- Article: Major Protests Expected This Weekend And This Is Why...
Yesterday, 09:31 PM
- Article: NFL Midseason Awards
Yesterday, 08:39 PM
- Giovani Bernard out vs. Jaguars
Yesterday, 12:20 PM
- Harnish done with a Lisfranc injury in his foot
Yesterday, 09:20 AM
- This Week in the NFC North - Week 9
Yesterday, 09:19 AM
- Article: Halloween Starts The Scary Road Ahead
Yesterday, 04:18 AM
- Griffen named NFC Defensive Player of the Month
Oct 30 2014 08:34 PM
- TACO NIGHT at The Cassel's!
Oct 30 2014 06:00 PM
- Article: Fantasy Football Week 9 Rankings
Oct 30 2014 04:24 PM
- Article: Fantasy Football Pants Party Podcast - Week 9
Oct 30 2014 02:39 PM
Really? No consideration during 2010 negotiations that Mauer might not catch?
Posted 09 February 2014 - 10:58 AM
"Every factor that the Twins and Mauer’s representatives could think of was discussed, projected and appraised before an agreement was reached. Every factor but one.
“I don’t think there was ever any expectation on either side,” Mauer’s agent, Ron Shapiro, said, “that Joe would be anything but a catcher.”
I know many (most?) fans thought he'd catch longer than through 2013 but almost all of the boards were discussing how long he'd catch and how many games he'd catch as he aged.
I can't believe that it wasn't part of the negotiations. (I'm not calling Shapiro a liar, I'm just stunned).
Posted 09 February 2014 - 02:51 PM
Posted 09 February 2014 - 05:25 PM
I would guess that a consideration of health and longevity did play into the Twins' analysis of the situation but it doesn't sound like it was really discussed between the parties to the contract. It would indicate to me that the Twins put, perhaps, even more emphasis on the need to retain the "hometown hero" than I thought initially. And I try to contrast that with, for example, the Pujols-St. Louis situation.
I just would have thought that when they were extending a 6'5" catcher through his age 35 season that there might have been some discussion about long-term health and position.
Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:38 PM
Joe likes the Tools of ignorance and I don't blame him. It's the best position on the field in my opinion.
Posted 10 February 2014 - 09:23 AM
[COLOR=#333333]I just would have thought that when they were extending a 6'5" catcher through his age 35 season that there might have been some discussion about long-term health and position.[/COLOR]
I understand your sentiments, but Joe would have received more from other teams. The offer was fair considering the market, and if they wanted him, they had to pay. I really believe the decision comes down to just that. Quite frankly, with free agents I believe teams take all these factors into account (whether publicly or not) and it comes down to whether you will outbid the other person.
It's kind of like a charity auction I was at a while back and bidding on a Kent Hrbek signed ball. Was the ball worth the cash for the people bidding (short term, hell yes), but in the long term maybe I'll see Kent in a bar sometime....
Posted 10 February 2014 - 09:37 AM
Why? Because it wouldn't have impacted dollars or years one bit. Joe was going to get big money. He wanted to catch. He was in the driver's seat during negotiations after his 2009 season.
If something changed down the road (as it did), then make the call at that point.
Posted 10 February 2014 - 11:18 AM
Welcome to the Beating a Dead Horse zone of TD. Meh, We'll probably see Mauer on the road to .400 this year.
I don't consider it beating a dead horse for this reason (and this was the point I was really trying to make earlier):
Many posters, when looking at signings (especially major ones over a significant number of years) get caught up in analyzing the player's potential WAR and the likelihood of a decline over a number of seasons -- and that would definitely include a position change.
What this article pointed out to me, is that those factors -- which are so popular to discuss on the boards -- may be discussed internally but may very well not be discussed in negotiations between the parties. I thought it was a little bit of insight as to what was actually said at the bargaining table.
Does anyone know if Shapiro's book about the Mauer negotiations is out yet?