Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store


Photo

Article: The Twins Thin Pitching Herd

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Parker Hageman

Parker Hageman

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 1,366 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:16 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...e-Pitching-Herd

#2 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    Old Geezer

  • Members
  • 1,384 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:33 PM

The Twins starting staff this year will have only Gibson as a Twins draft pick. The Red Wing starting staff as Len 3 had in a recent post has only Logan Darnell. That means out of our top 10 starting pitchers only 2 were drafted and developed by the Twins.

Doesn't that say maybe it's time to look at who and how the Twins are evaluating pitchers?

#3 pierre75275

pierre75275

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 285 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:39 PM

kudos to twins management to get something out of nothing. it will be interesting to see if Diamond clears. My guess is somebody takes him

#4 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 830 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:48 PM

This is the pitch to contact vs the pitch to miss bats change that took place about 2 years ago. Also has something to say where the Twins were drafting from 2001 - 2010. After the first 5-10 draft picks in a year(1st round), it is a draft and develop issue, you no longer have sure things.
Worley was a good change, but is was May the Twins wanted. Just did not work out, too bad

#5 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,293 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:48 PM

The Twins starting staff this year will have only Gibson as a Twins draft pick. The Red Wing starting staff as Len 3 had in a recent post has only Logan Darnell. That means out of our top 10 starting pitchers only 2 were drafted and developed by the Twins.

Doesn't that say maybe it's time to look at who and how the Twins are evaluating pitchers?


There are other factors: they likely aren't able to scout (closely) that many--thus missing entirely on them, then there is the development process.

#6 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,298 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:57 PM

And Diamond is put through waivers as well...

The Twins starting staff this year will have only Gibson as a Twins draft pick. The Red Wing starting staff as Len 3 had in a recent post has only Logan Darnell. That means out of our top 10 starting pitchers only 2 were drafted and developed by the Twins.

Doesn't that say maybe it's time to look at who and how the Twins are evaluating pitchers?


I definitely see a difference there in the last 2-3 seasons, starting with Gibson's draft. We shall see how it turns out.

On the other hand, if you look at the Tigers and the Red Sox, they had only 2 pitchers they drafted in their rotation last season, the Dodgers had one. There is so much player movement these days, that it is hard to have a rotation of 5 drafted players...
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#7 minnymadness

minnymadness

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:06 PM

The Twins starting staff this year will have only Gibson as a Twins draft pick. The Red Wing starting staff as Len 3 had in a recent post has only Logan Darnell. That means out of our top 10 starting pitchers only 2 were drafted and developed by the Twins.

Doesn't that say maybe it's time to look at who and how the Twins are evaluating pitchers?


I think we have but developing pitchers doesn't happen over night. Look at are farm systems. The guys we have drafted and signed internationally in the last 2 seasons have been of a different breed. Hopefully the control and throwing strikes doesn't change but a better job of mixing pitches with guys who can miss bats.

#8 Rosterman

Rosterman

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 994 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:53 PM

The Twins couldn't afford to stash him in the back of the bullpen (similar to Diamond). They could have a rotation of Logan, Dean, May, Pressley and Vasquez at Rochester. Meyer could advance. Diamond might stay in the mix. Wimmers should be there by now. I'm sure another body can be had. Part of the Worley/Diamond mess is also $$$ due each pitcher. Are they operating on a major/minor league split contract, do they get something in-between, or are both making whatever they have signed a contract for in the off-season.

#9 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 615 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:52 PM

Here's hoping the change in drafting and signing pays off in the next few years.

While Gibson will be the only home grown SP to begin the season with the club this year, I don't feel that in itself is a complete indictment of their system as a whole. Players at all positions, but in those focus SP 's, are acquired not only as draftees and young FA signees, but also through FA signings and trade. Some are acquired via trade of your own prospects, or are acquired via trade as prospects themselves, and then developed and promoted. In rare circumstances, you may even acquire a rule 5 player who develops, or a waver wire "reject" who finds himself late.

I hate to cover too much ground, but over the past 0-20 years the Twins, like most clubs, have used all of these methods to march out Radke, Silva, Milton, Santana, Slowey, Rogers and now Nolasco and Gibson just to offer up a few different examples.

Garza, not to bring up bad memories, is an example of a young player originally drafted by the Twins. Despite falling off the map after a few solid years, Slowey and Blackburn would be other examples who at least initially were solid pitchers. Some like Perkins and Swarzak found a different role for themselves.

The fact that Meyer and May, who have yet to arrive I grant you, we're originally drafted by other teams before being acquired by the Twins, and presumably developed and polished by them, should not be counted as a negative toward the Twins development system. That would be like saying Santana, just for example, wasn't a success story for the Twins system because someone else signed him first. The path to major league success is paved with the theoretical corpses of top pitching prospects who never made it despite "sure fire" prospect status.

If you have been around long enough, you would recall that in the md-80's, the Twins, believe it or not, invested heavily in a batch of hard throwing, high-ceiling youngsters that were universally regarded as top prospects. Playrers such as Banks, Gasser, Bumgarner, Nivens, Pittman and Newman. Even a couple of these young men developing to fruition could have had a major affect on the Twins in the late 80's and early 90's, despite the successes that they DID enjoy. For whatever unforgettable reasons, none of them turned out.

