career slashline. Typically in baseball you don’t see dramatic changes in someone’s batting line for example, and prospect development is a great indicator of this, unless there’s a change in scenery, or shift in a regime (managerial usually). Here is one physical scenario.
     
    I wanted to chose someone someone semi-millennial, preferably still active to debate this debate or myth of the hot-hand effect.
     
    *(Statistics calibrated in the American League)
     
    During the 2013 season, Jose Altuve didn’t have a firm-grip in the major leagues. On a rather atrocious Astros club that had stunk for a long time, spanning back to the Carlos Beltran days, they were scuffling and being spanked in the shadows of their unforsaken superstar. Under manager Bo Porter, unbeknownst to the Astros that they would have 2 MVP candidates and Hank Aaron best hitter awards, under their 2013 disposal (JD Martinez and Jose Altuve), they wound up a travesty rather than a juggernaut, drowning under 4 consecutive seasons of sub-60 win play. After Martinez was run outta town, Jose Altuve barely scraped by as a undrafted free agent and frankly played above expectation with all-star accolade to this credit. Nonetheless he hit .276 during the beginning month of April in 2014, pretty accurate representation of his career to that point. From that point on, Altuve wound up hitting a whopping .357, and vaulting his name into the MVP conversation, and having the best batting average, most hits, and 10th best OPS in the AL for what it's worth. A bargain in my boat, for a player that hadn’t exceeded an average above .290 and amassed a 6.1 WAR after a 2013 WAR of just 1.0!
     
    That’s one way you could express how little the first handful of games has on the rest of the season. The Twins postseason road down look as bleak as it did a few years back, however there’s little doubt that the behind the Yanks or Sox, their is a tier of about 3-5 clubs that could contest for the final spot and courtesy to play the latter of the loaded brethren in the AL East. The Rays and Athletics are also both, ballclubs that could collectively catch fire at any point if all things go right respectively, and the Angels aren’t a snooze themselves with perennial sluggers who could easily foil the Twins plan. The final spot should be hotly contested and the Twins need to orchestrate a bunch of runs, and configure somewhat of a capable staff, that has room for improvement. So, if your left partly conforming, or a down the middle perception on this club, that’s okay. I reckon that is the first team in years, that in every department of the roster I could point to that position group carrying the load. The offense is as dynamic and stacked in this century as it ever will be, the starting pitching staff possesses some electric and bat-missing stuff, and the bullpen has the makings of a shutdown backend if things goes according to plan. Not enough yet to be playoff or bust, but something around the ballpark would be fair.
     
    So I caution those jumping on the bandwagon and already scoreboard watching, to take the opening week of games with a grain of salt. So those needless stats of the 1 HR, and the insane 0-fer that Eddie Rosario snapped don’t really have tangible effect through the course of a season. Jose Berrios’s 10k, 7⅔ outing was impressive and all that, but really does it do a testament on Jose’s stuff or really just crucifies how mishmashy the Cleveland lineup is in its patchwork. How many times have we heard that the road to the Twins postseason runs will go as far as Buxton and Sano goes? Well the reality check is, Buxton is showing signs of improvement and candidly is playing as purposefully as I've ever seen and Sano isn’t on the roster. More or less, to the antithesis of Sano’s and Buxton’s liability to this team, is how important the newcomers need to perform to keep this team from falling off a cliff. Is it to early to say, that I sense collapse over the horizon?
     
    Regardless of how explicitly I may tread to heed caution, I can’t even refrain from excitement, myself. What’s for certain though? That this season will go haywire, for good or bad, and whatever of which will only the heighten the scope of interest on this club.
     
    So, (Don’t Jinx it, Don’t Jinx it, DON’T JINX IT) this season gonna be crazy good. The Phillies will provide a great litmus test of superior competition nearing the weeks end, and let’s just hope we give it to them good, and scurry to the Bronx with something more than a .500 record.
     
     
     
    From the Outer Galaxy of Fantasy,
     
    Sabir Aden
  4. Sabir Aden
    If you don’t already know the Minnesota twins inked the former Ranger southpaw, and well seasoned veteran Martin Perez to a short 1 year compact, to what seems to be a lackluster effort to “fortify the rotation.”
     
    Now we can interpret this transaction whatever way we deem to be fit, but the Twins projected rotation lines up as….
     


     
    Middling at best.With the likes of two potentially elite pitchers Dallas Keuchel and Craig Kimbrel standing pat for a desirable bidder, this has caught the chagrin of Twins rage twitter, and you can’t blame them. Imagine inserting Kimbrel or Keuchel into the pitching staff, and the added perks would benefit all parties involved including the most important; rectifying the vast abyss of Twins rants on the interwebs.
     
