Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Jason Bartlett

  • Please log in to reply
127 replies to this topic

#1 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 656 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:00 PM

I have no idea how Jason Bartlett made this team. When I looked at his spring training stats and it looks even worse, 3 hits in 38 AB's is good enough to make the club? The bigger joke is him being a super utility and back up CF.
I hate to start such a negative post, but how could there not be any better players on waivers than Jason Bartlett.

#2 boomerb5

boomerb5

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 23 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:08 PM

There aren't any guys that Gardy is so deeply in love with. Except maybe Kubel. If the club is going to lose 100 games, I'd rather it be with young players that were maybe rushed a little bit than "proven veterans" with AA-caliber skills.

#3 nathanaakre

nathanaakre

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 15 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:10 PM

Not saying he's going to be representing the American League at Target Field in July, but give the guy a chance in real games. He's hardly played in two years. I hope the same people that blew off Hicks' hot spring last year as "only spring training" (you were right by the way) aren't the same people destroying Kubel and Bartlett for their springs this year. Maybe they won't come around, but they were both very good hitters before - let's see if they can do it again!

#4 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,894 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:18 PM

Not saying he's going to be representing the American League at Target Field in July, but give the guy a chance in real games. He's hardly played in two years. I hope the same people that blew off Hicks' hot spring last year as "only spring training" (you were right by the way) aren't the same people destroying Kubel and Bartlett for their springs this year. Maybe they won't come around, but they were both very good hitters before - let's see if they can do it again!


Other than in 2009, Bartlett has never been good.

Kubel is in freefall.

These are bad roster decisions.

#5 Craig Arko

Craig Arko

    Pluto or bust

  • Members
  • 2,981 posts
  • LocationEarth
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:21 PM

Other than in 2009, Bartlett has never been good.

Kubel is in freefall.

These are bad roster decisions.


Given the material to work with, what would the good roster decisions have been?

#6 BHtwins

BHtwins

    Member

  • Members
  • 80 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:26 PM

The problem isn't "giving them a chance" The problem is there is a finite number of roster positions and the players who lost them to Kubel and Bartlett have a brighter future even if they're not perennial starters.

Id rather be young and ugly with the opportunity to get better then old and ugly and stuck in neutral.

I hope I'm wrong but this maybe one of those errors in decision making.

#7 kblack1011

kblack1011

    Member

  • Members
  • 52 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:28 PM

Gardy is just setting up to bring Nick Punto back. Losing 90 games and getting an extension, he going for 100 loses and a lifetime contract.

#8 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,413 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:29 PM

If you want to know why people are down on him, look at his stats the last three years....this isn't an untested rookie. He's closer to my age than Buxton's age.

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#9 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 7,185 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:29 PM

Given the material to work with, what would the good roster decisions have been?


Sign better ones?

I don't get how people think there is some way to wiggle out of this for the Twins. These options stink. These are the options the Twins chose to go with into ST. No matter how you slice it the roster looks woefully unprepared.

#10 specialiststeve

specialiststeve

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:33 PM

Bingo!!

#11 S.

S.

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 207 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:40 PM

No matter how you slice it the roster looks woefully unprepared.

They're very prepared...





























...for another top draft pick!

Posted Image

#12 notoriousgod71

notoriousgod71

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,204 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:43 PM

There aren't any guys that Gardy is so deeply in love with. Except maybe Kubel. If the club is going to lose 100 games, I'd rather it be with young players that were maybe rushed a little bit than "proven veterans" with AA-caliber skills.


Funny, because Gardy hated him when we had Castro. Wonder what he did in a year and a half to earn Gardy's unconditional love.

#13 Craig Arko

Craig Arko

    Pluto or bust

  • Members
  • 2,981 posts
  • LocationEarth
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:51 PM

Sign better ones?

I don't get how people think there is some way to wiggle out of this for the Twins. These options stink. These are the options the Twins chose to go with into ST. No matter how you slice it the roster looks woefully unprepared.


A couple of weeks ago people had Gibson, Pinto, Hicks and Arcia all going to AAA. We now get to see them. Yup, it's going to take time to prepare them. That's not the end of the world.

