Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: These Ain't Your Old Twins

  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,265 posts

Posted 01 December 2013 - 10:17 PM

You can view the page at http://www.twinsdail...-Your-Old-Twins

#2 tjsyam921

tjsyam921

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 129 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 05:28 AM

I can't help but wonder how different it would be had the twins traded Santana for Hughes. Would Hughes have been a better pitcher for the twins? Would he even be a twin in 2014 as he would still be a free agent?

#3 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let The Winning Continue!

  • Members
  • 5,271 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 02 December 2013 - 08:43 AM

I am incredibly grateful that, thus far, this off-season has been significantly different than last. I really felt like they took fans for granted last year but that they seemingly took notice of decreasing attendance and television viewership to figure out that they had to take some risks and spend some money to try to put a better product on the field while waiting for some of the prospects to mature.

We don't know if the moves will work out .... but even if they don't, I hope it doesn't discourage the team from continuing to take some calculated risks in the free agent market in the future. And I hope we still see another move or two in the next few weeks.

#4 stupidloser55

stupidloser55

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 10:40 AM

This off-season has gone about as well as you could hope given their history. I'd love to see Kazmir and Pierzynski under the tree before Christmas too.

#5 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 10:58 AM

Good article.

I think it is clear that the Twins are getting their stats in order. I refuse to read the comments at the ST, but I can't imagine the general average fan being at all excited about Hughes given the W/L an ERA. Same to a lesser extent about Nolasco. There are some out there who think these moves are simply about "fan pressure" but that is not the case given that most fans are going to not see the potential in these moves.

#6 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 10,426 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 10:59 AM

but I can't imagine the general average fan being at all excited about Hughes given the W/L an ERA.


I read Keith Law's article on the move and read a few of the comments.

The derp is strong with those commenters.

#7 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,496 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 11:22 AM

Even if fans don't see the upside, they should at least appreciate the increase in effort.

#8 Jim H

Jim H

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 439 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 07:20 PM

I guess if you need to believe this is some new and improved Terry Ryan, nobody can stop you. To me, this is the way he has always done things. I expect they had scouted Nolasco for years, and had probably identified him has a guy who was "better than his numbers". To me, Nolasco is a better version of Correia. He has been durable, pitched reasonably well for mostly poor teams, and might benefit from better team defense than what he got in Florida. He is past his so-called prime, just like Correia, but his durability suggests that he should continue to pitch as he has for at least a couple of more seasons. I don't see a whole lot of upside here, but there is no question he could,throw a pretty darn good year out there. Just like Correia, Ryan probably gave him an extra year he didn't really want to give, but probably couldn't of signed him without it.

I expect Ryan and his staff identified Nolasco as a better target then E. Santana or anybody else who is likely to land a bigger contract, because they feel Nolasco is more likely to pitch to his previous performance levels, has some small chance of being better than that, and will be more likely to still be worth something at the end of his contract.

The only difference from what Ryan is doing now to what he did in the past, is the money he has to spend. I don't think his approach as changed at all.

Edited by Jim H, 02 December 2013 - 07:23 PM.


#9 alphanumeric

alphanumeric

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 07:46 PM

I don't know what this author is talking about. Hughes has not only exceeded 150 innings twice, he's exceeded 175 IP twice. Check your stats better.

#10 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 08:37 PM

Good article.

I think it is clear that the Twins are getting their stats in order. I refuse to read the comments at the ST, but I can't imagine the general average fan being at all excited about Hughes given the W/L an ERA. Same to a lesser extent about Nolasco. There are some out there who think these moves are simply about "fan pressure" but that is not the case given that most fans are going to not see the potential in these moves.


You may be right, or maybe the Twins' scouts just really like Nolasco and Hughes. I'd like to think it's both, but I have no way of knowing.

What I believe is that these two pitchers are good bets, in fact, for my money, they're better bets than some of the guys who some people are looking at as being in the "top tier" of FA pitchers.

Given a couple of the comments left over at Knuckleballs following my post there about Nolasco & Hughes, I felt compelled to respond in the comments section there and I'll restate that comment here.

One year ago, Ubaldo Jimenez was coming off a 9-17 season (career high in losses) and a 5.40 ERA. Ervin Santana was 9-13 with a 5.16 ERA the same year. You’d have been hard pressed to find a Twins fan who wouldn’t have dogged the Twins mercilessly if they had added either pitcher last off-season. This year, those two guys are considered among the top tier of starting pitchers on the market. You think Cleveland and KC wouldn’t love to have the two of them locked up for a couple more years right now?

People bitch about the Twins “selling low and buying high” on players. They would almost certainly be “buying high” if they went out and signed Jimenez, Santana and even Garza or Tanaka this year.

Nolasco didn’t break the bank and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if his performance over the term of his contract with the Twins exceeds that of whoever gets stuck paying more money for Jimenez and Santana, certainly, and most likely Garza and Tanaka, as well. Hughes had a bad 2013 (just as Santana had in 2012), but one year earlier, he won 16 games and threw to a 4.23 ERA in that Yankee Stadium band box, totaling 0ver 190 innings of work.