    It isn’t any secret that the Twins have loads of room to supplement the roster to make a bid for the division. With the Indians unloading after 3 years of reigning as division champions, and the Royals, Tigers, and White Sox currently having no plans other the than tanking, the crease is there for the Twins to make a run for the Indian’s money and to snap a near decade for a division title deprived fanbase. Even to that tangent, what even is more baffling is that the Twins have an unprecedented allotment of salary (I felt so deeply compelled to say cap room) on the checkbook or whatever ledger the stingy twins utilize to organize their expenses. As Minnesotan Fans, we are so inherently adept to mediocrity and heartbreak, it’s as if misery is in our compatible middle name. But in this instance, there’s only room to spectate and to be optimistic, which is undoubtedly a tough pill to swallow.
     
    The Ugly on Perez
     
    The ugly is so glaringly obvious. The kid pitched to the horrendous tune of a 6.22 ERA last season and owns a below average 4.63 ERA. He’s got a poor career 4.44 FIP, and doesn’t strike people out. Watching some footage of his former* (as in last season he was converted into a reliever because he was so awful) starts, the guy doesn’t have an appealing secondary pitch, his control is rather iffy, and his changeup has fallen off a cliff since its former dominance prior to his injury. Speaking of injury, the guy spent 3 stints on the disabled in only the past year, has operated on for Tommy John, and is as far as away from durable as Minnesota is from Texas.
     
    The Bad
     
    The thing Perez isn’t terrible because he’s bad. As contradictory as it sounds, he isn’t necessarily by any means as pitiful as he appears. Looking at the tape, its as if his performance rides a rollercoaster. During the first inning, the guy is as rocky ever. He gets in many hitters count, can’t find the zone, and gets rocked once he does in 3-0, 2-0, 3-1, or 3-2 counts. But strangely he settles down and is frankly razor sharp with precision in the middle innings. That sinker-changeup combo is to die for on the edge of the plate, and reminds me a lot of….JA Happ. I think toggling with his sinker/four-seamer to changeup ratio, and maybe a change of scenery would do him wonders. Not to mention, GLP in Arlington is no easy place to pitch, because the ball CARRIES out there.
     

     
    The Good, and How to enhance it???
     
    Believe or not, Perez once was pegged inside the Top 100 prospects in the Baseball America’s 2010 edition. Don’t think because of this though, that I expect him to fulfill his top billing as a prospect. The guy has upside which at this point is hard to believe. But as I watched the tape, he isn’t the doormat pitcher as his number would indicate. He’s a solid and competent enough pitcher in the middle innings and is maybe or not a little shaky-nervous at game tilt. Beyond that, he’s got excellent above-average velocity from a left-handed starter. His relative youth and exuberance leaves room for hope of improvement, and he’s 28. He also is a ground ball demon and induces a well above average GB rate, and at worst is a decent innings eater. We’ve seen this regime sign the flyer free agent, as referencing last year’s Anibal Sanchez reclamation project. After looking at Sanchez’s pitch usage, there’s nothing at first glance that collasally has changed. But taking a deeper dive, we can see that Anibal has surged up in his career ranks in Chase%, Pitches out of the Zone%, and overall Strikeouts%.
     


    But his pitch movements, usages, and varying peripherals haven’t drastically changed.
     




    What can be attributed to this surge is pitch sequencing. Sanchez better utilized his changeup in complement because he threw the pitch out of the zone. He Split-Finger had a career-high strikeout rate in volume, and had the most minuscule SLG percentage in terms of volume pitched. He cutback the vertical movement of his 12-6 curve, and upped the ante of his split-finger that fit perfectly to a series of pitches (sinker, cutter, split) that better suited his repertoire, featuring horizontal movement. Which is a primary reason why Anibal had a renaissance season.
     
    I mention this because..
    Anibal was once a former project
    Perez bears a striking resemblance to Sanchez, in their deficiencies.

    All of this surmounts to absolute and utter baloney if Perez resists in reinventing himself as a pitcher. This, however, does include an unorthodox approach, and completing throwing the entire baseball manual out the window, and tinkering with breaking balls. Look at the Rich Hill’s and the Drew Pomeranz of the world, and we’ve even seen Tyler Duffey rely on an off-speed pitch more than his fastball firsthand. Albeit none of this pitchers are All-Star commodities, they all in some capacity became better to some extent by heavily depending on their secondary stuff. There’s no denying Martin Perez is a fully capable and average enough MLB arm, but the real question remains; Will Martin Perez be open to tinker his arsenal, and if not were the Twins better suited to have unleashed a prospect in his place? That remains to be seen.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZOeXGX0sfY"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZOeXGX0sfY[/
     
    My virtual fake money is betting on that Wes Johnson and company already have recognized this, and have a plan waiting to be set in motion. My suggestions are pretty rudimentary, but they follow along on a general theme. Adjust and configure Perez’s pitches to align with his strengths. Just a rogue modification of mine for the sake of hypothetical satisfaction; steer towards an arsenal of the basis of vertical movement, (by tinkering with the cutter), reduce the amount of curves, increase the ratio of sliders:curves, and intensify the changeup as a wipeout pitch (which comes in further developing the arm side run, Ala Dallas Keuchel). This isn’t a foolproof formula for immediate results, but over a long term sample size, it's more than likely that Perez’s results would be slightly better than before. There are models of success that radically changed many players careers (i.e JA Happ etc.) that follow the same general blueprint; gear towards a players strength, and wait to experience slight success (snazzy rhyming jingle huh?
     
