Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Veterans Or Youth


    Seth Stohs

    Recently, left-handed reliever Matt Thornton signed a minor league deal with the San Diego Padres. He was one of many left-handed relievers mentioned on this site this offseason.

    Meanwhile, the Twins have more than a half-dozen relief pitchers in the upper levels of the minor leagues who could be ready to contribute at some point during the 2016 season.

    Therein lies the struggle. Is it better to have aging veterans whose careers are clearly on the downward trajectory or youth with loads of talent but minimal (if any) big league experience?

    The best answer? It’s best to have players who are still in their prime with a ton of talent. However, we all know that teams are comprised of solely all-star caliber players aged 24 to 31.

    The real answer is that each team is going to be comprised of some veterans and some rookies. But the Twins had some tough decisions this offseason, and there will be more next offseason, and every subsequent offseason. This offseason, the bullpen was the focal point, and this very topic is at the crux of what happened, or what didn’t happen, if you prefer.

    Image courtesy of William Parmeter (L to R: Row 1: Alex Meyer, JT Chargois, Nick Burdi, Row 2: Mason Melotakis, Jake Reed, Taylor Rogers)

    Early in the offseason, Terry Ryan spoke frequently about the need to improve the bullpen, a bullpen that really struggled, especially in the second half of last season. As we got to the Winter Meetings, the focus became left-handed pitching. Yet, as the offseason continued on and now spring training has started, the Twins went without signing or trading for any MLB relief pitchers.

    Some can argue that the Twins accomplished some measure of addition by subtraction. They chose not to bring back free agents Blaine Boyer, Brian Duensing or Neal Cotts (each signed a minor league contract elsewhere shortly before spring training).

    Glen Perkins. Kevin Jepsen. Casey Fien. Probably Trevor May, as we assume he’ll be in the bullpen and not the rotation. We know it’s very possible that Ricky Nolasco or Tommy Milone, whichever is not the team’s fifth starter, will be in the bullpen. That leaves just two spots that are really open (assuming no trades, or any injuries - which of course can’t be assumed).

    Michael Tonkin is out of options. He will get a very long look. Many will say that he is a favorite for one more spot. I am one of them, though I do not think his roster spot is a given.

    So, let’s get back to the question at the top. Do we want veterans or young players with upside?

    39-year-old Matt Thornton has been a high-quality left-handed reliever for a decade. He was truly great from 2008 to 2010 when he threw really hard (mid-to-upper 90s) for the White Sox. While his velocity and strikeout rates have dropped the last five years, he still had an ERA under 2.00 last year. Will that continue as he approaches 40? Maybe.

    Neal Cotts, Brian Duensing, Manny Parra and others fall a category or two lower than Thornton. They’re a little younger, and they have had some experience and a bit of success over the last five to six years. They are veterans, but there isn’t a lot of potential. They are sixth and seventh inning type of guys.

    Reading the forums of Twins Daily the last couple of years, there are many who think that those lower-leverage situations are ideal for a young pitcher with upside. Remember, between Perkins, Jepsen, May and Fien, the 8th and 9th innings are pretty well covered. If things are going well, that group could cover the 7th inning at times as well. Ricky Nolasco (if he’s in the bullpen) is the likely long reliever.

    Let’s not call Michael Tonkin a given yet. So, do we want those veterans for the sixth and seventh inning, or do we want youngsters in those two remaining spots in the bullpen?

    SEEN THEM, STILL YOUNG (RH RP)

    Ryan Pressly was doing well when he was injured last year. He deserves another opportunity and will pitch well. JR Graham was up due to the Rule 5 rules last year, and he has a lot of talent. Most likely, he’ll do what Pressly has done and spend plenty of time in AAA in 2016. Alex Meyer clearly has a world of talent and will likely get an opportunity at some point in 2016 and has huge upside. He’s got to throw more strikes. Tonkin himself fits into this category.

    YOUNG FLAMETHROWERS (RH RP)

    JT Chargois sure had an impressive spring debut on Thursday night. He coaxed three weak ground balls with his mid-to-upper-90s fastball, solid slurve and good change-up. He missed 2013 and 2014 due to injury, but he returned in 2015. He began in Ft. Myers, but he worked up to Chattanooga where he became the closer for the Southern League champions.

