Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Nolasco and Pelfrey

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 MichiganTwins

MichiganTwins

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 346 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 07:05 PM

On a scale of 1-10, how happy would you be if the Twins sign Nolasco and Pelfrey only? (10 being very happy)

I think it might be a good plan E option, but I would like them to sign someone else first of course. What if the Twins sign 3 starting free agents? These two and maybe a wildcard like Santana?

#2 Trevor0333

Trevor0333

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 368 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 07:53 PM

Unless Pelfrey is in the 3 mill or less a year category no freakin way. He was terrible last year & hated watching hiom pitch period.

Any plan with Pelfrey as the 2nd veteren has me giving a 3 at best.

Arroyo, Garza, Capuano, Feldman, Bailey, Samardzija, & Anderson or bust!

I dont think they want to give up the draft pick to get Jiminez or Kazmir.

Add any of these poitchers with Pelfrey being the 3rd then it moves to a 8-9

#3 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 690 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 08:35 PM

Unless Pelfrey is in the 3 mill or less a year category no freakin way. He was terrible last year & hated watching hiom pitch period.

Any plan with Pelfrey as the 2nd veteren has me giving a 3 at best.

Arroyo, Garza, Capuano, Feldman, Bailey, Samardzija, & Anderson or bust!

I dont think they want to give up the draft pick to get Jiminez or Kazmir.

Add any of these poitchers with Pelfrey being the 3rd then it moves to a 8-9


No draft pick if they sign Kazmir.

#4 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,879 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 27 November 2013 - 09:23 PM

If Twins sign Nolasco and Pelfrey only I would be a 4. Not disgusted, but a tad disappointed they didn't do more. If the Twins sign a Dioner Navarro and a Matt Garza type in addition to Nolasco and Pelfrey, I would be 10.

#5 Danchat

Danchat

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,021 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 09:38 PM

A 3. It's the same horrible rotation plus Nolasco! We don't even know how healthy Deduno will be, and we have to kick the tires on somebody other than Pelfrey. We need a solid arm like Arroyo, Kazmir, or somebody in that range.

#6 johnnydakota

johnnydakota

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 09:49 PM

Garza or Kazmir, and Navarro and Chavez(or some one who can platoon with Trevor ) and I give them a 9...if we dont sign a better pitcher then Ricky , then its a 3(which is 2 more then last year)

#7 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,373 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 09:59 PM

At least a 5 if not higher depending on the veteran C they sign. I would welcome back Pelfrey with open arms if he is a 3rd choice. But I believe he will indeed be better and stronger this year, and while Nolasco isn't my very first choice, he is in the top 5 or so and instantly makes our rotation deeper and better. If it HAS to be Pelfrey as our second signing, but we sign Salt or AJ I'm pretty darn happy.

#8 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,909 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 10:43 PM

I would go 6. I expect pelfrey to be more like his second half than first, which means a pretty solid starter. All I want is legit talent on the roster, and with one signing they completely changed the starting rotation.

#9 EephusKnuckler

EephusKnuckler

    Member

  • Members
  • 65 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 11:15 PM

All I want is legit talent on the roster, and with one signing they completely changed the starting rotation.


ehhh...not completely. Nolasco instantly becomes the "ace" but is his sole addition to a terrible rotation really going to have a big effect on W-L? I'm not convinced. Remember, this is the team that's had arguably the worst starting pitching in the league over the past three seasons. They need to do more than just add one underwhelming innings-eater. Ok, resign Pelfry but also go get another guy like Kazmir or Arroyo. Then we might actually have something resembling a real MLB pitching staff.

I'm gonna say 4 like Sconnie, not disgusted but disappointed. I have a feeling that it might stop with Nolasco and Pelf, tho

#10 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 7,469 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 11:21 PM

I'd give a 9.....just because it represents a sea change in the organization.

#11 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,937 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 11:27 PM

Nolasco by himself is worth 3; Pelfrey might add a fourth point if the bullpen is reduced to seven.

#12 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 842 posts

Posted 27 November 2013 - 11:53 PM

A 7. This is the same team whose biggest free agent acquisition was a TOTAL of 21 mil and under 10 per. This is a move for the future and the guy will be 35 at end of deal. Pelfrey is a throw in low risk signing. The move wont hinder the future and might make the team respectable again. Farm is strong and I see Navarro next to help bring along pinto...I can see light for the first time in 3 years.