    And if this completely backfires, convert Perez into the bullpen, transition him into a killer LOOGY (he’s seriously a death on lefty guy, look at his numbers) and deal him during the trade deadline for some fringe B- to C prospect and look to take another bite at the apple next year.
  5. Sabir Aden
    (Disclaimer; this article was written during the time the Twins had the lead. In the time they relenquished it, it approximately induced me into a cycle of imminent doom and hate for the Twins Baseball. Also, the comments on the pitching staff were written before a cheese puff decided to disguise himself as Taylor Rodgers)
     
    Lately, Jake Odorizzi has been making a legitimate case as new staff ace of the Twins staff.
     
    And to be a frank, so has every starter the Twins have thrown out their not named Michael Pineda on the mound. But in all seriousness, Jake has been head and shoulders above the rest in consistency, durability, pitching length, in every start minus the Citi Field and Citizen Park debacles that really could’ve (and should’ve) been called off in the first place.
     
    That however shouldn’t dissuade anybody that this Jake Odorizzi isn’t here to stay.
     
    Refashioned, maybe.
    High Octane, umm sure.
    New, and very much improved. Hell, yeah.
     
    The last season version of Jake Odorizzi was the ultimate head scratcher. In an splendid article writer by fellow handyman John Bonnes, he dissects the warts and wallows that doomed the hurler they call ODO to his less than stellar opening Twinkie season. I highly encourage you to give it a descent peek, cause it’s as I said, splendid.
     
    The season as of today, has been a pleasure to watch, far above mine and probably your meager expectations. From the power splurge, and tremendous pitching, the Twins are on a nuclear level of destruction, one that isn’t internal, but external on how they’ve creamed everyone in their course.
     
    But wait, wait, wait……….. wasn’t I the very person who implored and preached that everyone that everyone take a broader perspective on what the twins really are? Seemingly every season has been a loop of the constant theme of the Twins of what they are; a team taking one step forward and a half-mile back.
     
    Well, I’m sorry to inform you, but the Twins are for-real. I received so many inquiries by family and friends, if they should emotionally invest into this club. Even though I’m the last you wanna ask from any gambling standpoint, as evidenced by my arbitrary affinity for the Buffalo Sabres. But, nothing so far has indicated to me that the Twins are teetering, and are bound to falter. So if that compels you to buy season tickets, just letting you know that I’m not liable if they epicly crash and burn just like the Vikings did versus the Bears.
     
    On a more positive note though, I’ve gotta give it to the braintrust of Falvey and Levine. They’ve nailed nearly single decision they’ve been tasked to wage, and to resounding success. From the coaching staff and the unconventionality of hiring zero experience candidates, to reclamation projects in Perez and company, and how they’ve masterfully approached minor league development through the entire pipeline. So I think it’s fair to say that I’ll stop ripping them every time Niko Goodrum gets a hit under the Ron Gardenhire regime.
     
    But……..we all know the seasons a constantly oscillating corkscrew, full of highs and lows, and the customary fluctuations that define baseball itself. The Twins however have defied the gravity that grapples to aspirerers, of which that plunged the high-flying mariners that looked destined to make a serious bid for launching taters into the space time continuum. But the pessimistic Minnesotan in me says, it could collapse at a moments notice, so it isn’t extraterrestrial to keep a healthy dose of skepticism even if things have been so ever optimal in every challenge that has posed this team. God I’m so desperate.
     
    But that's besides how the Twins have completely house cleaned and refurbished a pitching units that once sported literally the least upside since 3M started manufacturing post it notes.
     
    Once the achilles heel of the twins, the troubles for any above average pitching was the worst kept secret in baseball, and one documented well over the management of Ron Gardenhire. In every facet of pitching, in the pen and on the starters hill. Velocity, Swinging Strikes, Walks, and the results they bear, have all in some form or another improved.
     
    Remember the old pitch to contact mantra that epitomized the starting staff? That’s so far in the Twins rear view mirror, that Kyle Gibson was pushed so far to the brink to eschew that searingly nightmarish era of twins pitching baseball, that he actually began tallying strikeouts.
     
    Jake Odorizzi on a specific note, has been nothing short of really damn good. Brandishing a fastball, that will haunt the White Sox batting order for years to come, Jake has been wreaking havoc on the American League. The Twins have taken the league by storm, and plenty of that is owed to how well the Twins have pitched in length, and quality. Add to that repertoire with a already finely tuned splitter from hell, the once fitful pitcher has ascended to a different medium.
     
    Pitching has really been a godsend, and much more that just a mere pleasant revelation on how exceedingly stupendous this frontline, backline and in between starting rotation has performed in their proficiency. Remember the rumblings of the bullpen crisis? Overextension has been on the back burner, and much credit is due to the starting staff to keep everyone fresh in the marathon, not race that is the MLB season.
     
