Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 262

Thread: MLB Draft Discussion: Day One

  1. #241
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnarthor View Post
    Guess they were lucky to win all those games and develop two MVPs. -sigh- I really don't understand why there's so much negativity. They're in a down cycle, it's normal.
    There's no such thing as a "down cycle." Some teams choose to rebuild- the Twins amped up spending and collapsed anyway. That's just making poor decisions and having it catch up to them. No one forced them to make bad decisions.

  2. #242
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    78
    Does the Bard pick remind anyone else of Bashore? I hope he doesn't go the same route.

  3. #243
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer J-Dog Dungan's Avatar

    Posts
    622
    Are the Twins hoping that Mitch Brown slips to them in the second round, or are we seeing them liking him where they actually might not?

  4. #244
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnarthor View Post
    Guess they were lucky to win all those games and develop two MVPs. -sigh- I really don't understand why there's so much negativity. They're in a down cycle, it's normal.

    You could count the number of good draft picks, good trades and development sucess stories on one hand for this organization. Terry Ryan is skating by on the rep he built 10-20 years ago. Lately Terry, Radcliffe, Billy Smith, Johnson etc have been outclassed by smarter more modern-thinking front office folks. It is a fact that the game has passed these good old boys by. This organization is loyal to a fault and it will doom them for years.

  5. #245
    Junior Member Rookie Bojangles's Avatar

    Posts
    28
    Buxton has a chance to be the player we all were told Benson, Hicks, Revere and Span could be.
    Span and Revere are exactly what we were told they would be. Span may be even slightly better. Hicks was a raw, toolsy, mid first round pick. He's shown flashes and is still developing (and young.) A reasonable arc for him. Benson was a goddamn second round pick, and still has a good chance to develop into a major leaguer. Or were you expecting Bryce Harper?

    I look forward to years worth of posts lamenting on how Buxton isn't Ken Griffey Jr. yet. I mean, can the Twins do anything right?
    Last edited by Bojangles; 06-04-2012 at 10:14 PM.
    Joe Mauer should hit more home runs. JMO.

  6. #246
    Member Rookie
    Posts
    37
    John Manuel ‏@johnmanuelba
    Patrick Wisdom is the biggest reach in supp round so far. He hit in the past but serious draft-itis this year.

    So at least the Twins didn't reach as much as the Cardinals or now the Rangers with Collin Wiles, at least according to Manuel.

  7. #247
    Senior Member All-Star thrylos98's Avatar

    Posts
    2,421
    Quote Originally Posted by J-Dog Dungan View Post
    Are the Twins hoping that Mitch Brown slips to them in the second round, or are we seeing them liking him where they actually might not?
    Mitch Brown is a 3rd-4th round pick for most teams. The Twins have overvalued him because of proximity
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  8. #248
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,258
    thrylos, BA has Mitch Brown number 44 on their list, he's not a 3-4th round pick.
    Win Twins.

  9. #249
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,345
    Quote Originally Posted by thrylos98 View Post
    Mitch Brown is a 3rd-4th round pick for most teams. The Twins have overvalued him because of proximity
    First, the Twins haven't taken him, so it's a bit early to say the Twins are overvaluing him. The fact that they passed on him twice seems to indicate that. Second, BA had him rated #44 overall, Sickels had him #30 overall. Klaw said he was a solid pick for the Twins but I don't have insider so I don't know where he was ranked. So, in any event, there's nothing out there that supports either your claim that the Twins over value him or that he's a 3rd round pick for most teams.

  10. #250
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar

    Posts
    2,300
    Plawecki went higher than even I thought. The Mets are very smart (for a change).

  11. #251
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    78
    mlb.com has him at 51 and Sickles had him at 29 I think. I'm hoping for Brown and Brett-Walker tomorrow......that means it won't happen

  12. #252
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,258
    Anyone worried that one of the players put on 25 pounds and saw his FB jump in speed in 1 year?
    Win Twins.

  13. #253
    Senior Member Triple-A righty8383's Avatar

    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by thrylos98 View Post
    Mitch Brown is a 3rd-4th round pick for most teams. The Twins have overvalued him because of proximity
    Overvalued at 45 by Keith Law too I guess.

  14. #254
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    83
    Just by seeing video it is obvious the kid the twins took at 32 is much more athletic than Brown. Brown throws hard but it is pretty straight and his breaking ball needs a lot of work. He's also more like 5'10 or 5'11 not 6'2. I like him at pick 62 or 72 for Twins.

  15. #255
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    78
    Guys I like at 63 and 72: Mitch Brown, Kieren Lovegrove, Ty Buttrey, Peter O'Brian, Adam Brett-Walker, RJ Alverez, Wyatt Mathisen, Nolan Fontana, Brett Moonyham, and Nolan Sandburn (I'm assuming that Hunter Virant is unsignable) are just a few names that have jumped out at me. I'm assuming though that it's gonna be some Juco OF that none of us have heard of(and will probably end up being the equivalent of Jason Pridie) I guess I've been a Twins fan too long.....

  16. #256
    Senior Member Double-A PMKI's Avatar

    Posts
    128
    I can't believe how negative you guys are on here.

  17. #257
    Member Rookie denarded's Avatar

    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by PMKI View Post
    I can't believe how negative you guys are on here.
    (nodding head, sadly)
    Wikipedia is for suckers

  18. #258
    Senior Member Triple-A Gernzy's Avatar

    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by PMKI View Post
    I can't believe how negative you guys are on here.
    Welcome to the internet. Come here often?
    I bent my wookie...

  19. #259
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    78
    It's funny because I was really high on McCullers and Correa and really down on Appel. This morning here in Houston the sports talk guys were having a fit by passing up the "sure thing" in Appel for a 17 year old and they didn't like McCullers because he was gonna be expensive and his dad was just ok. It's interesting the reactions in different places

  20. #260
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,258
    All the posters complaining about "negativity", what would you like to do in a discusson about the draft? Only read positive stuff? I'm good with the Buxton pick, has a chance to be great. Wasn't keen at all on the other two picks, not even a little. But I don't get what people want in a discussion about the draft.....if you don't want discussions both pro and con, what do you want?
    Win Twins.

Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2013 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

SEO by vBSEO