Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: Top '13 Stories: #5 - A Dismal Starting Rotation

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Twins Daily Admin

Twins Daily Admin

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 202 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 10:56 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...arting-Rotation

#2 AM.

AM.

    Always in Moderation

  • Members
  • 998 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 06:02 AM

A discussion of the dismal start of the rotation in 2013 should include the historically low strikeout rates, especially given an era where teams are succeeding in large due to an increased focus on strikeouts.

#3 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,232 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 07:57 AM

The bulk of these starters were not very good. Most of them will be AAA filler or gone from the system in the next two years. Strikeout rates are nice, but command with stuff is what is needed. The strikeout rate should be higher next year, but not greatly higher.

#4 TheBigGuy7273

TheBigGuy7273

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 25 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 10:56 AM

Does anyone think this was the plan when TR returned???? They will at the very least, be much more competent this year then the past few!

#5 BigTrane

BigTrane

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 242 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 10:58 AM

I saw Albers (and Dozier) as rays of light late in the season after what you rightly call an 'avalanche' of disappointment. Simply put, there was no truly competitive/coherent rotation in place, and that pressure just cascaded through the system, from Pelfrey to Gibson and beyond.

Nolasco and Hughes stand to be serviceable or better, they buy breathing room for guys who need to spell in the minors (looking at you, Gilmartin). If they over-perform, then great.

If we go on to add another starter (Tanaka? unlikely. Arroyo? Possible. Johan? MiLB deal = lo/no risk) then we have a total makeover and gain flexibility in trades going forward.

#6 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 12,727 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 11:59 AM

Strikeout rates are nice, but command with stuff is what is needed.


This is the key... whether someone throws 88 or 98... Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay didn't throw 94+. It's not just about velocity.

#7 MrHockey

MrHockey

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 12:45 PM

Good point Seth. Jim Hoey is a good example.

#8 Paul

Paul

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 160 posts

Posted 01 January 2014 - 11:29 AM

... especially given an era where teams are succeeding in large due to an increased focus on strikeouts.


The "increased focus" on strikeouts is purely a fan focus. Teams covet the best pitchers. The best pitchers generally strike more people out than the lesser pitchers. Teams with the best pitchers succeed at a higher rate. To say teams succeed because they focus on strikeouts is analogous to saying wet streets cause rain.

#9 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,423 posts

Posted 02 January 2014 - 11:10 AM

What this story drove home, to me, is how just about everything that could go wrong did go wrong with the starting rotation this year. When 80% of the guys you count on either take enormous steps (Diamond, Worley) backwards or aren't ready (Pelfrey, Gibson), then it's going to be a bad year.

And when almost all of the fill-ins for them are absolutely dreadful - then things get even uglier. Just look at those guys. Deduno was good for a half year. Albers was competent for 1/4 of the year. The rest were brain-freezing bad.

After writing this, I had one thought - it seems silly to say this, because it's what was said before last year, but here it is - it really can't get much worse. But it's true. It really can't.