Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

A Look Back: The 2012 Draft

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs


  • Administrators
  • 15,799 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:05 PM

I'm stealing this from the Byron Buxton Top Prospect thread as I think it is a pretty interesting discussion... The Minnesota Twins had the #2 overall pick in the draft thanks to an awful 2011 season. The Astros surprised many by taking Puerto Rican shortstop Carlos Correa. The Twins, as we area all aware, used their pick in toolsy outfielder Byron Buxton, who most experts said had the highest upside of anyone in the draft.

The conversations leading up to that selection here at Twins Daily and other places was pretty intense. This was a huge pick. The Twins need pitching. The Twins are strong in the outfield. Do we want a middle infielder, or would a high-end college pitcher be more appropriate.

Obviously Mark Appel's name was out there, but the Boras agent would be (and proved to be) a tricky sign. Kyle Zimmer was said to have some great stuff, but really hadn't been pitching terribly long. And, Kevin Gausman from LSU was also in the running.

So, my question to everyone is: Who did you want the Twins to take, and why?

I'll acknowledge that my hope was that the Twins would take Kevin Gausman. I always believe in best available and believe that if the scouts are convinced that a certain player is going to have the highest ceiling, the team should take him. However, with the Twins pitching issues and perceive (and probably real) lack of pitching prospects, I thought a sure-fire, hard-throwing, four-pitch possible future ace was the way to go.

Obviously there were other times in the month leading up to the draft where I made cases for Buxton, and Zimmer as well... and for a week, I agreed with the argument that maybe catcher Mike Zunino (who went third to Seattle and has already played in the big leagues, as has Gausman) was the guy the Twins should nab.

So, who was your pick, and why?

#2 diehardtwinsfan


    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,829 posts
  • LocationThe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:17 PM

Honestly, I would have been fine with Appel, Gausman, or Zimmer... Now Appel wasn't going to sign, that I get... I dont' think anyone questioned the ceiling (though the comparrisons we see right now weren't being tossed around)... and he had a lot of question marks. Some of the biggest were concerns about the level of competition that he faced. I personally didn't see anything in those discussions that screamed BPA. A number of people had that at Appel...

Now that said, so far it appears as though I was wrong. I'm happy to eat crow. My biggest concern (and a bit tangental here) is that I'm hearing ridiculous comps for him now, and while I hope he sees that, we should probably remind ourselves that he's just getting his first taste of AA ball. There's still a lot that needs to go right for him.

#3 zenser


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 481 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:18 PM

At the time, I really wanted pitching. I was hoping Gausman. IIRC, Zimmer was interesting because he had just started pitching that season or the season before. Gausman was polished coming out of LSU. Appel, to me, reminds me of Mark Prior. I think he is good but IMO Gausman might have a better overall career than Appel. I will be the first to admit that I really wasn't in favor of grabbing one more toolsy OF. I loved getting proven wrong.

After seeing a season of this draft class, I love what Buxton means to the Twins. Not that Gausman, Appel, Zunino, and Zimmer among others won't be good, I think they will have nice careers and maybe a few all star games. The hype around Buxton is amazing. When you hear comps that his floor is Hunter, you know we nailed that pick.

#4 johnnydakota



  • Banned
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:29 PM

Zimmer once I heard Appels agent was boras, and he had another year of eligibilty left.
kinda glad they (the Twins) pissed me off and didnt listen to me now...yup another crow sandwich. Really disappointed in our 3rd (1st rounder) Bard ...

Edited by johnnydakota, 14 February 2014 - 01:32 PM.

#5 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 24,865 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:38 PM

1. Appel
2. Gausman
3. Zunino
4. unsure

that was my list, I think. It is still possible Appel is the better pick, but right now, it looks like the Twins were right, thankfully.

One of the best opening day rosters in years. Now go get 'em.

#6 howieramone1406390264



  • Banned
  • 715 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:33 PM

Off topic, but interesting to note, Gausman kept our very own Ryan Eades at the #2 starter at LSU. Aaron Nola, projected to go #10 this year by BA, did so the following year. Another concern was Eades 6.8K/9 rate, which is equal to BA's #2 pick this year, Jeff Hoffman.

#7 cmb0252


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,900 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:35 PM

I had a top three of Buxton, Correa, and Gausman who I would have been fine with the Twins picking. I honestly didn't care which as long as it was one of them. I'm not a supporter of drafting for need.

#8 Steve Lein

Steve Lein

    Senior Member - MiLB Report Contributor

  • Administrators
  • 1,644 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:41 PM

I wanted pitching, and complained about the Twins going that direction, though I wasn't exactly "against" their pick of Buxton. I was expecting him to not to develop as quickly as he has, so in retrospect kudos to the Twins.

