Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

From MinnCentric


Photo

Big Shock (Sarcasm): Tanaka to Yankees

  • Please log in to reply
133 replies to this topic

#1 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let's Keep Winning!

  • Members
  • 5,612 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 22 January 2014 - 08:49 AM


#2 TRex

TRex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 438 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 08:56 AM

Wow, a 7-year contract at what amounts to $25 million/year!

That is quite a bit more risky that I am comfortable with, and am glad the Twins didn't take that gamble.

#3 iTwins

iTwins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 400 posts
  • LocationNorth of Missouri, South of Minnesota
  • Twitter: Trimbletj

Posted 22 January 2014 - 08:57 AM

The good news is the free agent market should come to life again. Garza, Santana and company will finally find homes - and there will be actual baseball news stories to read again!

#4 tobi0040

tobi0040

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,421 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:07 AM

Wow, a 7-year contract at what amounts to $25 million/year!

That is quite a bit more risky that I am comfortable with, and am glad the Twins didn't take that gamble.


This is the same deal Felix Hernandez received when you add in the $20M post fee, I think only Verlander and Kershaw make more. For a guy that has never pitched here and who scouts say does not compare to Darvish

Felix Hernandez has a career 3.20 in 9 seasons. 3 seasons with an ERA under 2.67. 8.4 K per 9.

The other thing that hasn't been talked about, Yu Darvish's success here certainly made this guy more attractive, but Yu has only been here two years. Nomo and Dice-K had two very good years as well.

Nomo first two years 2.90 ERA, he ended at 4.24
Dice-K first two years 3.73 ERA, he ended at 4.52
Yu's first two years, 3.34 ERA, he ended at ?????

We should be applauding this. I think this guys opt out may be laughable in four years.

Edited by tobi0040, 22 January 2014 - 09:13 AM.


#5 johnnydakota

johnnydakota

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:14 AM

whoda thunk it ?

#6 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,980 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:22 AM

It's just money. Some teams spend it to win. Others, not so much. Anyone still think Ellsbury's contract will keep them from adding players?

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#7 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    Old Geezer

  • Members
  • 1,638 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:29 AM

Twins were in on him until it went over 2 years @ 8 mill. Terry just couldn't get him to take his money!

May all our prospects be All Stars and the beer be free.


#8 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,980 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:39 AM

This is the same deal Felix Hernandez received when you add in the $20M post fee, I think only Verlander and Kershaw make more. For a guy that has never pitched here and who scouts say does not compare to Darvish

Felix Hernandez has a career 3.20 in 9 seasons. 3 seasons with an ERA under 2.67. 8.4 K per 9.

The other thing that hasn't been talked about, Yu Darvish's success here certainly made this guy more attractive, but Yu has only been here two years. Nomo and Dice-K had two very good years as well.

Nomo first two years 2.90 ERA, he ended at 4.24
Dice-K first two years 3.73 ERA, he ended at 4.52
Yu's first two years, 3.34 ERA, he ended at ?????

We should be applauding this. I think this guys opt out may be laughable in four years.



If you have a billion a year in tv revenue, what does the money matter? They just showed the $189MM number has no meaning. So, they bought a number 2-4 pitcher. I don't get how that is bad/wrong/evil for them. I bet they go sign another pitcher now too. They have money, they had an open position, they spent money to fill the position. Seems like a good idea to me.

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#9 BigTrane

BigTrane

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 242 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:58 AM

As noted, it's their money, and this is how the Yanquis roll, so whatever.
Finally unblocking the FA logjam seems more interesting by far.

We face them in May, June & July, so let's hope for an "interesting" & extended transition.
Not to be negative, but I'm sick of being their whipping boys.

#10 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,773 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:04 AM

This thread illustrates the difference between "NY way of thinking" and "Minnesota way of thinking". Wildcatters do have dry holes--but the winners make up for them.

#11 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,983 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:10 AM

Yankees have spent half a BILLION dollars this winter & still have Kelly Johnson likely starting at 3B & Brian Roberts at 2B, plus the farm system is a mess and nearly everyone is an injury waiting to happen in their lineup. This signing is just another bad move for a franchise that clearly has no idea what it is doing year in and year out.

#12 dgwills

dgwills

    Member

  • Members
  • 65 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:19 AM

It seems like a lot of money, but if he doesn't live up to the contract the Yankees know ways of getting out of it.

#13 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:20 AM

Twins were in on him until it went over 2 years @ 8 mill. Terry just couldn't get him to take his money!


I know. It's so frustrating, this parsimony we have here in this organization. A mere $160 million and we could have had him...:D

#14 thetank

thetank

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 204 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:22 AM

A few of the Yanks signings won't pan out. Beltran slumped in the 2nd half the past 2 years. Tanaka will be interesting.

#15 jm3319

jm3319

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:24 AM

This thread illustrates the difference between "NY way of thinking" and "Minnesota way of thinking". Wildcatters do have dry holes--but the winners make up for them.


I think it's more about budgets and revenue flows....There's just simply no way the Twins can compete with the Uber-markets like New York and LA. Those teams get more in their TV deals than the Twins bring in total per year. It's just simply not a level playing field.

I'd love to see a hard salary cap in baseball, but know it has no chance of happening anytime soon.

#16 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    Old Geezer

  • Members
  • 1,638 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:35 AM

Yankees have spent half a BILLION dollars this winter & still have Kelly Johnson likely starting at 3B & Brian Roberts at 2B, plus the farm system is a mess and nearly everyone is an injury waiting to happen in their lineup. This signing is just another bad move for a franchise that clearly has no idea what it is doing year in and year out.


Yes in the playoffs 17 out of the last 20 years with 5 world series titles they clearly have no idea of what they are doing!

May all our prospects be All Stars and the beer be free.


#17 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let's Keep Winning!

  • Members
  • 5,612 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:35 AM

I'd love to see a hard salary cap in baseball, but know it has no chance of happening anytime soon.


Nope. And despite all the earlier chatter in the media about the Yankees staying under the luxury tax threshold, that was apparently blown apart, too:


  • Buster Olney ‏@Buster_ESPN
    Yankees were already slightly over the $189m luxury tax threshold before Tanaka signing... so, that # is in the rear-view mirror.

    7:56 AM - 22 Jan 2014

#18 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,983 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:42 AM

Nope. And despite all the earlier chatter in the media about the Yankees staying under the luxury tax threshold, that was apparently blown apart, too:


  • Buster Olney ‏@Buster_ESPN
    Yankees were already slightly over the $189m luxury tax threshold before Tanaka signing... so, that # is in the rear-view mirror.

    7:56 AM - 22 Jan 2014

Slightly over means they still could have found a way to get under the threshold. That is the crazy thing about the Tanaka signing, its not costing them $25 mil a year, its costing closer to $35 million a year with the luxury tax.

#19 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,983 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:48 AM

Yes in the playoffs 17 out of the last 20 years with 5 world series titles they clearly have no idea of what they are doing!

Let's talk recent history, they are clearly falling behind. What lead to the 5 world series titles was an infusion of in house talent that came through the minors and became the key pieces to those teams: Rivera, Pettite, Jeter, Cano, Posada etc. Now the cupboard is bare and other teams are starting to reap the benefits of TV deals (LA Dodgers, LA Angels, Seattle Mariners etc) so now they can't simply "sign everybody"

Also they have won only 1 title in the last 13 years...yes that is better than the Twins, but let's not pretend the Yankees have somehow been DOMINATING baseball the past decade or so.

#20 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,777 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:48 AM

Great move for the Twins! I've watched him and not a big fan of him. Glad he will be pitching for he Yankees at a super high price.
Do or do not. There is no try.