If you want high-upside value, you don’t pay premium dollars for guys who are coming off their BEST years as they hit free agency, you identify guys who you think might be positioned to perform BETTER than they did in their walk year.

If Nolasco and Hughes stay healthy, I think Twins fans will be really glad they’re both going to be returning in 2015-2016. And with the relatively affordable contracts, the Twins will still have enough payroll room to add even more (and perhaps better) pitching help next off-season when adding a true impact player could vault them in to legitimate contention.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#11 johnnydakota

johnnydakota

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 08:50 PM

The Twins have enough room to add even more(and perhaps better)pitching help NEXT YEAR?
We are still under last years opening payroll amount , and we havent even used 70% of this years money.

#12 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 09:14 PM

The Twins have enough room to add even more(and perhaps better)pitching help NEXT YEAR?
We are still under last years opening payroll amount , and we havent even used 70% of this years money.


I don't disagree that there's still payroll room now. That said, I'm simply not all that in love with a lot of the remaining FA pitchers this year. I liked Kazmir's potential, but he's gone now. I think Arroyo's a significant overpay risk, but for the right price, he'd be fine. A trade for someone that has a contract his team wants to get rid of might be the best shot at further improvements to the rotation. I'm good with spending some money on a catcher.

I just don't think you spend excessive money for someone you really don't think will be worth it and that's how I feel about most of the guys at the top of the FA list right now. I'd make sure I've got room to add significant payroll at mid-season or, more importantly, next off-season.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#13 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,099 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks

Posted 02 December 2013 - 10:37 PM

You may be right, or maybe the Twins' scouts just really like Nolasco and Hughes. I'd like to think it's both, but I have no way of knowing.

What I believe is that these two pitchers are good bets, in fact, for my money, they're better bets than some of the guys who some people are looking at as being in the "top tier" of FA pitchers.

Given a couple of the comments left over at Knuckleballs following my post there about Nolasco & Hughes, I felt compelled to respond in the comments section there and I'll restate that comment here.

One year ago, Ubaldo Jimenez was coming off a 9-17 season (career high in losses) and a 5.40 ERA. Ervin Santana was 9-13 with a 5.16 ERA the same year. You’d have been hard pressed to find a Twins fan who wouldn’t have dogged the Twins mercilessly if they had added either pitcher last off-season. This year, those two guys are considered among the top tier of starting pitchers on the market. You think Cleveland and KC wouldn’t love to have the two of them locked up for a couple more years right now?

People bitch about the Twins “selling low and buying high” on players. They would almost certainly be “buying high” if they went out and signed Jimenez, Santana and even Garza or Tanaka this year.

Nolasco didn’t break the bank and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if his performance over the term of his contract with the Twins exceeds that of whoever gets stuck paying more money for Jimenez and Santana, certainly, and most likely Garza and Tanaka, as well. Hughes had a bad 2013 (just as Santana had in 2012), but one year earlier, he won 16 games and threw to a 4.23 ERA in that Yankee Stadium band box, totaling 0ver 190 innings of work.

If you want high-upside value, you don’t pay premium dollars for guys who are coming off their BEST years as they hit free agency, you identify guys who you think might be positioned to perform BETTER than they did in their walk year.

If Nolasco and Hughes stay healthy, I think Twins fans will be really glad they’re both going to be returning in 2015-2016. And with the relatively affordable contracts, the Twins will still have enough payroll room to add even more (and perhaps better) pitching help next off-season when adding a true impact player could vault them in to legitimate contention.


Well said...

Warren Buffett says that you should "buy when there is blood in the streets".

Or was it Jim Morrison who said that?
A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

#14 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 10:43 PM

Well said...

Warren Buffett says that you should "buy when there is blood in the streets".

Or was it Jim Morrison who said that?


Haha! JM was "blood in the streets in the town of . . . "

#15 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 10,426 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 07:25 AM

You may be right, or maybe the Twins' scouts just really like Nolasco and Hughes. I'd like to think it's both, but I have no way of knowing.

What I believe is that these two pitchers are good bets, in fact, for my money, they're better bets than some of the guys who some people are looking at as being in the "top tier" of FA pitchers.

Given a couple of the comments left over at Knuckleballs following my post there about Nolasco & Hughes, I felt compelled to respond in the comments section there and I'll restate that comment here.

One year ago, Ubaldo Jimenez was coming off a 9-17 season (career high in losses) and a 5.40 ERA. Ervin Santana was 9-13 with a 5.16 ERA the same year. You’d have been hard pressed to find a Twins fan who wouldn’t have dogged the Twins mercilessly if they had added either pitcher last off-season. This year, those two guys are considered among the top tier of starting pitchers on the market. You think Cleveland and KC wouldn’t love to have the two of them locked up for a couple more years right now?

People bitch about the Twins “selling low and buying high” on players. They would almost certainly be “buying high” if they went out and signed Jimenez, Santana and even Garza or Tanaka this year.