    Chemistry from coaching staff to roster has been the heart of how the twins have been able to instill such radical changes in approach, sequencing, and on the field conduct. Nevertheless this season has been such a divine omen, that it might be better to just enjoy it, instead of mincing and nitpicking every trivial error and miscalculation (which have been very few and far between), because god knows the next team that borders this will have an electronic strike zone, and retractable foul made of shatterproof glass, and a underground transparent seating area underneath the baseball field and etc and etc and etc……..
     
    So savor this folks, cause the next good team will be playing in a new stadium post-Target Field.
     
    Follow me at @Sabir_Aden
  6. Sabir Aden
    ♪Tis the season for Spring Training♪,
    ♪Come Along with me to Fort Myers♪
     
    Not as catchy as I contemplated, but the day pitchers and catchers report usually marks a new focus for the American Sports Landscape. You get predictions, it’s (newly inundated) but the clock’s ticking for free agency crunch time, rosters battles are waged as players jockey for roster positioning, and the fresh aroma of roster cuts lingers through the air. No better time of year, especially since every club is granted a new slate to which to engrave their fate. With the season rapidly approaching, spring training is the time of year which rejuvenates the baseball brethren. You get some real baseball (exhibition practice) but baseball more or less, despite the majority of us being in an absolute winter inferno.
     
    Speaking of Spring Training, it's also the time where newly added players begin sporting snazzy and brand new spanking merch and apparel. The Twins have infused their voids with many of these stop-gaps, budget friendly assets through free agency. Martin Perez, Blake Parker, Michael Pineda, Nelson Cruz, and C.J. Cron only begin the conversation of what new faces we probably might see play significant roles during the season. Among the most recently acquired faces, is Marwin Gonzalez.
     
    When reports surfaced that the Twins were interested in Gonzalez, let's say I was fairly reluctant that they would incline to pull trigger. And I assure, I wasn’t alone. But, sitting in biology class taking a genetics quiz I nearly lurched outta my seat as my phone buzzed incessentally. Let’s just presume that I wasn’t doing anything against the rules beforehand, but I literally couldn’t not stop smiling after I found out. But to my compadres, me enjoying this reprehensible quiz just added another layer of my peculiarity to my mantle. And in hindsight, I aced that quiz so who’s winning now….
     
    But aside from this tangent, let’s analyze MarWIN, its implications on the roster picture, my horrendous takes on Sano and Buxton, and other housecleaning duties we must confer about because of my long absence (Sorry). Let’s dig’in
     
    MarWINS = More Wins?
    The Twins made some buzz and fairly interesting news on a Friday afternoon a few weeks ago, signing maybe* (we’ll get to that part later…) one of the under the radar gems of the free agency class—Marwin Gonzalez to a very cost-friendly 2 year, 21 million dollar deal. It’s funny how the Twins went from offseason failure to preseason sleepers in a matter of days after striking luck with the versatile man but….
     


     
    You’ve probably already surfed the internet for some introductory description or sort of primer to what Gonzales provides. But for the sake of those who didn’t here’s a brief report card on the guy the Astros nicknamed Margo (appropriately named)...
     
    Dubbed the Jack of all Trades, Swiss Army Knife, Utility Man Extraordinaire and whatnot, Marwin Gonzalez was once a fabulous hitter in 2017. Prognosticators had thought he would have only bulked up the 2018 free agent crop, but a rough 2018 get-go depressed his stats and this suppressed market only further lessened his margins. We’ll get to the intriguing tidbits later, but in short and sweet delivery Marwin succumbed to depreciation-itis and proved to be less a safety valve contributor to the Astros than his 2017 numbers would suggest. Reading around 2017 articles of Marwin, some tabloids had been lobbying for Marwin to push for MVP votes, and in retrospect it’s rather hard to believe. What comes to Marwin’s calling however is his insane versatility. The AL’s closest apparent to Ben Zobrist, Marwin played the role of super-utility during his time down south, and had a breakout 2017 campaign.
     


     
    Gonzalez should at minimum provide exemplary depth, but its clouds my judgement that the Twins went luxury over necessity (pitching). I’m further dumbfounded that bulk inning eaters like Gio Gonzalez and Dallas Keuchel still remain waiting for some appealing offers. My dumbfoundedness is further compounded because there isn’t any shortchange of any money to invest in some semi-lucrative contracts. Getting back to Marwin, I kinda do enjoy this veil of obscurity in what your getting in Marwin. So I dived in to his stats an…..
     


     
    Marwin was super lucky in 2017. And he wasn’t in 2018. This explain his nondiscript aberration that soared him up into the 2017 MVP discussion. I spoke about wOBA and expected wOBA in my last article conveniently hyperlinked and located nearby here, but if you’re too lazy like me here’s a short snippet….
     
