Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • MLB Players Association Negotiates Deal to Get Minor Leaguers Paid


    Ted Schwerzler

    For years the reality is that Minor League Baseball Players have been left out in the cold when it comes to representation. While the Major League Baseball Players Association negotiated deals for fair labor practices, the future of the game was left out to dry. Not anymore.

     

    Image courtesy of Jonathan Dyer-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Over the offseason talks began to come to a head with the reality that, for the first time, minor league players would have representation at the table. Minor league baseball players would be represented in Collective Bargaining Agreements by the MLBPA. On the eve of Opening Day, a monumental deal was reached. Of course, the CBA still needs to be ratified. 

    Throughout history, Major League Baseball ownership has looked to suppress the wages of minor-league players. Defined as seasonal or temporary workers, minor leaguers have been forced to play for well below livable wages, and the allure of a far-off payday in the major leagues was what drove them to keep pushing.

    The reality is that not every player is defined by their prospect status, and far more don’t come from a draft windfall through a hefty bonus. When looking to get by while focusing on their craft, the burden of financial hardship should not be part of the equation. Thanks to a deal struck on the eve of Major League Baseball’s greatest calendar day Opening Day,, a new era of the minor league future gets ushered in.

    ESPN’s Jeff Passan reported the breakdowns for salaries, and players will take home something much more representative of working a job rather than being an asset. Player’s will receive pay almost year round, and needing to figure out financial plans during spring training should no longer be an issue. On top of actually being paid for the fringe parts of the minor league season, players can earn additional money if those commitments extend (intsructional league). No organizational talent was looking to get rich off their minor league income, but players should now avoid needing to find second jobs in off hours.

    It was another win for minor leaguers in court today as well. Reported by the Associated Press on Wednesday evening, a federal judge approved the $185 million settlement against Major League Baseball for violating federal minimum wage laws. The litigation had been ongoing for nine years and finally reached its conclusion. The suit was filed in 2014 by Rochester Mayo grad Aaron Senne, along with fellow former minor-leaguers Michael Liberto and Oliver Odle.

    There has always been an argument that taking away some of the hardships players had off of the field could present a greater focus or outcome on it. Now we will get to see if that bears any fruit.

    News continues to come in on the monumental achievement for minor leaguers. The CBA will also allow players signed at 19 years old or younger to be under team control for just six seasons as opposed to seven. This is big news for many international free agents and players drafted out of high school. MLBPA expects to have its vote completed by midnight Friday. MLB owners need to vote as well. A formal grievance procedure will also be set in place.

    UPDATE: The players how not ratified the vote. Final step is MLB ownership approval.

    UPDATE: Major League Baseball owners have voted in favor of the proposal. The deal is now official. Congrats minor-leaguers!

    Great news for the minor-leaguers. Certainly there are more negotiations to come, but this is a terrific start. Share you thoughts in the COMMENTS below! 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    It is a black eye to MLB that it took them so long and protracted litigation to treat these young men fairly.  Glad it is finally accomplished, and also glad MLB players chose to support and negotiate on behalf of the younger, less accomplished brethren.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, mrtwinsfan said:

    Good to see,  Way overdue!!!!!!!!!!

    Fully agree. Way overdue and I'm sure the players are happy with those higher salaries. But the biggest shock may have been the big jump for players in the "complex league." Frankly, I'm not sure what the means? Is the short-season league for newly drafted players?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Having representation and a seat at the table is fantastic news.

    The agreement isn't enough in my opinion but it gets them above the poverty line and the fact that they needed to get above the poverty line is embarrassing. 

    I love the game of Baseball... Always have and always will but I know what the owners and the commissioners office did and it's hard to forgive. 

    In 2018 on page 1,967 of a 2,232 page 1.3. trillion omnibus spending bill some elected official was able to skip the committee process and just slide this in.

    [A]ny employee employed to play baseball who is compensated pursuant to a contract that provides for a weekly salary for services performed during the league’s championship season (but not on spring training or the off season) at a rate that is not less than a weekly salary equal to the minimum wage under section 6(a) for a workweek of 40 hours, irrespective of the number of hours the employee devotes to baseball related activities.

    This is how it works folks. A campaign contribution and it is quietly slipped into a massive spending bill and just like that... it's reality. This is what major league baseball did to minor league players. It's Ok... we don't watch this stuff anyway. 

    Progress from this is progress. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is how it works folks. A campaign contribution and it is quietly slipped into a massive spending bill and just like that... it's reality.

    But half the country doesn't understand that the expenses are now higher...., then ticket prices are higher,   The same people will complain about the higher ticket prices.