Nolasco didn’t break the bank and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if his performance over the term of his contract with the Twins exceeds that of whoever gets stuck paying more money for Jimenez and Santana, certainly, and most likely Garza and Tanaka, as well. Hughes had a bad 2013 (just as Santana had in 2012), but one year earlier, he won 16 games and threw to a 4.23 ERA in that Yankee Stadium band box, totaling 0ver 190 innings of work.

If you want high-upside value, you don’t pay premium dollars for guys who are coming off their BEST years as they hit free agency, you identify guys who you think might be positioned to perform BETTER than they did in their walk year.

If Nolasco and Hughes stay healthy, I think Twins fans will be really glad they’re both going to be returning in 2015-2016. And with the relatively affordable contracts, the Twins will still have enough payroll room to add even more (and perhaps better) pitching help next off-season when adding a true impact player could vault them in to legitimate contention.


Bang-up post, Jim. You outlined exactly why I'm lauding the acquisitions of Hughes and Nolasco while I would have groaned had the Twins signed Santana. Garza is somewhere in the middle.

#16 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 08:07 AM

Bang-up post, Jim. You outlined exactly why I'm lauding the acquisitions of Hughes and Nolasco while I would have groaned had the Twins signed Santana. Garza is somewhere in the middle.


I agree on Garza. With him, what I'd be concerned about wouldn't be so much the annual pay, but the years he may be able to command right now. Nolasco's deal is on the outer edges (or past them) of what I feel comfortable giving any pitcher in terms of years, but at least the money involved with him is far less than it's likely to be with Garza.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#17 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 10,426 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 08:37 AM

I agree on Garza. With him, what I'd be concerned about wouldn't be so much the annual pay, but the years he may be able to command right now. Nolasco's deal is on the outer edges (or past them) of what I feel comfortable giving any pitcher in terms of years, but at least the money involved with him is far less than it's likely to be with Garza.


Yeah. It's easier to swallow four years if the annual pay is around $12m.

But when you up that annual salary to ~$16-17m and add a fifth year, it gets a lot harder to justify the contract for a pitcher of Garza's ability and age.

#18 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 09:41 AM

Yeah. It's easier to swallow four years if the annual pay is around $12m.

But when you up that annual salary to ~$16-17m and add a fifth year, it gets a lot harder to justify the contract for a pitcher of Garza's ability and age.


Then again, it's not my money, so why should I care if the Twins want to spend it?

The only thing that should concern us about a big, long-term, contract to Garza would be the possibility that it would end up preventing the Twins from having that money 4-6 years down the road to spend on something else/better if Garza does tank before the contract is up.

It's pretty hard for me to imagine that becoming a problem during the next half dozen years. The Twins won't need to pay any new internal players obscene money until Sano and Buxton at least get in to arbitration years or closer to free agency and by that time, Mauer's contract will be about to come off the books.

That being the case, one could argue that if the Twins were ever going to be in a place where they can afford to take a chance on "bad" 5-6 year contracts, now is that time.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#19 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 10,426 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 09:49 AM

The only thing that should concern us about a big, long-term, contract to Garza would be the possibility that it would end up preventing the Twins from having that money 4-6 years down the road to spend on something else/better if Garza does tank before the contract is up.

It's pretty hard for me to imagine that becoming a problem during the next half dozen years. The Twins won't need to pay any new internal players obscene money until Sano and Buxton at least get in to arbitration years or closer to free agency and by that time, Mauer's contract will be about to come off the books.


That's my primary concern. Not all roster issues need to be taken care of in one offseason.

Say the Twins sign Nolasco and Garza and Buxton, Arcia, Sano, et al don't really come into their own until 2016/2017 and at that point, both Garza and Nolasco are either declining or flat-out awful and injured.

So you're looking at the core of a team who is young, cheap, and very good but you can't really make a push for a ring because you have $50m committed to three mid-30s players in Mauer, Nolasco, and Garza... Some or all of which might be bad, injured, or both in 2017.

To me, that's just not smart baseball management. There are good free agents available every offseason. There's no reason to go out and commit all your long-term money when the core players aren't ready to compete.

Keep some flexibility in your pocket for when you see an opening to not only get to the playoffs, but win.

Sign guys like Nolasco and Hughes this offeason. Next offseason, check in again and see where the franchise stands. React accordingly. Continue to do this until you know what you really have and what you really need to win it all.

I want the Twins to be good for 5+ years, not 2-3.

#20 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 10:10 AM

I don't disagree with you at all, Brock. You simply don't know for sure what your needs will be next year or the year after that, so you need payroll flexibility.

My point was just that, if you look at the old "52% of revenues for payroll" model, it's hard for me to see why the Twins signing a guy like Garza now would necessarily keep them from still having that flexibility going forward. Of course, given the past couple of years' experience, with payroll running closer to 35% of revenues than 52%, there's every reason to question whether the Twins would see things the same way.

I think it's a moot point anyway. The only way the Twins would sign Garza at this point is if they feel they really NEED him. I can't imagine they feel that way.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~