    [wOBA is simply a synthesized linear statistic where singles/walks are considered as a the primary building block, and incrementally scales a hit as for it’s due result. Expected wOBA is as self-explanatory as it sounds, and just express the quality of contact and how it yields to on field results. Their are some flaws to this that might apply to (X PLAYER) for being left handed, but if a player scorches a frozen rope and persists to label it INTO THE SHIFT, xwOBA would flag that as an unlucky hit, even though the entire left side of the infield is just begging for a bunt down the left field line. This is what hinders the stat, and I haven’t found a way to quantify how much this action has tainted (X PLAYER’s) stat value.]
     


     
    When I used Baseball Savant to tailor the pool with the highest differentials of wOBA and expecting, essentially denoting the most lucky hitters, I found Gonzalez at the top of list with a shocking amount of amassed luck. Which explains why he had a high.303 batting average. I would like to get more in-depth with his OBP and wider array of his totals in 2017 outlier season, but it's clear that luck isn't a sustainable trait and if you want more just go here.
     
    This offense now appears more meticulous and premeditated than a patchwork assembly in the years past, and with Gonzalez I think this has some sudden implications. I’m currently at work with my piece for my Opening Day roster prediction, but for now I can tell this lineup is going to kindle a lot of traffic on the bases and by implementing boom in the form of Cruz, Cron and Schoop it has loads of boom or bust potential. I going to admit even I couldn’t have fathomed a offense this dynamic would actually be wearing Twins uniforms coming into the 2019 season. Yet I feel the rhetoric is still glass half empty (alluding to the pitching fronts). Yet I feel this offense can compete with the premier firepower offenses of the AL (on paper at least). Could we be entering the dawn of a monolithic juggernaut? My jaded and (not level headed) convoluted glasses lenses having me saying that. Or I’m probably just super pumped.
     
    Speaking of juggernauts, let’s forensically say the Twins offense will cook. I don’t believe that’s a question unless something catastrophic happens which has a funny way of playing out strangely enough?! But on paper I think you have an offense that might mimic the historic (raking) K.C royals in terms of from top to bottom. I could honestly go on and rattle off and outline a parade of heavily optimistic circumstances that each player in this lineup could feasibly do. What this lineup is, is healthy and fruitful and abundant in it’s upside and spunk. If they just played to their abilities we wouldn’t be staring at a constant cycle of depressing yearly season exits that make us dispel our hope. So boys just…...
    Buxton-hit for average
    Sano- be 2016 you
    Kepler- let development journey take in full effect
    Polanco- play like the 2017 you (without PEDS)
    Cruz-destroy baseballs
    Cron- hit as far as those muscles can take you
    Castro- don’t swing at those high fastballs
    Schoop- deep soul searching for some all star swagger and lose the rust
    Rosario- be freakin awesome and all the power to yah
    So far what the Twins lack in is pitching. But no so long ago, did we see a frontline staff make the postseason with BARTOLO COLON, DILLON GEE, MATT BELISLE, and HECTOR SANTIAGO’s elicit shells manning our staff. Aside from the much more stiffer completion, there resides a little recurring theme in all the Twins moves. They’re banking on the bouncebacks. Hildenberger, Reed, May, Pineda, Buxton, Sano, and many more are players that in a perfectly Twins oriented world should be able to recreate their peak performances or fulfill their prospect potential. All we can do is let it unfold before our eyes. So take a seat back and hunker down on a menacing joyride of hell that is the Twins season.
     
    The Buck and Sano Scoop;
    I’ve been preaching for the Twins to sign a high-caliber relievers to shore up the bullpen all offseason, at such a profound volume that I’m starting to feel like I’m sounding like a broken record. But imagining Kimbrel in our bullpen gets me hyped just even envisioning it, and any passable reliever you’d be even marginally comfortable handling the 9th inning would get my red stamp of approval. This makes me wonder why I would be resistant or even hesitant on with signing a premier commodity over some cheap flyers (no offense) in the case of Gonzo, Cruz and Schoop etc… It’s because of Sano and Buxton.
     
    Every coming season since 2014 have I found myself convinced that ‘This is the Year’ and ‘they’re going to flick the switch’ or found myself defending their culpable cases by saying ‘its bound to be time they hit their stride’. But it’s time to set a ultimatum. This year is the final audition year to sparkle just a scintilla of that superstar pulse we’ve all been fixated on eventually showing. But let's be real. I’m going to speak as candidly as I can (maybe to an excess) but this is the season they must either
    Put up
    Or shut up.
    No undisclosed, or half hearted excuses. This is the final tryout act. So let's speak a little speculation, shall we.
     