Plus, since then they shipped off some good players to acquire young pitching, which is arguably in the class of the guys available for them in that draft, they covered themselves in other ways.
Scouting Report: Power: 30, Hitting: 50, Arm: 60, Defense: 45, Speed: 45. "Line drive swing and shows good contact and on-base abilities. Double's power at his peak. Strong arm from 2B or the OF, stiff hands. Not a fast runner, but above average instincts on the bases. Skinny body doesn't look the part, but will sneak up on you. ACL surgery sapped much of his athleticism." (Probably)

#9 Dman


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,034 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:41 PM

I was for Appel but would have been happy with any of the top pitchers. I just felt the Twins were so starved for pitching that it was was worth reaching for a pitcher. At the time I just couldn't see grabbing another outfielder. Although I understood what scouts saw in him I wasn't confident it would translate. I fell for the lack of competition question some analysts had about him. I really, really thought pitching was the way to go and I can't tell you how disappointed I was when the Twins chose Buxton. I just couldn't fathom them not going with a pitcher. I felt the pressure had to be immense for them to pick a pitcher but they still went outfield. I have been waiting to blast them for that mistake and it looks like I might never get that chance as I will be eating crow for quite a while.

Edited by Dman, 14 February 2014 - 02:48 PM.

#10 diehardtwinsfan


    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,829 posts
  • LocationThe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:42 PM

Honestly, I remember Correa being kind of a last minute thing. Buxton and Appel were always assumed to be 1-2. Correa was a late riser.

#11 birdwatcher


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,446 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:47 PM

I was confident and pleased that the Twins would pick the BPA in their own opinion, and was like most of us desperately hoping that the BPA would be a pitcher.

It appears there will be very few busts among the top 10 or so picks in 2011, and I think that might be a notable trend.

#12 markos


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,220 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:02 PM

My top 5:
1) Correa // super young for draft class. raked. projected to stay at short.
2) Zunino // I had visions of the next Buster Posey
3) Appel
4) Gausman
5) Buxton // old for draft class. questions about competition and polish. I thought he had the highest bust potential.

I'm glad I was wrong, though I still think Correa will be a stud.

#13 Kwak


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,939 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:07 PM

Buxton has worked-out great, but so have the others. I am curious if the Twins' confidence in Hicks had diminished in '12 and influenced the selection of Buxton? The reluctance around Appel was understandable, but there had to be other factors involved. Example: 1) a belief that pitching wasn't the #1 problem; 2) more risk selecting a pitcher than an OF; 3) a belief that Mauer would always be the starting catcher; 4) or was it the stated reason of not wanting to miss out on a long-term all-star?

After perusing the Houston site, I now understand why they selected Correa rather than any of the others mentioned--but that is a thread for a Houston blog.

#14 AlwaysinModeration


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Members
  • 1,767 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:15 PM

I remember reading the SI article about Buxton; scoring from 2B on a sac fly, and throwing a football the length of the football field, and hoping they'd take him.  Also thought Appel would go to his hometown Astros, so didn't think he'd be there.

#15 nfisch22



  • Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:28 PM

I was definitely high on Correa because he was projected to stay at SS. Much the same way as I'm high on Turner in this year's draft. As we've seen it's hard to find someone who can stay at SS long term... Obviously looking back on it I'm quite glad we picked Buxton

#16 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp


  • Administrators
  • 19,775 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:42 PM

I generally don't get too fired up about who was/wasn't picked in the draft because I don't get to see these kids play.

But I think the 2012 draft is a perfect example of why you always draft the best player available and never for need. You want the best player available, not the best pitcher or catcher or third basemen available. You're just undermining your own scouting department with that strategy.

#17 Monkeypaws


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,879 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:01 PM

My initial reaction was, "right, another toolsy HS outfielder." I don't remember who I wanted them to take.

He won me over right away though with his post draft reaction and comments.

#18 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 845 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:13 PM

I was so jacked when Appel wasn't taken #1 overall. Then, I was both astonished and outraged that he wasn't taken by the Twins. I knew lots about Buxton, but figured he'd go number 1. I wanted Appel more than the other pitchers, but an OF when we had so many? I then apologized to my inner self as I believe blindly that the Twins know what they are doing. As per-uze...the Twins knew what they were doing, and I was wrong. When Appel kept falling, I got more and more comfortable with the pick. Today, I guess you could say I admit that I was wrong, I would much rather have Buxton and JO than Appel and...some easy-to-sign/cheap senior in the supplemental.

#19 Willihammer



  • Members
  • 7,252 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:25 PM

I wanted Appel. The Twins had the biggest bonus pool at a little over 12m and paying over slot to get Appel would have been money well spent IMO. If anyone was going to sign Appel that year, it would have been the Twins. But I understand the enormous risk of him walking and Buxton isn't a bad consolation at all. I've gotten to like the pick more in the past year and a half. Still way too early to call Buxton the BPA over Appel though.

#20 Kwak


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,939 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:31 PM

Unfortunately none of the young men have BPA stamped on their forehead.