    Jake Reed came on with two on and one out in the 2nd on Thursday. He showed his mid-90s fastball, slider and a lot of movement. He needed a few pitches, but he got the double play. He was drafted in 2014 and dominated in two levels plus the AFL. In 2015, he jumped to AA where he struggled. After time in Ft. Myers he returned to the Lookouts, and then he pitched well in the AFL.

    Nick Burdi, like Chargois, can touch triple digits, and he has a strong slider too. He was terrific in the AFL, looking like he had found some control and had a great slider working. If he can continue with those pitches he will be up soon.These three are not likely to make the Opening Day roster, but all three of them could be ready within a month or two of the season.

    MINOR LEAGUE SIGNINGS (RH RP)

    The Twins signed veteran reliever Brandon Kintzler to a minor league deal. He had a couple of good years before a leg injury cost him much of his 2015 season.

    MINOR LEAGUE SIGNINGS (LH RP)

    The Twins brought back Aaron Thompson who was good for them the first four or five weeks of the season, and then struggled and went to AAA. But, he could be adequate in the short-term. The Twins signed two guys out of independent ball who won’t make the team, Dan Runzler and Buddy Boschers, but could make an impression in spring training and be an option later. The one veteran lefty reliever with an opportunity, most likely, to make the Opening Day roster is Fernando Abad. He’s just past 30, and he’s had some big league success. We’ll see. Though he is no longer on the 40-man roster, Logan Darnell could fill a left-handed reliever (or long-reliever) role out of the bullpen for the Twins in 2016. Darnell is not on the 40-man roster because the Twins signed lefty Mike Strong, who will compete for a job in Chattanooga or Rochester this spring at age 27.

    YOUNG LEFTIES

    Taylor Rogers had a rough - yes, really rough - 2016 spring debut on Thursday night. The first five batters reached, three scored, before he got the final three batters out. He even gave up back-to-back doubles to left-handers. However, of 202 lefties he faced in 2015 in AAA, he gave up just three extra-base hits (all doubles). He has a track record of dominating lefties. No, he’s never really pitched out of the bullpen, but he has the potential to be really, really good. High upside, lacking in experience.

    I’ll put 27-year-old Ryan O’Rourke in this category too. He spent the second half of 2015 with the Twins. He has made a career out of dominating left-handers as well. He did that with the Twins, at least until late in the season when he was used sparingly and in situations where he had to get both lefties and righties out.

    Mason Melotakis is potentially the left-handed equivalent to Burdi and Chargois. He missed all of 2015 but came back in Instructs hitting 97. He is a three-pitch pitcher with very nasty stuff. He really just needs to get some innings in the minors before throwing him into the big leagues. But he’s another that shouldn’t surprise us if we see him a lot in 2016.

    WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

    I mean, it’s going to mean something different to everyone. Have I mentioned Tony Sipp or Antonio Bastardo? No, because I fully understand not wanting to go three years on them. That is especially true as upside guys like Yorman Landa, Brandon Peterson and Trevor Hildenberger get closer too.

    I think the key points are these:

    • The Twins have four guys at the back end of the bullpen that they can, most likely, rely upon. (Glen Perkins, Kevin Jepsen, Trevor May and Casey Fien)
    • Michael Tonkin and Ricky Nolasco likely have the upper hand early in spring training on roster spots.
    • The Twins could go with veteran relievers. They brought a couple in with some big league success (Fernando Abad, Brandon Kintzler). There are still a couple out there who the Twins could sign if things go poorly for the other lefties this spring (Franklyn Morales, Randy Choate, Joe Beimel). Based on the volatility of relief pitchers, any of them could be good, or bad, for the year.
    • The Twins could choose to have their final bullpen spot or two filled by high upside pitchers that can be brought along slowly in lower-leverage situations. The fact that they have a bunch of options means that they shouldn’t be afraid to send these guys up and down from time to time throughout the season.

    So, who are the highest upside guys right now? In my mind, there are five guys that I would consider going with early in the season. Alex Meyer has huge upside. JT Chargois and Nick Burdi have the biggest upsides, and are both very nearly ready. Jake Reed is close to that level as well. Mason Melotakis has a huge upside, is left-handed, and now just needs to work some innings. He may not be down long. And, Taylor Rogers in a low-leverage situation where he can go 1-2 innings, or just go against left-handers, can be very good.

    That is list of six guys who may be ready in 2016. We thought some of them would be ready in 2015, and they weren’t. It’s possible that they won’t be again in 2016. If not, that shows bigger issues in the organization that likely need to be addressed. The talent is there, and they need to get to the big leagues.