    Let’s say they (Sano and Buxton) spearhead a blistering first half and you hunker down on some legitimate division title hopes. You supplement and complement during the trade deadline and weigh the options of adding a short term implicating star to at least temporarily get you over the hump. We can levy and count our losses if all goes wrong later, but that’s what I would do (yet what am I to believe). But in the case of Buxton and Sano faltering and underperforming you sever your ties and reload with the next wave of incoming prospects (Alex Kirilloff, Royce Lewis, Brusdar Graterol etc.) Some rationale has to dictate hope and promise and the end of line repercussions must be enforced. As a faithful and diehard (maybe to my disadvantage) as Twins fans we must stop settling with this modest and mediocre production complex, where this second rate performance is just OK, but frankly the Buck and Sano are underachieving specimens with freak of nature tangibles that can’t muster any of the things you'd expect they could. How many hitters like Sano’s build and frame are there that just strike you as someone who literally could annihilate the baseball and maybe the bat they use to hit it. But they strike out at such an excessive rate that their warts mask their Kodak moments. In reality Sano possesses no athletic mobility, can’t play anything close to passable defense anywhere so they have to be relegated to a 1st basemen role they probably play substandardly (Heck we’ve got 2 of those guys in Tyler Austin, Lucas Duda and toss in C.J. Cron too). In Buxton’s case, I could probably spot and distinguish with identical profiles similar players on every single team. Perhaps the Billy Hamilton’s, Jarrod Dyson’s, Rajai Davis’s, Jose Iglesias’s of the world that are literal speed demons who can flat out fly on the basepaths, and play dynamite outfield/infield D, but can’t muster any kind of sufficiency in their offensive game that they end up contributing as a negative anchor in the grand scheme. Just look at Melvin Upton, who has been staked as a similar player comp. (in the early years when Buxton showed promise) that if you keep a baseline level of competency and competitiveness and you're instantly vaulted into the MVP conversation. Now changes like that are drastic, but say that Buxton hits for average and plays like the 2nd half 2017 phenom he was, and Sano plays exactly like the 1st half 2017 mauler he was. Now you have a expectation setter or baseline ceiling (weirdly redundant) for the on-field product they can yield. In the right mind it's practically inconceivable for me that Buxton and Sano live up to their respective game-wrecker, superstar labels that they were pegged, but rest assured they should be able to contribute a feasible fringe all-star 3 WAR. In that case, at least we get a disclaimer of what were are dealing with they. So….Sano and Buxton…..NO PRESSURE
  7. Sabir Aden
    My Theoretical Mindset during the week;
    The status quo surrounding the Twins all offseason was their stubbornness and inability to commit to any outside assets (in free agency or on the trade block), yet until recently did the Twins finally break that narrative. But… they were in-house pieces. By committing to two sprightly and talented yet unproven stars, have they overplayed their hand on their future plans?
     
    The Twins right now are waltzing into what I would define as, a free-agency sweet spot. Where every added contributor would stabilize a liability, and boost their win total, which are at such a premium. The roster right now looks to be somewhere around the ballpark (lame pun not intended), to a potential spot in the postseason. Granted if nothing goes wrong (i.e injuries, supensions, curses) we could be staring towards a roster destined to secure a playoff, and readily prepared to be supplemented during the trade deadline. The added emphasis on a win or two or in the Twins case, blown-save-catastrophes-galore might end up sinking the ship when it comes to contention. If last year's bullpen collapses weren’t enough for you, I would say by far the Twins weakest position group lies in the most erratic, fragile and frail baseball clusters in all of baseball; the relievers.
     
    I spoke about this briefly in my last article, but what Keuchel or more importantly in Kimbrel possess is a semblance of stability so unprecedented that the last guy to be a stabilizer for us, is being inducted into our hall of fame. If we focus on Kimbrel in depth, the guy is as rare of a breed your ever going to find in the relief pitching industry. I’m not going to speak about Kimbrel in depth, but what really matters is that they both (Kimbrel and Keuchel) have walked the walks, and might play that kickstarter-trailblazer kinda player to get this steam boat sailing. Somehow the Twins front office has managed to finagle towards a somewhat competitive roster, and despite not committing to any external assets, keeping the books dry of anything, and keeping the payroll at or equal to ≈ 100 million is a remarkable feat, no doubt about it. But is it time for the Twins front office to relent and issue a blockbuster contract? That’s very debatable.
     
    Into the Nitty Gritty with Kepler and Polanco
    Here’s a basic 101 on how rookie contracts work:
    This rookie contract system is a focal point of the Collective Bargaining agreement and is tweaked and polished constantly, but it goes as follows;
     
    Typically ameuteur hitters agree to a contract with major league clubs coming out of school, or out of the states globally and major league clubs are given a 5 year window on either promoting the player, or releasing him. That promotion would then start the ticking on his 6-7 year free agency departure clock, and would stay with his team through his prime and peak years on a cheap deal, until he would reach free agency (expectedly after he would be years past his best seasons*). During his 3-4 year seasons, the players earns close to nothing on a athletic player scale (I say this because 500k seems like money heaven to me). If the team elects to let the player stick around, when the player hits his 5-7 year season he can contest for a slight raise, provided if both sides agree to a compromise. Until his 7th or 8th year does the player final get his rights to a free departure, and test the market for his free agency rights.
    *there are exception to this (Nelson Cruz etc).
     
