Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: Moving Goalposts

  • Please log in to reply
100 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,260 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 02:59 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...oving-Goalposts

#2 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    Old Geezer

  • Members
  • 1,591 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:24 PM

Well said!

#3 Sssuperdave

Sssuperdave

    Member

  • Members
  • 80 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:26 PM

I'm not certain that the goalposts are moving, rather than expectations were unrealistic to begin with, and probably still are. I think we've all been salivating thinking about a team built around Sano, Buxton, Arcia, Rosario, and Meyer, but I don't expect those five to instantly produce the moment they hit the majors. Even if everything breaks right and all five of them become all-stars, I wouldn't expect it to be until their third year in the majors. So, if Buxton and Sano debut in 2015 we're really talking about 2017 before this team really hits it's stride, and even that is optimistic because I don't think you can plan on all five becoming all-stars.

The one good thing about all this losing is that hopefully all those high draft choices can produce a pipeline of talent that lasts a while. I think the problem we all have is that we're impatient. Kohl Stewart has the potential to be a #1, but he probably won't even see the majors for thee or four years, and again will probably need two or three years after that before he's really producing at a top level.

#4 Spikecurveball

Spikecurveball

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 226 posts
  • LocationRice Lake

Posted 26 March 2014 - 03:38 PM

https://encrypted-tb...7lAO5Zf28Ti9H_M
Sooooo.......your sayin there's a chance!!! YYYeeeessssssss!!!!

#5 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,246 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:01 PM

2017 now. Wow.

#6 CRArko

CRArko

    Agent of SHIELD

  • Members
  • 2,133 posts
  • LocationEngaging Theta Protocol.
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:24 PM

http://www.mentalhea...st/crisis-lines

In case anybody needs crisis counseling. I used to do computer support for MHAM so I can vouch for them.

#7 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,424 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:25 PM

Hard to disagree with a blog that said basically the same things I've been saying. So....great blog! :)

If the Twins lose Diamond and Worley, the depth on both sides of the ball gets more questionable. Maybe not worse that last year, but huge unknowns.

#8 frightwig

frightwig

    Member

  • Members
  • 59 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:30 PM

When I look at the front office decisions this winter, I'm not entirely sure whether management is really lost at sea or just merely content to muddle along and collect high draft picks until Buxton and Sano arrive. If I'm feeling generous, I have to assume that they just spent money on pitching this winter, knowing full well that the new guys aren't really that good, with the intent of just being not-quite-so-embarrassing for the next couple years. Like, maybe if the team can show just enough progress to get 70-ish wins this season and next, then maybe the fans won't tune out, and maybe the team can be in position to push above .500 again when the top prospects are in place. By 2018, then, maybe the front office will replace the pitchers they just signed with some mix of prospects and one or two veterans who could lead a legit contender.

That isn't the most inspiring plan, because it's a slow approach and a lot could go wrong (and already has). But it's what I hope they have in mind, because I don't like to think that Nolasco-Hughes-Pelfrey is really the club's idea of "aiming high" or the kind of guys Terry Ryan really wants in the Twins' next playoff rotation.

#9 Highabove

Highabove

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 606 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:36 PM

The Fans are paying high ticket prices to see very bad baseball at Target Field.
The fans deserve to see an entertaining product on the field, regardless of what the future holds.

" I'm not sure the Twins realize the amount of anger which is building towards their Organization"
Patrick Reusse

Edited by Highabove, 26 March 2014 - 04:41 PM.


#10 Halsey Hall

Halsey Hall

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,264 posts
  • LocationCurrently Hammond Stadium

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:38 PM

I'll put myself in the 2nd group of fans. Mind you, I've been a fan since day one, attending opening day in 1961, so no reason for anyone to question my fanhood. To maintain any sense of sanity I had to turn off so many games early last year. It just wasn't much fun. The atmosphere here this year is just zero, no feeling of any expectations at all, and their spring training games just enforce the feeling. About the only thing I feel confident in is that I'll be able to see competitive games for more innings this year.

I remember back when we really should of beat the skankees in the playoffs, back when we had teams that had a pulse and a chance to go deep in the post season only to fail when IMO Gardy just made bonehead moves. And I remember telling anyone that would listen that it'll be a long time before we get this chance again. I'm afraid it might be alot longer than I even imagined then. After all, we do have the curse of "Big Popi". He almost singlehandly ended the curse of the "Bambino" and all we can do is think of what if.

Granted we've got some very nice young players coming up the pipeline. But let's remember, so does every other team. Some of these guys I see play for the opposing teams down here really look outstanding. Every team has hope for the future with their prospects. Are the Twins really that much better in the minors that it will translate to a winning team in the majors? Time will tell. But I'd put a date of hoping so at 2018, and not before. I sure hope I'm wrong on the closer side.

#11 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2014 - 04:57 PM

It's tough to sell the future as a reason to be interested in the present.

They had the opportunity and means to put a better product on the field in 2014, clear needs that matched available players, and the real kicker...none of it would have negatively impacted the future in any significant manner.

