Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store


Photo

Really? No consideration during 2010 negotiations that Mauer might not catch?

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Cynical Oldie

  • Members
  • 3,879 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 09 February 2014 - 10:58 AM

I find this statement from today's Strib article baffling:

"Every factor that the Twins and Mauer’s representatives could think of was discussed, projected and appraised before an agreement was reached. Every factor but one.


“I don’t think there was ever any expectation on either side,” Mauer’s agent, Ron Shapiro, said, “that Joe would be anything but a catcher.”

http://www.startribu.../244562131.html

I know many (most?) fans thought he'd catch longer than through 2013 but almost all of the boards were discussing how long he'd catch and how many games he'd catch as he aged.

I can't believe that it wasn't part of the negotiations. (I'm not calling Shapiro a liar, I'm just stunned).

#2 CRArko

CRArko

    Master of all I survey.

  • Members
  • 1,593 posts
  • LocationThe Pandorica.
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 09 February 2014 - 11:55 AM

I suppose they were thinking in terms of a Pudge Rodriguez type of career. Stuff happens.

#3 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 7,562 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 12:56 PM

I don't think that would have affected the negotiations in any way...

#4 Hosken Bombo Disco

Hosken Bombo Disco

    refuses to surrender his World Series baseball

  • Members
  • 1,302 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 02:22 PM

Pudge was about 5 foot 7 with his cleats on. You don't see many every day catchers as tall as Mauer, so we are fortunate Mauer lasted as long as he did!

#5 spycake

spycake

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,969 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 02:51 PM

Remember, this was the same club that traded Wilson Ramos for a relief pitcher and kept Drew Butera as the sole backup for several seasons, ensuring virtually zero depth behind Mauer and a parade of AAA nobodies once Mauer went down for an extended period in 2011. The evidence already strongly suggested they overrated Mauers ability to stay at catcher (and long-term catcher health in general). This new nugget adds very little (although like Seth, I am not sure what difference it would have made anyway).

#6 Halsey Hall

Halsey Hall

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 817 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 04:49 PM

Shapiro and Joe probably never gave it a thought, but you can bet the Twins thought about a possible move in that time. But like has been said, it wouldn't of made any difference, and why should it?

#7 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Cynical Oldie

  • Members
  • 3,879 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 09 February 2014 - 05:25 PM

What it most illustrates for me is the difference between the thinking/discussion in negotiations versus the detailed analysis of WAR and declining phase players, etc. that tends to take place here at TD.

I would guess that a consideration of health and longevity did play into the Twins' analysis of the situation but it doesn't sound like it was really discussed between the parties to the contract. It would indicate to me that the Twins put, perhaps, even more emphasis on the need to retain the "hometown hero" than I thought initially. And I try to contrast that with, for example, the Pujols-St. Louis situation.

I just would have thought that when they were extending a 6'5" catcher through his age 35 season that there might have been some discussion about long-term health and position.

#8 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 9,804 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks

Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:38 PM

I have no inside info but every impression I've ever had... Was that Joe wanted to catch and that was the position he wanted to play and the Twins management always understood that.

Joe likes the Tools of ignorance and I don't blame him. It's the best position on the field in my opinion.
A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

#9 LimestoneBaggy

LimestoneBaggy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 10 February 2014 - 09:23 AM

[COLOR=#333333]I just would have thought that when they were extending a 6'5" catcher through his age 35 season that there might have been some discussion about long-term health and position.[/COLOR]


I understand your sentiments, but Joe would have received more from other teams. The offer was fair considering the market, and if they wanted him, they had to pay. I really believe the decision comes down to just that. Quite frankly, with free agents I believe teams take all these factors into account (whether publicly or not) and it comes down to whether you will outbid the other person.

It's kind of like a charity auction I was at a while back and bidding on a Kent Hrbek signed ball. Was the ball worth the cash for the people bidding (short term, hell yes), but in the long term maybe I'll see Kent in a bar sometime....
I will one day successfully sneak onto the Sportive Podcast, and have nothing intelligent to say or add to the conversation.

#10 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,836 posts

Posted 10 February 2014 - 09:37 AM

Frankly, I'm neither surprised nor dismayed that they didn't talk about position during negotiations.

Why? Because it wouldn't have impacted dollars or years one bit. Joe was going to get big money. He wanted to catch. He was in the driver's seat during negotiations after his 2009 season.

If something changed down the road (as it did), then make the call at that point.

#11 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Cynical Oldie

  • Members
  • 3,879 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 10 February 2014 - 11:18 AM

Welcome to the Beating a Dead Horse zone of TD. Meh, We'll probably see Mauer on the road to .400 this year.


I don't consider it beating a dead horse for this reason (and this was the point I was really trying to make earlier):

Many posters, when looking at signings (especially major ones over a significant number of years) get caught up in analyzing the player's potential WAR and the likelihood of a decline over a number of seasons -- and that would definitely include a position change.

What this article pointed out to me, is that those factors -- which are so popular to discuss on the boards -- may be discussed internally but may very well not be discussed in negotiations between the parties. I thought it was a little bit of insight as to what was actually said at the bargaining table.

Does anyone know if Shapiro's book about the Mauer negotiations is out yet?

#12 CRArko

CRArko

    Master of all I survey.

  • Members
  • 1,593 posts
  • LocationThe Pandorica.
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:27 PM

Does anyone know if Shapiro's book about the Mauer negotiations is out yet?


Published last November. Available both in print and e-book formats.

"Perfecting Your Pitch: How to Succeed in Business and in Life by Finding Words That Work."

#13 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Cynical Oldie

  • Members
  • 3,879 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:43 PM

Thanks!