    We’ve seen this philosophy catch some steam in the present, with several clubs purchasing the rights of players who aren’t “seasoned or proven”, and maybe haven’t even made it to the league in some cases. What this leaves fans to savor is team friendly-contracts sculpted to buyout years of arbitration, for a couple years of free agency. Theoretically, this consumes the prime or peak years from a player, but is it really worth it. Let’s take a look.
     
    *Tabulated according to Spotrac


    For Kepler and Polanco, we’re seeing a hike in annual pay, over the arbitration years that somewhat amount to as what the players would earn in full amount in free agency. Both Kepler and Polanco have received somewhat mildly-risky contracts. Both have underachieved in their time on the major league spectrum, and in Polanco's case been busted for doping with PEDS. These contracts (5yr, 35 mill & 5yr, 25 mill) aren’t going to hinder or cripple the Twins in the future. What I find to be quite interesting is that the Twins have a healthy and expanding prospect pipeline coursing with talent, and yet they still inclined to purchase the underwhelming services of Kepler and Polanco. According to my fortune predictor (oh boy I’m talented fellow, yeet) these are the scenarios I see turning out. When the Twins finally open the window to a championship pursuit, either…
    Polanco and Kepler are shrewd bargains
    Or they both continue to lag Twins lineup, and logjam the outfield rotation (with prospects + Cave)
    I decided to input Scott Kingery, because I thought his situation with the Phillies is an excellent example of when jumping the gun isn’t as picture perfect as it might seem. His contract is nearly identical in terms with Polanco and Kepler, mainly because they have the same backfire caveats and loopholes in dispatching Kingery once he gets old. Kingery hasn’t developed as rapidly as one would expect his minor league numbers would indicate, and played to the tune of a NEGATIVE W.A.R!!! (-1.5). The Phils thought he would form a dynamite paring with Hoskins and the future skeleton of that team. Instead, Manager Gabe Kapler is juggling at-bats between Maikel Franco and Kingery, who are competing to “win or earn” third base. This just hits me clear in the head as when this doesn’t work as anticipated. Just some added insight….
     
    Both of these scenarios have their pros and cons. You might have to shuffle playing time between the chain of prospects and the fitful likes of Kepler, and/or Polanco. In this case you unload Kepler and/or Polanco for equitable return values, and propel prospects to replace them. Or both Kepler and Polanco emerge as building blocks and thrive, and you yield for a established major league chip, and supplement for an immediate push (hopefully sooner rather than later). The time tables are rough and tweakable, but both the former and latter are good problems to have.
     
    In my mind the extinction of the concept for paying someone for what they’re worth is truly baffling me. It strikes me as that teams are playing with fire and lottery tickets, and trying to pull a quick on the player/(s). The truth to the matter is they aren’t premising the agreement toward constructive proof but rather on whim, Lady Luck, and canniness. Even with the comprehensive and elaborate analytics (which I’m all for, frankly) I don’t think it’s plausible in the right shape of mind to predict someone future who hasn’t set a baseline for what their ascension might be. For all I know, Kepler could go and revert into a complete shell of himself and morph into the eternal spirit of Nick Punto. That might be a little far-fetched, but the guy hasn’t established himself as any kind of consistent regular. He isn’t a ‘proven’ left handed vs left handed hitter (granted he improved from his abysmal marks from a year ago, but there’s a lot more left to be desired). He could turn into a complete sponge against lefty’s, and be relegated to an exclusive platoon role against righties. He’s an admirable right-fielder whose play is fairly consistent, but nothing out-worldly ala The Buck. Could he be in line for a regression? I guess that’s up to him.
     
    Typically young players similar to Kepler and Polanco both experiences growing pains, and excruciatingly painful rough patches, but what usually leaves with people is that semblance of promise and hope that a player instills into a fanbase. Kepler and Polanco are by no means generational cornerstone players, but what Kepler and Polanco possess is that consistency a team as inconsistent as the Twins desperately needs. Every position has been a constantly rotating carousel of prospects, and the Twins decided to shore this up, by agreeing to terms with Max Kepler and Jorge Polanco each on intriguing multi year contract that speak to the mindset of the Falvine Front Office. I guess I’m playing Devil’s Advocate right now, because I’m sputtering trying to unravel their rationale.
     


     
    There aren’t many other motives for Kepler &co and Polanco &co not to reject these deal like this. This is guaranteed money your dealing with, and the signals and indicators in this suppressed markets wouldn’t sway them that they would command much more (or any offers at all) in the open market. I wanted to take a closer examination at Kepler’s logic in this, because I find much more faith in Polanco, RF is a much more vital to Target Field, and granted he got the more lucrative contract.
     
    In Kepler’s case, in some ways your betting with yourself; do you believe that Kepler would turn into a monster player and demand a lucrative contract, or do you settle with what in turn is an appealing and secure the offered multi year deal. It’s as playing with fire in the Twins perspective, and in light of him settling you could deconstruct this in either two way:
     
    1. I’m concerned that Kepler would settle with a buy-low contract like this and is satisfied with staying average
    2. Or the Twins got an absolute steal of a player.
     