    The only difference is that when the government does it........they raise our taxes.....instead of the ticket prices.

    I am not worried at all about spending Pohlad's money.......but you need to see the other side of the coin of...."hey, everybody gets paid more....."

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, miracleb said:

    This is how it works folks. A campaign contribution and it is quietly slipped into a massive spending bill and just like that... it's reality.

    But half the country doesn't understand that the expenses are now higher...., then ticket prices are higher,   The same people will complain about the higher ticket prices.

    The only difference is that when the government does it........they raise our taxes.....instead of the ticket prices.

    I am not worried at all about spending Pohlad's money.......but you need to see the other side of the coin of...."hey, everybody gets paid more....."

     

    Wow, not sure where you're going with this one.  Campaign contribution?  Quietly slipped into massive spending bill?  By who?  We're all reading about this now...in a public forum.  History has shown that when everyday people make more money, they end up spending more money in the communities in which they live and work.   Minor League baseball will still be the best financial deal in professional baseball for fans, even after its players earn a liveable wage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    News continues to come in on the monumental achievement for minor leaguers. The CBA will also allow players signed at 19 years old or younger to be under team control for just six seasons as opposed to seven. This is big news for many international free agents and players drafted out of high school. 

    I believe this is written backwards.  I understood the tweet as impacting players who are signed at 19 years old or older will now be under team control for 6 years going forward instead of 7.  So it won't impact too many international free agents, but will impact college players and older high school students.

    Here is the quote from the Athletic article.
     

    Quote

    Players who sign at age 19 or older are going to be under club reserve for six years, rather than seven, which is the blanket number that previously applied to all players. This policy is not retroactive to players who previously signed at age 19 or older.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That was a copy/paste from immediately above.  Just saying "players should make more money" without understanding the other side...is the problem.  When MLB eliminates "A ball" in 3 years as a cost cutting measure, these same people will be complaining about it........

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The housing and transportation changes are also pretty big.  Glad it also has an additional statement about spouses and children as well.  Quote from the Athletic article below. https://theathletic.com/4360686/2023/03/29/minor-league-bargaining-cba-mlbpa/

    Quote

    Players will have their own bedrooms at home at Double A and Triple A. Players are going to either receive a bedroom or be allowed to opt out and instead receive a stipend at Low A and High A. Spouses and children are going to be accommodated in club-provided housing. Housing is free for players except those who make a higher amount.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The problem is not how much teams spend on Milb players.  The problem is that two-thirds of the money goes to 10% of the players.   Last year MLB team paid out $291,408,490 in draft bonuses and as we all know most of those players fail.  There is an alternative.  If they made the max bonus $1M and dropped the bonus just 1 percent per draft slot, they could increase the average pay to Milb players by 48,706.53.  If they made the max bonus $500K, the increase would be 69,228.29 on average.  In other words, AAA players would get paid roughly $100K not the proposed $38,500 assuming AAA players would get paid a little more than A/A+ players.

    Obviously, this could be tweaked.  If you prefer to have a 2M top bonus, the pay increase would be $36,594.33 at all levels.  If you make the increase $50K at AAA and $22K at A ball you end up with roughly a $67K salary for AAA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, nclahammer said:

    Wow, not sure where you're going with this one.  Campaign contribution?  Quietly slipped into massive spending bill?  By who?  We're all reading about this now...in a public forum.  History has shown that when everyday people make more money, they end up spending more money in the communities in which they live and work.   Minor League baseball will still be the best financial deal in professional baseball for fans, even after its players earn a liveable wage.

    His first sentence was quoting me but he didn't use the quote feature so it looks like it was all his commentary.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is absolutely a good thing but it looks like it was paid for by cutting 450 spots for minor league players (15 per team).

    MLB does seem to want to shrink the minor leagues further, though I'm optimistic MLB expansion will bring baseball back to many communities.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, miracleb said:

    But half the country doesn't understand that the expenses are now higher...., then ticket prices are higher,   The same people will complain about the higher ticket prices.

    The only difference is that when the government does it........they raise our taxes.....instead of the ticket prices.

    I am not worried at all about spending Pohlad's money.......but you need to see the other side of the coin of...."hey, everybody gets paid more....."

    I'm not sure what you are saying. Are you worried about rising ticket prices for minor league games because minor league players being paid more. They are two separate entities. Minor league players are paid by the major league clubs. Minor league ownership are the businesses who profit from ticket, parking and concessions.   

    The ticket prices will take care of itself. If they raise the price too high, less people will attend and they will make less money and those prices will be set accordingly by the minor league clubs in order maximize their profit. Market forces will determine ticket price but higher player payroll doesn't hit the minor league ownership wallet because they are paid by the major league clubs.