    The only way to get them experience is to give them experience. That obviously starts this spring. They will take their lumps. So will veterans. So, the Twins (and fans) need to decide whether they want the lumps taken by a veteran like Matt Thornton or guys who could become the next Matt Thornton (circa 2008-2010). There is no way for the Twins (or fans) to know what the right decision is for 2016. That’s why they play the games.

    BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE

    These veteran versus high-upside, unproven talent questions happen all over the place. Consider the starting rotation. In theory, it’s possible that the Twins could decide on a rotation of Santana, Hughes, Gibson, Nolasco and Milone and let Duffey and Berrios go to Rochester. Duffey is pretty solidly penciled in to the starting rotation, but Berrios has very little chance to be on the Opening Day roster.

    As fans, do we want the veteran like Nolasco, who has had some measure of success in the past, or do we want to see the high-upside of Berrios?

    Behind the plate, do we want to see the veteran in Kurt Suzuki, or would we prefer to see John Ryan Murphy get more playing time?

    There’s a reason that we want the Twins to go with Byron Buxton as their center fielder from Opening Day. It isn’t a certainty that he is ready right now. It’s a confidence that his upside and potential are very high. Meanwhile a certain sect of Twins fans were disappointed when Rajai Davis signed elsewhere. Signing Davis would affect a roster spot and, more important, playing time for Buxton, or Eddie Rosario, or eventually Max Kepler.

    Some fans even see a scenario where trading an all-star, a proven veteran and a still-just-28-year-old Brian Dozier to make room for Jorge Polanco.

    In 2006, we saw the Twins sign veterans Juan Castro and Tony Batista to man the left-side of the infield. By mid-June those two were gone and Jason Bartlett and Nick Punto took over, and the team took off.

    That’s not to say that going with a veteran is always wrong either. On the right contract, a veteran can be great. The Twins have had plenty of success with minor league free agent signings in recent years (Jared Burton, Sam Deduno, Chris Colabello, Casey Fien, etc.). They’ve had success, at least for one year with major league signings (Phil Hughes, Josh Willingham). They’ve had failures with free agent signings too (Lamb, Nolasco, etc). Unfortunately in baseball, played by people as it is, there is no way to guarantee what kind of performance you will get from any player, veteran, or rookie.

    In 1991, the Twins signed Jack Morris, who wasn’t very good the two previous seasons in Detroit. They could have gone with the young guy with upside, like David West or something. They signed veteran Chili Davis rather than going with someone like Paul Sorrento. A year earlier, they had traded prospects for an upper-30s Bert Blyleven, and they re-acquired a long-time veteran Roy Smalley. I guess they were bringing back the gang, right?

    So what is the 'right' strategy, and can the answer to that question change? In other words, was the answer different during the 90-loss seasons than in 2016 when the team is expecting to compete for a playoff berth?

    We are two games into spring training. Opening Day is a month away. A lot of decisions will be made. Some will prove right. Some will prove wrong. But will the philosophy be to go with veterans, or will it be to go with youth and talent? My guess is that it will be a little of both. The important thing after making those Opening Day roster decisions, will be how quickly changes will be made.

     Share

    Featured Video


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'd be just fine with a youth movement in the bullpen. I just don't see it happening until June at the soonest, and I'm concerned that we'll be giving away wins early.

     

    A nitpick - Mike Lamb wasn't 2006. That was Tony Batista.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With the number of pitching option they have in the system, they need to make roster space to see what they can do in the majors.  If they fail, Ryan can alway add bullpen through a trade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In a way, what the FO does with Nolasco will be an indicator on whether it's business as usual. If he is in the rotation solely based on his veteran contract status, that's not a good sign. Signing him just didn't work out, sometimes you just have to bite the bullet, and move on!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you go with youth, you can send them up and down to AAA when they need a break, or to work on something. If you go with veterans, well, unless they stink (i.e., they aren't just meh), you have kind of stuck yourself with them, with no flexibility. 

     

    Plus, let's be honest, they probably aren't WS favorites this year. Let's get the youth here, and see what they have.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In a way, what the FO does with Nolasco will be an indicator on whether it's business as usual. If he is in the rotation solely based on his veteran contract status, that's not a good sign. Signing him just didn't work out, sometimes you just have to bite the bullet, and move on!