That they chose not to pursue that is their choice to make, of course, but it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that interest in the Twins is down, and almost certainly hasn't bottomed out.

#12 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let The Winning Continue!

  • Members
  • 5,052 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:03 PM

I place myself in the first group, mostly for the sake of my sanity

This is really the point. None of us has much (if any) influence on what the Twins do. The most we can do is endure and hope.

#13 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,424 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:11 PM

Let's pile all the negative stories into one article and push publish. Too bad no one around here wants to provide balance. Pessimism is a self-fulfilling prophesy. It's all too easy to project regression and injuries. Harder to make accurate projections that include development. Way to take the easy way out.


Projecting injuries isn't pessimism. Injuries are a reality all teams face every year to varying degrees. What is inaccurate is a projection with no care for depth against injury, that's completely unrealistic.

#14 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:33 PM

Projecting injuries isn't pessimism. Injuries are a reality all teams face every year to varying degrees. What is inaccurate is a projection with no care for depth against injury, that's completely unrealistic.


It just seemed like he was speculating about what would happen if everything went wrong. That's not only unrealistic, it's not even very interesting.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#15 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2014 - 05:52 PM

I place myself in the first group, mostly for the sake of my sanity

This is really the point. None of us has much (if any) influence on what the Twins do. The most we can do is endure and hope.

Well, the people here at TD aren't the people the Twins need to worry about. We'll most likely attend games, support radio and TV ratings, and do so despite their record. In my case, I've been following them, and spending money to do so, for 50 some years, and I'm not likely to stop doing so. I'm not an unusual case here.

But there's not enough of us here. The Twins do need to worry about the much more numerous casual fans, because if they lose them, it affects attendance, ratings, merchandise sales, etc etc etc. And in that sense, as a whole, fans do have a pretty huge influence on the Twins.

#16 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let The Winning Continue!

  • Members
  • 5,052 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:01 PM

And in that sense, as a whole, fans do have a pretty huge influence on the Twins.


But not in the sense of individual moves.

I do think that there may be more pressure on management to win this year. And a better understanding that baseball, not just the "Target Field experience" matters.

But that still really leaves us enduring and hoping. And when I see the Forbes numbers about last year's profit, I wonder how much is really pressure to win and how much is just a mirage especially when we've seen past numbers on Houston's profitablity.

#17 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,424 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:05 PM

It just seemed like he was speculating about what would happen if everything went wrong. That's not only unrealistic, it's not even very interesting.


I'm going to suggest that you misread that paragraph. Nick wasn't projecting all those things to happen, he was noting all the different areas in which even one injury might cause some headaches. He just said them as one stream of thought, not projecting them all to happen.

It's the same thing I noted in the other thread, there is virtually no position on offense the Twins could see an injury or awful performance in which they have a feasible backup plan. The odds of the Twins having zero injuries to their offense is HIGHLY unlikely. It's not pessimism to point out how shallow this group is.

#18 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:10 PM

But not in the sense of individual moves.

I do think that there may be more pressure on management to win this year. And a better understanding that baseball, not just the "Target Field experience" matters.

But that still really leaves us enduring and hoping. And when I see the Forbes numbers about last year's profit, I wonder how much is really pressure to win and how much is just a mirage especially when we've seen past numbers on Houston's profitablity.


You gotta spend money to make money. Even the old man got that, eventually. They committed 80 mil to the team this year to make it respectable. Everyone knows it would take another 87 to contend, and they don't have the horses. The horses will have to wait until 2016, when both Sano and Buxton should be ready. I'll settle for respectable until then.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#19 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let The Winning Continue!

  • Members
  • 5,052 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:20 PM

You gotta spend money to make money. Even the old man got that, eventually.


In baseball, you don't seem to have to do so. The Houston Astros had Operating Income (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of 55.9 million dollars on revenues of 186 million.

While their revenues were the 4th lowest, their Operating Income was the 2nd highest. Not a bad gig if you can get it.

Per the Forbes figures which are probably the best available to the general public. http://www.forbes.co...ion:asc_search:

Edited by JB_Iowa, 26 March 2014 - 06:23 PM.


#20 birdwatcher

birdwatcher

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,617 posts

Posted 26 March 2014 - 06:25 PM

I'm also a member of the 1961 Club. There have been a lot of teams over the years that have been close to unbearable to watch. Last year was up there in this category, and I hate to say it, but I'm likely to have the game on as background noise a whole lot in 2014. There are just too many players that are about as fun to watch as Hal Narragon. (Remember him, Halsey?) BUT...the minor league pipeline is better than any I've seen in the past, and MUCH better at that. I loved watching Gaetti, Hrbek, Puckett and gang flounder before they figured it out, so I'm not stressed about 2015 and beyond. I remember some very uninteresting teams when our Top 10 prospect pipeline included Eric Lis, David Winfree, and Doug Deeds. So, I'll take what I can get in 2014 and follow the system, because I'm completely confident that we have exceptional quality coming in waves. Yes, other teams have talent too, but very few have more than we do.