    It is major league ownership that had been keeping minor league player costs down and cutting minor league teams in order to minimize their expense and therefore keep profit. I don't have a problem with a business making profit but I do have a problem when elite talent is paid below poverty level because they can't do anything about it.       

    What I copy and pasted was from 2018 and I did so to point out what major league baseball did to keep minor league players at below poverty levels. I did it to illustrate what a big moment this is. Very few of us are aware of what they did because we don't read page 1,937 of a 2,232 page document and I think people should know, especially if you are a baseball fan. 

    They took the same language from a 2016 stand alone bill (Save America's Pastime Act) that was soundly defeated, basically laughed off the stage to the point where sponsors of the bill had to back pedal. Two years later despite having no chance of being passed on it's own, it gets quietly attached, skipping the committee process directly into a massive 2018 omnibus bill deep into 2,232 page document that was necessary to keep government functioning and had nothing to do with baseball. 

    Representation for minor league players has been necessary for a long time with the anti-trust advantages and the friends in high places that baseball had over the players for decades. I love baseball but what they have done to minor league players was shameful and today's news is so much bigger than how much money they are paying Aaron Judge and what the MLBPA and MLB baseball fight over every CBA.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TwinsAce said:

    The housing and transportation changes are also pretty big.  Glad it also has an additional statement about spouses and children as well.  Quote from the Athletic article below. https://theathletic.com/4360686/2023/03/29/minor-league-bargaining-cba-mlbpa/

     

    The housing is huge and with that I think some real important progress was made. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    The problem is not how much teams spend on Milb players.  The problem is that two-thirds of the money goes to 10% of the players.   Last year MLB team paid out $291,408,490 in draft bonuses and as we all know most of those players fail.  There is an alternative.  If they made the max bonus $1M and dropped the bonus just 1 percent per draft slot, they could increase the average pay to Milb players by 48,706.53.  If they made the max bonus $500K, the increase would be 69,228.29 on average.  In other words, AAA players would get paid roughly $100K not the proposed $38,500 assuming AAA players would get paid a little more than A/A+ players.

    Obviously, this could be tweaked.  If you prefer to have a 2M top bonus, the pay increase would be $36,594.33 at all levels.  If you make the increase $50K at AAA and $22K at A ball you end up with roughly a $67K salary for AAA.

    Agreed on the draft bonuses with one exception. Sometimes the elite athlete has other sport options so baseball does have to try and be competitive with the other sports in that occasional circumstance. 

    My concern with minor league compensation hasn't been with the bonus baby 1st and 2nd rounders. Those bonuses are big and a little financial discipline and they can ride out the low compensation. My concern has always been with the later round low bonus guys who has to have a young wife or girlfriend working two jobs just so he can chase a dream and afford a roof, sandwich, maybe even a car so she can get to work at those two jobs.    

    Every CBA I keep looking for someone either ownership or the players union to speak up for the minor league players. It never happens because it hasn't been in anybody's interest to concern themselves with what I'm concerned about.  

    This announcement is big... It makes me happy on this fine opening day of baseball in 2023. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, nclahammer said:

    Wow, not sure where you're going with this one.  Campaign contribution?  Quietly slipped into massive spending bill?  By who?  We're all reading about this now...in a public forum.  History has shown that when everyday people make more money, they end up spending more money in the communities in which they live and work.   Minor League baseball will still be the best financial deal in professional baseball for fans, even after its players earn a liveable wage.

    Here's an article explaining what baseball did with the help a high placed friend in Washington. 

     

    https://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2018/3/23/17152778/spending-bill-minor-league-baseball-explained-save-americas-pastime

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Agreed on the draft bonuses with one exception. Sometimes the elite athlete has other sport options so baseball does have to try and be competitive with the other sports in that occasional circumstance. 

    My concern with minor league compensation hasn't been with the bonus baby 1st and 2nd rounders. Those bonuses are big and a little financial discipline and they can ride out the low compensation. My concern has always been with the later round low bonus guys who has to have a young wife or girlfriend working two jobs just so he can chase a dream and afford a roof, sandwich, maybe even a car so she can get to work at those two jobs.    

    Every CBA I keep looking for someone either ownership or the players union to speak up for the minor league players. It never happens because it hasn't been in anybody's interest to concern themselves with what I'm concerned about.  

    This announcement is big... It makes me happy on this fine opening day of baseball in 2023. 