    The downsides and upsides are obviously staring us in the eyes. The guys looks he’s a got plenty of a Major League regular’s tools, but the intangibles are worrisome to me. He looks flustered, and stoic at the plate. His demeanor is “I’m under radar, so don’t notice me”. But he’s got those flashes of phenom and potential like he could rake, on an at bat to at bat basis. He got a great, pretty left handed stroke (if that’s worth anything). During 2018, we saw, provided if he hunkers down and locks in that he could hit lefties and for power. 2018 was the year he exorcised those demons and the knocks of his same handed ineptness, and not to mention he’s an above average right fielder. That’s what scares me locking into a promising yet unproven commodity.
     
    I have hunch that Kepler’s in for a breakout, quasi- bounceback campaign. I conjured up 7 imperative objectives, if Kepler wants to exponentially improve, and turns his contrast into a bargain.
    Don’t regress
    Don’t becomes injured (is that harsh?)
    Rake and Clobber
    Don’t flail to back-foot breaking ball
    Keep Smoking the Ball (Guy is getting better over career)
    Keep hitting lefties,
    Let development take its course (don’t rush it)
    - I literally had this stray though, but what if players get mad at their annual salary and if they’re not getting due compensation, play below their abilities. In this case, does Kepler play to the boundary of his abilities?
     
    Just on a side tangent, I stumbled on something interesting when looking through Kepler’s Numbers…..
     




     
    I recall times last year that Kepler had his extreme cold spells and fits at the plate, and I wanted to see how much of this was a byproduct of bad luck. wOBA is simply a synthesized linear statistic where singles/walks are considered as a the primary building block, and incrementally scales a hit as for it’s due result. Expected wOBA is as self-explanatory as it sounds, and just express the quality of contact and how it yields to on field results. Their are some flaws to this that might apply to Kepler (for being left handed), but if a player scorches a frozen rope and persists to label it INTO THE SHIFT, xwOBA would flag that as an unlucky hit, even though the entire left side of the infield is just begging for a bunt down the left field line. This is what hinders the stat, and I haven’t found a way to quantify how much this action has tainted Kepler’s stat value. But other than that, the stat has enlightened me with some tell-tale suspicions that Kepler slumps have accentuated because of the fact he is inducing himself into slumps. I added Trout’s statistic because quite honestly, the guy is the poster boy of hitting and is a golden standard benchmark stat. The reason why we don’t see the traditional pronounced periodical slumps in Trout, (IMO) is because Trout has found a way to amplify his stretches of success, and mask the monstrosities of his slumps and skids, which help maintain sparkling wOBA’s. (Or maybe he’s just too good to be bad????)
     
    This is an excellent inherent trait to have, because...
    It’s a great sign of a confidence booster
    It reinforces & enhances your overall stat...➡️ (Solid+Amazing=Really Good)
    This all might be baloney, but I find it interesting that Kepler’s more distinct patches of droughts tend to follow the Expected wOBA. The thing is, events like this are very common young hitters, (Heck, in real life too). Kepler rides the Hot-Hand like a wave, but when he hits his lows he virtually touches rock bottom. I just find it intriguing that this kinda-gives us a view to Kepler’s psyche during this plate appearances, to my understanding. Is it that Kepler’s gloom and doom approach at the plate is making that his Expected wOBA mimics and dampens his wOBA? That’s the real question…...
     
    I bet my theory will get invalidated, but I think this hints toward some better and consistent productions from Kepler in this upcoming season. Maybe just a little forward thought, the vote of confidence upstairs, in this new contract, encouragement from the staff, and some years under the belt will aid Max in carving-it-up in the Bigs.
     
    But if Kepler gets better (which I’m all inclined to believe), and if his performance does ride along an expected course, Kepler’s 8th and 7th year salaries are at complete bargain bottom prices. I also believe to some minuscule or macroscopic level (or really anything in between), that this instills some motivation into players. Disregarding why people rip players who pale in comparison near nothing to the owners, it’s a vote of confidence from the Front Office. It’s not like them handing contracts is routine kinda thing, and it issues sort of closure or something close after all summer people were calling for their collective heads. I do like these contracts, if that’s what you came to read this for, but still believe (no matter how much the PR department iterates it), where Buxton and Sano go, so do the Twins. I do hope success for all these player because they will take the fall if everything crashes and burns. Both Sano and Buxton in my mind aren’t ever going to have a year of this magnitude to prove doubters and/or the FO they were destined for stardom. To make the postseason I think the Journey runs right square through Buxton and Sano cascades, and to qualify to the playoffs I think it’s unequivocally contingent if Sano and Buxton rise to the occasion.
     
    This all surmises to probably befuddling you more prior to reading my tyrade/spiel but let’s simplify into simpler terms; if Kepler plays at or near a 4-5 WAR per year,(which is roughly fringe all-star level) this contract is a boon for the Twins. It's a bust if Kepler plays to a 1-3 WAR level (because the Twins have plenty of role players to insert). This also applies to some degree with Polanco.
×
×
  • Create New...