Whether deliberate or coindicental, possibly from drafting later in each round and/or having young fireballers flame out, the Twins seemed to draft SP's who thre softer, but had better control or polish. Some came through, even if they weren't all Brad Radke. And whether you want to blame poor scouting or bad luck, not all that long ago the Twins DID attempt to draft and develop Johnson, Ard and Serafini amongst others who never turned out. And while I offer no excuses, these young men and others entered the draft as well regarded prospects by all. Just goes to show how much of a crap shoot the MLB draft really can be.

I'm not sure where to pinpoint any dramatic change in scouting or philosophy, but the past couple of years the Twins DO seem to have focused once again on power arms with potential. Whether drafted, signed or traded for, I honestly can't remember the Twins ever having so many good to excellent young arms in their system as now. If even a couple of them develop to fruition, I will be a huge boost to the team's fortunes.

For this season, I feel the SP is the best it has, potentially, been in a few years.

#10 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:53 PM

The Twins starting staff this year will have only Gibson as a Twins draft pick. The Red Wing starting staff as Len 3 had in a recent post has only Logan Darnell. That means out of our top 10 starting pitchers only 2 were drafted and developed by the Twins.

Doesn't that say maybe it's time to look at who and how the Twins are evaluating pitchers?


Of course it does.
Lighten up Francis....

#11 Dantes929

Dantes929

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 319 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 09:47 PM

On the other hand, if you look at the Tigers and the Red Sox, they had only 2 pitchers they drafted in their rotation last season, the Dodgers had one. There is so much player movement these days, that it is hard to have a rotation of 5 drafted players...

I am guessing it is true of a lot of teams. There are probably others but the only team I can think of that has great representation of home grown is San Francisco. I think they had 4 of 5. None of them flame throwers by the way. Bat missability doesn't have to be with 96mph fastballs and pitching to contact did work to the tune of two WS championships. Pitching to contact should not mean throw meatball down the middle. Unfortunately for the Twins recently, it has meant that.

#12 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 09:00 AM

The difference is, the Twins claim their strategy, the TWins way, The only RIGHT way, is to build from within. If that is your strategy, is it working?
Lighten up Francis....

#13 Trevor0333

Trevor0333

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 313 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 10:01 AM

This is where the top 3 round misses from the 2007-2012 drafts really hurt.

2012 1st JO Berrios & Luke Bard; 2nd Mason Melotakis & JT Chargois
2011 1st Hudson Boyd 2nd Madison Boer 3rd Cory Williams
2010 1st Alex Wimmers 3rd Pat Dean
2009 1st Kyle Gibson & Matt Bashore; 2nd Billy Bullock 3rd Ben Tootle
2008 1st Carlos Guiterez & Shooter Hunt 3rd Bobby Lanigan
2007 No pitchers taken in top 3 rounds

Pitchers are always much harder to project & every team has misses but this is truly bad consectutive run of misses in the top rounds. Only Gibson is in the majors & Berrios has #2 starter potential. Dean, Boyd, Boer, & Melotakis could develop into solid mid to back of the rotation starters. Wimmers, Chargois, Bard, & Williams are all basically off the prospect map due to TJ injuries.

#14 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,800 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 27 March 2014 - 11:09 AM

Of course it does.


In thread. After thread. After thread.

Twins make a roster move. Time to launch a retrospective on the Twins front office.

#15 Jim H

Jim H

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 439 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 06:26 PM

The difference is, the Twins claim their strategy, the TWins way, The only RIGHT way, is to build from within. If that is your strategy, is it working?


Actually, it may be. They have a number of excellent position player prospects, headed by Buxton and Sano. They have a number of pitching prospects, some close to the majors and some far away, but promising.

To address your other, rather constant complaint about the front office and accountability: The Twins, as you should know, having brought it up often enough, have made a lot of changes among their farm system coaches and managers. If you were to compare a list of names from 5 or even 4 years ago, the number of new people in those positions might surprise you. The Twins also have a new farm director and a new scouting director. I don't know for sure, because I haven't tried to find out(don't really care) but I wouldn't be surprised if similar turnover has occurred in the scouting department as well.

Other changes that have occurred over time include: Just more players. The Twins now have many more young guys in extended spring training, then they did a few years ago. Another change is more coaches in the system. A team in the Dominican Summer league. Expanded presence in more countries throughout the world.

I expect there are more changes, progress perhaps, that I am not aware of. What I am trying to suggest, is that the Twins HAVE responded to past failures, by making changes, replacing personnel, doing more with advanced metrics, and probably other things that you and others have been asking/demanding that the Twins do. You just do not seem to be aware of them, or perhaps just unwilling to acknowledge them.

Whether all of this stuff is working as well as everyone wishes it would, I don't know. Some of it is a work in progress, so to speak. Drafting and developing players is perhaps more art than science. Luck seems to play a part. But it is hard to have intelligent coversations about these sort of things, if changes and progress that appear to be made is never acknowleged.

#16 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 7,103 posts

Posted 27 March 2014 - 09:07 PM

Whether all of this stuff is working as well as everyone wishes it would, I don't know. Some of it is a work in progress, so to speak.

Drafting and developing players is perhaps more art than science. Luck seems to play a part. '

But it is hard to have intelligent coversations about these sort of things, if changes and progress that appear to be made is never acknowleged.


Bad luck?

Art over science?

I'd rather philosophically go with teams like the Cards and Rays in their ability to identify, draft and develop- from the bottom of the draft and on a budget. They seem to have their processes down to a science rather than an art, thus making their own "luck", rather than using it as an excuse for repeated failure.