     

    I thought about the guys with other options.  Is the game really going to suffer in 1 guy every couple of years elects to go to the NFL?  Consider the tradeoff.  The reason I came up with this model is I was wondering how we could pay every single Milb player a good wage.  The guys that earn the big bonuses are obviously the guys that become great players but those guys are going to make generational wealth and retire in their 30S.  Why is the system all about them while ignoring the other 95% of players.

    The model I am talking about pays every player after round 6 a $50K signing bonus and more than double the current proposed system.  Just to be clear, not the existing system but would double the proposed system.  AAA players would make close to $100K.  It would be very easy to take compensate every Milb player quite well.  The players and owners have elected to pay a select few a lot and the rest very little.  All they need to do is reallocate.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I thought about the guys with other options.  Is the game really going to suffer in 1 guy every couple of years elects to go to the NFL?  Consider the tradeoff.  The reason I came up with this model is I was wondering how we could pay every single Milb player a good wage.  The guys that earn the big bonuses are obviously the guys that become great players but those guys are going to make generational wealth and retire in their 30S.  Why is the system all about them while ignoring the other 95% of players.

    The model I am talking about pays every player after round 6 a $50K signing bonus and more than double the current proposed system.  Just to be clear, not the existing system but would double the proposed system.  AAA players would make close to $100K.  It would be very easy to take compensate every Milb player quite well.  The players and owners have elected to pay a select few a lot and the rest very little.  All they need to do is reallocate.  

    I don't think the game would suffer in total. MLB already can't compete with the NFL when it comes to the immediate pay out to Kyler Murray. It will suffer in little corners of the game such as when Oakland wastes a number one pick on Kyler Murray. 

    I'm OK with your model in its basic form but I still think the real problem had always been above the minor leaguers heads at the CBA negotiation table where you have two big boys fighting over as much of the pie as they can get with no room to care about minor league conditions.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

    I don't think the game would suffer in total. MLB already can't compete with the NFL when it comes to the immediate pay out to Kyler Murray. It will suffer in little corners of the game such as when Oakland wastes a number one pick on Kyler Murray. 

    I'm OK with your model in its basic form but I still think the real problem had always been above the minor leaguers heads at the CBA negotiation table where you have two big boys fighting over as much of the pie as they can get with no room to care about minor league conditions.   

    the owners should see what Major League Ready is proposing as a win-win for them. 

    • they reduce the risk of over paying for a draft bust.  same as what the nfl did when those first round QB bonuses got ridiculous.
    • minor leaguers are paid much better and it gives owners the deepest possible depth to leverage because little to no players are quitting from economic hardship and they can hang in there a few more years.
    • competition increases because players see that at least they won't live in poverty so more will take a chance and it may pan out for them.  Think Caleb Theilbar type players.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    The problem is not how much teams spend on Milb players.  The problem is that two-thirds of the money goes to 10% of the players.   Last year MLB team paid out $291,408,490 in draft bonuses and as we all know most of those players fail.  There is an alternative.  If they made the max bonus $1M and dropped the bonus just 1 percent per draft slot, they could increase the average pay to Milb players by 48,706.53.  If they made the max bonus $500K, the increase would be 69,228.29 on average.  In other words, AAA players would get paid roughly $100K not the proposed $38,500 assuming AAA players would get paid a little more than A/A+ players.

    Obviously, this could be tweaked.  If you prefer to have a 2M top bonus, the pay increase would be $36,594.33 at all levels.  If you make the increase $50K at AAA and $22K at A ball you end up with roughly a $67K salary for AAA.

    This is the worst idea ever for so many reasons.

    What top athlete will ever choose baseball again, if they have an option?

    The best players should be paid like the best players?

    This would 100% drive down baseball participation and pay overall. Awful idea. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    This is the worst idea ever for so many reasons.

    What top athlete will ever choose baseball again, if they have an option?

    The best players should be paid like the best players?

    This would 100% drive down baseball participation and pay overall. Awful idea. 

    Really, how many top athletes can get drafted high enough in another professional sport that this would matter.  We are talking about maybe one person a year and a signing bonus of $3-7M is not necessarily going to sway the few guys that get drafted that high because they have a good shot at making two or three hundred million.  Most are still going to go wherever they think they have the best shot a enormous wealth. 

    Beside that fact, this has absolutely nothing to do with what "the best players" make.  We are talking about signing bonuses before a prospective player every plays one inning of Milb much less what they make as MLB player.  This would not impact one iota the compensation for MLB players. 