#14 tobi0040

tobi0040

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,561 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:54 PM

Other than in 2009, Bartlett has never been good.

Kubel is in freefall.

These are bad roster decisions.


He was at least a league average ss in 2006 to 2008 and 2010. I actually think he has better odds of starting next year than parmelee or pressley did. or even florimon. even at 35 and that is sad.

Edited by tobi0040, 27 March 2014 - 03:58 PM.


#15 Dman

Dman

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 618 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 03:58 PM

I predicted that Bartlett would make the team before spring training started. After watching him in Spring training I was hoping that I was going to be wrong about that. I hate to go negative but I am with most posters who believe there had to be better options than JB.

Maybe a good club house guy is just what this teams needs? I don't know what else to say.

#16 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 7,185 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:03 PM

A couple of weeks ago people had Gibson, Pinto, Hicks and Arcia all going to AAA. We now get to see them. Yup, it's going to take time to prepare them. That's not the end of the world.


None of those players have anything to do with this. We were going to get to see them regardless of this.

#17 Craig Arko

Craig Arko

    Pluto or bust

  • Members
  • 2,981 posts
  • LocationEarth
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:11 PM

None of those players have anything to do with this. We were going to get to see them regardless of this.


I hope you have an enjoyable season in your own way. I plan to.

#18 zwiefz

zwiefz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 35 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:15 PM

Jason Bartlett made the team for a few reasons in my opinion:

1)He apparently is versatile defensively, although I haven't seen enough of him play anywhere besides shortstop to verify that myself so I have to trust those who have been watching him daily

2)He is essentially another coach who will help teach the younger players the "Twins Way". That phrase has brought nothing but scorn and laughter the past few years, but Bartlett was around when it actually existed, was something to be proud of, and something to strive for. This is the same reason that guys like TK and Guardado are brought in for spring training instructors.

3)He knows and is comfortable with his role. He is the 25th man. Very little is expected offensively from the 25th man on any team in MLB. What is expected is someone who is professional and is ready to go that once(maybe twice) a week when someone needs a break or gets hurt. Otherwise they essentially rot on the bench. I would rather have that position be filled with an expendable veteran than a young player who still has room to grow and truly would rot if left on the bench. Chris Hermann, Danny Santana, and some of those guys that are close need to play.

So, basically I think Bartlett(and Kubel to a lesser extent) are great guys to have on the bench-so long at that's where they are. If Bartlett plays sparingly than I think it is great. If Gardenhire develops a Punto-ish crush on him and plays him daily then I will agree that it makes no sense. Only time will tell.

#19 Craig Arko

Craig Arko

    Pluto or bust

  • Members
  • 2,981 posts
  • LocationEarth
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:17 PM

Jason Bartlett made the team for a few reasons in my opinion:

1)He apparently is versatile defensively, although I haven't seen enough of him play anywhere besides shortstop to verify that myself so I have to trust those who have been watching him daily

2)He is essentially another coach who will help teach the younger players the "Twins Way". That phrase has brought nothing but scorn and laughter the past few years, but Bartlett was around when it actually existed, was something to be proud of, and something to strive for. This is the same reason that guys like TK and Guardado are brought in for spring training instructors.

3)He knows and is comfortable with his role. He is the 25th man. Very little is expected offensively from the 25th man on any team in MLB. What is expected is someone who is professional and is ready to go that once(maybe twice) a week when someone needs a break or gets hurt. Otherwise they essentially rot on the bench. I would rather have that position be filled with an expendable veteran than a young player who still has room to grow and truly would rot if left on the bench. Chris Hermann, Danny Santana, and some of those guys that are close need to play.

So, basically I think Bartlett(and Kubel to a lesser extent) are great guys to have on the bench-so long at that's where they are. If Bartlett plays sparingly than I think it is great. If Gardenhire develops a Punto-ish crush on him and plays him daily then I will agree that it makes no sense. Only time will tell.


Yeah, Bartlett is more or less this year's Jamie Carroll.

#20 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,413 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 04:20 PM

Which young players is he going to teach? Plouffe? Floriman? Dozier? Mauer? Suzuki? Kubel? Willingham? that is 7/9 of your starters......who are these mythical young players on the roster?

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.