miracleb

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

Oh boy.....3 for 3 yesterday and suddenly let's compare him to Trout?  Agree with the Mad King.......let's play more than 100 games this year.....and then we can talk.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

I sure don't like to see Sanchez at the top of this list!  If he was a middle of the pack defensive catcher, his hitting numbers could be bearable behind the plate.  His numbers DON'T hold up as a "regular" DH.  I would rather have Kiriloff, Larnach, Rooker, Sano, or Arraez at DH over Sanchez.

A lot of pressure on Ryan and Ober (and 2-3 other young pitchers who will be forced up due to injury.)  If they are not successful.......this is a "D" grade based on only getting Sonny Gray as a viable starting pitcher.

A lot of pressure on Ryan and Ober (and 2-3 other young pitchers who will be forced up due to injury.)  If they are not successful.......this is a "D" grade based on only getting Sonny Gray as a viable starting pitcher.

Ugh....I hate to see Sanchez even mentioned as a DH.  I would much rather have Sano, Larnach, or Kiriloff in that spot (heck, maybe even Rooker!)

Ugh....I hate to see Sanchez even mentioned as a DH.  I would much rather have Sano, Larnach, or Kiriloff in that spot (heck, maybe even Rooker!)

I like everything that Danchat says above.  Palacios would already be Adrianza or Simmons.  Solid glove and weak bat.  "Seems" like there is still some potential there with his bat though.

I like everything that Danchat says above.  Palacios would already be Adrianza or Simmons.  Solid glove and weak bat.  "Seems" like there is still some potential there with his bat though.

I like everything that Danchat says above.  Palacios would already be Adrianza or Simmons.  Solid glove and weak bat.  "Seems" like there is still some potential there with his bat though.

I think we have heard about Sano "getting in shape" for the past 5-6 years.   I hope that is true this year!

I think we have heard about Sano "getting in shape" for the past 5-6 years.   I hope that is true this year!

flexibility doesn't equal long term success.  It might mean we are a .500 plus team this year.  That would be improvement and the front office keeps it's job.  I guess it depends on what you are looking for.

flexibility doesn't equal long term success.  It might mean we are a .500 plus team this year.  That would be improvement and the front office keeps it's job.  I guess it depends on what you are looking for.

flexibility doesn't equal long term success.  It might mean we are a .500 plus team this year.  That would be improvement and the front office keeps it's job.  I guess it depends on what you are looking for.