    Quit paying guys like Mark Appel $6M before they earn a thing and you could afford to play EVERY player a decent wage. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    Really, how many top athletes can get drafted high enough in another professional sport that this would matter.  We are talking about maybe one person a year and a signing bonus of $3-7M is not necessarily going to sway the few guys that get drafted that high because they have a good shot at making two or three hundred million.  Most are still going to go wherever they think they have the best shot a enormous wealth. 

    Beside that fact, this has absolutely nothing to do with what "the best players" make.  We are talking about signing bonuses before a prospective player every plays one inning of Milb much less what they make as MLB player.  This would not impact one iota the compensation for MLB players. 

    Quit paying guys like Mark Appel $6M before they earn a thing and you could afford to play EVERY player a decent wage. 

    We already have HS players saying they don't choose baseball for this reason.....they can make so much more in football or basketball (not that it is realistic for the vast majority of them), and make it day one without 5 years riding buses and losing money (though your plan fixes the money losing issue).

    Really, they can afford more than they are now paying....no issue. They choose not to, which is their right, of course. 

    Economics is the thing we'll never agree on when it comes to baseball.....I'm ok with that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, heresthething said:

    the owners should see what Major League Ready is proposing as a win-win for them. 

    • they reduce the risk of over paying for a draft bust.  same as what the nfl did when those first round QB bonuses got ridiculous.
    • minor leaguers are paid much better and it gives owners the deepest possible depth to leverage because little to no players are quitting from economic hardship and they can hang in there a few more years.
    • competition increases because players see that at least they won't live in poverty so more will take a chance and it may pan out for them.  Think Caleb Theilbar type players.

    I always assumed the players association promoted the current system because why would the owners care if the money was distributed more evenly?  They also get rid of the PR problem associated with low Milb wages.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    We already have HS players saying they don't choose baseball for this reason.....they can make so much more in football or basketball (not that it is realistic for the vast majority of them), and make it day one without 5 years riding buses and losing money (though your plan fixes the money losing issue).

    Really, they can afford more than they are now paying....no issue. They choose not to, which is their right, of course. 

    Economics is the thing we'll never agree on when it comes to baseball.....I'm ok with that.

    I would advocate that a larger piece of the pie goes to Milb players regardless of how they fund it but make no mistake where that money would come from.  Like every other business, if the spend more in one area, they will spend less in another.  The owners are not going change their total spending level.  They would reallocate MLB salary expenditures.  That's why the players association has not made higher Milb pay a priority.    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Major League Ready said:

    I would advocate that a larger piece of the pie goes to Milb players regardless of how they fund it but make no mistake where that money would come from.  Like every other business, if the spend more in one area, they will spend less in another.  The owners are not going change their total spending level.  They would reallocate MLB salary expenditures.  That's why the players association has not made higher Milb pay a priority.    

    Agreed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The big bonuses for top draft picks are because those players are perceived to be worth much more than the bonus. Why take money away from the players perceived to be the most talented and give it to less talented players? In order for the union to work you need to take care of the star players as well as the scrubs.

    Top talent has choices. Some will play a different sport. Some will go to college and get paid through NIL endorsements. Some may go overseas. Some will play independently until their draft rights expire and sign a free agent deal. Some will choose to play another year of college instead of taking the bonus.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    The big bonuses for top draft picks are because those players are perceived to be worth much more than the bonus. Why take money away from the players perceived to be the most talented and give it to less talented players? In order for the union to work you need to take care of the star players as well as the scrubs.

    Top talent has choices. Some will play a different sport. Some will go to college and get paid through NIL endorsements. Some may go overseas. Some will play independently until their draft rights expire and sign a free agent deal. Some will choose to play another year of college instead of taking the bonus.

    How many are going to play another sport?  This is a hyperbolic argument.  We hear about every top prospect that could be drafted into another sport and they are a tiny percentage of the players that are actually top prospects in 2 sports.  Name 5 from the last 10 years.  Then, how many of those players with the potential to earn hundreds of millions will decide based on their draft bonus.  If they are not in the top half of the first round, the money is not that consequential especially if there is any indication they are more likely to succeed in baseball.  Their perceived relative ability to succeed in one sport over the other is more likely to influence their decision.

    What difference does it make if a player stays for another year of college or plays independent ball.  How does that impact the product we pay to see?  How does it change MLB at all?

    Why should players get paid on perceived value?  They are going to make an insane amount of money if they actually live up to the perception so why should they be paid on perception.   How is it fair that Mark Appel get's $6.35M to fail and many prospects get less than $100K to succeed?  This union is totally focused on stars and the rest get the scraps.   If the money paid to perceived stars that fail was allocated to all players, Milb players would be well compensated.  It sure seems to pay the enormous money when players actually earn it while taking much better care of all the other players who make these league possible.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...