Mike, this was not an excercise in reductio ad absurdum. You make a valid point that most every comparison leaves a logical counter argument. However - the real issue to me was the percieved atrocious overpay of #7 at $23m/yr is hardly the only current problem,and not by a longshot the worst problem in the allocation of current payroll funds. We may not all agree that Joe is a gross overpay - that is not the point of debate. Here is another way the Twins are spending $24.25m/yr. 7W 14L 6.45ERA 152IP 194H 79K 109ER 66BB 1.71WHIP 4.67K/9 This ghastly pitching line is the combined totals for Pavano, Blackburn, Baker and Capps for 2012. At a combined cost of $24.25m in 2012. I think we can all agree that 2 AAA callups could produce the combined line shown above. That is at least as bad of a percieved overpay. AAA Minimum salary (think Hendricks/DeVries) $1m combined for both. Leaving an overpay of roughly $12.5m/yr per pitcher. "Making bad decisions with lots of players (aka, your list) is actually better than making a huge, bad decision with one player." I can't imagine anyone making executive decisions thinking that lots of contracts that turned out bad is better then one contract that turned out bad. That said, I understand the distinction being made here - only Capps and Pavano were truly bad decisions at the time they were made. Mauer was a good decision, turned bad in hindsight and Baker was a "meh" decision that turned out bad.