Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store


Photo

Meyer and Span

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 LimestoneBaggy

LimestoneBaggy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 08:48 AM

Just out of curiosity, even without Alex Meyer playing a single Major League Game, does anyone think Washington made a good trade?
I will one day successfully sneak onto the Sportive Podcast, and have nothing intelligent to say or add to the conversation.

#2 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,665 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 09:16 AM

Span is a pretty solid CF, the jury is still out on Meyer. The Nats were in playoff mode so adding a piece like Span was necessary to compete. Proven commodities are worth a lot. Plus, the Nats had a pretty solid rotation already and they were desperate for a CF worth his salt and a leadoff hitter. I think it was a good trade.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#3 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,118 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 09:20 AM

Yes, if you believe that Washington is a playoff team right now, which I do. That said, I think it is likely the Twins also made a good trade.
Lighten up Francis....

#4 tobi0040

tobi0040

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,321 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 09:32 AM

Dealing from a position of strength for a high end pitching prospect is one I like. Even if Meyer doesn't turn out, I would support similar trades in the future.

#5 twinsnorth49

twinsnorth49

    Moderately Moderate

  • Twins Mods
  • 3,759 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 11:39 AM

Good for both teams, Twins definitely risked more getting rid of a proven player, but with as much of a sure thing as it gets coming through in Buxton it was worth it.

#6 Oldgoat_MN

Oldgoat_MN

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 672 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 12:02 PM

I think it was a good trade for both teams. Span did not produce like we all expected, but for the Nationals it made sense on paper. Remember that Meyer had arm issues before. They may have thought he would never get past those issues.

As things sit right now, I really like this trade for the Twins.

I'm on a whiskey diet. I've lost 3 days already.


#7 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,788 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 12:06 PM

Span was a nice acquisition for the Nats. He posted a .707 OPS and a 2.4 WAR. He was a fine player and was not the reason for the Nats stumbling in 2013... That was on everybody else, not Denard.

It was a good trade for both teams... But it looks like it's going to work out a little better for the Twins because the Nats stumbled last year. Again, not Span's fault.

#8 Danchat

Danchat

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 480 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 02:55 PM

Span wouldn't be making this team much better, maybe 2 more wins with him. If Meyer can fit in as a piece of the future (and not get hurt) then it will be a success in my mind, no matter how Span plays.

#9 drock2190

drock2190

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 223 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 05:16 PM

I like the trade for the Twins. Can never have too many power arms.

Though I do miss Span, he was a good player.

#10 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,291 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 30 January 2014 - 06:34 PM

Span's bat has been on a constant decline pretty much since 2009/10 and last season he posted a career low .327 OBP. He has been a 2-3 WAR player because of his defense. He is turning 30 before this season and will be continue the decline. Meyer is under team control for 6+ years and can be a 5+ WAR starter for those 6 years. So the diff here is like the Garza for Young trade, with higher baselines on both ways, not to count the $ diff.

Slam dunk for the Twins on paper, but injuries and such happen.
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#11 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,765 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 06:52 PM

I was always a huge fan of Span but it takes value to get value. Starters with front of the rotation potential don't grow on trees. Even if Meyer flames out I would be fine with the trade. At least we tried.

#12 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 08:17 PM

To me, this is a clear win for the Twins. Span is about a 2 WAR player. Meyer's upside is 4-5 WAR. Also, Meyer will be a cheap player at that WAR level for a few more years before Span gets expensive.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#13 jimbo92107

jimbo92107

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 554 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 12:23 AM

Twins got the best of the deal with Meyer.
Nats got the best of the deal with Span.

Ask me ten years from now, and I can say I called it!

#14 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,788 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 08:28 AM

To me, this is a clear win for the Twins. Span is about a 2 WAR player. Meyer's upside is 4-5 WAR. Also, Meyer will be a cheap player at that WAR level for a few more years before Span gets expensive.


Span has a fWAR of 3.6 and 3.5 the past two years.

The Nationals wanted to win now. Span did his part to help that happen, though the rest of the the team didn't live up to their potential.

The Twins wanted to win in a couple of years. Meyer looks like he's going to do his part to help that happen.

I still don't see a "winner" because the two teams had very different goals.

#15 iTwins

iTwins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 249 posts
  • LocationNorth of Missouri, South of Minnesota
  • Twitter: Trimbletj

Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:16 AM

I like the trade from both sides.

The Nationals were (are) close to contention and needed a reliable CF. They dealt from a position of strength (starting pitching) to acquire the piece they needed.

The Twins were in need of high quality starting pitching and dealt from a position of strength (CF) to make that deal happen.

If Meyer turns into the player the experts are projecting him to be - I think it's a win for both sides. (Assuming Span continues to play at the same level for the next couple of seasons).

#16 halfchest

halfchest

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 253 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:23 AM

http://www.masnsport...ter-trades.html

For what its worth here's an article written by a DC sportswriter after the 2013 season. At this point this trade really looks win win. Span performed decently and Meyer was great but had the injury issues. As in any trade involving prospects its going to be awhile til we can evaluate this one fully.

#17 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,665 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:33 AM

Not a slam dunk at all. Span is a proven commodity. He is a good player with a good attitude and a great lead-off hitter. Meyer had a shoulder injury that lost him half the season in 2013. Sure, he has potential to be a great pitcher, but so did Philip Hughes. You can't count on prospects reaching their ceiling. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Regardless, you need acquire as much high-end talent as possible to get high-caliber players. I am a fan of the trade, but I do believe Span is a pretty good player.

The entire reason it happened is because it made sense for both teams. If the Nats make a playoff run in the next few years (completely possible) Span will be a big part of it. If the Twins turn it around in the next few years, Meyer will most likely be a part of it. Both teams win this IMO.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#18 twinsfan34

twinsfan34

    Paul DeVos

  • Members
  • 679 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 12:09 PM

Agree with most everyone here, in that I like it for both teams.

The Twins weren't going to have much of a difference for keeping Span and it would/could make a difference for the Nationals.

Meyer has enough upside to even if he does 'better' (WAR) than Span, the timing of it made it a good trade because Meyer couldn't give those 2-4 Wins that Span could at that time.

It's why I'm not so hot on Stephen Drew at this time. I don't see the necessity of spending $10-12M per for a 1...maybe 2 Win upgrade over a $500k a year player and when his timing of contribution to a winner, 2015 and beyond, is very slim.

#19 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 12:24 PM

If Meyer becomes something close to what we hope he will, then there almost certainly will come a time when Nats fans will really wish they had kept him. How strongly they feel that way is likely to be determined by whether Washington ever does make a World Series run before then. If not, then getting Span won't have accomplished what it was supposed to accomplish.
[COLOR=#0000cd]I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at[/COLOR][COLOR=#800000] Knuckleballsblog.com[/COLOR][COLOR=#0000cd] while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for [/COLOR][COLOR=#0000cd][COLOR=#800000]MetroSportsReport.com[/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=#0000cd].[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000cd]
[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#b22222]~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~[/COLOR]