    Funny, I was thinking along the same lines. If Nolasco has a horrendous spring and still makes the team, I won't be happy. I think Nolasco should be let go if he shows he's still the same pitcher the Twins had last year. The Twins can lose just as easily with younger better yet untested arms.

    Edited by Blake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Nolasco goes thru spring pitching "Twins-Nolasco-like", is there any chance they just dump him?  Or is it possible he develops another nagging injury that puts him on the 180 day DL again?  

    I know it's only game 2 of spring, but it looked the same as the last two seasons.  Nobody chases his off speed pitches, and then he has to groove it.  If it comes down to watching him struggle for two months, I'd rather see a young guy struggle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There wasn't anything promising about LOLasco last night. Which is too bad. With Brett Anderson going down with injury for the Dodgers, I think it's safe to say we all wish Nolasco could be traded there for a bucket of sunflower seeds. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think league wide we saw last year that the better physical attributes of young guys trumped the experience of the veterans. Just look at the All Star game, it was almost all made up of guys in their 20s, and if the Twins ranked their pitchers and hitters last year, their performances would line up pretty nearly inverse to their ages.

     

    We live in such a technological age that coaches can instruct young players at all levels of the minors much easier. These guys have film, they have detailed scouting reports and they can still watch Tom Emanski videos if need be. Even though they aren't paid like it, minor leaguer's full-time job is baseball, they practice year-round now, it's not like how it used to be.

     

    The experience gap has surely been cut from what it was when Nuke LaLoosh got all of his advice from mound visits from Crash and sleeping with his baseball groupie girlfriend.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you go with youth, you can send them up and down to AAA when they need a break, or to work on something. If you go with veterans, well, unless they stink (i.e., they aren't just meh), you have kind of stuck yourself with them, with no flexibility. 

     

    Plus, let's be honest, they probably aren't WS favorites this year. Let's get the youth here, and see what they have.

     

    Absolutely correct... They'll get a chance to work with Neil Allen and Eddie Guardado. They may meet some struggles (they will), and they can be optioned with an encouraging message of "Here's what you need to work on, and you'll be back soon." They can replace that guy with another young guy.

     

    That's what I would do. I'm not suggesting that's what the Twins will do, and of course, I don't necessarily think there isn't value in having veteran types too. It should be a mix though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If Nolasco goes thru spring pitching "Twins-Nolasco-like", is there any chance they just dump him?  Or is it possible he develops another nagging injury that puts him on the 180 day DL again?  

    I know it's only game 2 of spring, but it looked the same as the last two seasons.  Nobody chases his off speed pitches, and then he has to groove it.  If it comes down to watching him struggle for two months, I'd rather see a young guy struggle.

     

    Fair point. I won't worry ever about any one outing, but I feel better about Taylor Rogers clearly looking nervous and short-arming pitches and not having real good control in his inning than about Nolasco getting rocked.

     

    Though, to be fair, Nolasco was hurt a little by his RF, but even there, that ball was absolutely crushed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There wasn't anything promising about LOLasco last night. Which is too bad. With Brett Anderson going down with injury for the Dodgers, I think it's safe to say we all wish Nolasco could be traded there for a bucket of sunflower seeds. 

    It's a position of need for the Dodgers. I think we should try and leverage Nolasco's early success and make a strong push for BBQ flavor. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does JR Graham have any shot at making the roster?

     

    Really, Really wish TR would have brought in Bastardo. The back end of the bullpen is shaping up nicely with a May-Jepsen-Perkins but if we need someone to work a 6th inning I am worried unless Abad does anything real well? May could maybe also pitch two innings at a time. 

     

    I am not sold on Nolasco pitching anywhere for an MLB team. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The time to add aging players with a year or two of competitive talent is when we are close to a WS team and have an obvious weakness.   Otherwise, keep the young players in the majors, let them go up and down if needed, and play to a positive future.  

    For years KC talked about potential and struggled, but then the talent came together and they made the push forward.  This is what the Twins need to do.  We are not going to sign a Price or Lester so lets be smart in developing talent and moving the vets as the youth is ready to go.

    Letting Nolasco go will be hard on the Twins FO, but if he fails it is necessary for the fanbase, who are the real employers of these players. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Does JR Graham have any shot at making the roster?

     

    Really, Really wish TR would have brought in Bastardo. The back end of the bullpen is shaping up nicely with a May-Jepsen-Perkins but if we need someone to work a 6th inning I am worried unless Abad does anything real well? May could maybe also pitch two innings at a time. 