#13 #24 Sano

#24 Sano

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 12:04 AM

I would say if they signed Garza, Jimenez, or E. Santana to a 5 year deal with the additions of Salty on a 3 year deal and Casey Mcgehee (3B) on a 1 year deal I would give it a 8.5 only because I want them to sign Ellsbury, sadly that's not happening.

#14 Bark's Lounge

Bark's Lounge

    Whatchamacallit is the Best Candy Bar

  • Members
  • 2,781 posts
  • LocationKerguelen Island

Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:01 AM

A "10" is probably unattainable, but if the Twins sign Kasmir and Navarro/Pierzynski to go along with Nolasco, this would be a pretty damn good off season that would have me giving a grade of 8.875.

I am still in shock that the Twins actually signed Nolasco... Wow and Holy "Bleep".

You're perfect, yes, it's true
But without me you're only you
Your menstruating heart
It ain't bleedin' enough for two
It's a midlife crisis


#15 TFelton

TFelton

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:19 AM

Nolasco signing (assumed) is great. Need some arms that can pitch. Provides some FA's the idea that the Twins are actually paying attention.

Now, go get Garza. He has been a horse. He's got an attitude and we need that.

I consider the scenario you laid out as a 3. We are shooting too low, and with some key 'over pays' we can change things here.

Then, go get Cano (see thread I started on it).

Nolasco, Garza, and Cano, then Twins have an off-season that gets us excited about 2014. I did the math in my head while I think that still leaves money in the budget and provides the Twins some trade chips (Dozier) or someone for SS...

#16 Top Gun

Top Gun

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,253 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:37 AM

WOW! that must hurt.

#17 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 12,148 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 08:59 AM

A 6. The more I look at the numbers, the more I like Nolasco. He approaches Garza performance for 50% less money and one less year. Smart signing.

Pick up Kazmir and it becomes a 9. Pick up Pelfrey and Salty and it becomes an 8. Pick up Pelfrey and Navarro and it's a 7.

I'm floored by how many people want the Twins to go out and drop $80m on Garza. That's bad baseball... In 2016-2017, the Twins would be paying three players in their mid-30s roughly $60m.

That doesn't leave a lot of room to pay the kids and fill potential holes when this roster actually looks good.

Get Nolasco this season, reevaluate need next offseason and act accordingly. Buying everybody in one offseason is a good way to hamstring yourself in 3-4 years.

#18 Heistyman

Heistyman

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 09:39 AM

I'd give it an 8. I'm still optimistic on Pelfrey.

#19 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,093 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 09:53 AM

A 6. The more I look at the numbers, the more I like Nolasco. He approaches Garza performance for 50% less money and one less year. Smart signing.

Pick up Kazmir and it becomes a 9. Pick up Pelfrey and Salty and it becomes an 8. Pick up Pelfrey and Navarro and it's a 7.

I'm floored by how many people want the Twins to go out and drop $80m on Garza. That's bad baseball... In 2016-2017, the Twins would be paying three players in their mid-30s roughly $60m.

That doesn't leave a lot of room to pay the kids and fill potential holes when this roster actually looks good.

Get Nolasco this season, reevaluate need next offseason and act accordingly. Buying everybody in one offseason is a good way to hamstring yourself in 3-4 years.


Approaches Garza's performance? How? There's like half a run difference in ERA, after all.

I am not one to look at one year (2013) and judge.

I give it a 4 right now, since Nolasco is basically a 4th starter. A 3 if Pelfrey is signed. A 4 if Navarro is signed. A 6 if Salty is signed instead of Navarro. Kazmir = 7, Hughes = 6, Arroyo = 6 (all instead of Pelfrey).

#20 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 5,340 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 28 November 2013 - 10:02 AM

Approaches Garza's performance? How? There's like half a run difference in ERA, after all.


ERA? how about W-L? :)

2013 Nolasco: 3.72 SIERA, 3.58 xFIP, 19.8 K%, 1.32 GB/FB
2013 Garza: 3.79 SIERA, 3.73 xFIP, 20.9 K%, 1.01 GB/FB

Depends on how you cut it, Nolasco might have actually been better than Garza, if anything


As far as grades go, I'd have to give it a 4 too. They need a lefty in the rotation and this will mean Gardy trotting out Diamond. Not. that. great. Go get Kazmir
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98