     

    I am not sold on Nolasco pitching anywhere for an MLB team. 

     

    He fits into the category with Pressly and Tonkin and such. He could, but after being pushed to MLB last year, and likely learning a ton, he can got back to AAA and hopefully develop more and more.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Fair point. I won't worry ever about any one outing, but I feel better about Taylor Rogers clearly looking nervous and short-arming pitches and not having real good control in his inning than about Nolasco getting rocked.

     

    Though, to be fair, Nolasco was hurt a little by his RF, but even there, that ball was absolutely crushed.

    Seth, my problem with the Nolasco outing is the abject failure of the last two season. I sort of expected he would show up ready to prove he wants to pitch in a Twins uniform. Nolasco was not exactly facing Boston's "A" lineup, either.

     

    I am more than willing to cut Rogers some slack, due to age and inexperience. Nolasco, no.

    Edited by Blake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seth, my problem with the Nolasco outing is the abject failure of the last two season. I sort of expected he would show up ready to prove he wants to pitch in a Twins uniform. Nolasco was not exactly facing Boston's "A" lineup, either.

     

    I am more than willing to cut Rogers some slack, due to age and inexperience. Nolasco, no.

    Sometimes, getting too amped up to prove you should be there can be destructive. There is plenty of time to evaluate Nolasco, there's no need to put too much emphasis on his performance yesterday (and I'm saying this as a person who doesn't like Nolasco, not even a little bit).
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Seth, my problem with the Nolasco outing is the abject failure of the last two season. I sort of expected he would show up ready to prove he wants to pitch in a Twins uniform. Nolasco was not exactly facing Boston's "A" lineup, either.

     

    I am more than willing to cut Rogers some slack, due to age and inexperience. Nolasco, no.

     

    The results of Nolasco's outing were still pretty meaningless in the big picture. Regardless of who he was facing. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sometimes, getting too amped up to prove you should be there can be destructive. There is plenty of time to evaluate Nolasco, there's no need to put too much emphasis on his performance yesterday (and I'm saying this as a person who doesn't like Nolasco, not even a little bit).

    I get that. Let's hope Nolasco turns things around. And, let's hope the Twins dump him if he doesn't.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The results of Nolasco's outing were still pretty meaningless in the big picture. Regardless of who he was facing. 

    You're more in tune with these things than I am. I'll take your word for it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not a given that Casey Fien rebounds from last year's disappointing numbers. I would have liked him to face competition in Spring Training, but that doesn't appear to be the case. He's got to be able to at least raise his K/9 past 6.0. 

     

    This is why I'm worried about our bullpen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any word on the early velocity readings from any of these guys? Watched the game last night and noticed it was shown on the scoreboard, but it was not on TV. I know things can change, but sometimes early readings have a guy throwing much higher or lower than before, which can give us something to go off of. 

     

    Part of the problem of assuming guys will be as good or bad as the year before, or yeas before is that they assume they can recapture once accomplished stats with diminished stuff and velocity. If Hughes is going to get back to how he pitched 2 years ago...it is never going to happen with his velocity from last year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Youth. Absolutely. We are talking about 6th and 7th inning guys...for now...not the back end of the bullpen. It's a perfect opportunity to break in to the majors with less overall pressure. As previously stated, the overall numbers are such that the train can keep busy running from Minnesota to Rochester all season if guys need time or work.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Young vs. veteran should not be the question here. 

     

    I want the Twins to go up North with their 7 (?) best relievers, and the 25 best players in general. 

     

    This is a team that competed last season so it should start acting like a competing team.

     

    BTW, so far it looks like the Twins are experiencing the curse of Brian Duensing.  None of the lefties who are auditioning for his spot have been good so far, with a couple of the most promising on paper (Rogers and Melotakis) melting down.

     

    Nope.  O'Rourke at 27 is not young (well in baseball terms), he is just inexperienced.

     

    Tonkin is likely the next in the DFA list...

     

    I like what I have seen from Chargois so far

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First outings of the spring do not mean much.  Much more interested in 2 weeks when regulars start playing more and pitchers who have a chance of making the club pitch meaningful innings.

    If Nolasco is getting rocked around March 25, will really hope the Twins cut him, and most clubs will for veterans to give them a chance to catch on elsewhere.  Keeping him because of his contact should not be an option as it was 3-4 years ago, when other options did not exist.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...